RE: No, No, Nano

Author
Discussion

Black S2K

1,462 posts

248 months

Tuesday 28th December 2010
quotequote all
I thought Luton was more Bangladeshi? Oh well, learn something new every day.

Anyway, Ferrari ought to be very scared. If Tata can make a car that spontaneously combusts just as well for so little money, it could actually do what the Honda NSX failed to. Actually, maybe that 'exclusive' paint scheme might just do it for those buyers with more money than taste.

bobberz

1,832 posts

198 months

Tuesday 28th December 2010
quotequote all
How does this get a 1.4 on the PH-O-Meter? Surely that means someone must be voting higher than 1?!!

It's like this:


crossed with this:

Lord Flathead

1,288 posts

178 months

Tuesday 28th December 2010
quotequote all
Gold Tissue Box Holder.

Munich

1,071 posts

195 months

Tuesday 28th December 2010
quotequote all
Judging by the way they decorate their lorries, this is tame.

AtomMan

10,742 posts

233 months

Tuesday 28th December 2010
quotequote all
Not sure what the issue is to be honest! I like it. It is cheap, simple and provides honest motoring for those not interested in cars (which is probably the majority of people).

No, it is not an enthusiast's car but surely no worse than a Smart FourTwo or bloody Priusmad. Especially for £1.5k...biggrin

jasongti

149 posts

159 months

Wednesday 29th December 2010
quotequote all
Bobberz I dont think its appropraite to say it actually like a religious monument which could cause some offence.

On topic its not a very good looking car.

Harji

2,196 posts

160 months

Wednesday 29th December 2010
quotequote all




Simond S

4,514 posts

276 months

Wednesday 29th December 2010
quotequote all
jasongti said:
Bobberz I dont think its appropraite to say it actually like a religious monument which could cause some offence.

On topic its not a very good looking car.
To be honest you'd need to be so far up your own arse to be offended by that you probably wouldnt see out.


jasongti

149 posts

159 months

Wednesday 29th December 2010
quotequote all
Simond S said:
jasongti said:
Bobberz I dont think its appropraite to say it actually like a religious monument which could cause some offence.

On topic its not a very good looking car.
To be honest you'd need to be so far up your own arse to be offended by that you probably wouldnt see out.
as it would seem you are.

soad

32,825 posts

175 months

Wednesday 29th December 2010
quotequote all
Looks horrid, that is all yuck

bobberz

1,832 posts

198 months

Wednesday 29th December 2010
quotequote all
jasongti said:
Simond S said:
jasongti said:
Bobberz I dont think its appropraite to say it actually like a religious monument which could cause some offence.

On topic its not a very good looking car.
To be honest you'd need to be so far up your own arse to be offended by that you probably wouldnt see out.
as it would seem you are.
I meant no offence, actually, Sikhism is probably one of the more sane religions out there. wink I simply was trying to point out the fact that it was like putting a gold facade on the electric jeepney: overly gaudy accoutrements on an unworthy vehicle.

James MK

556 posts

250 months

Wednesday 29th December 2010
quotequote all
So how long before they do this to a Jag?

Harji

2,196 posts

160 months

Wednesday 29th December 2010
quotequote all
bobberz said:
jasongti said:
Simond S said:
jasongti said:
Bobberz I dont think its appropraite to say it actually like a religious monument which could cause some offence.

On topic its not a very good looking car.
To be honest you'd need to be so far up your own arse to be offended by that you probably wouldnt see out.
as it would seem you are.
I meant no offence, actually, Sikhism is probably one of the more sane religions out there. wink I simply was trying to point out the fact that it was like putting a gold facade on the electric jeepney: overly gaudy accoutrements on an unworthy vehicle.
I saw no offence (i'm a Sikh)

KM666

1,757 posts

182 months

Wednesday 29th December 2010
quotequote all


i didnt know 2 live crew were designing cars?

GarryA

4,700 posts

163 months

Thursday 30th December 2010
quotequote all
It would make a cheap one make race series.

XitUp

7,690 posts

203 months

Monday 3rd January 2011
quotequote all
AtomMan said:
Not sure what the issue is to be honest! I like it. It is cheap, simple and provides honest motoring for those not interested in cars (which is probably the majority of people).

No, it is not an enthusiast's car but surely no worse than a Smart FourTwo or bloody Priusmad. Especially for £1.5k...biggrin
It's obviously much worse than a Prius, and probably a bit worse than a smart.

As for those trucks, they look ace.

p.s. I voted it a 10, not sure how much that will skew the scores.

sunsurfer

305 posts

180 months

Tuesday 4th January 2011
quotequote all
XitUp said:
It's obviously much worse than a Prius, and probably a bit worse than a smart.

As for those trucks, they look ace.

p.s. I voted it a 10, not sure how much that will skew the scores.
Those trucks are brilliant - a lot more interesting than the standard white van and Asda/Tesco/Van Morrison etc lorries

I will rate it a four. It's a simple cheap car and its major fault is just a paint job.