RE: Jaguar E-Type V8 | The Brave Pill

RE: Jaguar E-Type V8 | The Brave Pill

Author
Discussion

ate one too

2,902 posts

146 months

Saturday 11th July 2020
quotequote all
tommy1973s said:
Great project. Sell the V8, smooth the bonnet, fit a proper engine and job done. Prefer coupe to drophead all day long too.
Great idea ... let's ask Wheeler Dealers to sort it ........

'old aat yer 'and .....

thelostboy

4,569 posts

225 months

Saturday 11th July 2020
quotequote all
What does a mint 2+2 go for? For me, they look absolutely awful with the Pope-mobile roofline. £35k seems a lot of money for an unoriginal, ropey car.

can't remember

1,078 posts

128 months

Saturday 11th July 2020
quotequote all
tommy1973s said:
Great project. Sell the V8, smooth the bonnet, fit a proper engine and job done. Prefer coupe to drophead all day long too.
It's not a coupe it's a 2+2.

keljimstock

34 posts

96 months

Saturday 11th July 2020
quotequote all
Most interesting. I remember a racing version back in the 60s.. It was a one-off called an Egal. E-type body and a Ford Galaxy engine. A beast of a car. Incidentally, and with reference to an earlier correspondent., the early E-type fixed head coupe is possibly the most beautiful car ever made although the earlier Ferrari 250 GT of about 1960 is a strong contender. The E-type convertible, like most other variations of coupe bodies - though better than most - is still a bit of a bathtub.

unsprung

5,467 posts

124 months

Saturday 11th July 2020
quotequote all


To take the p***, let's turn this project up to 11:

-- Remake the bonnet so that it has not one, but two, humps

-- Replace the V8 with a rotary

-- Apply bumper sticker to the rear: "Las Malvinas son Argentinas"


A1VDY

3,575 posts

127 months

Saturday 11th July 2020
quotequote all
WJNB said:
The spinner of plates said:
Before my time so I don’t really ‘get’ the E-type. Neither the styling not how it drives.

My dads friend has one in his collection, they both fawn over it.

I can respect it’s place in history, but that is all, I’d never actually want one.
Believe me they all drive horribly, although in-period they were acceptable, just.. Only good for posing nowadays. As for that V8 wart-like contraption it's a real ugly cockup.
I often have to wash the drool off mine when others see it in the garage but tbh even though it's an original S1 flat floor I've never been over keen on its looks. Mechanically the cars perfect, brakes/ suspension inclusive but the overall drive isn't inspiring at all.
They're a car for those with rose tints.
Hugely expensive to restore correctly as well..

Dr G

15,167 posts

242 months

Saturday 11th July 2020
quotequote all
unsprung said:
To take the p***, let's turn this project up to 11:

-- Remake the bonnet so that it has not one, but two, humps

-- Replace the V8 with a rotary

-- Apply bumper sticker to the rear: "Las Malvinas son Argentinas"
Make it a quad rotor and tub the rear end evil

A1VDY

3,575 posts

127 months

Saturday 11th July 2020
quotequote all
Dr G said:
unsprung said:
To take the p***, let's turn this project up to 11:

-- Remake the bonnet so that it has not one, but two, humps

-- Replace the V8 with a rotary

-- Apply bumper sticker to the rear: "Las Malvinas son Argentinas"
Make it a quad rotor and tub the rear end evil
+four wheel drive with air suspension, big lift and chunky BF Goodrich mud terrain boots..

Mr Tidy

22,270 posts

127 months

Saturday 11th July 2020
quotequote all
I can understand why it happened years ago, but it definitely limits the value of the car now. A bit like all those Triumph Stags that got Rover V8s fitted after the Triumph V8 broke!

But with LHD and a Ford V8 surely the best place to sell that must be the States.

I've also read countless articles about the E-Type 150mph top speed and seem to remember a journalist from that era bought the original road test car in a sorry state some years later (maybe Bill Boddy?) and there was an article detailing all the non-standard mods found when it was stripped down. But even 130mph plus must have been amazing back in the 60s - my Dad had a 1964 Hillman Minx that struggled to get past 80mph!

As for looks I grew up always wanting the FHC since the day a primary school class-mate turned up with the red Corgi model of one (he got all the new models as his mum worked in a toy shop). I'm struggling to think of any drop-head car I like the look of TBH - unless the roof is down but this is England after all so Id rather have a roof!

J4CKO

41,499 posts

200 months

Saturday 11th July 2020
quotequote all
I dont get that reverential about E Types, they can look cool but most look over prepared. They are too long and the wheels sit too far in (even by the standards of the day) lot of the time like a Commer van.

So many are like they are straight off a greetings card in some lame colour, like a lot of Ferraris and stuff like that, too clean, shiny and prissy, looks so much cooler looking well used an E Type. Its like people who show dogs and wont let them get dirty.

I like the FHC, its from the same school of ungainly design, that somehow works on the Z3M Coupe.

Plenty of originals out there, one with the wrong engine, not the end of the world, probably better than the V12 Jaguar plonked in it, nice engine but too big and heavy.

threespires

4,289 posts

211 months

Saturday 11th July 2020
quotequote all
keljimstock said:
Most interesting. I remember a racing version back in the 60s.. It was a one-off called an Egal. E-type body and a Ford Galaxy engine. A beast of a car. Incidentally, and with reference to an earlier correspondent., the early E-type fixed head coupe is possibly the most beautiful car ever made although the earlier Ferrari 250 GT of about 1960 is a strong contender. The E-type convertible, like most other variations of coupe bodies - though better than most - is still a bit of a bathtub.
If I remember correctly the Egal was raced by Rob Beck. He had an outrageous XK120 before the E Type.
He lived on Tamworth Rd.

anonymous-user

54 months

Saturday 11th July 2020
quotequote all
I think I another factor with this particular one is the colour. It really doesnt suit that red at all.


tomic

720 posts

145 months

Saturday 11th July 2020
quotequote all
E Types surely can't be a good long term investment anymore.

There's an article in Classic Cars magazine this month about how XK150 values have started to fall as the number of people who remember them from when they were young starts to reduce. They were the model before the E Type so logically it can't be far behing.

XK150's are fairly rare. There are thousands of E Types - nearly 6000 in the UK plus the xkedata.com website is tracking over 21000 worldwide. I know of 2 they're not tracking so there must be loads more.

This is an undesirable model so I reckon you'd have to be crazy to pay that for it and even more bonkers to spend money making it original again.

Edited by tomic on Saturday 11th July 23:49

Amirhussain

11,488 posts

163 months

Saturday 11th July 2020
quotequote all
cerb4.5lee said:
Even when I was kid I never understood the love for the looks of the E-Type(in any guise). It is a shape that has never done anything for me. I've always preferred the looks of the XJS in comparison.
Same. They’re not ugly, far from it but IMO I don’t think they’re as beautiful as some people or car journos make them out to be.

That said...if I won the jackpot I’d love to have a Growler E-Type Jaguar cool

J4CKO

41,499 posts

200 months

Saturday 11th July 2020
quotequote all
tomic said:
E Types surely can't be a good long term investment anymore.

There's an article in Classic Cars magazine this month about how XK150 values have started to fall as the number of people who remember them from when they were young starts to reduce. They were the model before the E Type so logically it can't be far behing.

XK150's are fairly rare. There are thousands of E Types - nearly 6000 in the UK plus the xkedata.com website is tracking over 21000 worldwide. I know of 2 they're not tracking so there must be loads more.

This is an undesirable model so I reckon you'd have to be crazy to pay that for it and even more bonkers to spend money making it original again.

Edited by tomic on Saturday 11th July 23:49
That is a key point, you need to have a connection to something to pay a lot of money for it, most folk will know what an E Type is, but it will be older people,mainly men that want one. I used to drive one fairly often but I never really wanted one, I am, at 49 and the lower end of the main group that would want one.

Obviously its not just age based, family connections, just wanting something different etc but the main section of owners and those who want them were kids in the sixties and are getting older.

Same for all cars, they wont perhaps drop massively, just stop increasing.

MK1 and 2 Escorts are at the Zenith of their value trajectory, as all the original owners and those who want one are over 40 and have cash, of course stuff like F and F brings new enthusiasts on board, as does just hankering for something more mechanical but the bulk are working class blokes between 40 and 60, and rally drivers.



Fittster

20,120 posts

213 months

Sunday 12th July 2020
quotequote all
tomic said:
There's an article in Classic Cars magazine this month about how XK150 values have started to fall as the number of people who remember them from when they were young starts to reduce. They were the model before the E Type so logically it can't be far behing.
I think the idea that when people who remembered the cars as new in boyhood die off, the value of the car in the classic market drops is a bit fanciful.

It's not as if pre-war sports cars are dirt cheap.

