RE: SOTW: Honda Prelude

RE: SOTW: Honda Prelude

Author
Discussion

Black S2K

1,471 posts

249 months

Sunday 2nd January 2011
quotequote all
This is by LJK Setright, so mods feel free to pull it for copyright infringement:

So long as they remain in contact with the road, all four tyres of the car share its weight. They also share the task of stopping it; in four-wheel-drive cars they share the burden of making it go; and in all cars, in case you had not realised it, they share the duty of steering.
Conventional cars being what they are (gross travesties of engineering ideals), the rear tyres only get steering instructions by devious means. You turn the steering wheel: the front wheels turn, their tyres begin to generate a lateral force to move the nose of the car.
What happens next is a complex sequence of changing forces, all time-consuming and most of them destabilising, which result in the rear tyres taking on their share of making the car follow the desired course. By stages the car settles into a steady-state cornering mode which should continue until you do something else.
With active steering, all four tyres assume their new duties simultaneously. All those intermediate phases are eliminated: the car responds with alacrity and accuracy, regardless of how fast or how hard you are cornering.
Engineers have been investigating four-wheel steering for a long time. An Italian named Amati built a fine prototype in 1927; a couple of Britons, Freddie Dixon and Tony Rolt, built a frightful one a decade later.
The first hint of modern active steering came in 1983 when Mazda revealed that they were working on a four-wheel-steering system. First in production, though, came the Honda Prelude of 1987, with a system whereby the rear wheels were steered according to the steering input by the driver, and in which road speed was irrelevant.
I was enchanted by it: a succession of 4WS Preludes has served as my personal transport ever since. My present one will have to last the rest of my life, for they do not make them any more.
Deftness, adroitness, sensual gratification, agility, accuracy: all these terms come flooding to mind when trying to explain why this car is nicer to drive than anything else. What may matter most is the supreme ability to dodge, which has saved me from an assortment of accidents involving either errant road-users or things falling off lorries. As a lane-changer, especially at high speeds, the Prelude must be without peer.
Every other manufacturer pronounced it rubbish while privately trying to find a way of equalling it without paying royalties to Honda. Nissan and Mitsubishi produced approximations made farcical by an electronic time-delay, which ruined the effect. BMW tried a version in their 850 coupe, but failed to persevere. The French and Audi VW offered rear-wheel steering that was a disgusting system of squishy suspension mounts, The remainder waited for 4WS to go away, and their judgement was good: it went.
What killed active steering? Car salesmen. People who are good at selling things are not the sort who can explain the dynamic benefits: the most they could do was to point out how much easier it made parking.
It was a tragedy. All sorts of things matter from time to time when driving - brakes, accelerator response, gearbox - but the one thing in use all the time is the steering. To make do with second-best is not merely risky, it is heart-rending. Fancy technology sells cars today, but it has to be something that can be seen. Something that can at best be felt, however worthy, is unlikely to open wallets.

robsco

7,826 posts

176 months

Sunday 2nd January 2011
quotequote all
I always liked the shape of these and the Celicas from the same era. That interior doesn't half look drab, unfortunately.

ApexJimi

24,977 posts

243 months

Sunday 2nd January 2011
quotequote all
I have to say, the interior of a good spec'd 4th Gen prelude is a very nice place to be, and the driving position is very good too.

shanghai nutter

225 posts

165 months

Monday 3rd January 2011
quotequote all
[quote=Black S2K]This is by LJK Setright...]

Hats off to you for doing that - I assume I've buggered up the quoting - but these cars [MkIV -Preludes] really were engineering showcases of their day. It's perhaps easy to mock the hands into which they have now fallen but such is life - they remain an ideal which I think Honda have sadly (and understandably for commercial reasons) had to let go. Viva la Insight and CR-Z................Not.

LeeThr

3,122 posts

171 months

Monday 3rd January 2011
quotequote all
VTEC Just kicked in... Yo


Sorry, but this thread just wouldnt be right without that said hehe

Doniger

1,971 posts

166 months

Monday 3rd January 2011
quotequote all
Get it right, you're supposed to call it V-Tech and spell it "y0!"


This thread reminds me of how much I miss having a VTAK car frown

Black S2K

1,471 posts

249 months

Monday 3rd January 2011
quotequote all
ApexJimi said:
I have to say, the interior of a good spec'd 4th Gen prelude is a very nice place to be, and the driving position is very good too.
True indeed; the poor ergonomics of many 'prestige-teir' cars are often conveniently overlooked by journos.

It's another of those things (including excellent visibility) that makes a Prelude really enjoyable to drive.

ApexJimi

24,977 posts

243 months

Monday 3rd January 2011
quotequote all
This thread is actually making me miss mine frown

beergibbon

394 posts

194 months

Monday 3rd January 2011
quotequote all
First fast car I had was a fifth gen prelude. Great handling and lots of fun. Was tempted to look for a cheap one again. If you're going to get one, go for the 197bhp version that came out in 1998.

tali1

5,266 posts

201 months

Monday 3rd January 2011
quotequote all
urmm said:
Escort Si-130 said:
They seemed to be popular with some people of a certain race.
Innit bro
No need to tiptoe.You can actually say young asian males.
And hairdressers smile

nottyash

4,670 posts

195 months

Monday 3rd January 2011
quotequote all
beergibbon said:
First fast car I had was a fifth gen prelude. Great handling and lots of fun. Was tempted to look for a cheap one again. If you're going to get one, go for the 197bhp version that came out in 1998.
Got one.........well the Mrs has claimed it has hers actuallybiglaugh

stewjohnst

2,442 posts

161 months

Monday 3rd January 2011
quotequote all
Lovely shed

Picked up one myself the other week, used to have a Jap import 2.2 Si and wanted to scratch my 90's coupe itch again having stuffed my 535 BM into a hedge headache . Managed to find a UK spec 2.2vtec with 135k on it and FSH. Been having a whale of a time in it, especially amusing having vtec kicking in on the icy roads we've had round here and then trying to wheelspin/torquesteer it in something resembling a straight line.

Only cost me a grand, so not sure I'll be able to let myself flog it when sensible but dull company Golf Diesel arrives in April frown

Zircon

305 posts

181 months

Tuesday 4th January 2011
quotequote all
A bit of an also-ran in my opinion. Ok looks (bit OAP though), great dashboard, great reliability / build quality but overall not a great image as a sports car.

I would much rather have a Celica, CRX, MR2, MX5.......

Edited by Zircon on Tuesday 4th January 12:09

digger_R

1,807 posts

206 months

Tuesday 4th January 2011
quotequote all
lovely, my first vtak. I bought it on the basis of 1 mile as a passenger for the test drive. Mine did understeer on the limit but it was an 'early' JDM 2WS

Put a smile on my face everytime and that dash is worth it for the schoolboy in you

Sam1990

398 posts

167 months

Tuesday 4th January 2011
quotequote all
Lovely cars, took a few 4th gens for a test drive and they were a great drive. Ended up buying a 5th gen as I wanted something a bit more modern, that was back in October and I'm still grinning every time I walk away and especially when I put my foot down.

nottyash

4,670 posts

195 months

Tuesday 4th January 2011
quotequote all
stewjohnst said:
Lovely shed

Picked up one myself the other week, used to have a Jap import 2.2 Si and wanted to scratch my 90's coupe itch again having stuffed my 535 BM into a hedge headache . Managed to find a UK spec 2.2vtec with 135k on it and FSH. Been having a whale of a time in it, especially amusing having vtec kicking in on the icy roads we've had round here and then trying to wheelspin/torquesteer it in something resembling a straight line.

Only cost me a grand, so not sure I'll be able to let myself flog it when sensible but dull company Golf Diesel arrives in April frown
Invest in a induction air filter on ebay. About 30 quid, the noise is incredible over 5000 revs. Well worth it.driving

anything fast

983 posts

164 months

Tuesday 4th January 2011
quotequote all
they are actually quite good cars and nice looking, but no offense to those who drive them, but every one i see looks like a knackered pile of crap with loads of dents and often being driven by someone who thinks its a prestige motor..but they probably dont even have insurance.. if not that type the max powered junk with giant F1 rear wings glued on... shame.. maybe thats why these cars are worthless nowerdays... good car but will never be a classic.... unlike say a VR6 Corrado, try finding one of those for a grand!

bobberz

1,832 posts

199 months

Wednesday 5th January 2011
quotequote all
Doniger said:
johnpeat said:
kambites said:
My legs didn't fit, there just wasn't enough distance between the seat and the pedals, even with the seat right back. I'm only 6' but I do have quite long legs for my height.
This is a pet interest of mine - how some people seem to be able to fit into cars when others cannot (even tho they're similar sizes).

I'm 6'5" - longish legs in particular - so my problem is always getting my knees behind the wheel. I cannot heel/toe any car (as my right leg has to bend just to get into the car). I cannot get behind the wheel of a Z3/Z4, most TVRs or a MK1 or MK2 MX5 - and yet Clarkson (same height) drives one across the Middle East!??

I know part of it is the seating position people prefer - I'm forced to slump in the seat to avoid banging my head AND to get my knees extra room but maybe some people won't do that!??

Certainly, if I were to insist on sitting in the seat 'properly', there are probably not 10 cars in manufacture I could actually drive!
I think it's all about leg/torso proportion. I'm 5'10" and my mate is 6'3". I have proportionally long legs, his are proportionally short. So where he sits right up against the steering wheel I sit further back in the same car...but where my head is at about the 'right' height, his head brushes the headlining in most cars and he can look right up over the windscreen of an MX5 laugh
Yeah, I always thought that it's weird how the first time I sat in a (1st gen) Porsche Boxster, I had to contort myself and couldn't fit, but I can fit fine in a 2nd gen Mazda Miata/MX-5 today. (And when I sat in that Boxster I was probably 5 inches shorter (before I could drive) and at least 60 pounds lighter!) I always attributed it to the fact that the Boxster was mid-engined, so maybe cockpit space was compromised?

Back on-topic, these 'Ludes are starting to look pretty good, though I didn't like them when they were new. I still don't like the taillights on the 4th gen, but I love the taillights on the 5th gen, however the 5th gen has those strange headlights- arrgh! Can't win.

What I always thought was funny is how here in America, Civic Type-Rs are regarded like gods (they never sold Type-Rs here), but the Prelude Si had more power, was quicker, and you could buy one at any Honda dealer.