The "S**t Driving Caught On Cam" Thread (Vol 5)

The "S**t Driving Caught On Cam" Thread (Vol 5)

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

agent ecks

44 posts

95 months

Thursday 2nd July 2020
quotequote all
Dont like rolls said:
Laurel Green said:
The Spruce Goose said:
Thought it was going to be a comedy sketch when the chap got out of his car.
It was
Was that a fake? Certainly looked it. Surely no one would be like that if they wanted to fight?

Cliftonite

8,408 posts

138 months

Thursday 2nd July 2020
quotequote all

To think there are organisms like this on our roads:

https://www.nottinghampost.com/news/nottingham-new...



Dont like rolls

3,798 posts

54 months

Thursday 2nd July 2020
quotequote all
Cliftonite said:
To think there are organisms like this on our roads:

https://www.nottinghampost.com/news/nottingham-new...
I stopped watching that, mentally ill

What an unnecessary thing to post let alone on a Newspapers site.

WARNING on this one....

J4CKO

41,551 posts

200 months

Thursday 2nd July 2020
quotequote all
Dont like rolls said:
Cliftonite said:
To think there are organisms like this on our roads:

https://www.nottinghampost.com/news/nottingham-new...
I stopped watching that, mentally ill

What an unnecessary thing to post let alone on a Newspapers site.

WARNING on this one....
NP and E live !

Dont like rolls

3,798 posts

54 months

Thursday 2nd July 2020
quotequote all
J4CKO said:
NP and E live !
Don't understand that....


Solocle

3,289 posts

84 months

Thursday 2nd July 2020
quotequote all
KAgantua said:
Looks like he positioned very dominantly to block overtakes - which I get, as he had pupils, but could he have instructed his pupils to move in at any point to allow faster traffic to pass (They did seem to be going very slow compared to the speed limit - could be wrong on that front) as per the HC?

I notice as well he was not linked by radio. That would have been a safer scenario.

I can understand mr. fighty to a very small degree - but yeah, massive overreaction
It's virtually never safe to overtake a two wheeler without crossing the centre line. Dominant positioning like that doesn't block legal overtakes - it prevents illegal overtakes.

Pull in means a layby, not moving into the gutter.

Like so.

KAgantua

3,871 posts

131 months

Friday 3rd July 2020
quotequote all
Cliftonite said:
To think there are organisms like this on our roads:

https://www.nottinghampost.com/news/nottingham-new...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sOi1l_Dkl-A

KAgantua

3,871 posts

131 months

Friday 3rd July 2020
quotequote all
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jCXgrBcM-90

Imagine sitting in a car with DCB all day. His kids cant wait until they are 18...
Thinks hes a good driver, hes a bad driver

Bonefish Blues

26,698 posts

223 months

Friday 3rd July 2020
quotequote all
KAgantua said:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jCXgrBcM-90

Imagine sitting in a car with DCB all day. His kids cant wait until they are 18...
Thinks hes a good driver, hes a bad driver
That's Vicky Pollard, shirley?

Allanv

3,540 posts

186 months

Friday 3rd July 2020
quotequote all
Bonefish Blues said:
KAgantua said:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jCXgrBcM-90

Imagine sitting in a car with DCB all day. His kids cant wait until they are 18...
Thinks hes a good driver, hes a bad driver
That's Vicky Pollard, shirley?
I think from that I know the part of Bristol he possibly lives, he takes the same routes and if there is no wife or child most of the time he is going to / from work.

Last year from his truck videos he gave it away where he works, and as there is only 1 employer in that town it wasn't hard.


Edited by Allanv on Friday 3rd July 14:42

Gweeds

7,954 posts

52 months

Friday 3rd July 2020
quotequote all
Christ what a self-righteous ahole.

J4CKO

41,551 posts

200 months

Friday 3rd July 2020
quotequote all
Dont like rolls said:
J4CKO said:
NP and E live !
Don't understand that....
Swivel eyed mental ranting reminded me of some post in the News, Politics and Economics subforum on here.

Seesure

1,187 posts

239 months

Friday 3rd July 2020
quotequote all
Filibuster said:
KAgantua said:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jCXgrBcM-90

Imagine sitting in a car with DCB all day. His kids cant wait until they are 18...
Thinks hes a good driver, hes a bad driver

Just wow ..... What a terrible driver, and an absolute plonker too.
I gave him the benefit of the doubt and lasted about 60 seconds (where he forced the Mazda to reverse) at which point I conceded and had to acknowledge yet another prize dick of a DCW who does everything in his power to grab video footage...if he had eased up a fraction instead of flooring it the Mazda would have been through the pinch point.


bighop

138 posts

97 months

Friday 3rd July 2020
quotequote all
What an idiot. His first clip has a guy waiting at the crossing who he completely ignores.

Mexman

2,442 posts

84 months

Friday 3rd July 2020
quotequote all
How old is the tt driving in this video?, fooking 12?
Watch half and the annoying tt, started getting on my tits.

Graveworm

8,496 posts

71 months

Friday 3rd July 2020
quotequote all
Solocle said:
KAgantua said:
Looks like he positioned very dominantly to block overtakes - which I get, as he had pupils, but could he have instructed his pupils to move in at any point to allow faster traffic to pass (They did seem to be going very slow compared to the speed limit - could be wrong on that front) as per the HC?

I notice as well he was not linked by radio. That would have been a safer scenario.

I can understand mr. fighty to a very small degree - but yeah, massive overreaction
It's virtually never safe to overtake a two wheeler without crossing the centre line. Dominant positioning like that doesn't block legal overtakes - it prevents illegal overtakes.

Pull in means a layby, not moving into the gutter.

Like so.
It forces legal overtakes further over which restricts their vision and room for maneuver. It puts people on the opposite pavement, solos coming the other way and stationary vehicles on the offside at greater risk. Aside from no overtaking signs, solid white lines zebras etc. the only guidance on what is and isn't a legal overtake comes from the same source that says NEVER obstruct drivers trying to pass, it doesn't specify whether you think they are impossible to carry out legally is an exception. It also doesn't say pull over into a layby just pull in when it's safe. - if only laybys are safe then a lot of people stop unsafely all the time. But we have been down this road..

KAgantua

3,871 posts

131 months

Saturday 4th July 2020
quotequote all
Graveworm said:
Solocle said:
KAgantua said:
Looks like he positioned very dominantly to block overtakes - which I get, as he had pupils, but could he have instructed his pupils to move in at any point to allow faster traffic to pass (They did seem to be going very slow compared to the speed limit - could be wrong on that front) as per the HC?

I notice as well he was not linked by radio. That would have been a safer scenario.

I can understand mr. fighty to a very small degree - but yeah, massive overreaction
It's virtually never safe to overtake a two wheeler without crossing the centre line. Dominant positioning like that doesn't block legal overtakes - it prevents illegal overtakes.

Pull in means a layby, not moving into the gutter.

Like so.
It forces legal overtakes further over which restricts their vision and room for maneuver. It puts people on the opposite pavement, solos coming the other way and stationary vehicles on the offside at greater risk. Aside from no overtaking signs, solid white lines zebras etc. the only guidance on what is and isn't a legal overtake comes from the same source that says NEVER obstruct drivers trying to pass, it doesn't specify whether you think they are impossible to carry out legally is an exception. It also doesn't say pull over into a layby just pull in when it's safe. - if only laybys are safe then a lot of people stop unsafely all the time. But we have been down this road..
Totally agree - as I said, lack of radio comms and his general positioning make me think he is not a legit instructor. Being overtaken on a bike (Especially a 50cc) is a part of life - the 'instructor' trying to shield the pupil from that has escalated the situation. Though the car drivew was a knob yes

MB140

4,064 posts

103 months

Saturday 4th July 2020
quotequote all
TimmyMallett said:
ArsE82 said:
Stone Island. Says it all.
He wanted to have Queensberry Rules fisticuffs on the grass, in case he fell over on the pavement and scuffed his knees.

Edited by TimmyMallett on Wednesday 1st July 10:18
I saw a video similar to this in USA, some bloke in his massive truck try’s taking out the motorbike with a side swipe. Next junction bloke gets out the truck after some exchange of hand jestures.

Bloke from the truck then squares up to the biker. You can hear the biker laughing at the guy from his helmet camera. Then says. Do you really want to pick a fight with a guy in a crash helmet and armoured clothing. Trucker grabs hold of him. Biker gives him the biggest headbut with the helmet (forehead to nose), Christ the trucker goes down like a sack of st. Blood all over his face, nose clearly bent 90 degrees.

Personally I thought the trucker deserved it.


But why pick a fist fight with a guy in a crash helmet and body armour. Your never going to win

MB140

4,064 posts

103 months

Saturday 4th July 2020
quotequote all
KAgantua said:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jCXgrBcM-90

Imagine sitting in a car with DCB all day. His kids cant wait until they are 18...
Thinks hes a good driver, hes a bad driver
Whilst on some occasions he’s clearly in the right but he isn’t half being a prick with it (like not letting someone who is clearly not in the correct lane but is trying to correct there mistake and then you just accelerate to close the gap and then celebrate saying denied)..What a tt.


One day that throbber will try bullying the wrong person. At that point I just hope his kid isn’t in the car as he’s going to get his face smashed in.

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED