RE: Maybach 57S Cruisero Coupe for sale

RE: Maybach 57S Cruisero Coupe for sale

Tuesday 22nd June 2021

Maybach 57S Cruisero Coupe for sale

Xenatec's decade-old attempt to make a 612hp Maybach coupe is vanishingly rare - and crazy expensive



Feast your eyes on the Maybach 57S Coupe. Or to give it the full name Wikipedia deems correct, the Maybach 57S Cruisero Coupe by Xenatec. Which is an exceptionally apt name for a car that was reputedly ordered by Colonel Gaddafi before he met his fate. Doubtless the two-door conversion caught the Libyan dictator's eye for the same reason it did ours - i.e. its improbable look and exceptional rareness.

Of course, the car underneath is familiar enough. The 'standard' Maybach 57 S earned its differentiating consonant thanks to deployment of a 612hp version of Mercedes-AMG's 6.0-litre V12. Even saddled with a supertanker-grade kerbweight, a single driven axle and a five-speed auto, the model was said to be good enough for 62mph in less than five seconds. It rode half an inch lower, too.

But that wasn't enough for some. As our Dutch-based vendor helpfully points out, the template for two-door versions of prodigiously large luxury saloons was already well established and Daimler wasn't averse to taking part - especially when it had a coachbuilder to do all the heavy lifting.



By all accounts Xenatec took a thoughtful and concerted swing at the Cruisero. The coupe was very much a traditional restyle - the car is said to be mechanically identical to the model it's based on - but it was apparently built to Maybach's exacting standards, and (assuming you're vaguely onboard with the firm's idiosyncratic design template) it doesn't look too bad for having had its rear doors removed and the fronts significantly extended.

Xenatec thought it might shift as many as 100 examples. Then it had investor problems and the bottom fell out. But not before it had built eight working examples, including the one you see here for Samuel Eto'o, the Cameroonian legend plying his trade for Inter Milan at the time. His choice of Baltic Black over white leather is commendable enough, and we're inclined to agree that 737lb ft of torque probably does make the coupe feel quite nimble.

Does that justify the 795,000 euro asking price? Hardly. But being neither a North African despot nor an elite footballer, we're not exactly qualified to value these things. Presumably to some the exclusiveness and head-turning oddity of the Maybach 57S Cruisero Coupe by Xenatec is sufficient to justify the astronomical sum. We can all agree it's got the right name, at least.


See the full ad here

Author
Discussion

Augustus Windsock

Original Poster:

3,360 posts

155 months

Tuesday 22nd June 2021
quotequote all
When I first saw this article at 00.15 hours I’d been unable to sleep. Which May account for why on first glance I thought it was one of those tasteless things built by Cadillac, and with a value of ‘three bob and a conker’.
Looking at it again, now fully awake, I still stand by the above: the decimal place has obviously been put in the wrong place and even at €7950 it’s too expensive…

Esceptico

7,440 posts

109 months

Tuesday 22nd June 2021
quotequote all
A massive improvement over a standard Maybach. At least optically. Though that wouldn’t be difficult.

No doubt almost every post on this thread will contain a “how much” comment. Which will be well deserved. Seems you can pick up a Mayback for under £100k. Who in their right mind would pay over £500k for this?

Gruntled

74 posts

79 months

Tuesday 22nd June 2021
quotequote all
“Cruisero”... because Cayonero was already taken

eddharris

456 posts

193 months

Tuesday 22nd June 2021
quotequote all
Augustus Windsock said:
When I first saw this article at 00.15 hours I’d been unable to sleep. Which May account for why on first glance I thought it was one of those tasteless things built by Cadillac, and with a value of ‘three bob and a conker’.
Looking at it again, now fully awake, I still stand by the above: the decimal place has obviously been put in the wrong place and even at €7950 it’s too expensive…
Idiotic last sentence. Fantastic thing, if you can afford it then why not.

Turini

415 posts

166 months

Tuesday 22nd June 2021
quotequote all
Nice proportions, much better looking than the saloon but somewhat bizarre that one of the Maybach’s main appeals was the unparalleled rear seat luxury and space which must have been sacrificed to make it into a coupe..

The spinner of plates

17,687 posts

200 months

Tuesday 22nd June 2021
quotequote all
It works better than it should.

daytona111r

764 posts

204 months

Tuesday 22nd June 2021
quotequote all
Suprised at how much I like this. Always thought the normal Maybach saloons to be grotesque and ugly, but this thing is beautiful.

RSchneider

215 posts

164 months

Tuesday 22nd June 2021
quotequote all
I quite like it. Should have been a standard model. Would have enabled the 4-door model to be purely chauffeur-driven focused, and the coupe for the owner-driver. Glas roof would have been nice.

