Why does four wheel drive hurt 0-60 times?

Why does four wheel drive hurt 0-60 times?

Author
Discussion

jon-

Original Poster:

16,509 posts

216 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all
chard said:
jon- said:
jimbobsimmonds said:
My understanding is down to greater transmission losses because the engine has to get all of those drive shafts and differentials up to speed as well...
I would agree, but only in a lesser powered car. Cars like the RS4 could spin all 4 wheels with ease, so any transmission losses are nullified.
Have you ever driven an RS4? If you tried to spin all 4 wheels you would just wreck the clutch.
I didn't say it could be mechanically friendly, but when is Top Gear ever nice to the press cars!

That said, I've not driven an RS4 so if you're saying a full RPM, side step the clutch launch wouldn't spin up all 4 tyres I'd believe you (but be a little surprised)

chard

27,010 posts

183 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all
jon- said:
chard said:
jon- said:
jimbobsimmonds said:
My understanding is down to greater transmission losses because the engine has to get all of those drive shafts and differentials up to speed as well...
I would agree, but only in a lesser powered car. Cars like the RS4 could spin all 4 wheels with ease, so any transmission losses are nullified.
Have you ever driven an RS4? If you tried to spin all 4 wheels you would just wreck the clutch.
I didn't say it could be mechanically friendly, but when is Top Gear ever nice to the press cars!

That said, I've not driven an RS4 so if you're saying a full RPM, side step the clutch launch wouldn't spin up all 4 tyres I'd believe you (but be a little surprised)
I'm not going to bet the ranch on it but I reckon broken clutch. The clutchs on these cars are not that strong. They will even slip horribly if you screw up a fast gear change!!

NoelWatson

11,710 posts

242 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all
s
chard said:
jon- said:
chard said:
jon- said:
jimbobsimmonds said:
My understanding is down to greater transmission losses because the engine has to get all of those drive shafts and differentials up to speed as well...
I would agree, but only in a lesser powered car. Cars like the RS4 could spin all 4 wheels with ease, so any transmission losses are nullified.
Have you ever driven an RS4? If you tried to spin all 4 wheels you would just wreck the clutch.
I didn't say it could be mechanically friendly, but when is Top Gear ever nice to the press cars!

That said, I've not driven an RS4 so if you're saying a full RPM, side step the clutch launch wouldn't spin up all 4 tyres I'd believe you (but be a little surprised)
I'm not going to bet the ranch on it but I reckon broken clutch. The clutchs on these cars are not that strong. They will even slip horribly if you screw up a fast gear change!!
I seem to recall EVO saying that the clutch didn't engage that well when performance testing hence the relatively poor 0-30 time

jon-

Original Poster:

16,509 posts

216 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all
Good to know if I ever end in a RS4 (I'm more an M3 person though)

Daniel1

2,931 posts

198 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all
chard said:
jon- said:
jimbobsimmonds said:
My understanding is down to greater transmission losses because the engine has to get all of those drive shafts and differentials up to speed as well...
I would agree, but only in a lesser powered car. Cars like the RS4 could spin all 4 wheels with ease, so any transmission losses are nullified.
Have you ever driven an RS4? If you tried to spin all 4 wheels you would just wreck the clutch.
my R8 spins its wheels when you use the launch control.

pwd95

8,383 posts

238 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all
It's all down to the laws of Physics chaps.
Are there any 4x4 dragsters?.........
Ask the dragster guys why............

thumbup

The real Apache

39,731 posts

284 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all
pwd95 said:
It's all down to the laws of Physics chaps.
Are there any 4x4 dragsters?.........
Ask the dragster guys why............

thumbup
It's coz the front wheels are too skinny..........silly

pwd95

8,383 posts

238 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all
hehe

jon-

Original Poster:

16,509 posts

216 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all
pwd95 said:
It's all down to the laws of Physics chaps.
Are there any 4x4 dragsters?.........
Ask the dragster guys why............

thumbup
Explain frown

Mojocvh

16,837 posts

262 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all
I remember from many years ago a 911 had something like 94 bhp transmission losses.

