RE: Focus ST vs. Golf TCR vs. Megane Trophy vs. i30 N
Discussion
Sutcliffe does seem to like the Megane in this latest vid
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bwP5--0VI78
Personally don't care if it doesn't lap as fast as the SEAT.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bwP5--0VI78
Personally don't care if it doesn't lap as fast as the SEAT.
I recognise all of those roads as my farm is nearby. And I bet my Impreza performs better over all of them, especially in the damp/wet that is usual here. And if the Scooby was still on sale it would be a couple of grand cheaper as well !! I accept that an Impreza is not what you want running around a polluted city centre but why oh why do we allow politicians to set stupid limits on what we can and can't drive in the countryside.
cidered77 said:
Not because the MX5 isn’t so much fun, but because it’s noisy, uncomfortable, there is no air con, the interior is all nasty plastic, and the stereo is crap.
Not an MX5 I recognise. With the new engine it makes a great noise, the air con is excellent, it's well fitting plastic and WTF are you listening to the stereo rather than the noise from the exhausts as you boot it out of every corner. But I accept comfort depends on your size, but then I couldn't buy a new Focus RS as the seats won't raise and I couldn't see over the bonnet well enough, whereas the Mazda is 'just right', at least for me. But if you don't fit the Mazda, you've no hope with the Elise.
In reality it's just a civilised toned down version of the Elise for those who don't want to take a track car for their trip around the NC500 or other Scottish and Welsh roads.
But I will add some negative MX5 points that annoy me - the general software for the control panel is poorly laid out and crap, whilst the sat nav is beyond useless. And the latest software 'update' makes the car switch back to turning off the engine when stationary every few journeys, despite me turning it off.
MikeDB1 said:
I recognise all of those roads as my farm is nearby. And I bet my Impreza performs better over all of them, especially in the damp/wet that is usual here. And if the Scooby was still on sale it would be a couple of grand cheaper as well !! I accept that an Impreza is not what you want running around a polluted city centre but why oh why do we allow politicians to set stupid limits on what we can and can't drive in the countryside.
I'm not sure it would be that much betterhttps://www.motortrend.com/cars/honda/civic/2018/f...
Derek Chevalier said:
I don't know which impreza he has but if his isn't better I'd bet my 12 year old one is.Derek Chevalier said:
MikeDB1 said:
I recognise all of those roads as my farm is nearby. And I bet my Impreza performs better over all of them, especially in the damp/wet that is usual here. And if the Scooby was still on sale it would be a couple of grand cheaper as well !! I accept that an Impreza is not what you want running around a polluted city centre but why oh why do we allow politicians to set stupid limits on what we can and can't drive in the countryside.
I'm not sure it would be that much betterhttps://www.motortrend.com/cars/honda/civic/2018/f...
Elatino1 said:
Derek Chevalier said:
I don't know which impreza he has but if his isn't better I'd bet my 12 year old one is.nickfrog said:
It was a no brainer indeed. For me the Trophy is a downgrade for track use compared to the 280 Cup with the wrong wheel size and expensive replacement disks. The difference in weight is very modest too at 18kgs. Discounts on cash were more substantial on a 280 than on a Trophy so that should smooth the blow on depreciation. For such a track capable daily, PCP seems a bit strange as you can't track it.
I think you’ve said most of that a few times previously.Edited by nickfrog on Thursday 3rd October 10:15
MikeDB1 said:
Derek Chevalier said:
MikeDB1 said:
I recognise all of those roads as my farm is nearby. And I bet my Impreza performs better over all of them, especially in the damp/wet that is usual here. And if the Scooby was still on sale it would be a couple of grand cheaper as well !! I accept that an Impreza is not what you want running around a polluted city centre but why oh why do we allow politicians to set stupid limits on what we can and can't drive in the countryside.
I'm not sure it would be that much betterhttps://www.motortrend.com/cars/honda/civic/2018/f...
https://www.hepworthmotorgroup.com/news/the-honda-...
MikeDB1 said:
I did say on damp Peak District roads - not a drag strip or what looks like a smooth tarmac'ed Californian (?) road. 4WD is a necessity in the Peak District unless you want to join the bikers at the bottom of one of the many ravines.
What happens without 4WD? Terminal understeer into the ravine of doom? Zarco said:
MikeDB1 said:
I did say on damp Peak District roads - not a drag strip or what looks like a smooth tarmac'ed Californian (?) road. 4WD is a necessity in the Peak District unless you want to join the bikers at the bottom of one of the many ravines.
What happens without 4WD? Terminal understeer into the ravine of doom? But seriously, apart from the silly speed limits, Peak District roads are similar to the Isle of Man with some bikers saying they are better in places. And most of the top places on the Manx rally go to 4WD each year.
Elatino1 said:
What do you drive? I find my fwd car quite limiting in the wet compared to my awd cars. Pulling out of a junction or accelerating round a bend can result in a lot of wheelspin or understeer respectively.
FK8 Civic Type R. Yes, pulling away hard can result in wheelspin but once up and running I find it fine. Derek Chevalier said:
Elatino1 said:
What do you drive? I find my fwd car quite limiting in the wet compared to my awd cars. Pulling out of a junction or accelerating round a bend can result in a lot of wheelspin or understeer respectively.
FK8 Civic Type R. Yes, pulling away hard can result in wheelspin but once up and running I find it fine. Derek Chevalier said:
Elatino1 said:
Fwd is certainly is not the optimal layout in the wet.
On the public roads, I don't see how it's a limiting factorBut everyone from F1 and WRC downwards always say tyres are the limiting factor on how fast they can go, so I don't see how it's any different on public roads.
MikeDB1 said:
Derek Chevalier said:
Elatino1 said:
Fwd is certainly is not the optimal layout in the wet.
On the public roads, I don't see how it's a limiting factorBut everyone from F1 and WRC downwards always say tyres are the limiting factor on how fast they can go, so I don't see how it's any different on public roads.
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff