RE: Lexus RC F 10th Anniversary | Spotted

RE: Lexus RC F 10th Anniversary | Spotted

Thursday 26th September

Lexus RC F 10th Anniversary | Spotted

Japan's V8 coupe looks more appealing now than it did 10 years ago - especially with blue leather seats


Nothing says mid-life crisis more than throwing yourself into something vaguely sporty. For most people that usually means running, cycling or at the very least signing up for a gym membership that you’ll only end up using three times at most. For Lexus, having spent decades building sensible fuel-efficient barges for people who couldn’t give a dam about 0-60mph times, its idea of a mid-life crisis meant shoving huge, shouty V8s into anything it could get its hands on. First came the IS F, which was a critical hit (if not in showrooms) and proved that Toyota’s luxury brand could kick it with the likes of Audi RS, BMW M and Mercedes-AMG.

What followed was glorious Lexus LFA, one of which is available on PH in an ultra-rarer shade of Fresh Green, which matched F1-grade engineering with Toyota-levels of refinement, albeit at a price that eclipsed the most kitted-out RX by a factor of five. Then came the RC F, a sleek two-door coupe that had BMW M4-beater written all over it. Lexus introduced a new 5.0-litre V8 for the RC F with a punchy 473hp, a good 42hp more than the M4, while its 391lb ft torque figure was only a smidgen down on what the Beemer’s twin-turbo straight-six could muster. Once again, Lexus looked set to bloody the nose of the German establishment.

However, the RC F came at a time when a certain motoring show was at its absolute peak, where whatever was said during its one-hour runtime sent ripples through the industry. For the RC F, that was a very public dressing down from Clarkson and a whooping from the F82 M4 in the process. “I really don’t like this car. I don’t like the way it looks, I don’t like the way it goes, I don’t like the way it feels”, said Clarkson while in a cloud of tyre smoke. This can’t have helped sales, which were pretty lacklustre here in Britain. HowManyLeft puts the number at around 200 if you include all the special editions, which is even fewer than the 230-odd IS Fs sold here.

Most reviewers, however, were more kind to the RC F. Dale Lomas wrote in his PH review: “Maybe it's the breakthrough from low expectations, but the RC F is surprisingly easy to love." He added: “The balance that was lacking in the IS F is finally here. Slight understeer will transform to fantastically proportional oversteer, purely with driver input.” So Clarkson was right about the RC F’s stubborn front end, but there was probably a more adept chassis lurking behind it than he cared to admit on TV. 

Step forward ten years and the RC F becomes ever more appealing in a sea of turbocharged, ultra-efficient performance coupes. Its design has stood the test of time well, too, and looks especially striking in 10th Anniversary car we have here. The special edition arrived in 2018 to mark the 10th birthday of F’d-up Lexuseses and featured matte Nebula Grey paint, black wheels (optioned here with a blue lip, which looks ace), blue brake callipers and a carbon bonnet. And on the inside, Lexus fitted a pair of sub-zero blue leather seats, blue highlights on the steering wheel and dash, and even blue-tinted carbon on the door inserts.

Perhaps the greatest asset the RC F has over its German rivals is the fact that values continue to hold strong. This uber-rare 10th Anniversary will set you back £46,995, with only one previous owner on the books and just 10,000-miles recorded. Now, a standard RC F can be had for a whole lot less - take this 36,000-mile car for £31,495 as proof - but a F82 M4 can be had for high teens to mid-20s these days. And while it’ll be better to drive, it won’t match the theatre of a naturally-aspirated V8 - or the dependability of car built under Toyota’s watchful eye.


SPECIFICATION | LEXUS RC F 10TH ANNIVERSARY 

Engine: 4,969cc V8
Transmission: eight-speed automatic, rear-wheel drive
Power (hp): 473@7,100rpm
Torque (lb ft): 391@4,800rpm-5,600rpm
MPG: 26.2
CO2: 252
Year registered: 2018
Recorded mileage: 10,000
Price new: £69,995
Yours for: £46,995

See the original advert here

Author
Discussion

HardMiles

Original Poster:

361 posts

94 months

Thursday 26th September
quotequote all
Actually a nice looking machine - bar the blue rim protectors and interior. I'd probably take this over a multitude of other stuff, just because it's a bit different.

Crumpet

4,071 posts

188 months

Thursday 26th September
quotequote all
I do like these and might consider one for my next car, but can’t help thinking that at this price you’d go for a similarly aged LC500 instead?

sidesauce

2,719 posts

226 months

Thursday 26th September
quotequote all
Crumpet said:
I do like these and might consider one for my next car, but can’t help thinking that at this price you’d go for a similarly aged LC500 instead?
Exactly. LC 500 is a much nicer ownership proposition overall!

MyV10BarksAndBites

1,099 posts

57 months

Thursday 26th September
quotequote all
I still think these are really nice... Even more so now.

Motormouth88

377 posts

68 months

Thursday 26th September
quotequote all
These have grown on me, initially I thought they looked dreadful…however it needs a slight drop and some discreet wheel spacers to look the part, and loose the learner driver rim protector look

NGK210

3,446 posts

153 months

Thursday 26th September
quotequote all
"I'll take a robotic catfish from outer space over a beaver that smokes meth any day" - Sara-n-Tuned.

Lots of weight reduction for the exterior, so why not offer lightweight front chairs with delete options for the rear seats and hi-fi?

Nice cars, mind. But you really want an LC500 lick

aka_kerrly

12,490 posts

218 months

Thursday 26th September
quotequote all
Very nice, I do like the styling of these and the V8 is the icing on the cake!!! I think I'd be absolutely content with the regular RC-F for half the price though.

It must be a strange coincidence that I spotted a standard Lexus RC300 in a car park earlier and thought dam that's looking pretty smart in metallic red.
Sadly the standard 2.0T petrol and the petrol hybrid versions are too slow for my liking, think somewhere around 8 seconds to 60 when you'd expect 5-6.

Wheel Turned Out

1,051 posts

46 months

Thursday 26th September
quotequote all
Lovely motor, but "you could have an LC500 for the same money" was definitely my first thought as well.

Veteran63

324 posts

4 months

Thursday 26th September
quotequote all
Its difference from the mainstream is very much part of the appeal for me, but I'd go for an LC500 too.

LincolnLovin

2,923 posts

226 months

Thursday 26th September
quotequote all
The RCF and the LC500 are very different cars imo, muscle car vs grand tourer. I’ve owned a LC500 and I’m picking up a 2015 RCF tomorrow.

The LC has a much better gearbox and engine note, with a rubbish boot and pointless rear seats. The RCF has better rear seats, same engine with a different (more muted) exhaust note and an ok gearbox. I’d say it offers about 60-70% of the LC and for the price of the first gen (£23-27k) that’s good enough for me.

Where the RCF is better than the LC is track situations, as it has engine & transmission coolers. It’s easy to overheat the transmission on the LC when hitting it hard. It’s also slightly more practical.

I almost got back into an LC but the rear seats + the canbus theft issue caused me to defer for a little longer. Maybe next time, as the LC 500 is an utterly fabulous car.

cerb4.5lee

33,773 posts

188 months

Thursday 26th September
quotequote all
I do really like the idea of these, plus who doesn't like a 5.0 V8? Very nice.

This would be a very nice alternative to my F82 M4 I reckon.

Gericho

601 posts

11 months

Thursday 26th September
quotequote all
After seeing this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iYsVeFko5Ds

I was completely put off them.

GT3hopeful

257 posts

125 months

Thursday 26th September
quotequote all
Nice car but not comparable to LC500. Looking at prices I think that LC prices are bottoming out now that production has ceased and choice of second hand V8 cars is becoming limited probably because people will want to keep them?

Andy86GT

454 posts

73 months

Friday 27th September
quotequote all
There aren't many cars that I be persuaded to swap my '86 for, this is one of them. However I much prefer standard model looks, for me at least, that bonnet looks like a terrible after market add-on.

BIRMA

3,863 posts

202 months

Friday 27th September
quotequote all
As someone who normally changed his car every year I've had mine for nearly 5 years now. Compared to my previous AMG's etc servicing is dead cheap plus you get the Lexus 10 year warranty if you keep it serviced with Lexus. The 2017 like mine have AVS and £170 road tax. Standard car sits too high so I plan to change suspension to the Tein EDFC active coil-overs which lower it substantially

andy43

10,651 posts

262 months

Friday 27th September
quotequote all
There’s a yellow LC500 on autotrader for 36k. 80,000 miles though, so it’s only got 20k of warranty left.
I’d go LC every time at the price of this RC but around 25-30k the RCF would definitely be my choice over an M3… gets a lot more tricky when you bring the C63 into the equation …

andy43

10,651 posts

262 months

Friday 27th September
quotequote all
LincolnLovin said:
The RCF and the LC500 are very different cars imo, muscle car vs grand tourer. I’ve owned a LC500 and I’m picking up a 2015 RCF tomorrow.

The LC has a much better gearbox and engine note, with a rubbish boot and pointless rear seats. The RCF has better rear seats, same engine with a different (more muted) exhaust note and an ok gearbox. I’d say it offers about 60-70% of the LC and for the price of the first gen (£23-27k) that’s good enough for me.

Where the RCF is better than the LC is track situations, as it has engine & transmission coolers. It’s easy to overheat the transmission on the LC when hitting it hard. It’s also slightly more practical.

I almost got back into an LC but the rear seats + the canbus theft issue caused me to defer for a little longer. Maybe next time, as the LC 500 is an utterly fabulous car.
Matt Farah overheated the LC on his YouTube test. I think you’d really have to be going some in the UK to do that - it’s roughly half a tonne too much to be a track car, the RC is far more trackable.
Canbus problem is finally getting sorted with free trackers and geofence devices from Lexus, although BBC Watchdog are looking at doing a follow-up article as Lexus’s solution still doesn’t stop theft. Immobiliser and visible signs it’s fitted are the answer.

C5_Steve

4,903 posts

111 months

Friday 27th September
quotequote all
I do like these but have to agree at this price I'd be looking hard at an LC instead as they're a much better looking car.

cerb4.5lee

33,773 posts

188 months

Friday 27th September
quotequote all
Gericho said:
After seeing this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iYsVeFko5Ds

I was completely put off them.
That review is absolutely brutal about them for sure, but it makes me wonder if they're as bad as he makes out though?

I guess that you have to see them as more of a GT car in fairness, rather than something that you grab by the scruff of the neck though? My 370Z is a bit like that in many ways as well. You can throw it around if you want, but it naturally prefers a more laid back approach really though.

C5_Steve

4,903 posts

111 months

Friday 27th September
quotequote all
cerb4.5lee said:
Gericho said:
After seeing this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iYsVeFko5Ds

I was completely put off them.
That review is absolutely brutal about them for sure, but it makes me wonder if they're as bad as he makes out though?

I guess that you have to see them as more of a GT car in fairness, rather than something that you grab by the scruff of the neck though? My 370Z is a bit like that in many ways as well. You can throw it around if you want, but it naturally prefers a more laid back approach really though.
I've only really heard praise from people that own them.