RE: Rover 220 Coupe Turbo | Spotted

RE: Rover 220 Coupe Turbo | Spotted

Tuesday 25th February 2020

Rover 220 Coupe Turbo | Spotted

Rover's Tomcat lived up to its nickname: assertive, vigorous and more than a little wayward...



The Rover 220 Coupe Turbo's hero status is well established amongst brand aficionados at this point. With its 16-valve, 2.0-litre turbo engine producing 200hp and 174lb ft of torque, it was the fastest production car the manufacturer had built up to that point. Its 150mph top speed and 6.2-second-to-sixty figures were 23mph and 2.0 seconds superior to the benchmarks set by the non-turbo 220. And it received upgrades like anti-lock disc brakes all around, a Torsen diff - which was marketed as traction control - uprated suspension and 15-inch 'Turbo' alloy wheels with Michelin Pilot tyres.

Known as the "Tomcat" thanks to its pre-production nickname, the Coupe Turbo looked all set to go head to head with the likes of the Vauxhall Calibra Turbo, Volkswagen Corrado and Ford Escort Cosworth. That wasn't quite the case, though, as Tiff Needell found when he took a 220 Turbo to Germany for a vintage episode of Top Gear.


The powerful Rover was indeed rather refined in a high speed motorway cruise, with a comfortable cabin, smooth power delivery and excellent stability. Try to exploit its plentiful power somewhere twistier, however, and despite its Torsen diff, the front-wheel drive layout, vague steering and lack of genuine traction control left it wanting. He at least seemed to enjoy himself, though.

Car magazine was considerably less forgiving in its 1993 group test, which may be the most damning critique of a car ever written: "Under its chic, feline skin, this Tomcat's a dog. A howler ... Under power the whole car writhes and squirms as if an exorcist were trying to rid its body of a plague of demons ... Powering hard through corners is not recommended. Unless you enjoy that much understeer ... Matters are worsened by the stiff suspension set-up ... The 220 Turbo is totally without finesse, unless you care to drive using only a fraction of its potential ... It doesn't just finish fourth in this comparison, it finishes rock-bottom last. It's the company's calamity coupe." Ah.

Still, there are no shortage of cars whose legends remain untarnished by the limits of their real-world abilities. Sure, it may not be the best handling sports coupe on the market (it could in fact be the worst ever, apparently) but the 220 Coupe Turbo's handsome looks, comfortable cruising capacity and record-setting top speed ensure its hero status remains intact.


Today's Spotted is more noteworthy still, being as it is an 'FDH' registered car. As the ad explains, that makes it one of around 200 fully-specced examples which were built in the UK for export to Japan. A change in Japanese emissions legislation before their sale left them in limbo, however, and each car was returned to Blighty where, after a long delay, it was registered to Rover in Dudley DVLA office - resulting in an ****FDH plate - before being sold on at a discount either to an employee or the dealer network.

While curio kudos may be in the eye of the beholder, though, a car's outright ability is a little less subjective. Nonetheless, there'll be plenty of PHers intrigued by sight of an icon like the 220 Coupe Turbo. And if it's the absolute best example of Rover's Tomcat they're after, they need look no further.


SPECIFICATION - ROVER 220 COUPE TURBO
Engine: 1,994cc, inline-four
Transmission: 5-speed manual, front-wheel drive
Power (hp): 200@6,000rpm
Torque (lb ft): 175@2,100rpm
MPG: N/A
CO2: N/A
Recorded mileage: 6,646
First registered: 1998
Price new: £18,400 (around £36,000 after inflation)
Yours for: £15,995

See the full ad here

Author
Discussion

supacool1

Original Poster:

370 posts

179 months

Tuesday 25th February 2020
quotequote all
I had one offered to me £500 after I sold my Prelude Vti. It was miles faster in a straight line and lighter but damm was it scary in the corners. When you were pushing on it was epic fun as the back end would rotate mid corner...But if you didn't have your whits about you it could snap sideways. It was dare I say it, exciting in a Rover! I never did get to take the roof panels off in the summer as I only kept it for a winter before selling it for £2000!

I never did get much understeer though....oversteer yes.

Arsecati

2,302 posts

117 months

Tuesday 25th February 2020
quotequote all
Before I start reading these 'Spotted' articles, I usually try amuse myself by guessing what price it is up for. I'm usually quite good: I guessed 8 grand for the Accord, before scrolling down to see it was up for £8990, so I was pretty pleased with myself there.

For this, I went..... 'hmmmm, I reckon about £3/4k'.

Sweet jaysus did I get this one wrong (though I still think my estimate is more accurate!!!).

rossub

4,440 posts

190 months

Tuesday 25th February 2020
quotequote all
Still to this day the fastest I have ever driven. An indicated 146 mph.

It was definitely rubbish in anything other than a straight line. Actually it didn’t do straight lines well either due to the torque steer.

Drivetrain couldn’t handle the power either.

LaurasOtherHalf

21,429 posts

196 months

Tuesday 25th February 2020
quotequote all
Arsecati said:
Before I start reading these 'Spotted' articles, I usually try amuse myself by guessing what price it is up for. I'm usually quite good: I guessed 8 grand for the Accord, before scrolling down to see it was up for £8990, so I was pretty pleased with myself there.

For this, I went..... 'hmmmm, I reckon about £3/4k'.

Sweet jaysus did I get this one wrong (though I still think my estimate is more accurate!!!).
White background in photos adds at least £10k.

PSB1967

281 posts

156 months

Tuesday 25th February 2020
quotequote all
Arsecati said:
Before I start reading these 'Spotted' articles, I usually try amuse myself by guessing what price it is up for. I'm usually quite good: I guessed 8 grand for the Accord, before scrolling down to see it was up for £8990, so I was pretty pleased with myself there.

For this, I went..... 'hmmmm, I reckon about £3/4k'.

Sweet jaysus did I get this one wrong (though I still think my estimate is more accurate!!!).
To be fair to you, the white background adds £10K so you're not far off.

f1nn

2,693 posts

192 months

Tuesday 25th February 2020
quotequote all
I don’t believe this is for sale at KGF, having sold many, many months ago suggesting there was at least one person willing to pay (or close to) the asking price.

dunnoreally

960 posts

108 months

Tuesday 25th February 2020
quotequote all
16 f***ing grand? Even for a massive longship fancier like me, that seems outrageous.

Very moved out of my old 45 into a 1.6 one of these five or six years ago. Would have cost me the princely sum of £200 plus a part ex worth about the same!

cerb4.5lee

30,491 posts

180 months

Tuesday 25th February 2020
quotequote all
I always thought that these were one of the best looking cars on the road at the time and they seemed so quick. I've driven one with a 1.6 NA engine and I liked the way it drove so I'd love a go in this.

Mafffew

2,149 posts

111 months

Tuesday 25th February 2020
quotequote all
£16k grand? rofl

Anyone paying that is a clown.

Gary29

4,146 posts

99 months

Tuesday 25th February 2020
quotequote all
Many moons ago, a guy a year or two older than me, in a purple tomcat nicked the girl I fancied in sixth form, I was heart broken, and have loved/hated these cars ever since.

Never driven one though.

GTEYE

2,094 posts

210 months

Tuesday 25th February 2020
quotequote all
supacool1 said:
I had one offered to me £500 after I sold my Prelude Vti. It was miles faster in a straight line and lighter but damm was it scary in the corners. When you were pushing on it was epic fun as the back end would rotate mid corner...But if you didn't have your whits about you it could snap sideways. It was dare I say it, exciting in a Rover! I never did get to take the roof panels off in the summer as I only kept it for a winter before selling it for £2000!

I never did get much understeer though....oversteer yes.
I had a 216 version as my first (allocated, rather than chosen) company car. It was as bad as I was expecting, the handling was scary in a 216 never mind the 220. The first time the rear snapped was a bit of a surprise, to say the least.

I changed jobs shortly afterwards. Not because of the car, but I certainly didn't miss it.

s m

23,219 posts

203 months

Tuesday 25th February 2020
quotequote all
rossub said:
Still to this day the fastest I have ever driven. An indicated 146 mph.
Still a fair bit left in a healthy one as well at that indicated speed
A genuine 150mph car and would be showing well over that

nikaiyo2

4,709 posts

195 months

Tuesday 25th February 2020
quotequote all
My dad used to have one of these in a kind of aquamarine type colour when I was 14 or 15- hated it there was no leg room in the back biggrin

kambites

67,547 posts

221 months

Tuesday 25th February 2020
quotequote all
Always thought it was a lovely looking car and the modern trend for bulbous designs covered in slashes, vents and enormous grilles has only made it more so. From what I remember they were pretty rubbish to drive, though.

jdmave

135 posts

135 months

Tuesday 25th February 2020
quotequote all
Always loved the look of these.............

RobEB

96 posts

95 months

Tuesday 25th February 2020
quotequote all
Funny this should come up now as only a couple of days ago my Youtube feed put a video from a Tomcat owner.

It was about a guy who has one, and the rear window just shattered in the cold weather. Literally...Cracked massively, and then shattered completely.
And the trouble he had to go to to get a replacement glass - impossible as no one makes the rear window glass for this vehicle, so if it happens to you, your only recourse is to hope someone has a used one for sale.

V8fan

6,283 posts

268 months

Tuesday 25th February 2020
quotequote all
I often see the white KGF pickup at classic auctions. As soon as I saw the seller, I knew it'd be an astronomical price.

They try to get the very low mileage cars, and then punt them on. Fair enough, its a business model, and they have to provide a warranty, but they take the p**s with their prices. Often 200% or more than they buy them for.

The blue Sierra that have up for £3995 almost seems reasonable when it was bought for £2226 at ACA in January.

They do seem to sell them though. wobble

Edited by V8fan on Tuesday 25th February 08:50

whytheory

750 posts

146 months

Tuesday 25th February 2020
quotequote all
I know this lot always charge mental prices but these FDH cars have long gone for decent money, this one looks totally mint and with that mileage, I don't actually think the price is that crazy.

I am a bit of an R8 Rover fanboy though, 216 Coupe was my first car and they're still a tremendous car to look at IMHO.

Pinkie15

1,248 posts

80 months

Tuesday 25th February 2020
quotequote all
Hmm, nice looking example, but 16k

And the T16 turbo’s power was 197 horses. Still with less than 7k on it the front chassis legs shouldn’t have cracked, ..... yet.



Still fancy one mind, but hear the 218 was better drive as the k series vvc was a better matched to the chassis

BRR

1,846 posts

172 months

Tuesday 25th February 2020
quotequote all
I remember seeing these as a kid and thought they looked amazing and was adamant that I'd get one when I grew up. looking at it now I have zero desire for one.

I'm sure it will sell though as there can't be many in such immaculate condition