RE: Audi S6: Driven

Author
Discussion

NJJ

434 posts

80 months

Thursday 23rd May 2019
quotequote all
Should also say that it will depreciate faster than David Cameron's legacy. The wrong fuel for the wrong car at the wrong time.

anonymous-user

54 months

Thursday 23rd May 2019
quotequote all
Surely this is more of a 540d competitor than any sort of S car? Either do it properly or don't bother, Audi.

cerb4.5lee

30,534 posts

180 months

Thursday 23rd May 2019
quotequote all
Michaelbailey said:
I think a key ingredient in a S car has a lot of the time been about the engine. 5.2 v10 from lambo, 2.7 twin turbo in the S4, supercharged 3.0 in the S4, 2.2 in the old S6, even the 4.2 V8 though not the greatest rep it makes a heavenly noise! A diesel I don't think can provide the same as what those engine above provided though they are all different. I know diesels have come a long way but theyre just not a petrol engine, revs, noise, refinement and lightness is something that I think has always never been as good as a petrol and with the current climate I suspect it never will. Theres a reason you don't get a Rolls Royce TDI. In the Q7 it was passable if not warranted to give the S badge too but this S6 seems a rather sporty A6. Much like the A6 Biturbo Diesel. This would have been such a different story should it of just had an A badge, even just let the S badge die in the A6 variant rather than dilute the value.
Agree and the reason that I've always lusted after the S6 was mostly because of its engine. By going diesel I'm not sure that it deserves the S6 badge, but I suppose that is unfair just because I have a personal bias towards a petrol engine.

silentbrown

8,827 posts

116 months

Thursday 23rd May 2019
quotequote all
article said:
...but it must have been a while since an S car was bought for its motor.
Really? I can't think of any other reason for buying one. Surely nobody's buying them for the hateful quad exhausts or the fake aluminium mirror caps?

Happy S4 (supercharged) owner here. I have absolutely no interest in owning a diesel S car.

Shuthan_S5

256 posts

129 months

Thursday 23rd May 2019
quotequote all
When I first heard about the Audi S models being a Diesel, I thought it was a rumour so now its finalised, I don't approve of it at all. I used to own a few TDI units and they are great but I have used them purely to get from A to B wafting whilst returning excellent economy. I don't think a performance car and diesel should be linked, imagine running out of revs on that nice piece of road and can't begin to think of the noise a Diesel would produce unless they put some fake sounds through the speakers or something. However I do understand that S model Audis are probably driven daily and its where Diesel may benefit those people and to give lower company tax too hence Audi have made this move.

I am sure this will push the prices up of many previous generation S model Audis now. I will however continue to enjoy my current petrol S5 smile





Edited by Shuthan_S5 on Thursday 23 May 09:39

silentbrown

8,827 posts

116 months

Thursday 23rd May 2019
quotequote all
Michaelbailey said:
Much like the A6 Biturbo Diesel.
Spot on. I can see the appeal of those as they're pretty understated yet surprisingly quick. Probably no chance of that model in the new line-up as there's not enough clear air performance-wise between it and the S6.

Terminator X

15,057 posts

204 months

Thursday 23rd May 2019
quotequote all
Well done Audi virtually all existing customers alienated^. Yes it may bring a few new people to the party (diesel aficionados) but in the round an absolute sales disaster for them imho.

TX.

^I appreciate that the #greentax has perhaps forced them down this road but other manufacturers still seem to be able to churn out bog standard cars for the masses and performance cars for the petrol heads.

scottygib553

528 posts

95 months

Thursday 23rd May 2019
quotequote all
I would guess that S6 owners typically do a high mileage, I don't see someone buying an S6 of any generation as a weekend runabout. The more I look at it the more it seems to make sense to have gone down this route.

budgie smuggler

5,379 posts

159 months

Thursday 23rd May 2019
quotequote all
The chrome round the windows and on the boot looks a bit grandad spec

Terminator X

15,057 posts

204 months

Thursday 23rd May 2019
quotequote all
scottygib553 said:
I would guess that S6 owners typically do a high mileage, I don't see someone buying an S6 of any generation as a weekend runabout. The more I look at it the more it seems to make sense to have gone down this route.
S cars are their performance cars though and RS high performance. Diesel and performance don't go together. As others have said drop the S cars if you have to rather than dilute the brand.

TX.

Shiv_P

2,746 posts

105 months

Thursday 23rd May 2019
quotequote all
I think it's a shame the S6/S7 are derv but clearly this new engine is good... AND I only ever see 1 S6 regularly compared to numerous RS6/7 so clearly something needed to be changed to get them to sell better. No great loss IMO

Gez79

217 posts

183 months

Thursday 23rd May 2019
quotequote all
I'm sure it's a good car but unless you need a diesel because you do over 15k a year I can't see how this can be a performance model which wouldn't be improved by a decent petrol engine.

And that's ignoring the fact that it's 100bhp down on the previous model.

I certainly won't be replacing my S6 with one of these.

They will probably sell more than the petrol versions but what popular isn't always right, and what's right isn't always popular!

cerb4.5lee

30,534 posts

180 months

Thursday 23rd May 2019
quotequote all
Terminator X said:
scottygib553 said:
I would guess that S6 owners typically do a high mileage, I don't see someone buying an S6 of any generation as a weekend runabout. The more I look at it the more it seems to make sense to have gone down this route.
S cars are their performance cars though and RS high performance. Diesel and performance don't go together. As others have said drop the S cars if you have to rather than dilute the brand.

TX.
A diesel engine can offer performance though and power delivery wise I actually prefer a performance diesel to a high revving N/A petrol V8(especially as a daily).

The problem for me is that a diesel engine is purchased with the head rather than the heart, and the noise a diesel engine makes can never be improved at idle and the annoying low rev rattle that they emit. A diesel engine struggles to stir the soul versus a nice petrol engine for me for sure.

Michaelbailey

651 posts

106 months

Thursday 23rd May 2019
quotequote all
silentbrown said:
pot on. I can see the appeal of those as they're pretty understated yet surprisingly quick. Probably no chance of that model in the new line-up as there's not enough clear air performance-wise between it and the S6.
Very little room. The funny thing is I met a bloke with the A6 bitdi and I was very impressed. as soon as you stick an S badge there it becomes a very different thing. The regression from the old S6 is inexcusable as well. 100hp less. This is the end of the S6 and a promotion for the Bitdi in my opinion.

anonymous-user

54 months

Thursday 23rd May 2019
quotequote all
Would anyone take this over an Alpina Bi-turbo though?

Rawwr

22,722 posts

234 months

Thursday 23rd May 2019
quotequote all
I'm sure it's great. The only thing that irks me is the use of the S moniker. Should've gone with D or something else.

Water Fairy

5,498 posts

155 months

Thursday 23rd May 2019
quotequote all
yonex said:
It’s the big brother of my awful A4, why can’t Audi make a brake servo work, why is their steering so weird, why does the damping only work on smooth roads?

I’d never own another. Cars made for people that like the badge but care nothing about driving
That would be you then, as you bought one? wink

WokkaWokka

699 posts

139 months

Thursday 23rd May 2019
quotequote all
yonex said:
It’s the big brother of my awful A4, why can’t Audi make a brake servo work, why is their steering so weird, why does the damping only work on smooth roads?

I’d never own another. Cars made for people that like the badge but care nothing about driving
I’ve had 3 of the fking things now, okay I’ll discount the S3 that was quite fun and had a bit of street cred a bit it. God knows why I’ve had the other 2 though, they are awful. The latest one is an A5 which I got to basically lower my tax bill after I pumped an enormous sum of money into renovating our current (soon to be old since it’s sold) house and I would have rather gone skint.

fk me they are awful I really hate them. I honestly think that my life is missing something since having this god awful thing.

I think I might just get it valeted since our jack russell has fked the interior anyway and just park it up and get a clio sport 200 for 3 grand.

Don’t buy an Audi, saying that I change my mood depending on which way the wind blows so this S6 looks lovely.

TartanPaint

2,988 posts

139 months

Thursday 23rd May 2019
quotequote all
Knowing a couple of S owners who have been won over by the 640d, I can see the logic in this move. I'm sure they'll lose a few customers, and win a few others. But it's a shame diesel electric (oooh, can we call these deltics?) is the only engine option. The Bavarian equivalents all have petrol choices too.


anonymous-user

54 months

Thursday 23rd May 2019
quotequote all
It's probably a reflection on the incredible performance of modern cars that a car with 350 horses that gets to 60 in 5 seconds is effectively described as "a bit tardy"..........