least fuel efficient car? nothing 'obscure'

least fuel efficient car? nothing 'obscure'

Author
Discussion

dave9

Original Poster:

579 posts

162 months

Thursday 30th December 2010
quotequote all
whats the least fuel efficient, up to 8 years old normal type of car so no Hummer H1's or 6 wheeled Russian things.

I'm thinking stuff like M6's, 750iL's, C65 AMG's, Range Rover Sport Supercharged, Bentley GT etc?

i'm interested in how this has affected depreciation if any of you are wondering why i'm asking this!

cheers

EDLT

15,421 posts

206 months

Thursday 30th December 2010
quotequote all


Probably.

EDIT- It does between 9 and 12 mpg (American) apparently. So its not THAT bad.

Edited by EDLT on Thursday 30th December 18:29

Grant.D

1,258 posts

224 months

Thursday 30th December 2010
quotequote all
Our Cayenne Turbo driving

dave9

Original Poster:

579 posts

162 months

Thursday 30th December 2010
quotequote all
EDLT said:


Probably.

EDIT- It does between 9 and 12 mpg (American) apparently. So its not THAT bad.

Edited by EDLT on Thursday 30th December 18:29
that probably wins but i'm not allowing it as it comes under the 'obscure' heading. smile

don't think 10mpg is too bad for that though

dave9

Original Poster:

579 posts

162 months

Thursday 30th December 2010
quotequote all
Grant.D said:
Our Cayenne Turbo driving
what does that do?

thinfourth2

32,414 posts

204 months

Thursday 30th December 2010
quotequote all
dave9 said:
Grant.D said:
Our Cayenne Turbo driving
what does that do?
Go very fast and look ugly?

Defcon5

6,181 posts

191 months

Thursday 30th December 2010
quotequote all
Are we talking manufacturer figures here or real world examples?

dave9

Original Poster:

579 posts

162 months

Thursday 30th December 2010
quotequote all
Defcon5 said:
Are we talking manufacturer figures here or real world examples?
dunno what do you reckon?

real world if you know it, if not manufacturer.

generally i'd say you are down 20% in real world figures on a manufacturers combined figure.

reason i ask is that m6's cayenne turbos etc seem DIRT cheap but I still don't want one until they are practically a giveaway

Eagerbeaver

386 posts

199 months

Thursday 30th December 2010
quotequote all
OK, I'll start with some every day cars.

Daihatsu Copen 45mpg
BMW Z4M Coupe 30mpg

dave9

Original Poster:

579 posts

162 months

Thursday 30th December 2010
quotequote all
Eagerbeaver said:
OK, I'll start with some every day cars.

Daihatsu Copen 45mpg
BMW Z4M Coupe 30mpg
not bad for a Z4M. To beat that though I know a normal Cayenne V8 averaged about 22mpg when my mate had his.

kambites

67,554 posts

221 months

Thursday 30th December 2010
quotequote all
I think the Veyron does 11mpg on the combined cycle, if that counts. smile

Things like Rolls Royces and Maybachs are in the teens, too.

Edited by kambites on Thursday 30th December 18:47

Kong

1,503 posts

171 months

Thursday 30th December 2010
quotequote all
RX-7 must take some beating, especially if youre talking 'fuel efficiency' - its such a small car!

rog007

5,759 posts

224 months

Thursday 30th December 2010
quotequote all
One Sunday morning, North Yorkshire Moors, Subaru Impreza Turbo WRX STI Type RA (close ratio gearbox; 70mph = 5000 rpm!), down to about 8 mpg...so I took it easy!

terzo

122 posts

160 months

Thursday 30th December 2010
quotequote all
Range Rover 4.2 V8 Supercharged VOGUE SE 4d Auto
17mpg

Dodge SRT-10 8.3 V10 2d
13mpg

both official figures

Grant.D

1,258 posts

224 months

Thursday 30th December 2010
quotequote all
thinfourth2 said:
dave9 said:
Grant.D said:
Our Cayenne Turbo driving
what does that do?
Go very fast and look ugly?
Official combined figure is 18 MPG IIRC

12/13 is not unusual if making swift progress

Have seen it at 8 MPG at its best smile

Edited by Grant.D on Thursday 30th December 18:55

dave9

Original Poster:

579 posts

162 months

Thursday 30th December 2010
quotequote all
some good examples there guys - took some doing i bet to get 8mpg in the scoob. however that's a one off!

shall we allow the dodge srt ram as not 'obscure'?

if so that's winning so far with 13mpg if not the range rover is winning at 17mpg.

the veyron i think we'd have to class as obscure in that it's just too rare.

cayenne turbo's can now be had for £16k - do you think they will get to £12-£13k by April? I think so!

edo

16,699 posts

265 months

Thursday 30th December 2010
quotequote all
rx8.

dave9

Original Poster:

579 posts

162 months

Thursday 30th December 2010
quotequote all
edo said:
rx8.
which is prob why at 4k they are great value. this months evo had their fleet car at 21.8 mpg which whilst bad isn't bad enough!

stackmonkey

5,077 posts

249 months

Thursday 30th December 2010
quotequote all
edo said:
rx8.
+1 for this. Every owner I've spoken to has said mid teens mpg.

edo

16,699 posts

265 months

Thursday 30th December 2010
quotequote all
Great value cars if you dont do great mileage. They handle well and are very practical.

I tried driving mine like a Granny and couldn't get more than 21, so drove it like it was designed, and got 19.