The Audi TT Diesel

Author
Discussion

SteveS Cup

1,996 posts

160 months

Friday 4th March 2011
quotequote all
I'd happily have one!

It looks great!

You could say the same about any Diesel with a Sports body kit... 335d, 535d, 330cd, 320cd, Golf Anni TDI.

These are all kitted up oil burners... So why not an oil burning Coupe like the TT.

PKLD

1,161 posts

241 months

Friday 4th March 2011
quotequote all
adycav said:
Is this true though?

Or is it just about the looks?
Well... Can't speak for the diesel but mine is the fwd 2.0t so basically a golf gti drivetrain but the car is lighter, wheels wider, seat position lower, centre of gravity lower and the front half of the car is aluminium to help reduce understeer - and after test drives in a gti, seat leon, A3, astra vxr I felt the TT was the best handling and best looking.

Leon was most practical, vxr the most raw and the golf was the closest. Why does the golf gti get such a high praise but the TT is laughed at?

Parents jealous that if you had the choice you would chose the TT over a hatchback? Confused?!

But it is not a sportscar!!

adycav

Original Poster:

7,615 posts

217 months

Friday 4th March 2011
quotequote all
PKLD said:
mine is the fwd 2.0t
Did you consider the TDi yourself?

richcorsavxr

966 posts

172 months

Friday 4th March 2011
quotequote all
i have one sitting on the drive.
its my Dad's company car, when given a list of cars to choose from, you have to consider fuel costs (at the moment, his fuel allowance doesent cover the rise in fuel prices. So diesal for price and economy makes sence) to be in a car most of the day would you want to be in your ordinary rep mobile or something different were when the mood fancys, a quick blast down a B road with decent handling. Its by no means fast but then again its no slouch, its got a suprising amount of space in the boot, fairly practicle and suprisingly really comfortable (i prefer to hit a pot hole in this rather than my hatchback).


Just to add he was given some bonus by his company for getting a low emisions car which covered the cost of rental for a year

Edited by richcorsavxr on Friday 4th March 21:22

anonymous-user

54 months

Friday 4th March 2011
quotequote all
People say it's because of the torquey engine but the new for MY2011 2.0 TFSI petrol has the same amount of torque as the deseisal so I doubt it's that.

I recon it's purely based on tax and the fact that people who are bothered about what juice their car uses are in the minority.

adycav

Original Poster:

7,615 posts

217 months

Friday 4th March 2011
quotequote all
So the general consensus is that it is a tidy handler with good looks and an engine that makes sense cost wise, especially for business users.

Fair enough.

Liquid Knight

15,754 posts

183 months

Friday 4th March 2011
quotequote all
...and maybe because the Devil juice powered A4 cabriolet has been outselling the petrol version for years.

PKLD

1,161 posts

241 months

Friday 4th March 2011
quotequote all
adycav said:
Did you consider the TDi yourself?
Not at the time last year, it's my g/f daily car as I've got a 318d for a CC so didn't want another diesel as she does far less miles than me.

But now I've changed jobs and without a CC I think the replacement will be the diesel TT - the g/f now wants a 4x4 for the weeks of snow (we're north Scotland) but most 4x4s are too big and heavy on fuel.

I'm hopefully getting a biggish bike soon so no need for a fastish car!

sly fox

2,226 posts

219 months

Friday 4th March 2011
quotequote all
Kiltox said:
Keeping up with the Joneses whilst still having something on the company car list.

No, I don't see the point in it either.
Ironic considering the car in your profile.


It is a car pretty much designed for the company car market, which after all is about 75% of all new car sales.Naughty manufacturer for making something that might sell.

PKLD

1,161 posts

241 months

Friday 4th March 2011
quotequote all
adycav said:
So the general consensus is that it is a tidy handler with good looks and an engine that makes sense cost wise, especially for business users.

Fair enough.
Yup

Kiltox

14,619 posts

158 months

Friday 4th March 2011
quotequote all
sly fox said:
Ironic considering the car in your profile.
What, one of the cheapest cars money can buy? rolleyes

stabbed rat

2,208 posts

175 months

Wednesday 9th March 2011
quotequote all
I know i'm late to the party here but surely they make the diesel TT because they do the same engines in all the other cars that the TT is based on so it probably cost them very little extra to do the TT as a diesel. As someone mentioned earlier, they have sold very well, one might assume Audi did their research before deciding to build and sell it scratchchin

AMacA

193 posts

201 months

Wednesday 9th March 2011
quotequote all
Diesel TT owner here...

I was given a company car two years ago (not the TT), and at the time my financee, now wife, and I both had a car each. With no need for three cars between us we decided to chop our own cars in for one.

I was taken by the shape of the Mk2 TT when it was released, and at first had reservations about the diesel in a sporty coupe. Went for a test drive and it seemed to tick all the boxes, low running costs (fuel, tax and insurance), looks good and has decent performance (0-60 in about 7s, quattro etc).

Now we've had it for 18 months and unless circumstances dictate otherwise won't be looking to change it anytime soon.

Blue Meanie

73,668 posts

255 months

Wednesday 9th March 2011
quotequote all
What exactly is wrong with having a diesel in something that looks a little bit interesting. Just because it's a diesel, doesn't mean it can't be fun to drive.

chillo

724 posts

222 months

Wednesday 9th March 2011
quotequote all
Recently got a 18 month old black TT tdi roadster which my missus uses as a daily (110mile a day) car, get 42-46mpg without taking it steady, its well put together, lovely inside with the nav and bose etc etc, it handles ok(understeers as per most audi's) but can be hustled along nicely once you re adjust to the lack of available revs(gets to an indicated 140+ easily), is a fun car on the weekend for a drive to the coast etc whilst using feck all fuel to do it! Once warm I can genuiely barely tell its a diesel, the CR unit is very good. Also 4x4 for crappy winter weather too. £120 car tax, It basically ticks all boxes that we wanted.
Downside is i miss the Maser v8 soundtrack etc and its only a 2 seater but there are only 2 of us anyway.
Going to be re mapped along with a dpf bypass pipe in the next few months.

Just got fed up with being taxed so much!

slipstream 1985

12,211 posts

179 months

Wednesday 9th March 2011
quotequote all
its porsche boxster syndrome.

Blue Meanie

73,668 posts

255 months

Wednesday 9th March 2011
quotequote all
slipstream 1985 said:
its porsche boxster syndrome.
Huh?

Evil.soup

3,595 posts

205 months

Wednesday 9th March 2011
quotequote all
adycav said:
For me, the key factor of a performance car is the engine. This is what differentiates sporty cars from the more ordinary stuff.

So what is the point of a TT diesel?

Would it not make more sense to have the same engine in a more practical Golf/Leon/Octavia/Passat/Exeo alternative?

Someone please explain the appeal of the TT diesel to me.
It just looks better than the others. I see your point and i once thought like this until i needed a second economical car. What i have is a Polo but the above would be much more appealing to drive i would have thought.

J4CKO

41,499 posts

200 months

Wednesday 9th March 2011
quotequote all
Audi make them as people want them, people want them as it suits them, I see it as less of a compromise than an M3 or RS4 convertible.

A lot of company car policies are diesel only now, I am sure most prospective TT owners would go for the TTRS as a rule but reality dictates compromise, so they go for the diesel.

Blue Meanie

73,668 posts

255 months

Wednesday 9th March 2011
quotequote all
I'm not sure why diesel owners should only drive saloon cars, or hatchbacks. I'm still to hear WHY a TT shouldn't be diesel, and why it is wrong?