RE: Driven: New Lotus Elise 1.6

RE: Driven: New Lotus Elise 1.6

Author
Discussion

Rawwr

22,722 posts

234 months

Thursday 15th April 2010
quotequote all
Fidgits said:
I loved my elise and would love another one... and i find it funny just because it has a smaller engine people seem to think its no good...
They're asthmatic, poorly built buckets and touching £28k for a basic one is teetering on the brink of insanity.

All IMHO smile

kambites

67,556 posts

221 months

Thursday 15th April 2010
quotequote all
UncappedTag said:
But you are twisting my post, I never said it was useless just IMO v.overpriced for what essentially is a light weight small engined car......now with rear parking sensors. The cost of manufacture would be halfed if Proton shifted the production overseas making it more in line with what it's actually worth.

Just my opinion for value for money, not it's capability.
Each to their own, but I struggle to think of anything cheaper which can even get close to it for B-road driver appeal whilst still being realistically usable as a daily driver.

Mr Gear

9,416 posts

190 months

Thursday 15th April 2010
quotequote all
UncappedTag said:
Mr Gear said:
UncappedTag said:
I'm staggered at the price these plastic pigs go for. £27.5k for a fibreglass body with a 1.6 mass produced engine.

And to think the RS gets some stick being £25k

Is it me or do these not offer any value for money whatsoever.
The boot is st too, and it won't tow a caravan. Useless.

Edited by Mr Gear on Thursday 15th April 12:50
But you are twisting my post, I never said it was useless just IMO v.overpriced for what essentially is a light weight small engined car......now with rear parking sensors. The cost of manufacture would be halfed if Proton shifted the production overseas making it more in line with what it's actually worth.

Just my opinion for value for money, not it's capability.
Fair enough, but the serious answer is that the difference is Lotus are handbuilt in small numbers and therefore development costs are spread over a smaller number of units with higher manufacturing costs too. That Focus body is produced in the millions by robots, and the only low-volume bits are a few engine tweaks and unique bits and bobs.

Gary C

12,423 posts

179 months

Thursday 15th April 2010
quotequote all
UncappedTag said:
I'm staggered at the price these plastic pigs go for. £27.5k for a fibreglass body with a 1.6 mass produced engine.

And to think the RS gets some stick being £25k

Is it me or do these not offer any value for money whatsoever.
Its you smile

Peeved

83 posts

213 months

Thursday 15th April 2010
quotequote all
Mr Gear said:
In addition, I can't think of any tiny 2-seat sportscar that is fitted with a diesel... scratchchin

So it's not really an option to "buy a diesel" when you're after a car like an Elise! Why can't all cars have decent handling AND good fuel consumption? They are not mutually exclusive.
I guess we had better hope for the VW Bluesport roadster thing. Looked the part and quite economical. How it goes remains to be seen.

The trouble it seems, is you want what I want. A cheap to buy/run, fuel efficient, light, fast drop-top sportscar with a decent badge, rwd and space for four and a real-world dollop of practicality. It just doesn't seem to exist.

Any ideas?

UncappedTag

2,102 posts

185 months

Thursday 15th April 2010
quotequote all
Brand new MX5 1.8's can be had for £16.8k. I just would not be able to justify a £10k+ premiem for a car just as capable for the average joe.

BBS-LM

3,972 posts

224 months

Thursday 15th April 2010
quotequote all
876kg for a modern car is bloody amazing achievement considering most hot hatch's are getting on for 1500kg.

Beefmeister

16,482 posts

230 months

Thursday 15th April 2010
quotequote all
Before someone whinges about them....

DRLs are about to become mandatory for all cars sold in the EU, so they are going to be on every car. Live with it.

otolith

56,082 posts

204 months

Thursday 15th April 2010
quotequote all
kambites said:
Each to their own, but I struggle to think of anything cheaper which can even get close to it for B-road driver appeal whilst still being realistically usable as a daily driver.
Besides which, depreciation is likely to be low - given that and the low fuel and tax costs, cost per mile is likely to look very favourable compared to any souped up shopping car.

Fidgits

17,202 posts

229 months

Thursday 15th April 2010
quotequote all
Rawwr said:
Fidgits said:
I loved my elise and would love another one... and i find it funny just because it has a smaller engine people seem to think its no good...
They're asthmatic, poorly built buckets and touching £28k for a basic one is teetering on the brink of insanity.

All IMHO smile
have you had one?

have you actually driven one?

the last thing i would have called my R was asthmatic...

UncappedTag

2,102 posts

185 months

Thursday 15th April 2010
quotequote all
BBS-LM said:
876kg for a modern car is bloody amazing achievement considering most hot hatch's are getting on for 1500kg.
And so it should, it's a 1.6 fibreglassed two seater car.

I would love to own one, but never ever at this price.

Stu_00

1,529 posts

219 months

Thursday 15th April 2010
quotequote all
Fidgits said:
Rawwr said:
Fidgits said:
I loved my elise and would love another one... and i find it funny just because it has a smaller engine people seem to think its no good...
They're asthmatic, poorly built buckets and touching £28k for a basic one is teetering on the brink of insanity.

All IMHO smile
have you had one?

have you actually driven one?

the last thing i would have called my R was asthmatic...
Check his profile lol - He Has owned S1/S2......

I on the other hand love my buckets, asthmatic R....LOL

KenBlocksPants

6,010 posts

184 months

Thursday 15th April 2010
quotequote all
Gary C said:
UncappedTag said:
I'm staggered at the price these plastic pigs go for. £27.5k for a fibreglass body with a 1.6 mass produced engine.

And to think the RS gets some stick being £25k

Is it me or do these not offer any value for money whatsoever.
Its you smile
Nope me too.

£27k is far to much for this really.


lotoid

1 posts

168 months

Thursday 15th April 2010
quotequote all
Hmmmm.. it's ok, but I Think I'll stick with my S1.

As for weight, on scales my S1 (no passenger ) with 3/4 tank of fuel was teetering 783kgs and its the 111s which is a bit lardier.. especially with my 13 stone frame in it! hehe


Stu_00

1,529 posts

219 months

Thursday 15th April 2010
quotequote all
KenBlocksPants said:
Gary C said:
UncappedTag said:
I'm staggered at the price these plastic pigs go for. £27.5k for a fibreglass body with a 1.6 mass produced engine.

And to think the RS gets some stick being £25k

Is it me or do these not offer any value for money whatsoever.
Its you smile
Nope me too.

£27k is far to much for this really.
Granted its not cheap, but then what is now. Its going to be better to own than an Asbo RS....Plus with the added benefit you can run it on the track and wont each tyres/pads like an RS would....

Still I am biased - I would rather walk than buy an RS

RobCrezz

7,892 posts

208 months

Thursday 15th April 2010
quotequote all
I think its cool!

Cant help but think that they could have gotten more power out of the 1.6 (toyota managed this kind of power out of the old 1.6 in the 80s mk1 MR2, Honda managed 160bhp in the 90s)... 150bhp would have been more like it to sit under the 190bhp 111R.

Perhaps it was quite a cheap engine to buy.

kambites

67,556 posts

221 months

Thursday 15th April 2010
quotequote all
Just about every new car seems heinously over-priced to me.

UncappedTag

2,102 posts

185 months

Thursday 15th April 2010
quotequote all
Stu_00 said:
KenBlocksPants said:
Gary C said:
UncappedTag said:
I'm staggered at the price these plastic pigs go for. £27.5k for a fibreglass body with a 1.6 mass produced engine.

And to think the RS gets some stick being £25k

Is it me or do these not offer any value for money whatsoever.
Its you smile
Nope me too.

£27k is far to much for this really.
Granted its not cheap, but then what is now. Its going to be better to own than an Asbo RS....Plus with the added benefit you can run it on the track and wont each tyres/pads like an RS would....

Still I am biased - I would rather walk than buy an RS
But personally why not shift production overseas. I do not give two hoots that it's been handbuilt somewhere in the countryside in Norfolk. To be honest I have no idea what the reliability of these the modern day Lotus, but my dad had a Excel from new and I always recall it always being off the road due to something failing. He wrote it off in the end and kindly declined another one!


Richard-G

1,675 posts

175 months

Thursday 15th April 2010
quotequote all
i really like it, in fact i even like what they have done with the interior too!

still 27k is overpriced, its as simple as that, even taking into account retained value

BBS-LM

3,972 posts

224 months

Thursday 15th April 2010
quotequote all
UncappedTag said:
I'm staggered at the price these plastic pigs go for. £27.5k for a fibreglass body with a 1.6 mass produced engine.

And to think the RS gets some stick being £25k

Is it me or do these not offer any value for money whatsoever.
There an amazing handling car to drive and it's not really about the power with the Elise, but I know what you mean, for £27K this car should have 200-bhp as standard and then progress from there. A 1.6 with 134-bhp is perfetic really. My GTI has better BHP-TON and it is close to 390-kg more in weight.

Edited by BBS-LM on Thursday 15th April 13:31