RE: Czinger 21C revealed in full
Discussion
Just watched the TopGear video. Nice to see something that looks production viable for a change! Lights in the right places that look like they actually pass legals, properly designed suspension and not a small block V8 in sight!
I strongly assume this is a lead project to demonstrate the company’s primary business, which I assume is productionised additive manufacture, and AI based design tools, and it’s fascinating to see someone like this with the vision and money to really push the technology. It’s stuff like this that genuinely does make OEMs consider new manufacturing processes.
Seems to run from the promo videos, and the engine sounds pretty cool....it fits the motorbike theme for sure!
I strongly assume this is a lead project to demonstrate the company’s primary business, which I assume is productionised additive manufacture, and AI based design tools, and it’s fascinating to see someone like this with the vision and money to really push the technology. It’s stuff like this that genuinely does make OEMs consider new manufacturing processes.
Seems to run from the promo videos, and the engine sounds pretty cool....it fits the motorbike theme for sure!
RacerMike said:
I strongly assume this is a lead project to demonstrate the company’s primary business, which I assume is productionised additive manufacture, and AI based design tools, and it’s fascinating to see someone like this with the vision and money to really push the technology. It’s stuff like this that genuinely does make OEMs consider new manufacturing processes.
Divergent 3D is the company behind it. Arsecati said:
When this was first unveiled, all I went was 'yawn, not another one'. But I've literally just watched the TG video on it, which was only uploaded an hour or so ago.........
............ holy. sweet. jaysus!
This is legit - and I am more than happy to stand not only corrected, but upright gormless with my gob on the floor!!
Wow!!!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OCto6qSjIXw
Thanks for the video link, confirms the two seater as well. Looks a little...challenging getting into the back ............ holy. sweet. jaysus!
This is legit - and I am more than happy to stand not only corrected, but upright gormless with my gob on the floor!!
Wow!!!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OCto6qSjIXw
PhantomPH said:
The more I look at this the more I like it. That side shot is the best bit for me, agreed that photo is fantastic.boringbeige said:
Looks like it only has a single seat. So it's pointless. Why buy a very expensive car that you can't take a mate out in, or your girl out in, or share the experience. Same mistake BAC made, it's why you don't see Mono s knocking about.
Erm...no. The BAC Mono is supposed to be like an F1 car for the road. The reason you don't see so many of them knocking about is because of the price tag and the weather/roads in UK.The suspension components have been created by FEA Topology Optimization. This basically consists of starting with a computer model of a chunk of material, applying restraints on it in the places they occur, then apply all the know loads on the places they occur. This could be many separate load cases The program will then repeatedly 'load the model', removing areas with low-stress regions, and keep this up until it converges on a solution. I have used this, it works, but use WITH CAUTION. It's capable of producing a structure that will take, theoretically, all the designed loads, but still not be OK for actual use. If you want to see it in action:-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wYhOhYffyNo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iV2iMt-FB5s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wYhOhYffyNo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iV2iMt-FB5s
Uses 3d printed components in its chassis, still costs 1.7million though. I believe this company was on jay leno at osme point as this car is very similar.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vPv7PwS50OE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vPv7PwS50OE
robinessex said:
The suspension components have been created by FEA Topology Optimization. This basically consists of starting with a computer model of a chunk of material, applying restraints on it in the places they occur, then apply all the know loads on the places they occur. This could be many separate load cases The program will then repeatedly 'load the model', removing areas with low-stress regions, and keep this up until it converges on a solution. I have used this, it works, but use WITH CAUTION. It's capable of producing a structure that will take, theoretically, all the designed loads, but still not be OK for actual use. If you want to see it in action:-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wYhOhYffyNo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iV2iMt-FB5s
Out of interest, where does it fall down? I assume it's the number of load cases you can provide and material differences?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wYhOhYffyNo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iV2iMt-FB5s
3D printing of hollow section shapes is really interesting tech, and I think it'll definitely be the future once the costs start coming down.
Edited by Krikkit on Friday 21st February 16:41
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff