RE: Porsche Macan facelift: Driven

RE: Porsche Macan facelift: Driven

Tuesday 11th December 2018

2019 Porsche Macan facelift | PH Review

Porsche's junior SUV has been treated to the faintest of updates; can it remain as competitive as ever?



Here's a statistic to kick off with. For some idea of how important the Macan has become to Porsche in its few short years on sale in 2017, combined sales of the 911 (32,000), 718 (25,000, all models) and Panamera (28,000) were less than the Macan on its own, with a staggering 97,000. That was up two per cent on 2016, and represents very nearly 40 per cent of all Porsches sold globally. In the UK it's nearer to being one in two sales. So yeah, it's pretty significant in the Porsche hierarchy, despite its apparently junior billing and what might be thought of it...

Which presents something of a conundrum when it comes to the mid-life update. A drastic overhaul could well attract yet more customers to a burgeoning sector, but also risks alienating those existing buyers potentially contemplating a replacement. Conquest sales are high for the Macan, though that clearly shouldn't be at the expense of keeping existing ones. That said, a facelift perceived to be too minor may mean buyers will see little need to change to something new - be that from their current Macan, or a close competitor.

As can be seen from these pictures - and was already revealed back at Paris in October - this car is definitely still recognisably a Macan. Just with a rear light bar now, something that's back a la mode and which we are absolutely okay with. Note as well a new range of colours and wheels - should you want a Macan in Mamba Green with body-coloured 21-inch wheels, that is possible. Miami Blue is now on the regular options list, too.


If anything the most interesting point of this revision, at least from a PH perspective, is the availability of a 2.0-litre, four-cylinder petrol engine. The keen amongst you may remember this being offered pre-facelift, as a special-order unit; the EA888 turbo, familiar from a whole host of VW hot hatches, is now on regular price lists. A diesel, as should now be expected, is not.

For the entry Macan, the engine is making 245hp and 273lb ft, which is broadly comparable with every Leon Cupra, Octavia vRS and Golf GTI you care to mention. Only trouble here is, of course, the additional weight that comes with it being a bigger car: a 245hp Golf GTI Performance weighs 1,445kg with a driver as a five-door automatic. A 245hp Macan, obviously also equipped with five doors and in this case a PDK automatic, is 1,870kg.

Therefore despite Porsche's assorted engineering witchcraft, a peerless gearbox and good throttle response, there's no escaping a near half-tonne penalty over a middle-order hot hatch. While not exactly slow, neither does the 2.0-litre car ever really deliver performance befitting a Porsche, even one of the more affordable ones. Ignore that 6.7-second dash to 62mph - that says as much about the traction benefits of four-wheel drive, the short ratios and sharp changes.


Rather the feeling is of an engine that isn't struggling, but that also doesn't have the authority over proceedings that Porsche engines typically do - and should, arguably. Will prospective buyers care? Of course not, because it gets them into a Macan and the performance that is there is delivered in a smooth, refined, unobtrusive manner. And, perhaps just as crucially, without any hint of diesel clatter in earshot.

It takes all of about four hundred metres to discover that, if at all possible, the V6 Macan is the one to have. There's performance that more accurately matches its Porsche SUV billing, a much nicer noise and, just as validly, a more relaxed drive. There's just not the same need to consciously keep the car in the right gear for overtaking and so on, thanks to the additional power and torque.

Moreover, the larger engine feels a better match than the four-cylinder for what's always been the Macan's best asset - the way it drives. There's a breadth of talent and ability here, no doubt helped by the constant tinkering and tweaking that happens during a lifecycle, that means the Macan is still unmatched as a driver's car. Yes, Stelvio included, from memory at least. This isn't a car that will compel its owner to rise early on a Sunday just for a blast - this remains a 4x4, technically, regardless of all the technology thrown at it - but the Macan is without equal for clarity of response, damping quality, control weights, rolling refinement and more. It's just a really well sorted car to drive, more so than it ever has been - not downright thrilling, but imbued with a quality that Porsche does seem to do better than others.


On the launch there are a range of V6 cars available to drive: different wheels sizes, with or without air suspension, with or without torque vectoring and so on. Truth be told, on a narrow and congested test route, no one specification stood out as a Goldilocks configuration - the larger wheels on the passive suspension did introduce some rigidity to the ride, though otherwise there was little to differentiate the bunch. All were precise, agile and unflappable when the right bit of road presented itself, implying that options may well come down to personal preference and resale concerns as much as anything else. That's perhaps one to reassess in the UK though, given fleeting exposure to the cars here.

Thanks to the introduction of a Panamera-style Porsche Communication Management screen (now 10.9-inch, up from 7.2), the Macan interior is more modern and more appealing than it was. That said, the bizarre amalgamation of new screen with the old button fest is initially a little odd. Then after about 10 minutes it all seems to make sense from behind the (optional) GT Sport steering wheel. Finally, despite being an obvious point it feels worth saying that the Macan is still not the most accommodating SUV - something like an F-Pace would suit families better. But then that hasn't bothered 350,000 buyers so far...

That's the Macan in a nutshell, then. There are niggles, frustrations and flaws in some cases, though nothing significant enough to detract from its impressive showing and consequent popularity. Or perhaps it's the other way around. Whatever the case, everything from this drive of the refreshed car would suggest it will retain a place somewhere near the top of the sports SUV class, thanks to the same array of talents that put it there in the first place. It's a dynamically adept, high quality and plentifully fast Porsche SUV - with the right engine, that is - and so expect to see many thousands more (with that jazzy new light bar) on UK roads very soon.


SPECIFICATION - PORSCHE MACAN S
Engine:
2,997cc, V6 turbo
Power (hp): 354@5,400-6,400rpm
Torque (lb ft): 354@1,360-4,800rpm
0-62mph: 5.1 seconds
Top speed: 156mph
Weight: 1,870kg (DIN, without driver)
MPG: 32.8 (NEDC)
CO2: 196g/km
Price: from £48,750

SPECIFICATION - PORSCHE MACAN
Engine:
1,984cc, four-cyl turbo
Power (hp): 245@5,000-6,750rpm
Torque (lb ft): 273@1,600-4,500rpm
0-62mph: 6.7 seconds
Top speed: 139mph
Weight: 1,795kg (DIN, without driver)
MPG: 34.9 (NEDC)
CO2: 185g/km
Price: from £46,344







Author
Discussion

Xfe

Original Poster:

257 posts

76 months

Monday 10th December 2018
quotequote all
Delightful. Picking mine up in May.

Sport220

632 posts

75 months

Tuesday 11th December 2018
quotequote all
Almost 2 tonnes even with a 4 pot, FFS

Looks 99% the same as the previous one too

unpc

2,835 posts

213 months

Tuesday 11th December 2018
quotequote all
Sport220 said:


Looks 99% the same as the previous one too
Was going to say the same thing. I want a job in their studio so I can sit there playing candy crush all day or whatever instead of working. Money for old rope.

Sport220

632 posts

75 months

Tuesday 11th December 2018
quotequote all
-> "Can we call it the new Macan if we put the Cayenne's tail lights in it?"

-> "Brilliant!"

anonymous-user

54 months

Tuesday 11th December 2018
quotequote all
Xfe said:
Delightful. Picking mine up in May.

You will love it

My Macan Turbo was probably the best all rounder I have ever owned.

Enjoy smile

TonyG2003

257 posts

92 months

Tuesday 11th December 2018
quotequote all
I had a 2.0turbo Macan curtesy car recently and it was pretty gutless even with 245bhp and the handling seemed nothing special for me. I’d definitely get the V6 if I was into SUV.

rare6499

656 posts

139 months

Tuesday 11th December 2018
quotequote all
A Porsche SUV with a four cylinder engine from a golf. Oh dear!! Got to be the six cylinder surely.

Rojo

40 posts

70 months

Tuesday 11th December 2018
quotequote all
Looks great, just like the old one... in fact pretty much exactly like the old one.... think I might buy the old one.

cerb4.5lee

30,519 posts

180 months

Tuesday 11th December 2018
quotequote all
Sport220 said:
Almost 2 tonnes even with a 4 pot, FFS
Its not got a great deal of torque either, I can't imagine this engine offering much in this application. I look forward to the other engine options in the future.

JackReacher

2,126 posts

215 months

Tuesday 11th December 2018
quotequote all
Slightly awkward for the Porsche driver when an Ateca Cupra creams this off the line. But otherwise, 'only' 245bhp is still enough to see off most small SUVs on the school run which is all that matters.

Robert-nszl1

401 posts

88 months

Tuesday 11th December 2018
quotequote all
I've always felt that there was something utterly resolved about the Macan shape in a way the Cayenne has never been. It's the best looking small SUV by far (arguably best looking SUV of all). Probably not as practical as most, but the Porsche badge and engineering that goes with it makes it a very compelling car for those that can't quite fit in a 911. There will always be those that knock Porsche for being too conservative in their design updates but in a way if it ain't broke....and it helps residuals. In general when you have owned a Porsche you get it, and I'm glad they continue to be so successful, they really do make good cars.

cvega

404 posts

159 months

Tuesday 11th December 2018
quotequote all
Sport220 said:
Almost 2 tonnes even with a 4 pot, FFS
And? Still quicker than a GT86 biggrin

aeropilot

34,566 posts

227 months

Tuesday 11th December 2018
quotequote all
I still think those previous sales figures will not be matched without a diesel option, despite the media and Govt led anti-diesel campaign.

I bet 60%+ of those Macan sales figures were diesel powered.

The 4 cyl engine is a joke, and the petrol V6 is quite thirsty if doing anything more than average mileage.

And I believe the hybrid option won't appear until the next gen Macan arrives.

rtz62

3,366 posts

155 months

Tuesday 11th December 2018
quotequote all
I’ve often mused wether the design team responsible for the front of the Macron (sic) were made to watch countless repeats of ‘2001; A Space Ofyssey’...

Sford

428 posts

150 months

Tuesday 11th December 2018
quotequote all
Drove the Macan Turbo PP of the old shape and it is a great car. Throw in the nostalgia of the light bar on the back and I love it. Plus better colours on the new model. No more silver and grey cars.

r1flyguy1

1,568 posts

176 months

Tuesday 11th December 2018
quotequote all
Why the fk are you comparing an SUV to a hot hatch on Performance figures!!! Great piece of reporting there rolleyes

Id have thought comparing like for like more informative...

Now lets compare a new mclaren with a audi a3 laugh

Edited by r1flyguy1 on Tuesday 11th December 10:06

Rick1.8t

1,463 posts

179 months

Tuesday 11th December 2018
quotequote all
r1flyguy1 said:
Why the fk are you comparing an SUV to a hot hatch on Performance figures!!! Great piece of reporting there rolleyes

Id have thought comparing like for like more informative...

Now lets compare a new mclar with a audi a3 laugh
Agree with that, people going on about 'seeing other cars off' and only discussing its straight line peformance - While it is a Porsche I think an understanding of where this sits in the market is needed, people wont be racing them around attempting to extract every bhp from it and probably wont engage in many traffic light races either, it will likely be driven by people who want a really nice SUV type car that they like the look of and wont completely ruin them in terms of outright running costs (fuel, tax, tyres, etc etc)

It might not engage with the average PHer but I cant see why it wont with lots of actual potential customers.


J4CKO

41,523 posts

200 months

Tuesday 11th December 2018
quotequote all
I am guessing this is the base engine ?

Hence 4 cylinders and "only" doing 139 mph and getting to sixty in a yawning 6.7 seconds, it will be fine for those who buy it, they kind of have to offer a range of engines, quicker than the original 928 to sixty.

It accelerates plenty fast enough for most, I introduced a couple of mates to how an slightly tuned M135i accelerates and it is fair to say they shat themselves, a lot of punters just arent used to having massive amount of power spare, those chaps would probably love a Macan and would declare this model as pretty bloody rapid, they would be coming from a 2.0 Galaxy diesel and a Focus 1.6, oh and a Kia Rio.

We have become addled and addicted to massive straight line thrust and ok, any self respecting PHer, if they had to get a Macan would gravitate to the Turbo but this is fine for most owners and still plenty faster than most cars out there.

I do like these, best looking of that ilk of car and I bet they are great to own.

alexrogers92

71 posts

94 months

Tuesday 11th December 2018
quotequote all
Engines aside - I'm wondering if they've fixed the pointlessly heavy steering...

All of that aside, it looks typically nice as Macan's always have done. I'm sure it'll be a lovely car.

aeropilot

34,566 posts

227 months

Tuesday 11th December 2018
quotequote all
J4CKO said:
I am guessing this is the base engine ?

Hence 4 cylinders and "only" doing 139 mph and getting to sixty in a yawning 6.7 seconds, it will be fine for those who buy it, they kind of have to offer a range of engines, quicker than the original 928 to sixty.
0-60 times have been a pointless measure of a cars performance for half a century now......and yet people are still fixated on it rolleyes