Converting a hot hatch to RWD

Converting a hot hatch to RWD

Author
Discussion

Taskedo

Original Poster:

64 posts

165 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all
I love little lightweight hot hatches. However, I also love rear wheel drive and I find it regrettable that you cannot have a fun little hot hatch, that weighs about a tonne, that is still relatively modern ie built over the last 10 years but has rwd. That got me thinking about rear wheel drive conversions, I know many people will say that I should just get old 325/Escort (Volvo, eek), but could the conversion of a front wheel drive car ever make sense? People who will convert a 205 are relatively easy to find but those who might have experience converting much else are probably less easy to find. I've only ever come across one specialist in this:


Conian

8,030 posts

201 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all
If you are rich and thats what yuo want then, yes it makes sense.
If not, then no it doesnt make sense.

RobM83

108 posts

159 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all
I don't think sense is the point of this... it's a bonkers thing to do and, IMO, will probably lead to very odd results.

I'm no engineer, but there must be a lot more to making this work than simply transferring the power to the rear wheels. Chassis and suspension setup, for instance, should be taken into consideration and if you get any of it wrong, you could end up with something far worse than you started.

But as said... if you're rich and have money to burn, why not?

Horns

323 posts

163 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all
Old Starlet with an engine swap?

NISaxoVTR

268 posts

169 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all
Square peg, round hole. The car will be so butchered by the time you've cut enough metal away to swing the engine around and make a transmission tunnel that it will be far from the original hot hatch you started with. You'll also be starting from scratch with regards to setting up the handling and with a short wheel base and the weight all shifted to one side like in that photo above you might have some trouble.

Efbe

9,251 posts

166 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all
RobM83 said:
I don't think sense is the point of this... it's a bonkers thing to do and, IMO, will probably lead to very odd results.

I'm no engineer, but there must be a lot more to making this work than simply transferring the power to the rear wheels. Chassis and suspension setup, for instance, should be taken into consideration and if you get any of it wrong, you could end up with something far worse than you started.

But as said... if you're rich and have money to burn, why not?
wuss.
plenty of people switch old polos and golfs to rwd. it wont end the world, the results aren't surprising tbh and it usually works well.

pbirkett

18,085 posts

272 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all
Clio V6... job done wink

Burrito

1,705 posts

220 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all
130i?

snuffle

1,587 posts

182 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all
B.I.V.A

martin mrt

3,770 posts

201 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all
Pbirkett and Buritto have hit the nail on the head!!!

Taskedo

Original Poster:

64 posts

165 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all
Burrito said:
130i?
Ideal but...a bit heavy isn't it to be a true 'flickable' hot hatch? V6, I like them it worries me that the dynamics weren't so good - the 182 was almost as fast around a circuit and had quite a bit less power.

Jayho

2,014 posts

170 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all
Correct me if I'm wrong... But wouldnt the alterations to make the car RWD not add to the weight?

Think the easier and cheaper way to do it would be just a volvo 340 with a Clio 1.8 engine conversion...

Either that or the BMW 1 Series...

egomeister

6,700 posts

263 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all
Taskedo said:
Burrito said:
130i?
Ideal but...a bit heavy isn't it to be a true 'flickable' hot hatch? V6, I like them it worries me that the dynamics weren't so good - the 182 was almost as fast around a circuit and had quite a bit less power.
So you think you'll get better handling from a homebrew rwd conversion than Renault managed with the Clio V6?

Faust66

2,035 posts

165 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all
Hmmmm, potentially a huge can of worms.

It has been done, I remember reading about a chap who'd converted a MK1 Fiesta to RWD some years back (think it was in Classic Ford magazine). IIRC he basically shortened a Sierra V6 floor pan and grafted the body of his Fiesta on - this would have to be the 'easiest' way of doing this as it'd avoid messing around with driveshafts & tranmission tunnels etc.

As other posters have said, changing the fundamental balance of a car by swapping the engine from a transverse to longtidudinal nounting (the very least of your problems) would be ill-advised to say the least, not to mention the problems you'd encounter with suspension.

Besides, a short wheel based RWD car will swap ends rather quickly at the limit - I've heard that the Lotus Talbot Horizons were legendary for this.

But to pay someone to do it? Jesus, hope you've won the lotto!!

Simple bit of advice: buy a RWD car mate!

interloper

2,747 posts

255 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all
This sort of thing used to be popular in club rallying circles, hence the Gartac RWD MK3 Escort, various Metro conversions (not to be confused with proper 6R4s) etc.

Also there are genuine RWD hatches, as somebody already mentioned there is the old Starlet and there were the Vauxhall Chevette and Talbot Sunbeam. Obviously there were factory spec hot Chevettes and Sunbeams but plenty of people converted base models into genuine fast cars. The snag with these is that they are all seriously long in the tooth and slowly gaining in value.

In short anything is possible if you have the time, money and nous!

Burrito

1,705 posts

220 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all
Taskedo said:
Burrito said:
130i?
Ideal but...a bit heavy isn't it to be a true 'flickable' hot hatch? V6, I like them it worries me that the dynamics weren't so good - the 182 was almost as fast around a circuit and had quite a bit less power.
According to the internets the v6 is 1400kg versus the 1205kg the 1 series. Neither is the lightest but should be quite chuckable still.

volvos60s60

566 posts

214 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all
Sunbeam Lotus?

150bhp

904 posts

172 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all
Each to their own but for the amount of money it could cost between buying the car then the conversion id much rather have this...

I know its not a hot hatch but think it would be faster, handle better and cost less. Or you could maybe just my an MR2 or MX5?

thinfourth2

32,414 posts

204 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all
Why bother?

Buy a caterfield for the same sort of cash and a hat, faster, lighter and less hassle.

RWD has its place but it isn't in hatchbacks.

Edited by thinfourth2 on Saturday 1st January 21:17

poo at Paul's

14,147 posts

175 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all
pbirkett said:
Clio V6... job done wink
Look great, sound great and a great idea......but mine drove disappointingly. A 182 was a far quicker machine in the real world.