RE: Porsche Cayenne Turbo S E-Hybrid Coupe | Driven

RE: Porsche Cayenne Turbo S E-Hybrid Coupe | Driven

Author
Discussion

neil1jnr

1,462 posts

155 months

Thursday 15th August 2019
quotequote all
ROSS-ncbaf said:
Excessive car weight needs taxing. A lot. A 2500kg car like this wears out the road 5.76x more than a typical, 1600kg car.

Blame potholes on tw&ts in SUV's.
Any proof?

Anyway, my question is, if you are going about your business in electric only, then floor it, does a cold engine fire into life and have to perform at maximum revs without issue?

I love the car, personally I couldn't care less about the weight of a car in a daily, heavier probably makes it better in some aspects.

DonkeyApple

55,138 posts

169 months

Thursday 15th August 2019
quotequote all
neil1jnr said:
Any proof?

.
Proof, just look around, there are thousands of potholes. Each one is caused by rich people who pay shed loads of tax and will be shot just as soon as Emperor Farridge is in charge. wink

Roundm

161 posts

118 months

Thursday 15th August 2019
quotequote all
ROSS-ncbaf said:
swisstoni said:
ROSS-ncbaf said:
Excessive car weight needs taxing. A lot. A 2500kg car like this wears out the road 5.76x more than a typical, 1600kg car.

Blame potholes on tw&ts in SUV's.
Roads are designed to take vehicles several times the weight of these things (not that I’m saying that weight is a good thing).

Potholes appear because of cheapskate repairs and maintenance.
Vehicle weight has a massive effect on road wear! Seriously?!

https://streets.mn/2016/07/07/chart-of-the-day-veh...
/rant mode on/

grrr that's not proof - there is no evidence cited, no basis for the assessment - just a table of numbers that someone made up. If they are to publish something like that then it needs evidence of the basis - along with evidence and logic for the tiering. That link has neither!

and the number of potholes is related to poor maintenance, volume of traffic and the style of repair and build of the roads - it's not as simple as just looking at any one factor (weight) and plotting a spurious (or potentially spurious) correlation!

see here for other equally well evidenced links ! https://www.tylervigen.com/spurious-correlations

/rant mode off/

neil1jnr

1,462 posts

155 months

Thursday 15th August 2019
quotequote all
DonkeyApple said:
neil1jnr said:
Any proof?

.
Proof, just look around, there are thousands of potholes. Each one is caused by rich people who pay shed loads of tax and will be shot just as soon as Emperor Farridge is in charge. wink
Quite.Or possibly it is heavy goods vehicles and buses...

neil1jnr

1,462 posts

155 months

Thursday 15th August 2019
quotequote all
neil1jnr said:
DonkeyApple said:
neil1jnr said:
Any proof?

.
Proof, just look around, there are thousands of potholes. Each one is caused by rich people who pay shed loads of tax and will be shot just as soon as Emperor Farridge is in charge. wink
Quite. Or possibly it is heavy goods vehicles, buses and poor repair jobs and cost cutting measures...

DonkeyApple

55,138 posts

169 months

Thursday 15th August 2019
quotequote all
neil1jnr said:
DonkeyApple said:
neil1jnr said:
Any proof?

.
Proof, just look around, there are thousands of potholes. Each one is caused by rich people who pay shed loads of tax and will be shot just as soon as Emperor Farridge is in charge. wink
Quite.Or possibly it is heavy goods vehicles and buses...
My theory is that it’s all the motobility vehicles ploughing from garden centre to garden centre in between Countdown.

WCZ

10,513 posts

194 months

Thursday 15th August 2019
quotequote all
And172940 said:
This just highlights the bullst of supposedly trying to save the planet.
Since the popularity of turbo-diesels and now hybrids, we've had ever increasing efficiency. But instead of using it to lower emissions we just get bigger and heavier cars with greater performance.
yeah it's complete non-sense and not been thought out properly

NicoG

640 posts

208 months

Friday 16th August 2019
quotequote all
And172940 said:
This just highlights the bullst of supposedly trying to save the planet.
Since the popularity of turbo-diesels and now hybrids, we've had ever increasing efficiency. But instead of using it to lower emissions we just get bigger and heavier cars with greater performance.
Nail. Head.

DonkeyApple

55,138 posts

169 months

Friday 16th August 2019
quotequote all
NicoG said:
And172940 said:
This just highlights the bullst of supposedly trying to save the planet.
Since the popularity of turbo-diesels and now hybrids, we've had ever increasing efficiency. But instead of using it to lower emissions we just get bigger and heavier cars with greater performance.
Nail. Head.
The only solution to a problem caused by excess consumption is to reduce excess consumption but that means ending the global economic era of growing GDP, which in turn is a very serious problem due to the absolutely insane levels of debt built up since the early 90s. This is why the whole ‘eco revolution’ is built around consumption and the maintaining of GDP growth. It’s all a bit of a mess.

However, taxation on weight is likely to be the core solution down the line once we have enough consumers switched to various forms of EV power.

So, like big cc ICE we should enjoy these big heavy cars while they are legislatively permitted as it won’t last.

J4CKO

41,443 posts

200 months

Friday 16th August 2019
quotequote all
Quite like it, bet its an amazing bit of kit.

It is heavy but those types of cars always are, its a tonne heavier than a normal car, it isnt going to eat the roads, that is more down to trucks and other massive stuff as mentioned, but also just the sheer volume of traffic. Perhaps also poor quality surfaces, lack of maintenance and bad weather cause more damage than the odd pretty weighty hybrid SUV.


SydneySE

406 posts

260 months

Friday 16th August 2019
quotequote all
pb8g09 said:
TartanPaint said:
Why? The Porsche warranty can be extended up to 15 years. I think it's about £1,800 every 2 years. Hardly terrifying.
Not many people that buy 10+ year old, heavily depreciated used vehicles tend to purchase a £900 a year warranty from Porsche though?
Exactly!!! My current car fleet includes: 2005 Cayenne Turbo, 2004 Murcielago, 2005 DB9, 2005 quattroporte.... and I AM the warranty! LOL I would not imagine buying/owning any of those cars if I had to pay a mechanic for servicing and things that went wrong out of service.

SydneySE

406 posts

260 months

Friday 16th August 2019
quotequote all
TartanPaint said:
I've got an old diesel Cayenne as a family bus. It came up for sale when I was thinking about a Touareg.

I've been eye-openingly impressed with it, and have been obsessed with thoughts of a newer, faster petrol/hybrid/V8/turbo Cayennes ever since.

This isn't helping. What a beast! You can keep that "coupe" shape though.
Much the same for me... I bought an old 2005 Cayenne Turbo (princely sum of £3,500) as hack car and occasional tow car for my track car, and I've been so impressed by it, I'm considering a new or near new version... This didnt happen with my L322 v8 range rover...