RRS SVR

Author
Discussion

Phooey

Original Poster:

12,600 posts

169 months

Friday 21st September 2018
quotequote all
I have a big want for one of these. Scared I'll blow my bks off with the running costs though..

1/ Sorry, daft question but got to ask - what are owners getting mpg combined? I do approx 15k miles/yr - mixture of A roads and country roads. Currently averaging 35-40mpg in my Cayenne V6d. Used to average 15-20mpg in old my 6.2 C63 amg.

2/ Can you run them on normal unleaded or is Super / Vpower recommended?

3/ Servicing costs?

4/ Extended warranty cost?

5/ Reliability?

6/ Depreciation? Sorry to mention the D word but I really haven't a clue on these or LR products in general. Where do people see a 2016 20k mile £70k car in a year or two?

I'm looking to change my Cayenne v6d and thoughts are - Another Cayenne (2016/2017 v8d or 2015/2016 4.8 turbo or 2016 3.6 GTS), RS6 Performance, E63s estate, RRS 3.0d or 4.4d, or possibly an SVR if I can make the man maths stack up smile

Cheers

Phooey

Original Poster:

12,600 posts

169 months

Saturday 22nd September 2018
quotequote all
Anyone? I can't believe everyone on PistonHeads doesn't own one or two SVRs! Come on... don't be shy ears

MellowshipSlinky

14,696 posts

189 months

Saturday 22nd September 2018
quotequote all
I managed about 18mpg in the v8 F type overall.
Add in a bit more weight and a few more bhp for the RR.... smile

(And SUL / V power, you tight bastid)

riscuit

93 posts

238 months

Saturday 22nd September 2018
quotequote all
I’m getting an easy 24mpg combined out of mine. That’s with a mix of fast road driving and general A-road commuting. I’m running mine on super/v power exclusively.

Reliability wise, so far so good. I’ve run many newer JLR products over the years and never had any notable issues.

Depreciation will be pretty punchy, mine lost 30k in 18 months. An SVR will hold slightly better than a standard V8 but the only way is down with these things.

Still, if you have the means, buy one well you can still can. As an all round part SUV, part GT it’s awesome.

Good luck with the search.

Phooey

Original Poster:

12,600 posts

169 months

Sunday 23rd September 2018
quotequote all
riscuit said:
I’m getting an easy 24mpg combined out of mine. That’s with a mix of fast road driving and general A-road commuting. I’m running mine on super/v power exclusively.

Reliability wise, so far so good. I’ve run many newer JLR products over the years and never had any notable issues.

Depreciation will be pretty punchy, mine lost 30k in 18 months. An SVR will hold slightly better than a standard V8 but the only way is down with these things.

Still, if you have the means, buy one well you can still can. As an all round part SUV, part GT it’s awesome.

Good luck with the search.
Brill - thanks for reply

24mpg is quite respectable. I struggled to get that out of a C63 - and that's a lighter car and 2WD.

Depreciation is my biggest consideration. I couldn't quite afford to spunk £30k in 18 months biggrin

The SVR is still on my radar though - top end (and a bit more) of what I want to spend, but It looks and sounds so damn good that everything else looks normal / boring. I might even look at a 2018 RRS 3.0d - won't have the engine and dynamics of the SVR, but I think now Land Rover have sorted out the styling (especially the rear valance / exhausts) it's quite a good looking thing. Probably the best looking SUV on sale today IMO. I'm struggling to find a replacement to my Cayenne (fantastic car but after 5 years fancy something different) - and having owned and driven SUVs, pick-ups, and vans over the last 15years I prefer the driving position to a normal car.

MellowshipSlinky said:
I managed about 18mpg in the v8 F type overall.
eek. Must've had a leak in your fuel tank biggrin

JohnG123

622 posts

130 months

Sunday 23rd September 2018
quotequote all
Just a thought have a test drive in a X5m or X6M 576 BHP .

Phooey

Original Poster:

12,600 posts

169 months

Sunday 23rd September 2018
quotequote all
JohnG123 said:
Just a thought have a test drive in a X5m or X6M 576 BHP .
Actually I had considered an X5M some time ago - might need to revisit that one - cheers. X6M wouldn't suit I don't think due to shape of roof/back. It's the shape and styling of the SVR that grabs my attention... just been to have a look at a black one today at Derby LR and although it looked pretty good, I do think they look better in blue..

PrancingHorses

2,714 posts

207 months

Tuesday 25th September 2018
quotequote all
Wrong forum mate. Head over to http://www.rrsport.co.uk/forum/index.php for a proper response from owners wink

Phil Dicky

7,162 posts

263 months

Tuesday 25th September 2018
quotequote all
What about the F Pace SVR and the Stelvio.....the Stelvio is being raved about.

cayman-black

12,644 posts

216 months

Monday 1st October 2018
quotequote all
Phooey i have just been up into the Alps with mine 18mdl SVR it's averaging around 18-20 mpg ,( this trip i used normal unleaded.)and i must say its absolutely a fantastic car, in fact, it's my favourite car, get one it will make you smile all the time.

Steviesam

1,244 posts

134 months

Tuesday 2nd October 2018
quotequote all
I have been running one recently.

Avg MPG 17.5, but thats A road steady speeds.

At night or driving it "normally" ie overtaking stuff etc its 14-16.

Worth it though.

Phooey

Original Poster:

12,600 posts

169 months

Tuesday 2nd October 2018
quotequote all
Brill thanks guys. They look and sound fantastic. I do approx 15-18kmiles year, so I'd be doubling fuel costs, possibly a bit more if I put the top shelf stuff in the tank. It's still a car that's on my radar. Cheers

trowelhead

1,867 posts

121 months

Wednesday 10th October 2018
quotequote all
Phooey said:
riscuit said:
I’m getting an easy 24mpg combined out of mine. That’s with a mix of fast road driving and general A-road commuting. I’m running mine on super/v power exclusively.

Reliability wise, so far so good. I’ve run many newer JLR products over the years and never had any notable issues.

Depreciation will be pretty punchy, mine lost 30k in 18 months. An SVR will hold slightly better than a standard V8 but the only way is down with these things.

Still, if you have the means, buy one well you can still can. As an all round part SUV, part GT it’s awesome.

Good luck with the search.
Brill - thanks for reply

24mpg is quite respectable. I struggled to get that out of a C63 - and that's a lighter car and 2WD.

Depreciation is my biggest consideration. I couldn't quite afford to spunk £30k in 18 months biggrin

The SVR is still on my radar though - top end (and a bit more) of what I want to spend, but It looks and sounds so damn good that everything else looks normal / boring. I might even look at a 2018 RRS 3.0d - won't have the engine and dynamics of the SVR, but I think now Land Rover have sorted out the styling (especially the rear valance / exhausts) it's quite a good looking thing. Probably the best looking SUV on sale today IMO. I'm struggling to find a replacement to my Cayenne (fantastic car but after 5 years fancy something different) - and having owned and driven SUVs, pick-ups, and vans over the last 15years I prefer the driving position to a normal car.

MellowshipSlinky said:
I managed about 18mpg in the v8 F type overall.
eek. Must've had a leak in your fuel tank biggrin
Make sure you test drive an SVR...

I had a C63 6.2 and then a 2014 RRS 3.0 - i hired an SVR for a couple of days expecting to be blown away and fall in love (seems perfect car on paper), in the end i was more than happy to be back in my TDV6...

I found the SVR too hard, the buckets uncomfortable, and for me didn't seem to suit the character of the car.

I prefered the smooth, quiet, torquey delivery of the diesel engine - suits the nature of the car better for me and also economy is of course miles better.

I'd be tempted to try the new 2018 SVR but not until prices come down...

I have a 2018 RRS 3.0 now - can highly recommend, i love mine even at the expense of faster stuff. As a daily i think they are unbeatable.

I had an RS6 for 2 weeks - found that very dull indeed.



trowelhead

1,867 posts

121 months

Wednesday 10th October 2018
quotequote all
JohnG123 said:
Just a thought have a test drive in a X5m or X6M 576 BHP .
I'd be intrigued to try these, along with the AMG equivalent GLE63 Coupe/GLE63

I'm really unto SUVs at the moment - love the space and high driving position etc

Triple7

4,013 posts

237 months

Thursday 11th October 2018
quotequote all
trowelhead said:
I prefered the smooth, quiet, torquey delivery of the diesel engine - suits the nature of the car better for me and also economy is of course miles better.

I'd be tempted to try the new 2018 SVR but not until prices come down...

I have a 2018 RRS 3.0 now - can highly recommend, i love mine even at the expense of faster stuff. As a daily i think they are unbeatable.
Amen

V8LM

5,174 posts

209 months

Thursday 11th October 2018
quotequote all
Phooey said:
I have a big want for one of these. Scared I'll blow my bks off with the running costs though..

1/ Sorry, daft question but got to ask - what are owners getting mpg combined? I do approx 15k miles/yr - mixture of A roads and country roads. Currently averaging 35-40mpg in my Cayenne V6d. Used to average 15-20mpg in old my 6.2 C63 amg.

2/ Can you run them on normal unleaded or is Super / Vpower recommended?

3/ Servicing costs?

4/ Extended warranty cost?

5/ Reliability?

6/ Depreciation? Sorry to mention the D word but I really haven't a clue on these or LR products in general. Where do people see a 2016 20k mile £70k car in a year or two?

I'm looking to change my Cayenne v6d and thoughts are - Another Cayenne (2016/2017 v8d or 2015/2016 4.8 turbo or 2016 3.6 GTS), RS6 Performance, E63s estate, RRS 3.0d or 4.4d, or possibly an SVR if I can make the man maths stack up smile

Cheers
I have a March 2015 SVR from new. Absolutely love it, as much after 50,000 miles as I did from day one.

My daily commute is 12 miles to work. Takes about an hour. InControl says 16 mpg. InControl is optimistic.

110 miles drive to Wales, averaging 53 mph, reported 24 mpg.

I run mine on Optimax/Super when I can, but doubt there is much difference.

I have the service plan. Can't remember how much it was (£750?)

I bought the extended warranty (Car Care Plan), but the car has been perfect. Only bought it because I knew if I didn't something would go wrong.

100% reliable. The only issues have been with the InControl sometimes getting out-of-sync with the water fluid/petrol/tyre pressure lights.

Depreciation. Titanic probably, but I ain't selling.



Epic car.

ETA: And the MY18 cars don't sound as good.


Edited by V8LM on Thursday 11th October 22:42

Phooey

Original Poster:

12,600 posts

169 months

Friday 12th October 2018
quotequote all
V8LM said:
I have a March 2015 SVR from new. Absolutely love it, as much after 50,000 miles as I did from day one.

My daily commute is 12 miles to work. Takes about an hour. InControl says 16 mpg. InControl is optimistic.

110 miles drive to Wales, averaging 53 mph, reported 24 mpg.

I run mine on Optimax/Super when I can, but doubt there is much difference.

I have the service plan. Can't remember how much it was (£750?)

I bought the extended warranty (Car Care Plan), but the car has been perfect. Only bought it because I knew if I didn't something would go wrong.

100% reliable. The only issues have been with the InControl sometimes getting out-of-sync with the water fluid/petrol/tyre pressure lights.

Depreciation. Titanic probably, but I ain't selling.



Epic car.

ETA: And the MY18 cars don't sound as good.


Edited by V8LM on Thursday 11th October 22:42
Fantastic reliability! My Cayenne (116k miles) is about to have the engine out for the second time to address a common oil leak problem. First engine out job was at 60k miles rolleyes

I've just had the new shape Cayenne S (440hp) for the last 3 days and best I got out of it was 24mpg - driving very carefully. Driving as I normally would and I averaged 17mpg over 30miles. I didn't like it as much as the previous (my shape) Cayenne either - too much tech and really difficult / frustrating to operate. I couldn't even work out how to get the air flowing out of the side air-vents. The system seemed to throw a few wobbles as well which I suspect was some kind of malfunction. For now the Porsche is definitely off the next car list for me.... unless I find a well spec'd last of the old shape (something like a 66/67 plate) V8d.

I suspect the noise issue in the newer SVR will be down to extra filters in the exhaust?

Trowelhead - I'm actually considering a 3.0d RRS. I'd like to find out more about the V8D RRS but not much info on the internet. I suspect it's not very popular?

V8LM

5,174 posts

209 months

Friday 12th October 2018
quotequote all
Phooey said:
I suspect the noise issue in the newer SVR will be down to extra filters in the exhaust?
Remap of the ECU and the fact the exhaust valves are now continuously variable.

trowelhead

1,867 posts

121 months

Saturday 13th October 2018
quotequote all
Phooey said:
Trowelhead - I'm actually considering a 3.0d RRS. I'd like to find out more about the V8D RRS but not much info on the internet. I suspect it's not very popular?
Generally people seem to go for the V6 - not much in it in terms of 0-60 etc, V6 is lighter and better on fuel - i'm happy with that but not driven the 4.4V8 so can't comment!


Phooey

Original Poster:

12,600 posts

169 months

Saturday 13th October 2018
quotequote all
trowelhead said:
Generally people seem to go for the V6 - not much in it in terms of 0-60 etc, V6 is lighter and better on fuel - i'm happy with that but not driven the 4.4V8 so can't comment!
I get the 0-60 bit is neither here nor there, but I think where the 4.4 scores is in the torque / flexibility of the engine in day-to-day driving. I've raced my mates 4.4v8d FFRR with my Cayenne V6d and from standstill upto 60/70 theres nothing in it, but after that the v8d starts to pull on me. I think he averages about 30mpg in the v8d FF. What are you getting in the RRS v6d?