Now add another set of driven wheels to the equation.....

Rollcage

11,327 posts

192 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all
Someone had better tell Porsche then - 997 Turbo S - 0-60 2.9 secs.


If you had ,say a 2wd and a 4wd Sapphire Cosworth then I would say extra weight and transmission losses would account for the difference - the 4wd had 20bhp extra ,but was 0.5 of a second slower to 60mph.


I am sure I read that a degree of wheelspin is desirable to get the best time, and it is obviously harder to achieve that in a 4wd car.

roverspeed

700 posts

196 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all
Shirley the Nissan GT-R is proof that most cars can't handle full bore starts on 4WD.

There is going to be a weak link in the chain somewhere.

Clutch, Gearbox, Prop, Driveshafts, Diffs.


busta

4,504 posts

233 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all
jon- said:
pwd95 said:
It's all down to the laws of Physics chaps.
Are there any 4x4 dragsters?.........
Ask the dragster guys why............

thumbup
Explain frown
What good would driving the front wheels do when they hardly touch the ground? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HzlXbwnTCQ8&lis...

jon-

Original Poster:

16,509 posts

216 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all
busta said:
jon- said:
pwd95 said:
It's all down to the laws of Physics chaps.
Are there any 4x4 dragsters?.........
Ask the dragster guys why............

thumbup
Explain frown
What good would driving the front wheels do when they hardly touch the ground? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HzlXbwnTCQ8&lis...
Ah ok, I thought there was some actual science I'd missed in a road car application (eg non-wheelie!)

busta

4,504 posts

233 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all
jon- said:
busta said:
jon- said:
pwd95 said:
It's all down to the laws of Physics chaps.
Are there any 4x4 dragsters?.........
Ask the dragster guys why............

thumbup
Explain frown
What good would driving the front wheels do when they hardly touch the ground? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HzlXbwnTCQ8&lis...
Ah ok, I thought there was some actual science I'd missed in a road car application (eg non-wheelie!)
Yes I agree in a road car awd makes a bit more sense and there aren't many road cars that'll lift the front wheels (although a chap in a pub once told me his Skyline would :S ).

I'd say in performance road cars, 4wd does not hurt 0-60 times but mechanical sympathy does. Type 'RS4 launch' into youtube and you get a few videos of gentle rolling starts. Type in 'M3 launch' and you get screeching tyres and long black lines smile

m3jappa

6,424 posts

218 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all
4wd just needs a better clutch.

My old evo 9 gt with just over 400hp had launch control and a twin plate clutch (cant remember the brand now, carbonetics iirc) and that was nothing short of brutal when launched. A chirp of wheelspin. no bogging (if you got it right) and within a split second you are long gone.

Launching any car doesnt do it any favours though and imo will need a better clutch. I had a stripped out 335hp e36 m3 and that could be launched as well as the evo, it was just a very fine balance between a chirp at the wheels or a full burnout.

DAVEVO9

3,469 posts

267 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all
m3jappa said:
4wd just needs a better clutch.

My old evo 9 gt with just over 400hp had launch control and a twin plate clutch (cant remember the brand now, carbonetics iirc) and that was nothing short of brutal when launched. A chirp of wheelspin. no bogging (if you got it right) and within a split second you are long gone.

Launching any car doesnt do it any favours though and imo will need a better clutch. I had a stripped out 335hp e36 m3 and that could be launched as well as the evo, it was just a very fine balance between a chirp at the wheels or a full burnout.
My EVO 9 has 400/400 but I have resisted a full on launch in the dry! Clutch being the weak point on the EVO with that sort of start!

I don't really need to try this though because as soon as it's rolling and you nail it, it's pretty much gone like a stabbed rat!

24k miles and on the original clutch. My car is meant to be capable of a 4.3 0-60 time, but I have never felt the need to prove this.

I could get a bomb proof clutch fitted and give it some abuse but then it would just transfer the shock to some other part of the drive train.

It goes like stink as it is so I am quite happy with it.