Mad Negative Camber. Why?

Mad Negative Camber. Why?

Author
Discussion

JB!

5,254 posts

180 months

Monday 30th November 2009
quotequote all
Marf said:
JB! said:
It's all fashion really, form over function, but a well excecuted dub looks a million times better than "gaz" in his saxo...
Yet "gaz" in his saxo could probably run rings around a gashed up well excecuted dub around some b-roads.

I guess some people are far too concerned about how their car looks, rather than how well it drives. redface
having seen the way "gaz" drives down @ MK Cruise, I'm not too worried about a French fag-packet driven by a spotty oik, but you have a point. People don't get into the VAG scene for performance. It's (in 90% of cases) style over substance, granted, well-excecuted style and quality workmanship, but "show cages" don't do it for me!

My cupra has been "freshened up" with some smoothing and colour coding, but I'm just saving up for a big turbo setup and some nice buckets and harnesses.

Project 644 said:
JB! said:
On my cupra (16x6.5") I run no caster,
No. You do run caster. You just don't run any more than the factory settings. HTH
sorry, I don't recall you setting my car up for me?

FYI I don't run caster or excessive toe because the front ARB and wishbones are polybushed, which means the car reacts differently to it's original setup with more flexible bushes, and thus has to be setup differently.

Thanks.

Oh, and it looks like the PH resident trolls have got hold of this thread...

If the most amazing handling "hot hatch" looked like a daewoo nexia, would you still own one?

The Wookie

13,946 posts

228 months

Monday 30th November 2009
quotequote all
JB! said:
It's (in 90% of cases) style over substance, granted, well-excecuted style and quality workmanship, but "show cages" don't do it for me!
If you want to have a whinge about safety of mods, then show cages are the ones to go for, all of the problems of a cage (namely not being able to use the back seats and the risk of head injury without a lid on) with none of the benefits (namely chassis stiffness and not getting squashed by the ground when things go tits up)

kambites

67,554 posts

221 months

Monday 30th November 2009
quotequote all
Interesting, I've never come across a car with no caster at all. Wont that mean the steering doesn't auto-centre at all?

warped head

272 posts

173 months

Monday 30th November 2009
quotequote all
I thought polybushes were stiffer than the normal rubber bushes used in most cars? not softer...

JB!

5,254 posts

180 months

Monday 30th November 2009
quotequote all
kambites said:
Interesting, I've never come across a car with no caster at all. Wont that mean the steering doesn't auto-centre at all?
front coilover looks vertical to me, and was adjusted that way after polybushing, steering centres, but nowhere near as fast as before...

Now also running more front negative camber.

PhillipM

6,517 posts

189 months

Monday 30th November 2009
quotequote all
Just 'cause the coilover looks vertical, doesn't mean it is.
No caster would be a really weird setup to have, even if you are running polybushes that doesn't make much difference - hell, I'm running rose joints and I'm still running 6.5 degrees of caster, 'cause it the flex in a buh doesn't really affect the reasoning behind having it anyway...

Edited by PhillipM on Monday 30th November 15:39


Edited by PhillipM on Monday 30th November 15:39

JB!

5,254 posts

180 months

Monday 30th November 2009
quotequote all
warped head said:
I thought polybushes were stiffer than the normal rubber bushes used in most cars? not softer...
they are, you are reading it wrong. *insert smiley*

HereBeMonsters

14,180 posts

182 months

Monday 30th November 2009
quotequote all
JB! said:
If the most amazing handling "hot hatch" looked like a daewoo nexia, would you still own one?
That would be awesome.

Marf

22,907 posts

241 months

Monday 30th November 2009
quotequote all
HereBeMonsters said:
JB! said:
If the most amazing handling "hot hatch" looked like a daewoo nexia, would you still own one?
That would be awesome.
The MK2 Astra wasnt a bad handling car, was it?

Huff

3,150 posts

191 months

Monday 30th November 2009
quotequote all
Marf said:
The MK2 Astra wasnt a bad handling car, was it?
NO. It was a dreadful-handling car.

Marf

22,907 posts

241 months

Monday 30th November 2009
quotequote all
hehe

HereBeMonsters

14,180 posts

182 months

Monday 30th November 2009
quotequote all
Huff said:
Marf said:
The MK2 Astra wasnt a bad handling car, was it?
NO. It was a dreadful-handling car.
Seconded.

OK, so the only I ever drove one there were 4 people in the back, it was on DitchFinder(TM) tyres and it had just rained, but I was doing under 20mph into the roundabout. I turned the wheel, the car went straight on.
"We're dropping Rich off first." I said as it headed for Sandhurst rather than Wokingham...

williamp

19,255 posts

273 months

Monday 30th November 2009
quotequote all
More unusualc amber angles- only a slight turn here:





carl_w

9,178 posts

258 months

Monday 30th November 2009
quotequote all
warped head said:
Look at BTCC.

The lacetti its FWD and iirc has a mahoosive spoiler.

theres a function to that or the guy who run the team wouldnt have stuck it on.
Afraid not. The wings in BTCC have to produce zero downforce, but their presence is (IIRC) mandated by the rules to make them look like 'racing cars'. It's sad, but it's the way the rules went a few years ago.

kambites

67,554 posts

221 months

Monday 30th November 2009
quotequote all
carl_w said:
warped head said:
Look at BTCC.

The lacetti its FWD and iirc has a mahoosive spoiler.

theres a function to that or the guy who run the team wouldnt have stuck it on.
Afraid not. The wings in BTCC have to produce zero downforce, but their presence is (IIRC) mandated by the rules to make them look like 'racing cars'. It's sad, but it's the way the rules went a few years ago.
rofl Is that really true?

carl_w

9,178 posts

258 months

Monday 30th November 2009
quotequote all
kambites said:
carl_w said:
warped head said:
Look at BTCC.

The lacetti its FWD and iirc has a mahoosive spoiler.

theres a function to that or the guy who run the team wouldnt have stuck it on.
Afraid not. The wings in BTCC have to produce zero downforce, but their presence is (IIRC) mandated by the rules to make them look like 'racing cars'. It's sad, but it's the way the rules went a few years ago.
rofl Is that really true?
Actually further investigation reveals that it may no longer be true. I think that was the BTC-Touring regs that were in place up to 2007, and they run to Super 2000 (WTCC) regs now although some BTC-T cars still compete.

kambites

67,554 posts

221 months

Monday 30th November 2009
quotequote all
There's nothing wrong with wings on the back of FWD cars as long as they have sufficient down-force on the front as well, anyway.

warped head

272 posts

173 months

Monday 30th November 2009
quotequote all
kambites said:
There's nothing wrong with wings on the back of FWD cars as long as they have sufficient down-force on the front as well, anyway.
nahh.

Loads on the back, none on the front, wheelie init yo!!!

(dont tell me that you need a rwd car to wheelie as i already know this, im being sarcastic)

sadako

7,080 posts

238 months

Monday 30th November 2009
quotequote all
Airbag said:
Mr MoJo said:

Worse.

WTF is going on there? Did someone leave that out in the sun or something?
Bosozoku (street tribe) style. It exists solely so that people can create the most insane thing possible.

kambites

67,554 posts

221 months

Monday 30th November 2009
quotequote all
In a way I can respect that pink... thing. It clearly only exists for comedy value - at least it's not trying to be something it isn't.