Volkswagen T Roc R | UK Drive

Volkswagen T Roc R | UK Drive

Monday 20th January 2020

2020 Volkswagen T Roc R | UK Review

The T-Roc R arrives just as the Golf R departs; can it improve on the hot hatch standard bearer?



The response from certain quarters to cars like the VW T-Roc R and its rivals - the X2 M35i, Cupra Ateca, that sort of thing - is not unlike the reaction to a Greggs' vegan sausage roll. Because a sausage roll without meat seems as silly to some as a hot hatch that's actually a 4x4 that can't really off-road. But that's rather missing the point. Maybe it is a bit daft ideologically, but if the customer requests a meat-free sausage roll, and is willing to pay for it, then there's little reason for it not to be made.

Furthermore, in the case of both sausage roll and performance SUV, they are additions to line ups - not replacements. You can still have a porky pastry from Greggs, and hatchback equivalents are still available from BMW, Cupra and VW. The next Golf R might be a little way off, but the end of production ought to mean good deals on the outgoing one - the one that Dan P still preferred to a new AMG A35, so it remains very good. The prospects that some deride, put simply, are in addition, and not in place of, the things that people like. Nothing is going anywhere, so chill out.

And, if Jost Capito is to be believed, buyers may well want a T-Roc R instead of a Golf R anyway. Keen drivers, that is. Back in Marchwhen interviewed about the T-Roc, Capito said: "I believe this car drives better than the Golf R." So there. He attributed that behaviour to the additional stiffness gifted to the SUV, as well as new mounts for the engine and transmission and reworked steering.


He's not talking total guff, either. Given the T-Roc is built on the same MQB architecture as the Golf and shares a powertrain, it should come as no surprise that the first few miles feel distinctly Golf-like. Only it feels ever so slightly improved, those grievances that do exist with the flagship Golf have been addressed to some extent - not transformatively so, but noticeably. The most aggressive steering mode has less cloying weight, the DSG is more decisive, the augmented engine sound isn't as intrusive, the snatchy feeling of the brakes at the top of the pedal reduced slightly. The T-Roc still feels distinctly VW, of course, and there's always the suspicion of a placebo effect with a new car - plus altered expectations for an SUV - but there's also the feel of underpinnings refreshed and rejuvenated for this particular R.

Conditions for the UK launch of the T-Roc could hardly suit it better: a wet and windy Wales play to its strengths of compact dimensions - wider than a Golf, but shorter - easily accessible performance and all-wheel drive. Sitting slightly higher up gives a better line of sight than something lower-slung, meaning speed can be maintained and conserved because you can observe the way ahead - rather than accrue it all over again because a hedge is in the way. In terms of usable pace on the public road, it's an ideal formula.

And you know what? The T-Roc really isn't half bad to drive, either. The most intense 'Race' mode for the DCC adaptive dampers is too brusque, jostling with rather than accommodating the surface (who'd have thought?) but the normal setting strikes an agreeable compromise. Mass feels decently controlled, kept admirably low and balanced for something that does purport to have some off-road credentials.


While precious few buyers will likely give a toss, the T-Roc has good balance, too. Turn in with a little too much speed and the understeer will gradually and predictably move through the car to tighten the line, while on the throttle the all-wheel drive can straighten the line and mitigate some of the power understeer. It still doesn't make for the most finessed experience, because Haldex always seems to be playing catch up with what the car is doing, but it's pretty entertaining given expectations. It also suggests a level of work put into the T-Roc that didn't need to be there, which is nice to see. It could have been less agile and more ponderous - so it's to the credit of the engineers that the R is an enjoyable vehicle to blat along a Welsh mountain road.

The engine and gearbox are now the Troy McClure of the VW group line up, a powertrain you might remember from such productions as the Golf R, Leon Cupra, Cupra Ateca, Octavia vRS, Audi S3 and on. Of course, it does just the same job here, eagerly if plainly delivering performance for very little driver effort. Perhaps that's a little harsh, given the EA888 still comes across as a reasonably energetic unit for one that's been around a good few years, but being installed in all-wheel drive, DSG cars on the MQB platform has never quite shown it off as the most exciting prospect - just as it is here.

