RE: McLaren 720S Spider: Driven

RE: McLaren 720S Spider: Driven

Author
Discussion

mikey k

13,011 posts

216 months

Wednesday 27th February 2019
quotequote all
isaldiri said:
mikey k said:
Nope
Its no wider than a 650 or 675 and a lot narrower than an Aventador
Never had any issues with width clearance in 25k miles of driving mine.
The 720 definitely is a wider car than the already quite wide 650/675.
675 is 1,895 mm
720 is 1,930 mm
BMW 5 series is 1905 mm

35mm not enough to be a problem in the real world

Aventador is another 100 mm on top of the 720 and that is a lot more of a challenge, though I have mate who daily drives one no issue.

I guess my point is

isaldiri

18,559 posts

168 months

Wednesday 27th February 2019
quotequote all
mikey k said:
675 is 1,895 mm
720 is 1,930 mm
BMW 5 series is 1905 mm

35mm not enough to be a problem in the real world

Aventador is another 100 mm on top of the 720 and that is a lot more of a challenge, though I have mate who daily drives one no issue.

I guess my point is
I think you will find a 675 is slightly over 1900mm and you had earlier said the 720 is 'not wider'. And those are without mirror widths. As I assume you can't pass cars at speeed by retracting mirrors, the 720 is iirc over 2.15m wide vs the P11 cars that are under 2.10m with mirrors. 5cm I admit isn't a lot on the face of things but anything over 2m counts disproportionately in terms of the 'suck in your breath moment' when you are passing traffic on a b road.

WCZ

10,521 posts

194 months

Wednesday 27th February 2019
quotequote all
£316,540 as tested - ouch!

with some cars changing hands in the 160's it might feel painful to lose £150k in 12 months!

J4CKO

41,529 posts

200 months

Wednesday 27th February 2019
quotequote all
Pre Gulzar'd !

anonymous-user

54 months

Wednesday 27th February 2019
quotequote all
Robert-nszl1 said:
A really striking looking car, which on most objective measures is better than the Ferrari/ Lambo competition. I'm surprised they can't dial in a sexier exhaust note, recognising the limitations of turbo charging. Seems to be the element that would most easily engender a bit more passion/ drama into the package.

Certainly some ambitiously priced options, though I imagine most people can do without quite a lot of the carbon detailing. I look forward to the nearly new cars that will appear at sub £200k prices....
I’d guess they listen to the intended demographic who probably don’t want a ghastly racket. Personally I’d certainly appreciate a bit more refinement and a whole lot less “theatre” or whatever daft euphemism is currently in vogue, for the farting, rattling, boomy, throbbing, droning, rasping, bellowing, snorting cacophony that too many cars demonstrate.

V8 FOU

2,973 posts

147 months

Wednesday 27th February 2019
quotequote all
You'll never get a "sexy" exhaust note with a flat plane crank. Plus the turbos......
Brilliant car - I'll have the blue one....

mikey k

13,011 posts

216 months

Wednesday 27th February 2019
quotequote all
WCZ said:
£316,540 as tested - ouch!

with some cars changing hands in the 160's it might feel painful to lose £150k in 12 months!
The £168k car is a low spec launch car with high miles that is over 12 months old and sold for ~£215k new
Cheapest low mileage is now £175k, as a mate just bought the black one at JZM.
High spec unregistered stock coupes are ~£250k

As always, with ANY car, going mad on the options means a big hit at resale.
Most buyers wouldn't do that made, those that do fund the second owners enjoyment thumbup

I bought a new 650S built to my spec for £210k and sold it 2 years later with 19k miles on it to a dealer for £165k.
Very happy with that considering the mileage and enjoyment we got out of it.
They don't have to cost a fortune in depreciation (or service £900/yr for the last 3 years)
Fuel? that's a different matter! wink

daytona111r

769 posts

204 months

Wednesday 27th February 2019
quotequote all
Nice, i'd take it in dark green.

Slightly o/t, but how have car manufacturers managed to convince buyers they need to tick every available option and ramp up the price? This mentality seeps form supercars right down to german rep mobiles too.

mikey k

13,011 posts

216 months

Wednesday 27th February 2019
quotequote all
isaldiri said:
mikey k said:
675 is 1,895 mm
720 is 1,930 mm
BMW 5 series is 1905 mm

35mm not enough to be a problem in the real world

Aventador is another 100 mm on top of the 720 and that is a lot more of a challenge, though I have mate who daily drives one no issue.

I guess my point is
I think you will find a 675 is slightly over 1900mm and you had earlier said the 720 is 'not wider'. And those are without mirror widths. As I assume you can't pass cars at speeed by retracting mirrors, the 720 is iirc over 2.15m wide vs the P11 cars that are under 2.10m with mirrors. 5cm I admit isn't a lot on the face of things but anything over 2m counts disproportionately in terms of the 'suck in your breath moment' when you are passing traffic on a b road.
Yep ALL without mirrors
My original point, somewhat lost in the mm variations, was in 25k miles neither my 650 or 675 has caused a problem with its width. Both went in a standard garage and allowed both doors to be opened no issues.
I often park in "normal" parking spaces, no issue there.
In the real world, away from the tape measure, they are very usable.
In fact I know of several 720 owners who daily drive them because they are so usable.

mikey k

13,011 posts

216 months

Wednesday 27th February 2019
quotequote all
daytona111r said:
Nice, i'd take it in dark green.

Slightly o/t, but how have car manufacturers managed to convince buyers they need to tick every available option and ramp up the price? This mentality seeps form supercars right down to german rep mobiles too.
No idea but it does happen a lot frown
My dealer was excellent when I speced my 650.
He pointed me at the musts for residuals.
Picked the "packs" that had those items in to keep the cost down.
Subtly moved me away from the costly options that take big hits (lots of CF!).
Hence the "relatively" low depreciation I posted above.

Harry_523

351 posts

99 months

Wednesday 27th February 2019
quotequote all
mikey k said:
No idea but it does happen a lot frown
Simple, profit on a base car is 5-10%, profit from options on "normal" cars is 50-80%. Profit from options on supercars are likely 500-1000%. Like £3500 for 360 degree cameras here....

Bo_apex

2,557 posts

218 months

Wednesday 27th February 2019
quotequote all
From the front it looks like a giant toad.

Nice colour though

MX6

5,983 posts

213 months

Wednesday 27th February 2019
quotequote all
I really like the looks of this. I wasn't convinced about the black eye sockets look at first but it has grown on me, they do give the front an aggressive look and sets them apart from rival brands. The yellow/gold colour isn't my favourite, that blue does look very appealing though. I think I still prefer the looks of the Huracan Spyder that was in the news yesterday, though as a driving machine the 720S does seem a great bit of kit... Being in the position to choose which one to buy would be nice...

anonymous-user

54 months

Wednesday 27th February 2019
quotequote all
Love it. Design looks cohesive, taut and sexy. Finally McLaren styling is back on form.

simonrockman

6,852 posts

255 months

Wednesday 27th February 2019
quotequote all
I never liked the way the 720 looks, until I saw one in real life. I was cycling down Millbank and passed one in traffic and thought it looked amazing.

I still think it looks dreadful in pictures.

Simon

Robert-nszl1

401 posts

88 months

Wednesday 27th February 2019
quotequote all
V8 FOU said:
You'll never get a "sexy" exhaust note with a flat plane crank. Plus the turbos......
Brilliant car - I'll have the blue one....
Er..... I would argue the 458, with a flat plane crank, has one of the great engine notes, so it is of course the turbos that emasculate these engines exhaust notes. But the 488 isn't so bad....

I'm not suggesting the exhaust note is the be all and end all of a car, but those that discount it as in some way childish strike me as cold fish. Pre turbo era F1 cars sounded epic, by way of further example. Are people really suggesting the sport hasn't lost out a little even though the performance of the current cars is on a par/ better? Noise matters!

GranCab

2,902 posts

146 months

Wednesday 27th February 2019
quotequote all
Robert-nszl1 said:
V8 FOU said:
You'll never get a "sexy" exhaust note with a flat plane crank. Plus the turbos......
Brilliant car - I'll have the blue one....
Er..... I would argue the 458, with a flat plane crank, has one of the great engine notes, so it is of course the turbos that emasculate these engines exhaust notes. But the 488 isn't so bad....

I'm not suggesting the exhaust note is the be all and end all of a car, but those that discount it as in some way childish strike me as cold fish. Pre turbo era F1 cars sounded epic, by way of further example. Are people really suggesting the sport hasn't lost out a little even though the performance of the current cars is on a par/ better? Noise matters!
^^ This thumbup

Jerry Can

4,454 posts

223 months

Wednesday 27th February 2019
quotequote all
looks like btcc star Josh Cook in the picture....

Gameface

16,565 posts

77 months

Wednesday 27th February 2019
quotequote all
Simonium said:
ghastly racket
You've never sat in front of a Lamborghini V10 or V12 hurling you down the road at 8000rpm...

isaldiri

18,559 posts

168 months

Wednesday 27th February 2019
quotequote all
Gameface said:
Simonium said:
ghastly racket
You've never sat in front of a Lamborghini V10 or V12 hurling you down the road at 8000rpm...
Yes it's great on throttle but it's still horribly fake and contrived the moment you come off the throttle and the car does the farty overrun burble thing.