Does anyone have figures showing that things like Jaguar SS have dropped in price over the last 10 to 20 years?

tomic

720 posts

145 months

Sunday 12th July 2020
quotequote all
Fittster said:
tomic said:
There's an article in Classic Cars magazine this month about how XK150 values have started to fall as the number of people who remember them from when they were young starts to reduce. They were the model before the E Type so logically it can't be far behing.
I think the idea that when people who remembered the cars as new in boyhood die off, the value of the car in the classic market drops is a bit fanciful.

It's not as if pre-war sports cars are dirt cheap.

Does anyone have figures showing that things like Jaguar SS have dropped in price over the last 10 to 20 years?
I don't know about those specific models but it is definitely something that happens. Classic Car mag describe as 'diminishing generational appeal'


https://www.classiccarsmagazine.co.uk/market-insig...

Also if you watch that programme about Mathewsons Car Auctions - Bangers and Cash or something it's called, they always struggle to get good money for pre-war stuff. Most people these days would actually struggle to drive a lot of those cars.

Mr Tidy

22,270 posts

127 months

Sunday 12th July 2020
quotequote all
tomic said:
I don't know about those specific models but it is definitely something that happens. Classic Car mag describe as 'diminishing generational appeal'

https://www.classiccarsmagazine.co.uk/market-insig...

Also if you watch that programme about Mathewsons Car Auctions - Bangers and Cash or something it's called, they always struggle to get good money for pre-war stuff. Most people these days would actually struggle to drive a lot of those cars.
Let's be honest, most people wouldn't want to drive any pre-war car these days!

I grew up dreaming about owning a FHC E-Type, but in this century realised I would never afford one unless I sold the house and lived in the car!

But the more I have read the more I realise they aren't that great to drive nowadays.

So in 2014 I bought my poor man's equivalent, a BMW Z4 Coupe which seems to have had a similar design brief but had a 155mph limiter - which the E-Type never needed!

A semi-retired mate of mine keeps telling me I ought to buy a "Classic" car (probably one he is selling). laugh

But I can't see why I'd want to pay up to £10K for a decent 2.8i Capri when I've already had 2 and sold my last one for les than £3K in 1989. And by current performance standards it's just slow!

biggbn

23,210 posts

220 months

Sunday 12th July 2020
quotequote all
Amirhussain said:
cerb4.5lee said:
Even when I was kid I never understood the love for the looks of the E-Type(in any guise). It is a shape that has never done anything for me. I've always preferred the looks of the XJS in comparison.
Same. They’re not ugly, far from it but IMO I don’t think they’re as beautiful as some people or car journos make them out to be.

That said...if I won the jackpot I’d love to have a Growler E-Type Jaguar cool
Hallelujah. I thought I was the only one, jeez its been lonely . Contrived styling, recalcitrant Moss box, cramped cabin that cooks you, knock kneed track, and never the 150mph car promised in bog standard trim. The current Eagle lightweight rep, oh yes please. Later, fatter v12, yup..But standard cooking e type. Dont get it.


....i feel better now.


....could one argue throwing a v8 in one is a good thing?

coppice

8,600 posts

144 months

Sunday 12th July 2020
quotequote all
For younger readers it is hard to convey just what an impact the E-Type made in period. Most of the stuff on the road in the Sixties was tragic , slow , ugly and utilitarian grey porridge . If you liked driving you had a Mini Cooper or maybe an MGB or TR4 . Ferraris , Astons and Porsches are in every traffic jam now it seems , but back then were rarer than hen's teeth . I recall only seeing two Ferraris in my first couple of years as a teenage enthusiast , and maybe three or four 911s or 356s . Nobody you'd ever met had seen a Lambo .

In that environment , seeing an E-Type was the highlight of the week . It was gratuitously sexy , with that absurdly priapic bonnet , achingly sexy hips and even the detail entranced - those phallic exhausts pointing at the guy behind and the almost flat rear window -which was heated and tinted !

But every iteration of the car made it look worse - the 2 +2 looked a bit daft, the loss of the faired in lights ruined the front view and they lost the plot with the porky V12 with its blingtastic wheels . And weren't V12s supposed to whoop , crackle and wail , rather than make a self deprecating hum ?

Time gives a new perspective to one of the few cars that merits 'icon' status. The drophead now looks almost odd, with its huge bonnet but tiny cockpit but from some angles (plan , front and 3/4 rear) the fixed head is still sensational . But the beauty is severely undermined by that comically narrow track.

Of that era ,. the two sports cars which I think look even better now than in period are the Elan and 911 (in the days before it grew an enormous arse ) . Age has not withered them one iota

Edited by coppice on Sunday 12th July 07:01