RE: Litchfield BMW M2 Competition: Driven

RE: Litchfield BMW M2 Competition: Driven

Thursday 18th April 2019

2020 Litchfield BMW M2 Competition | UK Review

The M2 has come of age as the 410hp Competition, so what's it like with more than 500?



The memory of that day on the North York Moors still gives me chills. The BMW M2 was fresh in the country at the time and we'd driven it to the frosty north to test it alongside a couple of rivals. With snow and ice piled up by its fringes, the surface of the road can't have been much warmer than freezing. I had driven the littlest M-car on a marble smooth track in warmer conditions the day before, pointed it up the A1(M) that evening and pretty much fallen in love with it. Twelve hours later the love affair was over.

Numb steering gave no impression at all of what the front axle was up to. Rock-hard rear tyres didn't stand a chance against a big wedge of turbocharged torque and a frigid road surface. Over the crests and undulations that pepper the moors like discarded burger wrappers outside a McDonald's, the M2 had so little body control I was convinced on more than one occasion we had been spat off. And that was with 370hp. If you had handed me the keys to a modified M2 with 540hp, I'd have zipped my coat up to my chin and walked the 170 miles home instead.

Ever since BMW announced it was replacing the M2's once-turbocharged straight-six with the twin-turbo S55 engine from the M3 and M4 - and labelling the new model M2 Competition - it was inevitable that tuners up and down the land would be having their way with it at the first opportunity. The likes of Litchfield Motors near Tewkesbury have been squeezing enormous power out of the S55 motor with new engine maps since it was introduced in 2014. Doing the same thing to the same engine in the M2 Competition would be no more onerous than plugging in a laptop and tapping a few keys.


But it isn't just the higher specification engine that's made this all possible. Because if you'd armed an early M2 in its original state - iffy body control, squidgy rear end - with 540hp, it would have been undriveable on anything other than a smooth, dry and warm race track. I think the car you see here owes its existence as much to the M2 Competition's vastly improved chassis (with its solidly mounted rear axle, additional shell bracing and night-and-day-improved body control) as to its twin-turbo engine.

'If you'd put this power through the old M2 you'd have really struggled,' says Iain Litchfield, unprompted. 'But it really works on this car. We've had our own M4 for almost five years so we know the engine inside out. Tuning this M2 was therefore a very quick process. Its particulate filter is very restrictive so we take that out, although the cats stay in place.'

Tuned in this way, the M2 Competition has a healthier power-to-weight ratio than a Mercedes-AMG GT C. So it's searingly fast. This car has the seven-speed DCT transmission. It feels tall-geared, so from behind the wheel with the throttle wide open you get this unsettling sense of the car piling on speed exponentially, of it getting faster and faster and faster with the scenery getting ever more blurry as though you're strapped to a runaway train. It's the sort of rampant acceleration that you have to steel yourself for.


The engine doesn't feel at all moody. It starts boosting hard at 2,500rpm. It pulls all the way through 7,000rpm. In third gear, midway through the rev range, you have to conclude there is no turbo lag whatsoever because when you do stand on the throttle pedal, the car just surges forward instantaneously. In normal driving there are signs the engine isn't in factory tune, though, because when you pull away the transmission seems to hold onto first and second gear a fraction longer and the soundtrack at low speeds is much raspier.

Inevitably you'll spin the rear wheels up through second gear if you're really clumsy, but from there on the car just takes it all. On a dry road, anyway. To give the driven wheels at least some chance, Litchfield's map reduces torque in first gear by around 10 per cent and in second by five per cent, but from third gear onwards you get the full 520lb ft. You'll need the titanium Akrapovic cat-back exhaust system to get the full 540hp, although given that it costs £7,067 you might prefer to go without and make do with 520hp instead.

Before we go any further, a word about warranties. Make any substantial modifications to a new car's powertrain and you'll invalidate the manufacturer's warranty. That's a fact. The sensible advice would be to wait until the cover has expired and only then get to work on the engine. But you can tell by the number of new cars that are delivered to Litchfield's Gloucestershire base directly from the supplying dealership that plenty of owners simply aren't concerned. What's more, Litchfield says he's been uprating the S55 engine for half a decade at a rate of one a day and hasn't had a single failure yet.


Aside from its new engine management software and that Akrapovic exhaust, this particular car also runs Litchfield's suspension upgrade. The AST coilovers are two-way adjustable, so you can adjust bump and rebound through 12 steps. It's as simple as turning a screw, although apparently owners tend not to bother and just stick with the settings recommended by Litchfield, which work beautifully on our roads. Nice to have the option of tautening everything thing up if you're heading out onto a Grand Prix circuit, however. The 30mm ride height drop (also adjustable) gives the car so much more visual attitude, too.

Before the M2 Competition came along the AST suspension was an essential upgrade, but the M Division made such enormous strides with the updated model that you could leave the chassis be. So while I haven't driven a 540hp M2 Competition on stock springs and dampers, I'm certain the factory setup would be up to the task.

The cost of the remap is £720 and the AST suspension package costs £2,845, both with VAT. In conclusion? The M2 Competition isn't necessarily made a better car by the sort of power output that delivered Porsche and the 917 maiden victories at Le Mans, but 540hp does make the BMW more hilarious, as well as a whole heap faster. Importantly, the little coupe isn't at all tripped up by that sort of shove. You might even drive it across the North York Moors in the middle of winter.


SPECIFICATION | 2020 LITCHFIELD BMW M2 COMPETITION

Engine: 2,979cc, twin-turbo 6-cyl
Transmission: 7-speed dual-clutch automatic, rear-wheel drive
Power (hp): 540@6,800rpm
Torque (lb ft): 520@4,000rpm
0-62mph: 3.8 secs (estimated)
Top speed: 185mph (estimated)
Weight: 1,625kg
CO2: N/A
MPG: N/A
Price: see text







Author
Discussion

IMI A

Original Poster:

9,410 posts

201 months

Thursday 18th April 2019
quotequote all
First M car that I've seen in a while thats super cool. Must be a rocket with 540bhp!!

J4CKO

41,524 posts

200 months

Thursday 18th April 2019
quotequote all
Wow, 200 bhp more than an already pretty brisk M140i.

corcoran

536 posts

274 months

Thursday 18th April 2019
quotequote all
Absolute Filth.

Plate spinner

17,696 posts

200 months

Thursday 18th April 2019
quotequote all
IMI A said:
First M car that I've seen in a while thats super cool. Must be a rocket with 540bhp!!
Yeah, I’d agree with that.

I like this, but I’d still have to test drive an older 6cyl Cayman first. Just to be sure.

Zoon

6,696 posts

121 months

Thursday 18th April 2019
quotequote all
Surely removing the particulate filter makes the car fall below Euro 6 standards?

MDifficult

2,043 posts

185 months

Thursday 18th April 2019
quotequote all
So an M2 with the power of my M5?

laughlaughlaughlaughlaughlaughlaughlaughlaugh

Bloody brilliant!

Harry_523

351 posts

99 months

Thursday 18th April 2019
quotequote all
Can they do it with a manual? This is f*****g tasty

Tuvra

7,921 posts

225 months

Thursday 18th April 2019
quotequote all
Harry_523 said:
Can they do it with a manual? This is f*****g tasty
Yes they can. I ordered a manual and had this work planned (I pulled out of the order).

Very tasty bit of kit smile

G13NVL

2,755 posts

84 months

Thursday 18th April 2019
quotequote all
Really fancying one of these I think they look great and quite small(ish) but pictures don’t do it justice to how much presence it has on the roads with those beefed up arches! And with 500+bhp evil

T1berious

2,259 posts

155 months

Thursday 18th April 2019
quotequote all
Yes. Yes Please..

I've been looking at the classifieds at M2 Competitions (just seeing them drop under 48k), looking at getting one in Nov this year all things being equal, had my heart set on Hockenheim Silver but in Black with that suspension drop?

It looks proper naughty.. cloud9

Slippydiff

14,821 posts

223 months

Thursday 18th April 2019
quotequote all
Plate spinner said:
Yeah, I’d agree with that.

I like this, but I’d still have to test drive an older 6cyl Cayman first. Just to be sure.
Rest assured the chassis (and specifically the steering feel) will be superior to that of the BMW), but any N/A Cayman will feel slower than a stunned slug when compared with the M2C.

andyeds1234

2,277 posts

170 months

Thursday 18th April 2019
quotequote all
Regarding the original M2...

"Twelve hours later the love affair was over.

Numb steering gave no impression at all of what the front axle was up to. Rock-hard rear tyres didn't stand a chance against a big wedge of turbocharged torque and a frigid road surface. Over the crests and undulations that pepper the moors like discarded burger wrappers outside a McDonald's, the M2 had so little body control I was convinced on more than one occasion we had been spat off"

Doesn't sound like any m2 I've driven rolleyes


anonymous-user

54 months

Thursday 18th April 2019
quotequote all
Zoon said:
Surely removing the particulate filter makes the car fall below Euro 6 standards?
And will be an instant MOT fail......

(not to mention giving people cancer, so thanks for that!)

CousinDupree

779 posts

67 months

Thursday 18th April 2019
quotequote all
Max_Torque said:
And will be an instant MOT fail......

(not to mention giving people cancer, so thanks for that!)
Yep, a brain dead thing to do.

RSTurboPaul

10,360 posts

258 months

Thursday 18th April 2019
quotequote all
Max_Torque said:
Zoon said:
Surely removing the particulate filter makes the car fall below Euro 6 standards?
And will be an instant MOT fail......

(not to mention giving people cancer, so thanks for that!)
Are petrol particulate filters covered in the MOT? Or is it just diesel particulate filters?

Are you chopping your current car in for one of these so you can stop giving people cancer? wink (Have PPFs been proven to prevent cancer?)

anonymous-user

54 months

Thursday 18th April 2019
quotequote all
RSTurboPaul said:
Max_Torque said:
Zoon said:
Surely removing the particulate filter makes the car fall below Euro 6 standards?
And will be an instant MOT fail......

(not to mention giving people cancer, so thanks for that!)
Are petrol particulate filters covered in the MOT? Or is it just diesel particulate filters?

Are you chopping your current car in for one of these so you can stop giving people cancer? wink (Have PPFs been proven to prevent cancer?)
Gasoline GDI particulates are significant worse than Diesel particulates because the mean particle size is so much smaller, and hence are significantly more likely to become ingested in your lungs. That horrible black smoke you see out the back of old diesels isn't good, but actually, the big sooty particles mostly are too heavy to stay airborn for long, and are easily "washed out" of the atmosphere by rain.

And there's a big difference between removing the GPF from a car that had one when new, and driving an old car than was never required to have one fitted when it was sold............

cerb4.5lee

30,521 posts

180 months

Thursday 18th April 2019
quotequote all
I would love one of these with a manual gearbox for sure. cool

simonbamg

767 posts

123 months

Thursday 18th April 2019
quotequote all
Zoon said:
Surely removing the particulate filter makes the car fall below Euro 6 standards?
Thanks for that useless contribution and spoiling a potentially joy filled thread

G13NVL

2,755 posts

84 months

Thursday 18th April 2019
quotequote all
Max_Torque said:
RSTurboPaul said:
Max_Torque said:
Zoon said:
Surely removing the particulate filter makes the car fall below Euro 6 standards?
And will be an instant MOT fail......

(not to mention giving people cancer, so thanks for that!)
Are petrol particulate filters covered in the MOT? Or is it just diesel particulate filters?

Are you chopping your current car in for one of these so you can stop giving people cancer? wink (Have PPFs been proven to prevent cancer?)
Gasoline GDI particulates are significant worse than Diesel particulates because the mean particle size is so much smaller, and hence are significantly more likely to become ingested in your lungs. That horrible black smoke you see out the back of old diesels isn't good, but actually, the big sooty particles mostly are too heavy to stay airborn for long, and are easily "washed out" of the atmosphere by rain.

And there's a big difference between removing the GPF from a car that had one when new, and driving an old car than was never required to have one fitted when it was sold............
So why did they fit them to diesels long before petrols? Genuine question not being an arse.

jagfan2

391 posts

177 months

Thursday 18th April 2019
quotequote all
Because diesel was getting cleaner than petrol, eu6d on WLTP aligns nox and particulates to same levels. So other than more complex EGR and Urea on larger diesels both are equally complex and expensive now