MagicMonkey

94 posts

175 months

Tuesday 22nd June 2021
quotequote all
Are we just going to gloss over the fact that it’s just a CL65AMG with a facelift?

AMGSee55

633 posts

102 months

Tuesday 22nd June 2021
quotequote all
Fantastic! Alas, I am about €775000 short of the required entrance fee weeping

cmvtec

2,188 posts

81 months

Tuesday 22nd June 2021
quotequote all
I really like that.

Augustus Windsock

Original Poster:

3,360 posts

155 months

Tuesday 22nd June 2021
quotequote all
eddharris said:
Augustus Windsock said:
When I first saw this article at 00.15 hours I’d been unable to sleep. Which May account for why on first glance I thought it was one of those tasteless things built by Cadillac, and with a value of ‘three bob and a conker’.
Looking at it again, now fully awake, I still stand by the above: the decimal place has obviously been put in the wrong place and even at €7950 it’s too expensive…
Idiotic last sentence. Fantastic thing, if you can afford it then why not.
Idiotic start to your sentence ‘fantastic thing’, the word fantastic, used as an adjective should be replaced with the phrase ‘emperors new clothes’ or similar
And I apologise that I offended your sensibilities, 300-odd posts and you’ve become the arbiter of sense and reason: fantastic….!

rassi

2,451 posts

251 months

Tuesday 22nd June 2021
quotequote all
MagicMonkey said:
Are we just going to gloss over the fact that it’s just a CL65AMG with a facelift?
Indeed. And the CL looks a lot better.

cerb4.5lee

30,481 posts

180 months

Tuesday 22nd June 2021
quotequote all
The spinner of plates said:
It works better than it should.
I think this is where I'm at too. It could be a lot worse I reckon.

Hairymonster

1,427 posts

105 months

Tuesday 22nd June 2021
quotequote all
That's going to be fun opening the door in a multi-storey carpark and trying to a) get out and b) avoid dinging the car next to you!

I suspect the coupe still has more rear legroom than an S-class Merc, they've just made it a lot less accessible. Looks like it has the same wheelbase as the donor car.

Numeric

1,395 posts

151 months

Tuesday 22nd June 2021
quotequote all
Compared to the equivalent Rolls it is OK - just that in my mind, OK and so for the me seems rather bad value as the Rolls may be the better bet. To command what is even today a premium over the Rolls it would have to be utterly fabulous.

For me the core design language of the Maybach was always deeply flawed, lacking in every way elegance and looking like a stretched S, so being easily to my mind outclassed by the Rolls, while I also found the extra height of the rear of the Phantom and the more clubbable atmosphere gave a greater feeling of space and tranquillity.

But it was always the rear of the Maybach that was seen as its party piece, here was the great differentiator with the 'first class airline' style experience on offer. This coupe removes the one thing that people did say was better (if you liked it that way) and so for me this car loses the one USP that the Maybach had.

Chubbyross

4,545 posts

85 months

Tuesday 22nd June 2021
quotequote all
Ooh, that’s a lovely thing but I was expecting to see a £35k price tag. If you have the kind of money to buy something at this price you would never buy it second hand. There is no way this will shift at this price.

benzinbob

750 posts

56 months

Tuesday 22nd June 2021
quotequote all
Augustus Windsock said:
When I first saw this article at 00.15 hours I’d been unable to sleep. Which May account for why on first glance I thought it was one of those tasteless things built by Cadillac, and with a value of ‘three bob and a conker’.
Looking at it again, now fully awake, I still stand by the above: the decimal place has obviously been put in the wrong place and even at €7950 it’s too expensive…
This is worthy of a long slow facepalm. I’m lost with this website, not thinking this for the first time either. How have these thoughts happened inside someone’s mind?

bigbadbikercats

634 posts

208 months

Tuesday 22nd June 2021
quotequote all
Turini said:
Nice proportions, much better looking than the saloon but somewhat bizarre that one of the Maybach’s main appeals was the unparalleled rear seat luxury and space which must have been sacrificed to make it into a coupe..
Makes perfect sense when you’re selling into a market sector where nothing makes sense (or at least not in terms you or I would recognise) and pointless excess is the sole justification for the exercise.

Don’t get me wrong, I’m kind of glad that things like this exist, I just don’t expect there to be any logical reason for them to…

whp1983

1,171 posts

139 months

Tuesday 22nd June 2021
quotequote all
Think I’d just go for an S class coupe of any AMG flavour and save a shed load of cash…. I also get the sense that would be the better drive, better looking, nicer place to be too.