RE: Bugatti Bolide: 1,850hp, 1,240kg, more than 310mph
Discussion
BFleming said:
noble12345 said:
Im offering a half eaten pack of Polo mints i found in my boot, a twix wrapper and a bag of fine English Toffee in return for one of these track Bugatti Bolide's plus a road car variant roadster, with free servicing for 20yrs inc unlimited tyres. I have a picture of Bugatti's blue carbon yacht on my screen now, so im sure that will guarantee that i will be first in the que, Im expecting delivery early 2022 with one billion dollar cashback.
No problem. My father was the minister for finance in my country, but due to a military coup, all of his gold taps from his 122 bathrooms were tied up in legal wranglings. If you send me a Bugatti Bolide and a cheque for one billion dollars today, this will guarantee release of the taps. The taps will be opened, you could say. In return the gold will flow. You will get gold, frankincense, myrrh, more gold (flowing) and a Bolide by return. This is a none time offer (as opposed to a one time offer) so strike whilst the.... erm... gold.. is hot. Unlike a DFS sale, this offer won't be around this weekend.Wammer said:
Sorry are you saying the company that created a prototype car to break 300mph only one way and then produced a car called the same but is not able to do 300mph trustworthy.
I find Bugatti one of the most untrustworthy companies as they have never held the worlds fastest production car record as they have only done it one way and there performance figures in the real world are way off.
https://youtu.be/XRNv2yXqmaU
The Mclaren F1 was faster than the Bugatti Veyron up to 150mph but on paper the Bugatti should have just disappeared from the start.
RWD, manual NA 90’s car beating a quad turbo double clutch AWD 1000 bhp car off the line? No chance. Top Gear is an entertainment show and I don’t understand why they let the McLaren seem like it’s winning. There’s another race in Dubai that confused me too, even years ago as a child, was a SLR McLaren vs a Lamorghini Murcliago LP670 SV. The Merc was RWD, heavier with less power and it beat it. Hammond also called the SLR a hypercar. I find Bugatti one of the most untrustworthy companies as they have never held the worlds fastest production car record as they have only done it one way and there performance figures in the real world are way off.
https://youtu.be/XRNv2yXqmaU
The Mclaren F1 was faster than the Bugatti Veyron up to 150mph but on paper the Bugatti should have just disappeared from the start.
Edited by Wammer on Thursday 29th October 14:06
I’d take both races with a pinch of salt
Chestrockwell said:
Wammer said:
Sorry are you saying the company that created a prototype car to break 300mph only one way and then produced a car called the same but is not able to do 300mph trustworthy.
I find Bugatti one of the most untrustworthy companies as they have never held the worlds fastest production car record as they have only done it one way and there performance figures in the real world are way off.
https://youtu.be/XRNv2yXqmaU
The Mclaren F1 was faster than the Bugatti Veyron up to 150mph but on paper the Bugatti should have just disappeared from the start.
RWD, manual NA 90’s car beating a quad turbo double clutch AWD 1000 bhp car off the line? No chance. Top Gear is an entertainment show and I don’t understand why they let the McLaren seem like it’s winning. There’s another race in Dubai that confused me too, even years ago as a child, was a SLR McLaren vs a Lamorghini Murcliago LP670 SV. The Merc was RWD, heavier with less power and it beat it. Hammond also called the SLR a hypercar. I find Bugatti one of the most untrustworthy companies as they have never held the worlds fastest production car record as they have only done it one way and there performance figures in the real world are way off.
https://youtu.be/XRNv2yXqmaU
The Mclaren F1 was faster than the Bugatti Veyron up to 150mph but on paper the Bugatti should have just disappeared from the start.
Edited by Wammer on Thursday 29th October 14:06
I’d take both races with a pinch of salt
Kent Border Kenny said:
TyrannosauRoss Lex said:
Exactly. I love the F1, it's my favourite car of all time, but not a chance it's quicker than the Veyron.
Is that definitely correct? It’s far, far lighter, and lower drag.Kent Border Kenny said:
TyrannosauRoss Lex said:
Exactly. I love the F1, it's my favourite car of all time, but not a chance it's quicker than the Veyron.
Is that definitely correct? It’s far, far lighter, and lower drag.Leon R said:
Kent Border Kenny said:
TyrannosauRoss Lex said:
Exactly. I love the F1, it's my favourite car of all time, but not a chance it's quicker than the Veyron.
Is that definitely correct? It’s far, far lighter, and lower drag.https://www.topgear.com/videos/top-gear-tv/bugatti...
BFleming said:
Leon R said:
Kent Border Kenny said:
TyrannosauRoss Lex said:
Exactly. I love the F1, it's my favourite car of all time, but not a chance it's quicker than the Veyron.
Is that definitely correct? It’s far, far lighter, and lower drag.https://www.topgear.com/videos/top-gear-tv/bugatti...
TyrannosauRoss Lex said:
Kent Border Kenny said:
TyrannosauRoss Lex said:
Exactly. I love the F1, it's my favourite car of all time, but not a chance it's quicker than the Veyron.
Is that definitely correct? It’s far, far lighter, and lower drag.McLaren F1 3.4 S 0-100 km/h, 9.4 S 0- 200 km/h, 23 S 0-300 km/h
Bugatti Veyron 2.5 S 0-100 km/h, 7.3 S 0- 200 km/h,16.7 S 0-300 km/h
BFleming said:
Leon R said:
Kent Border Kenny said:
TyrannosauRoss Lex said:
Exactly. I love the F1, it's my favourite car of all time, but not a chance it's quicker than the Veyron.
Is that definitely correct? It’s far, far lighter, and lower drag.https://www.topgear.com/videos/top-gear-tv/bugatti...
Kawasicki said:
Yep, it's not even close.
McLaren F1 3.4 S 0-100 km/h, 9.4 S 0- 200 km/h, 23 S 0-300 km/h
Bugatti Veyron 2.5 S 0-100 km/h, 7.3 S 0- 200 km/h,16.7 S 0-300 km/h
Having now watched the video, it’s as I thought, the F1 was ahead up to 150mph, and it was very definitely “close.”McLaren F1 3.4 S 0-100 km/h, 9.4 S 0- 200 km/h, 23 S 0-300 km/h
Bugatti Veyron 2.5 S 0-100 km/h, 7.3 S 0- 200 km/h,16.7 S 0-300 km/h
Kent Border Kenny said:
Kawasicki said:
Yep, it's not even close.
McLaren F1 3.4 S 0-100 km/h, 9.4 S 0- 200 km/h, 23 S 0-300 km/h
Bugatti Veyron 2.5 S 0-100 km/h, 7.3 S 0- 200 km/h,16.7 S 0-300 km/h
Having now watched the video, it’s as I thought, the F1 was ahead up to 150mph, and it was very definitely “close.”McLaren F1 3.4 S 0-100 km/h, 9.4 S 0- 200 km/h, 23 S 0-300 km/h
Bugatti Veyron 2.5 S 0-100 km/h, 7.3 S 0- 200 km/h,16.7 S 0-300 km/h
There is no "close" in that regard.
Kawasicki said:
The McLaren accelerates slower, at all speeds, any video evidence showing otherwise is false.
There is no "close" in that regard.
Yes, you keep claiming this, but it’s not clear where you are getting your definitive facts from.There is no "close" in that regard.
Power to weight favours the McLaren, and the video above bears this out.
You are writing as though you have experience of both, so is the diesel golf that you list some sort of inside joke that I’m just not getting?
Kent Border Kenny said:
Yes, you keep claiming this, but it’s not clear where you are getting your definitive facts from.
Power to weight favours the McLaren, and the video above bears this out.
You are writing as though you have experience of both, so is the diesel golf that you list some sort of inside joke that I’m just not getting?
Driving a Tesla I'd imagine you don't do jokes.Power to weight favours the McLaren, and the video above bears this out.
You are writing as though you have experience of both, so is the diesel golf that you list some sort of inside joke that I’m just not getting?
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff