RE: RPM Technik 718 Cayman GT4 MR | PH Review

RE: RPM Technik 718 Cayman GT4 MR | PH Review

Sunday 8th May 2022

RPM Technik 718 Cayman GT4 MR | PH Review

Considering going the full Manthey Racing with your GT4? You should


I’ve driven the Porsche Cayman GT4 on track. That was at the fabulous Knockhill circuit. And the GT4 matched the verdurous, rolling beauty of the backdrop with its performance: it went round all day, lapping up the laps as it was born to do. It is, after all, a product of the motorsport department at Weissach, and motorsporty cars are what they excel at. Now we have the even more hardcore track car, the GT4 RS, which Matt Bird drove recently. If you’ve seen his video, you’ll know his voice went all squeaky. That wasn’t a helium leak; the GT4 RS apparently does that to you. Because it’s that good.

Let’s be honest, though - it’s also unattainable, at least for the vast majority of us. In theory you can buy a new standard 718 GT4, although if that too proves to be like alchemy in practice, you can absolutely pick one up second hand: for around £100,000, simply by clicking on the PH classifieds right now. And then if you find you would like it more finely honed for the track in the manner of the elusive RS, there are other things you could do. Like having a chat with RPM Technik.

This is the RPM Tecknik 718 GT4 MR, which adds Manthey Racing upgrades for, to quote the blurb, ‘extra spice’. It’s claimed to be ‘more engaging’ on the road and ‘scintillating’ on a circuit. Well, we can’t tell you whether the latter stands up to scrutiny, because we haven’t been on track with it, but we have driven RPM’s demo car on the road. Before getting stuck into its dynamic delights, though, time for a quick rundown of what you get for your money - and the sums involved.

RPM’s MR menu is a la carte, and begins with a spicy £12,750 starter (all prices are plus VAT). This kit includes Manthey coilover springs that drop the ride height by an ‘I mean business’ amount, and add dampers with passive adjustment for rebound and compression (the standard switchable damper button remains but becomes redundant, with phantom-limb resistors fitted to stop the ECU thinking something’s been amputated). The suspension hardware also includes new, solid uniball top mounts front and rear, and the inner bushes on the rear lower track-rod arms are rose jointed and shimmed to offer higher camber angles.

The pads are racing spec, the brake hoses braided, and there are a few aero tweaks: modified intakes, underbody air deflectors and an MR rear wing complete with Gurney flap. For £18,700, you get all that plus a set of lightweight forged BBS wheels. The tyre sizes are standard GT4, though, and the car we drove was fitted with Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2s.

So, there’s your baseline MR car. And obviously once you’ve spent the money you can then spend hours playing about on the set-up side. Or, take the settings that Darren Anderson, RPM Technik’s commercial director (and owner of a very tricked-up 996 track-day special), says that he and Tim Harvey, RPM’s chassis consultant, feel make a good compromise. One that works on the road, in that it’s useable and makes the car more engaging, while on the track it should have you creating mid-corner consternation in the minds of GT3 owners. Of course, you’re free to choose something less aggressive or even more time-attack, should you wish.

On top of the chassis fiddling, you can go more fundamental, too. RPM offers a shorter final drive ratio with a new crown wheel and pinion. The intention here is to address the age-old issue of the GT4’s overly long gearing, which some feel blights the car. That upgrade costs £5,265, or £6,300 if you choose option two. Naturally, the shorter final drive makes the GT4 MR sing more on motorways, so option two has the tranquilising effect of a taller sixth gear. The demo car has the full Autobahn-spec overdrive sixth, but there’s a UK version coming that’s not quite so leggy.

On top of the new ratio, option two also comes with a lightened flywheel that does away with the dual-mass affair fitted at the factory. Naturally, there’s an exhaust upgrade: this stands you in at £3,000 and replaces everything aft of the petrol particulate filters, which were added when the 981 GT4 became the 718 GT4. The new exhaust retains the switchability of the standard system with a choice of modes.

There’s also a full brake rework for £10,350 supplied by Surface Transforms. This package bags you carbon fibre reinforced ceramic discs – 410mm diameter discs at the front with six-piston calipers, and 400mm and four pistons at the rear. Finally, as you can see, there are some ‘out there’ styling upgrades, too, although you don’t have to have these if you’d prefer to remain low-key – well, as low-key as you can be while running around in a GT4. And if your car didn’t spring from the factory with the Clubsport package, fear not. RPM will supply and install an MR roll cage, floor-mounted harnesses and a pair of original 918 carbon-backed seats to replicate it.

Give the starter a whir and kick the 4.0-litre flat-six into life and two things strike you immediately. Firstly, it’s louder and appreciably filthier-sounding from outside – even in the quieter mode. This is good. From inside though you can barely tell the difference; to my ears it’s no more boomy or raucous than the standard GT4. But it is lumpier. And before that observation is misconstrued as a criticism, it ain’t. Not at all. There are cars that should be quiet and serene, and cars that should feel raw. To me, a GT product ought to be among the latter, which is why I love that the MR makes you feel like you’re wearing its flat-six like a backpack at idle. The vibrations percolate through the stiff carbon seats as part of the racing theatre. In case you’re wondering, the added churn comes from the lighter flywheel, which has less mass to damp out the chunter.

When I initially popped the exhaust valve open, I didn’t like the boom it introduces. But that was ambling around; another listen while scything up the rev range proved a lot better. Past 3,000rpm, on a hard-pressed throttle, any boom has vapourised. You're left with a crisper, richer call. Now, this might not match the induction-roar heaven of the GT4 RS - and the GT4 MR doesn’t reach its heady, high-revving delights, either - but when it’s spinning up to its 8,000rpm limiter it’s not exactly lacking character, that’s for sure. Nor pace. The GT4 MR isn’t more powerful, but it is more urgent; noticeably so, thanks to the lower gearing. And because there’s less mass in the engine, every blip of the throttle comes with a burst of revs that make heel-and-toe shifts lightening quick.

Which brings me onto the brakes. Now, I’d say, and with some confidence, that Porsche is among the best at setting up a pedal box for heel and toeing. It’s all about the height of the brake relative to the throttle, of course: the more even they are the better. In the MR there’s more of a disparity, and having to twist my ankle to get the blips bang on was a let down. It’s nothing to do with the pedal box, which hasn’t been changed. It’s because the brake pedal is now so solid – with the ST running gear and braided pipework – that there isn’t the initial compression you get with the regular GT4, which puts the appropriate pedals on the same plane.

Well, not when you’re stopping relatively gently, as I was to begin with. It turns out I’m not the only one who’s pointed this out, because there’s an adjustable throttle pedal coming (yes, I know all throttle pedals are adjustable, but their mountings aren’t) to solve the issue.  Although, as I found out later, when you’re really stamping on the brakes, which, by the way are massively strong on the retardation front, the issue goes away. And remember, this is more of a track day car, so chances are you’ll be stamping on the brakes a lot. If you’re not, you’re not trying hard enough. 

There are other quirks, too. Like, for example, the chatter from the geartrain when the engine’s labouring below 3,000rpm. This sounds a bit like a knackered-out input shaft bearing, but nothing’s on the way out here. Once again, the cause is the reduced damping effect of the flyweight flywheel, and, once again, as far as I’m concerned, it adds to stripped-bare motorsport spirit. It’s not annoying, which I’m not sure I can say is true of the new sixth gear.

I’d suggest strongly going for the UK halfway house variant rather than the taller fitted to this demo. That might be fine at Autobahn speeds, but at 70mph you go from fifth, when the engine’s pulling around 4,000rpm, to sixth, and the tacho needle sinks to a lowly 2,000rpm – just beyond the engine’s comfort zone. Other than that, I like the shorter final drive. As I said, it makes the car seem racier but also less thwarted by its lofty second gear. The standard GT4 will exceed 80mph when you wring its neck in second. So if you want to avoid a hug from the long arm of the law, you can only rev it out fully in first. Well, you can safely max out the GT4 MR in second because it tops out at 70mph, and even on country roads it makes the experience more engaging.

Which brings us onto the steering. Like the brake pedal, the changes here had me fretting at first. Connecting your consciousness to a car’s front wheels is another given in virtually any modern Porsche, but in the MR there’s some vagueness either side of dead centre. Obviously, this was a concern. I imagined it was going to make the car less precise on tight lanes, where you need to be deadly accurate between any kerbs that crop up to avoid taking lumps out of those lovely, forged rims. Yet, twenty minutes into my drive, there was no damage to the wheels. I found myself placing the car easily, even with the little extra pull you get over cambers – more than I remember feeling in the regular GT4.

It’s still a slight trade-off, mind, but you appreciate what for come the first long, fast sweeper. Oh my, the bite from the front tyres and the reassurance you get when the front end is loaded-up is a thrill. Even if you’re name’s Tom, Dick or Ham-fisted Harry, I don’t think you could miss the MR’s added panache. And in case you’re thinking it’s all locked down for a track, it’s not. If anything, it’s more agile in the slower-speed stuff. Barrel into a roundabout with a little lift midway through and the rear starts to swing. It stays delightfully cockeyed with some power on the exit, but it’s not loose, as such. It’s still predictable, just more spirited and helps the car turn.

The suspension set-up is just as impressive. It’s tauter than the standard GT4, although not in a bad way. Again, this being a proper, purposeful sports car it’s meant to feel firm. And there’s a key difference between firm and fidgety, and firm yet supple, like this is. Sure, the MR punches hard over potholes and sunken manhole covers, but it doesn’t decimate your spine and deals with the aftershocks swiftly. Like any good set up, the smaller imperfections are filtered away so you’re not left in a state of constant agitation. As with the steering, there’s payback, too: the dampers are like a dog with a bone. They just won’t let go of the body, so the GT4 MR is able to deal with tremendous vertical challenges at full pelt while appearing to mutter under its breath “pah, is that all ya got?” And when you think the car isn’t running the road-biased settings it has access to, that’s pretty damn impressive.

That’s the overriding thought, as it happens. I think ‘impressive’ best describes the GT4 MR. Sure, there are things that I’d change, like that Empire State Building sixth gear, and I’m not hugely drawn to those lairy decals, either. But everything else gets a big thumbs up, mainly because of the accompanying big smile the MR induces. Any initial scepticism – the fear that the GT4 MR might be a GT4 made worse, for the road at least – peeled away under use like a visor tear off.

In fact, the more time I spent exploring and playing and delving into its reserves, the more I came away thinking the opposite is true. Obviously I can’t confirm whether the GT4 MR is a giant killer on track, but crikey, I would be very surprised if it isn’t. I can tell you, categorically, that it’s a car you should drive to the circuit, not trailer. The GT4 is still wonderful – the MR configuration doesn’t change that. But, as Porsche proved with its GT4 RS, you can always go one better. The difference is, when you have a chat with RPM Technik, which I really think you should, you’re guaranteed to get a ‘yes, of course we can help’ instead of a polite ‘maybe next time, sir.’


Specification | RPM Technik Porsche 718 Cayman GT4 MR

Engine: 3,995cc, flat-six, naturally aspirated
Transmission: six-speed manual, rear-wheel drive
Power (hp): 420 @ 7,600rpm
Torque (lb ft): 310 @ 5,000-6,800rpm
0-62mph: 4.4 secs (standard car)
Top speed: 189mph (standard car)
Weight: 1,420kg (DIN)
MPG: 25.9
CO2: 249g/km
Price: £46,020 inc. VAT (plus donor car)

Author
Discussion

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

54 months

Saturday 7th May 2022
quotequote all
Another track car. On the kind of C roads I hoon about on, this skinny little tyres would have those pretty alloys busted up in a week.

blue al

944 posts

159 months

Saturday 7th May 2022
quotequote all
46k would buy something vey competitive for track days and you get to keep your 100k GT 4 value intact.
I actually like the idea of this car but the chunk of change required says start with a Gts and budget a few engine mods to arrive at a more palatable final number ?

plumslikerocks

30 posts

86 months

Saturday 7th May 2022
quotequote all
Agreed……a hefty Porsche owner tax has been applied to this little lot…

SidewaysSi

10,742 posts

234 months

Saturday 7th May 2022
quotequote all
RPM know how to charge, though presume a lot of this is Manthey bits.

Their CSR range whilst no doubt well executed never made sense to me at the prices they were asking for.

The spinner of plates

17,697 posts

200 months

Saturday 7th May 2022
quotequote all
Some very nice, very expensive enhancements.

200Plus Club

10,752 posts

278 months

Saturday 7th May 2022
quotequote all
My GT4 is practically perfect as is, other than the well discussed gearing issue.
A step too far unless you want a pure trackday car methinks.

Edited by 200Plus Club on Saturday 7th May 08:14

Evolved

3,565 posts

187 months

Saturday 7th May 2022
quotequote all
Eye watering pricing. The demo car looks pants with that paint/graphic scheme too!

I’d much prefer the standard car and use the £50k (ouch) to buy something else to complement it.

Made me think of this.

Pflanzgarten

3,942 posts

25 months

Saturday 7th May 2022
quotequote all
All prices plus vat, who’s claiming the vat back on these purchases?

I can’t help thinking anyone who cracks vat free prices when talking to the public is a rip off merchant and they know it.

Elmariachi

48 posts

59 months

Saturday 7th May 2022
quotequote all
Quite an achievement, nearly £50k to make a car look cheap.

samoht

5,713 posts

146 months

Saturday 7th May 2022
quotequote all
Another top contribution to the collection of homonym errors here:

"There are cars that should be quiet and serine" - serene

"Your left with a crisper, richer call" - You're

"when you ring its neck" - wring



On the car, the factory RS is going to have to stay very expensive for a very long time for this to make any kind of sense.

jason61c

5,978 posts

174 months

Saturday 7th May 2022
quotequote all
it reads like its actually not really that much better?

The prices for the mods are a total joke.

Slowlygettingit

649 posts

41 months

Saturday 7th May 2022
quotequote all
Is the gt that flawed you need to spend so much on it even for just some of the initial packages?
I don’t think so.

Wab1974uk

996 posts

27 months

Saturday 7th May 2022
quotequote all
Watched the Carfection video last night.

For me personally, I'd go for the shorter ratio's and that's it.

I nearly bought a GT4 a couple years ago, but the long gearing put me off. This now makes a GT4 far more appealing.

200Plus Club

10,752 posts

278 months

Saturday 7th May 2022
quotequote all
Wab1974uk said:
Watched the Carfection video last night.

For me personally, I'd go for the shorter ratio's and that's it.

I nearly bought a GT4 a couple years ago, but the long gearing put me off. This now makes a GT4 far more appealing.
It's no show stopper having the long gearing. Plenty of torque in 3rd and 4th so you don't have to wring it out all the time.

barchetta_boy

2,196 posts

232 months

Saturday 7th May 2022
quotequote all
200Plus Club said:
It's no show stopper having the long gearing. Plenty of torque in 3rd and 4th so you don't have to wring it out all the time.
I think that misses the point completely. It's not about having to rev it out it's about being able to rev it out without going silly speeds. I have the 718 GTS which is the same drivetrain as the GT4 and I have booked in for the short gears at RPM. The car makes no sense as it is, you may as well move the red line down from 7750 to 6000.

SidewaysSi

10,742 posts

234 months

Saturday 7th May 2022
quotequote all
barchetta_boy said:
200Plus Club said:
It's no show stopper having the long gearing. Plenty of torque in 3rd and 4th so you don't have to wring it out all the time.
I think that misses the point completely. It's not about having to rev it out it's about being able to rev it out without going silly speeds. I have the 718 GTS which is the same drivetrain as the GT4 and I have booked in for the short gears at RPM. The car makes no sense as it is, you may as well move the red line down from 7750 to 6000.
Yep, the tall gearing kills the car on road in the UK.

John Howell

20 posts

30 months

Saturday 7th May 2022
quotequote all
[quote=samoht]Another top contribution to the collection of homonym errors here:

"There are cars that should be quiet and serine" - serene

"Your left with a crisper, richer call" - You're

"when you ring its neck" - wring


All points noted and now corrected. Thanks for highlighting them. We're a small team working flat out and, while we always aim to avoid mistakes, we appreciate you pointing out any errors that creep in. Hopefully the content as a whole keeps you coming back.

BillyB

1,388 posts

258 months

Saturday 7th May 2022
quotequote all
barchetta_boy said:
200Plus Club said:
It's no show stopper having the long gearing. Plenty of torque in 3rd and 4th so you don't have to wring it out all the time.
I think that misses the point completely. It's not about having to rev it out it's about being able to rev it out without going silly speeds. I have the 718 GTS which is the same drivetrain as the GT4 and I have booked in for the short gears at RPM. The car makes no sense as it is, you may as well move the red line down from 7750 to 6000.
I don’t suppose the warranty is still valid with the new shorter final drive etc is it?

Slippydiff

14,830 posts

223 months

Saturday 7th May 2022
quotequote all
Wab1974uk said:
Watched the Carfection video last night.

For me personally, I'd go for the shorter ratio's and that's it.

I nearly bought a GT4 a couple years ago, but the long gearing put me off. This now makes a GT4 far more appealing.
Me too, and my take away from it was “now too stiff for UK roads”.

At the end of the Carfection video and this feature, I’m left thinking, why buy a GT4 to track, then have to chuck a big chunk of additional money at it to make it into a decent trackday car.
Just buy a 991.1 or 2 GT3 with it’s superior (for which read more powerful) engine, better resolved gearing and a chassis that was designed to provide the duality that anyone who tracks their 911 expects in the first place.



Wab1974uk

996 posts

27 months

Saturday 7th May 2022
quotequote all
BillyB said:
barchetta_boy said:
200Plus Club said:
It's no show stopper having the long gearing. Plenty of torque in 3rd and 4th so you don't have to wring it out all the time.
I think that misses the point completely. It's not about having to rev it out it's about being able to rev it out without going silly speeds. I have the 718 GTS which is the same drivetrain as the GT4 and I have booked in for the short gears at RPM. The car makes no sense as it is, you may as well move the red line down from 7750 to 6000.
I don’t suppose the warranty is still valid with the new shorter final drive etc is it?
According to carfection, it is. Though I think I'd check with Porsche before doing it, just to male 100% sure.