RE: Jaguar F-Pace SVR | UK Drive

RE: Jaguar F-Pace SVR | UK Drive

Saturday 27th July 2019

2020 Jaguar F-Pace SVR | UK Review

Our second taste of Jaguar's super SUV occurs in the Cotswolds - does it still impress?



Our first go in the F-Pace SVR was back in April, where it excelled on the billiard table-smooth tarmac of continental Europe; there it was hard not to be impressed by its dynamism and that familiar V8 soundtrack. But things were not done and dusted in the south of France; there were concerns that the Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio had the Jag beat for excitement. Which is why, this time, we're on the lumpier and bumpier roads of the Cotswolds, barely 50 miles from where the SVR was built, to see if things seem any different with a home advantage.

Barring the movement of the steering wheel to the correct side, nothing's changed since we last drove the F-Pace. Most will now be familiar with the model's slick cabin, complete with its widescreen central infotainment system and sharp instrument cluster graphics. It can't quite match the fit and finish of the Porsche Macan (what can in this class?), but it certainly leaves the Alfa's cabin looking old fashioned. The Jag's got lovely sports seats that can be set low, while the wheel can be placed close to your chest, although in this regard it's the Alfa that does a better sports car impression.


Starting up that ubiquitous supercharged 5.0-litre V8, here in 550hp and 502lb ft form, there are no doubts about its intentions. It's little different in this application to any other from Jag's performance car, but then again that deep throated growl and underlying supercharger whine never get boring. There's reward in pushing it hard, with the motor only offering its best when you spin it beyond 4,000rpm. It's less explosive than the Alfa's turbocharged V6, but the pace is still nothing short of rapid.

That characteristic is mostly mirrored by the eight-speed automatic gearbox, which is quick to upshift and also responsive back down, but it can't match the instantaneousness of a PDK Macan, nor is the act of shifting as rewarding as it is in the Stelvio. The paddles behind the wheel, for example, feel too small; the Alfa's are sculpted to encourage their use where the Jag's feel very much like they're presented as a second option. But there is reason to use them, because each upshift is met with a sharp, racy 'crack!' from the exhaust, and it's extremely entertaining to be the one encouraging more revs from such a vocal powerplant. Ten years into the 5.0-litre's life and there's still much to enjoy.

With such an immense powertrain the F-Pace SVR might easily have been overwhelmed by its brawn, but the cohesion we sensed in the South of France remains on show in Britain. The chassis can't quite match the responsiveness of the Quadrifoglio, nor does it feel like it has as much mechanical grip as a Macan. But the Jag is sweetly damped, so remains composed and confident without being harsh through corners. It's a neat match to that powerplant, as is the steering, which is consistent and offers feel when the car's loaded up, although it's not as fast as the Alfa's so the chassis feels less agile. There's also more body roll than in the Alfa, something Jaguar has surely opted for in order to make the F-Pace more forgiving. It's the less busy car on a bumpy British road, so we suspect that in slipperier conditions, the Jag will also be the nicer car to drive quickly - if not the fastest.


That said, the F-Pace certainly feels more than SVR enough in its dynamic balance; with a little commitment (and a lot of space), the F-Type-donated differential makes it throttle adjustable, although the car remains planted unless really provoked. There's a lot of Pirelli wrapped around those optional 22-inch wheels (21s are standard), after all, and there's always torque being sent to the front axle. You're encouraged to drive the F-Pace with more fluidity, which is rather different to the aggression the Alfa wants.

As we suspected in France, the loud, thunderous Jag remains the more mature option compared to the Stelvio. But on a bumpy British B-road, that's no bad thing, particularly when these broadly talented cars will often be someone's main source of transport. If you're after maximum theatre, speed and excitement, the Alfa's ranking is unchallenged. But as an ownership proposition for someone faced with UK weather and roads, the SVR might just have it beat.


SPECIFICATION - JAGUAR F-PACE SVR
Engine:
5,000cc, supercharged V8
Transmission: 8-speed automatic, all-wheel drive
Power (hp): 550@6,000-6,500rpm
Torque (lb ft): 502@2,500-5,500rpm
0-62mph: 4.3 seconds
Top speed: 176mph
Weight: 2,070kg (to EU, with 75kg driver)
CO2: from 272g/km
MPG: up to 23.7
Price: £74,835












[Pics: Dafydd Wood]

 

Author
Discussion

cerb4.5lee

Original Poster:

30,560 posts

180 months

Saturday 27th July 2019
quotequote all
I absolutely love the engine in these! cloud9

I bet you would have some fun in this on the school run. driving

stevemcs

8,664 posts

93 months

Saturday 27th July 2019
quotequote all
Yes please, whats not to love ? V8 + supercharger in something that has ground clearance, across a back you wouldn't see which way it went.

craigjm

17,950 posts

200 months

Saturday 27th July 2019
quotequote all
Suck the engine up while you can. The deal with Ford for the v8 is ending this year. BMW 4.4 customer engines from next year

BigChiefmuffinAgain

1,062 posts

98 months

Saturday 27th July 2019
quotequote all
I think what is most interesting is that after 9 or so hours, mine is the 4th comment on this article...

cerb4.5lee

Original Poster:

30,560 posts

180 months

Saturday 27th July 2019
quotequote all
BigChiefmuffinAgain said:
I think what is most interesting is that after 9 or so hours, mine is the 4th comment on this article...
I guess that it is a Jag though and there can't be many 80 plus year olds on here in fairness!! hehe

Joking aside SUV's aren't very well received on here(which I do understand why), but I can appreciate the engine and performance for sure though.

akashzimzimma

182 posts

77 months

Saturday 27th July 2019
quotequote all
Why's theres no mention of the faster and dynamically superior GLC63S ?

soad

32,894 posts

176 months

Saturday 27th July 2019
quotequote all
Now, that is pacey!!

garystoybox

776 posts

117 months

Sunday 28th July 2019
quotequote all
Had one of these on demo a couple of months back. Agree that the highlights were the engine (lovely sound and throttle response) and the seats. However, just did not feel very special inside or that much different to a standard F-Pace.
Also the worst/cheapest sounding indicators ever.... how did these ever get signed off?
Having sat in a Velar SV-Autobiography yesterday, in comparison the Jag seemed very dated and imo the interior plastics/switches felt of lower quality. Acceptable at £45k but not in a £80k plus vehicle (with a couple of options)

Chestrockwell

2,627 posts

157 months

Sunday 28th July 2019
quotequote all
cerb4.5lee said:
BigChiefmuffinAgain said:
I think what is most interesting is that after 9 or so hours, mine is the 4th comment on this article...
I guess that it is a Jag though and there can't be many 80 plus year olds on here in fairness!! hehe

Joking aside SUV's aren't very well received on here(which I do understand why), but I can appreciate the engine and performance for sure though.
I recall the X3M Competition thread being a very popular with lots of rows on it hehe

Could it be that this Jag just isn’t interesting as it isn’t bringing anything new to the table? People who can afford this car probably already own the RRS SVR!

I know the Germans recycle their engines a lot and share them with a lot of cars in their range but I feel like this 5.0 V8 has been around forever, the only car that appeals to me with this engine is the RRS SVR. I think it sounds OTT in the F Type, I can’t remember the last time I saw an XF R/RS ..in fact, the only car I see with this engine is in SVR’s.

I think it’s time Jaguar do something new, imagine BMW still making the V10 from the E60 and putting it in newer cars with even higher price tags, nobody would buy them!

craigjm

17,950 posts

200 months

Sunday 28th July 2019
quotequote all
Chestrockwell said:
I recall the X3M Competition thread being a very popular with lots of rows on it hehe

Could it be that this Jag just isn’t interesting as it isn’t bringing anything new to the table? People who can afford this car probably already own the RRS SVR!

I know the Germans recycle their engines a lot and share them with a lot of cars in their range but I feel like this 5.0 V8 has been around forever, the only car that appeals to me with this engine is the RRS SVR. I think it sounds OTT in the F Type, I can’t remember the last time I saw an XF R/RS ..in fact, the only car I see with this engine is in SVR’s.

I think it’s time Jaguar do something new, imagine BMW still making the V10 from the E60 and putting it in newer cars with even higher price tags, nobody would buy them!
They are being forced to at the end of this year because they can’t buy this engine from ford anymore after this year. That’s what the deal with BMW is about for the 4.4 v8.

dhamilton99

35 posts

67 months

Sunday 28th July 2019
quotequote all
garystoybox said:
Had one of these on demo a couple of months back. Agree that the highlights were the engine (lovely sound and throttle response) and the seats. However, just did not feel very special inside or that much different to a standard F-Pace.
Also the worst/cheapest sounding indicators ever.... how did these ever get signed off?
Having sat in a Velar SV-Autobiography yesterday, in comparison the Jag seemed very dated and imo the interior plastics/switches felt of lower quality. Acceptable at £45k but not in a £80k plus vehicle (with a couple of options)
We've already had a few SVRs come back with water in the footwells, theres a seam around the bulkhead that on some cars hasnt been sealed properly. As you mentioned they arent different enough to the regular F-pace to warrant the SVR badge imo.

JerryF

283 posts

174 months

Sunday 28th July 2019
quotequote all
cerb4.5lee said:
BigChiefmuffinAgain said:
I think what is most interesting is that after 9 or so hours, mine is the 4th comment on this article...
I guess that it is a Jag though and there can't be many 80 plus year olds on here in fairness!! hehe
Stupid statement. Tongue in cheek... smile

On topic, if I had the cash would certainly lease.

eftiem64

117 posts

79 months

Sunday 28th July 2019
quotequote all
uurrrghhh!

vomit

CS Garth

2,860 posts

105 months

Sunday 28th July 2019
quotequote all
As a fan of all things automotive I think the fact that this is being made in 2019 against all headwinds is remarkable. A supercharged V8 in any form probably won’t be available new within 10 years max.

On an aside, where in the Cotswolds is that? Looks more like the Forest of Dean, which in turn looks like the New Forest.

anonymous-user

54 months

Monday 29th July 2019
quotequote all
Loads of these clogging up the back roads around Hayle at the moment. I hope the holiday makers are enjoying their summer break trying to coax these gigantic pantechnicons through tiny gaps and around narrow village streets, desperate to avoid waiting longer than they feel they should. When all is said and done, it’s only another SUV, in a nice colour with a big engine. I disliked them before but there are so many lurching and lumbering gracelessly around. Ghastly things.

DonkeyApple

55,257 posts

169 months

Monday 29th July 2019
quotequote all
BigChiefmuffinAgain said:
I think what is most interesting is that after 9 or so hours, mine is the 4th comment on this article...
The first barrage of comments are usually the ‘angry ones’ who need to say something about women, non whites, people with more money than them but who shouldn’t have, the wrong wheels etc etc.

The absence of this means there was either a mass therapy session somewhere in the UK for men who feel downtrodden or that this car has somehow failed to trigger the usual low brow rantings of the women haters and success haters? biggrin

As for the car, I think it’s a bit more elegant than the RRS equivalent which makes it a more appealing way to have that engine. The Stelvio really misses out in the looks department, it reminds me of the van in Dumb and Dumber and the interior just isn’t up to scratch. The Macan is a great car and I’m not surprised that this package doesn’t beat it but coming from a company a fraction of the size of VW it’s a massive win to only miss in some areas.

I prefer the interiors of this over the others and a supercharged V8 v a turbo’d executive minicab V6? That’s a win while they still exist.

I do wish you could turn off the pops and bangs though. That’s just not my bag and I find it a bit too brash.

The Wookie

13,946 posts

228 months

Monday 29th July 2019
quotequote all
Personally I think the Alfa is a bit too far into the pointless side in the fact that it rides badly but is too tall to handle as well as a decent saloon. I also think the Macan is overrated, and I say that as a Cayenne owner and a Porsche fan.

I even tried an E63S to see if a saloon floated my boat instead and yes it cornered flatter but it felt artificially pointy, the interior was a blingy mess and the secondary ride was poor.

Had a go in an F-Pace with my mate who works in SVO. Yes the interior is only ‘OK’ to look at but the seats are great, the engine is mega, it rides really well and handles brilliantly for what it is.

So I ordered one! Hopefully might be able to pick it up this week if the logistics work!

craigjm

17,950 posts

200 months

Monday 29th July 2019
quotequote all
There is an update to the F pace coming, probably early next year, to give it a better interior (similar to the XE recent update and XF update coming this year). I might be tempted to wait for that if I was in the market although it’s unclear what will be available in the face lift model wise as the 5.0 Ford built engine seen here is off the table. Will they get the BMW 4.4 ready in time?

Gameface

16,565 posts

77 months

Monday 29th July 2019
quotequote all
Nice enough but (if I was in the market) I'd take the Stelvio because I'd rather drive an Alfa Romeo than a Jaguar.

Vocht

1,631 posts

164 months

Monday 29th July 2019
quotequote all
akashzimzimma said:
Why's theres no mention of the faster and dynamically superior GLC63S ?
Superior at crabbing too rolleyes ...