RE: £100k Supra!

Author
Discussion

fernando the frog

298 posts

68 months

Friday 4th January 2019
quotequote all
Smokey32 said:
Its a Ferrari, and a manual and just look at it. The other is a Toyota.
and i have no doubt the Toyota is the better made product

cvega

404 posts

159 months

Friday 4th January 2019
quotequote all
"iconic" styling.


it really isnt

ravster

55 posts

232 months

Friday 4th January 2019
quotequote all
cvega said:
"iconic" styling.


it really isnt
Different opinions.
A lot of people can recognise it (even if they don’t like it) which is more than can be said for most Jap cars of the 1990s.

bloomen

6,893 posts

159 months

Friday 4th January 2019
quotequote all
If the idea is that the cars you lusted after in your youth go bonkers when you actually have money then anything that was Fast and Furious ish will be a dead cert.

I hope it brings the new owner all the joy in the world. I'd be spending elsewhere.

anonymous-user

54 months

Friday 4th January 2019
quotequote all
TwinExit said:
Whoever has bought the Supra either has no intention of driving it much, or is wealthy enough to take a hit of the re-sale value to experience the car as closely as when it was new.

How do you know if the buyer already owned/driven a F355, let alone a tired 100k mile example that has sat in the salty UK roads for 20 years?

All these comments about 'oooh you coulda bought this for the same amount of cash' are just people who are not in the position to comfortably buy and play with cars at that price point.

The whole 'value for money' aspect is not applicable here.
Without viewing the 355 I don't think you can describe it as tired or imply it's a rust bucket.

MX6

5,983 posts

213 months

Friday 4th January 2019
quotequote all
cvega said:
"iconic" styling.


it really isnt
It's debatable, but I'd say it is "iconic". Let's not forget the meaning of iconic: it's doesn't mean objective beauty, the internet says, "very famous or popular, especially being considered to represent particular opinions or a particular time". I'd say the Supra fits that description for at least a section of petrolheads, maybe of a certain generation. Some people love these pricisely becuase it isn't a Ferrari, but for the big tuning potential of a turbo 2JZ.

Jasandjules

69,885 posts

229 months

Friday 4th January 2019
quotequote all
Even if i won 115m on the lottery, there is no way I would spend more than 9.5k on that...

Jonstar

866 posts

191 months

Friday 4th January 2019
quotequote all
The dealer isn't expecting the car to sell at this price its just marketing of which he received plenty of!

I could advertise my mx5 at £100k but what does that really mean?

gigglebug

2,611 posts

122 months

Friday 4th January 2019
quotequote all
Jonstar said:
The dealer isn't expecting the car to sell at this price its just marketing of which he received plenty of!

I could advertise my mx5 at £100k but what does that really mean?
Correct me if I am wrong but doesn't the article state that the car sold for 95K, not that it is being advertised for that amount?

JMF894

5,502 posts

155 months

Friday 4th January 2019
quotequote all
fernando the frog said:
Smokey32 said:
Its a Ferrari, and a manual and just look at it. The other is a Toyota.
and i have no doubt the Toyota is the better made product
So is my trouser press. What's your point?

neutral 3

6,472 posts

170 months

Friday 4th January 2019
quotequote all
Used to see a fair few of these around east London in the mid to late 90s, usually in silver, can only guess just how many have ended up in the larger breakers yards since then.
I well remember a looking at a silver L reg one, with rear damage in an auction salvage yard, on Canvey in the late 90s.

Fast forward to 2007 and I decided to take the plunge. I wanted a dk blue, manual Turbo ( just like the one I had read about in that Fast Lane magazine road test in circa 93 ) but even 11 years ago I couldn't find one, so I bought my first Griffith 500 instead.
I know of 2 cars, sitting in front gardens, but they won't sell.

Scootersp

3,166 posts

188 months

Friday 4th January 2019
quotequote all
Jasandjules said:
Even if i won 115m on the lottery, there is no way I would spend more than 9.5k on that...
Different strokes for different folks, the guy who bought it probably doesn't have anywhere near £115M!


We are all different, I would not have say a £300K+ Countach if I won that much, but someone else would, it's so personal that it matters not what I or you like if something sells it sells and demand of some sort was obviously there, despite however much we personally might balk at the prices!



British Beef

2,213 posts

165 months

Friday 4th January 2019
quotequote all
cocopop said:
To be fair, this sold in the US.

Mk IVs have always been held in high regard over there and values reflect that.

The money some US examples will have had poured into tuning them will dwarf the sale price of this one.
THIS!!!

Plenty of tuners have spent easily into 6 figures tuning these things. So it would probably make a nice stablemate to have the best low mileage show car next to some 2000hp mutant sister car.

Jasandjules

69,885 posts

229 months

Friday 4th January 2019
quotequote all
Scootersp said:
Different strokes for different folks, the guy who bought it probably doesn't have anywhere near £115M!
Very true. For me100k is a DB9 or maybe McLaren.....

alec.e

2,149 posts

124 months

Friday 4th January 2019
quotequote all
Shoot me down in flames, but I always have found the Supra a bit ugly compared to the gorgeous RX7, ect. I can appreciate the tuning potential with these, but no way more than say £30k for a mint one with low miles.

Pudsey

1 posts

196 months

Friday 4th January 2019
quotequote all
Typo in the write up. As the Mkiv is model designation A80.

j_s14a

863 posts

178 months

Friday 4th January 2019
quotequote all
ravster said:


Anyone want to buy mine for £100k please get in touch :-)
The rear bumper paint is likely not to be an issue. It’s due to the shape of the bumper and light reflection at certain angles with pictures taken on a camera rather than normal viewing. I have a similar picture taken of my car last year on a sunny day with light reflections whilst I was looking at & it looked perfect to me - that might sound weird but just giving my experience.

Obviously I am biased but Mk4 TT Supras are fantastic cars and way ahead of their time. I think their appeal is that across the showroom was a Corolla so the fact they made cars like this is nuts, like the GTR today. Jap cars are marmite but IMO the Supra’s styling is iconic.
I guess something is only worth what someone is going to pay and that one buyer who wants to spend £100k has bought so the same car on another day might not make half that price. It’s a game and a gamble rather than something solid to make a comparison with but that’s what the whole classic car market is based on.
Nice UK spec smile

j_s14a

863 posts

178 months

Friday 4th January 2019
quotequote all


I was actually looking to sell mine a couple of years ago, but events transpired which prevented a sale, and then when I was ready the huge increase in values has meant selling now would be madness. They are truly great cars. They are both hyped and slated by a lot of people with no experience and little understanding of them, but they really are very special when tuned properly; a practical, reliable, comfortable, super car slaying GT.

ravster

55 posts

232 months

Friday 4th January 2019
quotequote all
j_s14a said:
Nice UK spec smile
Thank you. I prefer cars to be OEM and not running meth :-) but I am a boring old 30 something

Blayney

2,948 posts

186 months

Friday 4th January 2019
quotequote all
Pudsey said:
Typo in the write up. As the Mkiv is model designation A80.
Was starting to wonder if anyone was going to point it out. Sort it out PH! smile