RE: Jaguar XE SV Project 8 Touring Spec | Driven
Discussion
Bright Halo said:
simonbamg said:
Futse said:
Four. As it says in the article.
Yeah four I concur ‘It's easy to imagine actually touring in one, even a Track Pack. Albeit just the two of you...”
This one had 4. The front seats in the 4 door version are excellent and part of the attraction IMO is that it seats 4.
Terminator X said:
akadk said:
Here is mine.
IMO - where this went wrong is the price...way too much
Everything about the car is absolutely top drawer and in 4 seat form, completely without equal ... but the price...
Without equal? M5C?IMO - where this went wrong is the price...way too much
Everything about the car is absolutely top drawer and in 4 seat form, completely without equal ... but the price...
TX.
On the road the M5C will equal it in performance but not on a track ... then there is the M5 looks like a Turkish taxi ...
But it is so exciting and interesting that I’m absolutely super glad they made it. I thought they were all sold?
God I would love one of these.
That’s a statement I’ve never made about a Jaguar ever before. I hope that it makes others feel the same because that “want” factor is what drives brands like Porsche forwards and that’s sorely lacking at Jaguar at the moment. F Type is good but there are lots of alternatives. Project 8 is two fingers up to everyone next level cool as far as I’m concerned. Hats off to you gents who have already got one. Absolutely fantastic!!!
God I would love one of these.
That’s a statement I’ve never made about a Jaguar ever before. I hope that it makes others feel the same because that “want” factor is what drives brands like Porsche forwards and that’s sorely lacking at Jaguar at the moment. F Type is good but there are lots of alternatives. Project 8 is two fingers up to everyone next level cool as far as I’m concerned. Hats off to you gents who have already got one. Absolutely fantastic!!!
I think everybody on this thread is struggling to come to terms with the price tag. When you consider that the Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio comes in at £65K and the figures are not far off: 3.9 sec to 60 compared to the Jag's 3.7 and a 191 top end compared to the Jag's 186, it shows how much performance you're really getting from the Alfa. Yes, the Jag is much more than this overall but is it really worth almost £100K more?
The price is steep but I suspect this is basically a racing car with a squishy interior. That means that the suspension and drivetrain will be littered with outrageously expensive engineering that gives adjustability and repeatability unlike a normal road car. That’s why this would most likely destroy an M5 or QV around a track.
I’m sure one of the owners can enlighten us a bit more on this?
I’m sure one of the owners can enlighten us a bit more on this?
FlukePlay said:
I think everybody on this thread is struggling to come to terms with the price tag. When you consider that the Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio comes in at £65K and the figures are not far off: 3.9 sec to 60 compared to the Jag's 3.7 and a 191 top end compared to the Jag's 186, it shows how much performance you're really getting from the Alfa. Yes, the Jag is much more than this overall but is it really worth almost £100K more?
Precisely my thoughts. Overrated and overpriced. The UK press love to ignore the elephant in the room too, when banging on about this car. akadk said:
Look at the Ring times. The P8 has proper bespoke engineering
On the road the M5C will equal it in performance but not on a track ... then there is the M5 looks like a Turkish taxi ...
7:35 ring time for the M5C and 7:21 for the P8 ... No doubt you will tell me that is a sound thrashing over what 13 miles. On the road the M5C will equal it in performance but not on a track ... then there is the M5 looks like a Turkish taxi ...
Fair enough comment re a taxi though!
TX.
Edit - PS I love the Jag, if it wasn't LHD and so expensive I'd have one in a heartbeat.
Edited by Terminator X on Sunday 1st September 21:50
chelme said:
FlukePlay said:
I think everybody on this thread is struggling to come to terms with the price tag. When you consider that the Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio comes in at £65K and the figures are not far off: 3.9 sec to 60 compared to the Jag's 3.7 and a 191 top end compared to the Jag's 186, it shows how much performance you're really getting from the Alfa. Yes, the Jag is much more than this overall but is it really worth almost £100K more?
Precisely my thoughts. Overrated and overpriced. The UK press love to ignore the elephant in the room too, when banging on about this car. Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff