RE: 'Desert spec' Bloodhound LSR revealed

RE: 'Desert spec' Bloodhound LSR revealed

Author
Discussion

RumbleOfThunder

3,552 posts

203 months

Friday 25th October 2019
quotequote all

CallMeLegend

8,777 posts

210 months

Friday 25th October 2019
quotequote all
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FjkFf26yZNA

Great update on yesterdays goings on.

marine boy

770 posts

178 months

Friday 25th October 2019
quotequote all
Mr LegendInHisOwnLunchtime wink in a past lifetime you were kind enough to give me (don't tell em my name Pike) a private showing around this monster

I don't normally 'grey out' with info. overload around cars but with all the design/engineering volume knobs turned up to 11 I sort of lost my mental processing capacity

Needed a quiet little moment with myself to gather my thoughts when while sitting in the cockpit I saw this



I'm following this with great interest and it's a real shame you're not reporting from the desert

MiniMan64

16,904 posts

190 months

Friday 25th October 2019
quotequote all
That is a fantastic dial/image.


oilit

2,623 posts

178 months

Monday 28th October 2019
quotequote all
That in itself is worthy of a place in a museum !

I do find it a bit of a shame that it takes a watch manufacturer to supply the dial/instrument - as opposed to Smiths or Caerbont Automotive Instruments Ltd as they are called these days

AlpinaB5s

159 posts

159 months

Monday 28th October 2019
quotequote all
The Rolex dial is probably linked to lots of sponsorship dosh rather than pure functional need.....

Jimbo89

141 posts

144 months

Monday 28th October 2019
quotequote all
thelostboy said:
Galveston said:
Have you watched the onboard videos from Thrust SSC? It was hugely unstable. Andy Green's ludicrous ability was all that kept it vaguely on track.
Recognise that I may open a can of worms here, but you really think he has "ludicrous ability"?

It may be cynical, but surely he was initially drafted into speed records because it's great PR - he was a wing commander in the RAF.

And yes, he is used to high speed and you would like to think have better than average reaction time, but all the video footage shows of Thrust SSC is him gently sawing at the wheel. That's nothing compared to the control of snap oversteer that youngsters are reacting to in single seaters every race weekend.

Not knocking the guy, I just don't understand and happy to be enlightened. For me, the pat on the back is the willingness to be a guinea pig, and not really about ability.
I would assume that Andy was brought on board because his previous experience flying jet aircraft translated quite well to a car that would be travelling at aircraft speeds using aircraft jet engines. The ingrained 'check, double check and re-check' fighter pilot mentality as well as the high IQ, quick reaction times and ability to absorb a lot of information at once is key to this kind of thing and having someone with a proven track record is probably a good idea.

That and his massive titanium love nuggets.

A lot of weirdly negative comments on this thread. Having followed the project from the off, seen what they're trying to do and how/why they're doing I'm really surprised. One of the main aims of the project at the start was to engage with schools and colleges to try and get kids interested in engineering.

romac

595 posts

146 months

Monday 28th October 2019
quotequote all
Jimbo89 said:
thelostboy said:
Galveston said:
Have you watched the onboard videos from Thrust SSC? It was hugely unstable. Andy Green's ludicrous ability was all that kept it vaguely on track.
Recognise that I may open a can of worms here, but you really think he has "ludicrous ability"?

It may be cynical, but surely he was initially drafted into speed records because it's great PR - he was a wing commander in the RAF.

And yes, he is used to high speed and you would like to think have better than average reaction time, but all the video footage shows of Thrust SSC is him gently sawing at the wheel. That's nothing compared to the control of snap oversteer that youngsters are reacting to in single seaters every race weekend.

Not knocking the guy, I just don't understand and happy to be enlightened. For me, the pat on the back is the willingness to be a guinea pig, and not really about ability.
I would assume that Andy was brought on board because his previous experience flying jet aircraft translated quite well to a car that would be travelling at aircraft speeds using aircraft jet engines. The ingrained 'check, double check and re-check' fighter pilot mentality as well as the high IQ, quick reaction times and ability to absorb a lot of information at once is key to this kind of thing and having someone with a proven track record is probably a good idea.

That and his massive titanium love nuggets.

A lot of weirdly negative comments on this thread. Having followed the project from the off, seen what they're trying to do and how/why they're doing I'm really surprised. One of the main aims of the project at the start was to engage with schools and colleges to try and get kids interested in engineering.
IIRC Andy Green was the winner of a competition run by the Thrust SSC team lead by the great Richard Noble to find a driver. There were all sorts of candidates, and they had to compete in a variety of tasks, including single-seaters, rally cars and much, much more - even non-driving related. It obviously helps that he's a likeable bloke with a brilliant CV!

Good luck to the whole team, past and present.

Added: link to ThrustSSC site where it talks briefly about the selection process. http://www.thrustssc.com/thrustssc/Press_Pack/cast...

Edited by romac on Monday 28th October 17:24

oilit

2,623 posts

178 months

Monday 28th October 2019
quotequote all
AlpinaB5s said:
The Rolex dial is probably linked to lots of sponsorship dosh rather than pure functional need.....
My thoughts - bet there is more money in fancy watches than classic speedometers and rev counters rofl

CallMeLegend

8,777 posts

210 months

Monday 28th October 2019
quotequote all
oilit said:
AlpinaB5s said:
The Rolex dial is probably linked to lots of sponsorship dosh rather than pure functional need.....
My thoughts - bet there is more money in fancy watches than classic speedometers and rev counters rofl
I'm not 100% sure the Rolex timepieces are still in the car.

anonymous-user

54 months

Monday 28th October 2019
quotequote all
9 miles a minute is a bit over 500 mph.

9 miles is about 13,500 metres.

Wheel circumference is, say, 2.5 metres so wheels turning at about 5,000 rpm.

Double the speed to 1,000 mph and that's a lot of rpm!

Mind you, a train wheel is spinning one hell of a speed at 186mph and has to do it for hours on end.

CallMeLegend

8,777 posts

210 months

Monday 28th October 2019
quotequote all
rockin said:
9 miles a minute is a bit over 500 mph.

9 miles is about 13,500 metres.

Wheel circumference is, say, 2.5 metres so wheels turning at about 5,000 rpm.

Double the speed to 1,000 mph and that's a lot of rpm!

Mind you, a train wheel is spinning one hell of a speed at 186mph and has to do it for hours on end.
design speed it just over 10000rpm

jzakariya

176 posts

118 months

Tuesday 29th October 2019
quotequote all
marine boy said:
Thank you for that share, made me grin like a kid.

oilit

2,623 posts

178 months

Tuesday 29th October 2019
quotequote all

E65Ross

35,051 posts

212 months

Tuesday 29th October 2019
quotequote all
Tim bo said:
Article is missing the usual:

Engine:
Transmission:
Power (hp):
Torque (lb ft):
0-60mph:
Top speed:
Weight:
MPG:
CO2:
Price:


Our readers want to know. What is the mpg? What is the CO2??
hehe

I suspect it'd be more gpm rather than mpg

Arsecati

2,302 posts

117 months

Tuesday 29th October 2019
quotequote all
Yeah, but it ain't a production car, it only did it one way and it's not road legal....... so the record don't count, innit??

wink

V41LEY

2,893 posts

238 months

Wednesday 30th October 2019
quotequote all
I thought there was more movement on the steering wheel that I expected and AG had to make some relatively big inputs to keep on track. Might be less forgiving the faster they go ?

CallMeLegend

8,777 posts

210 months

Wednesday 30th October 2019
quotequote all
V41LEY said:
I thought there was more movement on the steering wheel that I expected and AG had to make some relatively big inputs to keep on track. Might be less forgiving the faster they go ?
There were quite high crosswinds that day, coupled with a barn door of a fin makes the car want to weather cock to face the wind. Was 100% expected, we predicted it years ago.

s6boy

1,623 posts

225 months

Wednesday 30th October 2019
quotequote all
V41LEY said:
I thought there was more movement on the steering wheel that I expected and AG had to make some relatively big inputs to keep on track. Might be less forgiving the faster they go ?
I suspect it will be the opposite and the faster they go the more the aero will come into its own.

olliep82

10 posts

65 months

Wednesday 30th October 2019
quotequote all
V41LEY said:
I thought there was more movement on the steering wheel that I expected and AG had to make some relatively big inputs to keep on track. Might be less forgiving the faster they go ?
If you see the onboard footage from Thrust SSC when that ran, the steering inputs at near record speeds where similarly large.
I know that was rear wheel steer so maybe the system was set up to be deliberately slow, but I can't imagine having a super fast and hyper sensitive steering system is what you want at several hundreds of miles per hour.