Hopefully it's not a disservice to suggest the T-Roc R is agreeable company; not the fastest, not the most thrilling, but a really pleasant quick car to spend time with. Much like the Golf and Leon, there feels just enough in this VW to elevate it above the equivalent Cupra as an experience - interior ambience, most notably, but also a marginally improved drive - resulting in a better car overall.


And yet. Whatever Jost Capito claims, whatever little tweaks have been done for the T-Roc that weren't done for the Golf, there's no escaping the inevitable handicap: weight. This little 4.2m crossover is 1,575kg at the kerb; while lighter than a Golf R estate, that's 70kg heavier than a five-door, DSG Golf hatch, and it is noticeable. Performance isn't as enthusiastic, direction changes lacking just a wee bit in precision and willing. In isolation the T-Roc R is decently close, though a back-to-back comparison does make the differences clear.

No great surprise, is it? Heavier, higher-riding car isn't as sharp to drive as lighter, lower one. The T-Roc R, that said, should be praised for getting as close as it does, and those buyers for whom a Golf isn't in contention for being, well, too much like a Golf will be suitably impressed. This feels like a close sibling of the base product, not some long lost and distant acquaintance. The best of both worlds doesn't exist just yet - the compromise of a dynamic SUV arguably suggests it never will - but this is arguably as close as the genre below the Macan has yet reached. As long as those buyers are willing to pay for it, that is - don't expect many T-Roc Rs to leave the dealer at less than £40,000. Still, if there's a competitive lease deal, who knows how many might end up on the road...


SPECIFICATION - VOLKSWAGEN T-ROC R

Engine: 1,984cc, four-cyl turbo
Transmission: 7-speed dual-clutch automatic, all-wheel drive
Power (hp): 300@5,300rpm
Torque (lb ft): 295@2,000-5,200rpm
0-62mph: 4.8sec
Top speed: 155mph
Weight: 1,575kg (DIN)
MPG: 31.3
CO2: 176-171g/km
Price: £38,450 (as standard; price as tested £41,699.19, comprised of Flash Red paint for £360 (only pics of the blue car currently available!), rear view camera for £185, Dynamic Chassis Control for £695, Driver's Assistance Pack Plus (Emergency Assist, High Beam Assist, Side Scan, Traffic Jam Assist) for £205, keyless entry for £395, 'beats' soundpack (eight channel digital amp, subwoofer, 400w output and six speakers) for £425, pre-crash preventative occupant protection for £150, winter pack (heated front seats and heated washer jets) for £300 and Vodaphone S5-VTS tracker with one year subscription for £534.19 including fitting.)

Search for a Volkswagen T-Roc here












Author
Discussion

saxy

Original Poster:

258 posts

124 months

Friday 17th January 2020
quotequote all
As a Dadmobile, I'd prefer this over a Q5 or whatever. practicality will be enough, speed will be decent, parking will be easy, wife won't complain that I didn't get an SUV, and I won't sitting in the back anyways.

Hub

6,430 posts

198 months

Friday 17th January 2020
quotequote all
Quite like it actually, though I predict it won't get much love on here!

What's the boot space like in these? getmecoat

Shappers24

816 posts

86 months

Friday 17th January 2020
quotequote all
I’m a fan of SUVs. I enjoy the higher seating position and the fact my spine doesn’t get broken on potholes roads.

A quick SUV is right up my street. Liking this a lot.

Wonder what the lease deals are like....

Gromm

890 posts

57 months

Friday 17th January 2020
quotequote all
I quite like it apart from the front grille shape. It looks like VW designers were trying very very hard to find a shape which won't have anything in common with the rest of the VW family and came up with this, whatever this thing is. Probably looks much better in metal and should be fun to drive.

Edited by Gromm on Sunday 19th January 18:18

Water Fairy

5,494 posts

155 months

Friday 17th January 2020
quotequote all
So, slightly heavier than a Golf R with a slightly higher COG.

Perfect for the non drivers of this world.

Gitwhoismiserable

767 posts

123 months

Friday 17th January 2020
quotequote all
would be perfect for the days when i need a slightly higher COG, i like it and also like the wheels

Hatchoo

211 posts

203 months

Friday 17th January 2020
quotequote all
Water Fairy said:
So, slightly heavier than a Golf R with a slightly higher COG.

Perfect for the non drivers of this world.
This.

LuS1fer

41,127 posts

245 months

Friday 17th January 2020
quotequote all
Dumb name always reminds me of Trug from the kids programmes

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9mlQrzJKxsM

Arsecati

2,301 posts

117 months

Friday 17th January 2020
quotequote all
'The best of both worlds doesn't exist yet': well, would that not be the Golf R Estate?

ZX10R NIN

27,572 posts

125 months

Friday 17th January 2020
quotequote all
They'll sell loads

Jim on the hill

5,072 posts

190 months

Friday 17th January 2020
quotequote all
Why does stuff like this have to exist! Why can't everything just be the same. Motoring world has gone mad.

Bet it's good fun.

Augustus Windsock

3,359 posts

155 months

Friday 17th January 2020
quotequote all
Apologies, I’m on the receiving end of a few glasses of some lovely vino but what is the advantage of this over a Cupra Ateca? Price wise the Cupra is a smudge cheaper but ohas everything standard (other than a pan roof at over £1k and a tow bar)
Personally I find the t-roc to be bland as bland can be, not my cup of tea at all (and I’m not overly keen on the Cupra either, truth be known).

f1nn

2,693 posts

192 months

Friday 17th January 2020
quotequote all
This appeals to me.

Golf R running gear in a (hopefully) better riding, fresher looking body, that hopefully avoids the image problem that the Golf R is gaining.

Yeah. I’d consider one of these in a year or two.

Sensibleboy

1,143 posts

125 months

Friday 17th January 2020
quotequote all
If they didnt make something like this the idea of having one would be great. But now that they do make a fast SUV type thing I'd much rather just have the less compromised car.

nickfrog

21,072 posts

217 months

Friday 17th January 2020
quotequote all
Water Fairy said:
So, slightly heavier than a Golf R with a slightly higher COG.

Perfect for the non drivers of this world.
I am not sure what you mean. I bet it can pull 1g of lateral, which surely is more than ample for mere road use.

Different people like different things for different functions.

eddharris

456 posts

193 months

Friday 17th January 2020
quotequote all
It's a shame we aren't getting this in Canada, must mean Canada is full of real drivers.

IMO looks great, practical and appears to be pretty quick. I like it.


Pan Pan Pan

9,874 posts

111 months

Friday 17th January 2020
quotequote all
It will probably be just fine for the type of driver who will go for an SUV type vehicle. In a recent EVO magazine its editor was singing the praises of the Dacia Duster, which is also fine. As posted elsewhere most cars these day are pretty good, though some will have experience of the exception to the rule. As posted elsewhere, they are unfortunately the automotive equivalent of someone who falls into a barrel of t*ts and comes up sucking their thumb! smile

Baldchap

7,582 posts

92 months

Friday 17th January 2020
quotequote all
Looks OK, got a Golf cabin. Will be dynamically worse than the car it's based on but not by a lot.

I've had two Mk7/7.5 Golfs and even I don't want one.

NDNDNDND

2,017 posts

183 months

Friday 17th January 2020
quotequote all
nickfrog said:
Water Fairy said:
So, slightly heavier than a Golf R with a slightly higher COG.

Perfect for the non drivers of this world.
I am not sure what you mean. I bet it can pull 1g of lateral, which surely is more than ample for mere road use.

Different people like different things for different functions.
Isn't that exactly what he's saying? For the kind of person this is aimed at, slightly more weight and a higher CoG aren't important.

FlukePlay

946 posts

145 months

Friday 17th January 2020
quotequote all
Gromm said:
I quite like it apart from the front grill shape. It looks like VW designers were trying very very hard to find a shape which won't have anything in common with the rest of the VW family and came up with this, whatever this thing is. Probably looks much better in metal and should be fun to drive.
Yep, it's an odd shape they're probably looking to differentiate from the Tiguan, which has a prettier face.