RE: PH Investigates: Ginetta's Road Cars

RE: PH Investigates: Ginetta's Road Cars

Author
Discussion

thewheelman

2,194 posts

173 months

Monday 21st March 2011
quotequote all
Harry Monk said:


Arash is a lovely bloke but it has to be said that putting half an NACA duct on back to front on the side of his car was never one of his greatest wheezes.
I quite like it....paperbag

geeeman

1,310 posts

255 months

Monday 21st March 2011
quotequote all
G40 is a bit expensive, but i cant think of another car thats road legal and is a direct development of the racing version, incorporating such things as FIA safety cell, Fia fuel cell,LSD, 4 pot brakes as standard

their chassis is exceptionally strong and makes a great dual purpose car

and if it retains the sequential six speed box, thats also unheard of for road car of this type.

Edited by geeeman on Monday 21st March 16:29

EDLT

15,421 posts

206 months

Monday 21st March 2011
quotequote all
julian64 said:
mitch78 said:
julian64 said:
The 95K needs to come down to 50K and then Ginetta will be the new TVR IMHO.
You're right. If they dropped it to ~£50k they would be the new TVR, unable to provide reliable cars for the money and bankrupt in no time.
Nope, TVR were cars that should only have been sold to certain members of the public. They should only have been sold to people who never discussed taking out warrantees, and were never RAC or AA affiliated, and always carried enough tools in the boot to sort 99% of anything that went wrong.

The sort of people who didn't care much about sat navs, the fit of the internal decor, or all the other crap that people to seem to care about today in their vectras and mondeos, but did care about having a decent lightweight package with a decent engine, in other words a car with a bit of character in a sea of crap eurobox monotony.

Small market perhaps in this day and age but probably enough to keep a niche manufacturer alive.
Like Bristol then?

mat205125

17,790 posts

213 months

Monday 21st March 2011
quotequote all
Some wonderful machines, and I wish Ginetta every success with this venture, and pray that they don't rush to get ideas above their niche and fail.

otolith

56,074 posts

204 months

Monday 21st March 2011
quotequote all
HebdenHedgehog said:
Which makes it nearly the same as the mooted Alfa 4C - and both seem to be going for a market which is / was pretty much the sole reserve of Lotus?
Lotus are vacating the niche. Nature abhors a vacuum.

therealpigdog

2,592 posts

197 months

Monday 21st March 2011
quotequote all
I love them - but really want them to develop the G50 into a road car. I think there's definitely a market for these, and wish them all the best - Ginetta seem to be doing things right though and concentrating on their core business, which is producing racing cars rather than having pie in the sky aspirations to take over the world. It might be a labour of love, but I can't see LNT failing with Ginetta - it is in safe hands.

Some shots from when I was lucky enough to visit the factory a while back (fantastic experience and thanks to everyone at Ginetta).






Podie

46,630 posts

275 months

Monday 21st March 2011
quotequote all
G50 would be lovely, but I understand the logic in starting with the G40.

suffolk009

5,385 posts

165 months

Monday 21st March 2011
quotequote all
bumped into a couple of prototype F400s down at LeMans last year, they looked absolutely wonderful...except that thing going on with the door scoop/vents. The car looks better in the flesh than pictures - except for side on, ruined by the air holes.

bet that gets reworked pretty quickly.

dandarez

Original Poster:

13,282 posts

283 months

Monday 21st March 2011
quotequote all
Looks like it's going to be another good year for Ginetta then, new and old.

With the good news last week that the 1965 V8 G10 is back on the circuit after all these years, the G4 is 50 this year, the original G10 road car has been located in the US, again after many, many years. Yes, all good.



Back in 65 on it's first outing at Brands(soft top then), hardly a shake down and Chris Meek blew away the low-drag Coupe E-type (Protheroe's ex car) and won outright. Good old days... back again!

Lovely story about the Ginetta name on the rear of the G10: the Walkletts were 'told off' because they had a tiny 'brake company' sponsor sticker on the car and got a 'remove it or else' from officials. So annoyed were they that they stuck the marque name 12 inches high in bright yellow plastic tape on the rear. Bob Walklett recounted that it caused enormous displeasure among some of the officials. biggrin



Edited by dandarez on Monday 21st March 18:49

Stew2000

2,776 posts

178 months

Monday 21st March 2011
quotequote all
Why is there a Panoz GTLM?

DonkeyApple

55,239 posts

169 months

Monday 21st March 2011
quotequote all
Stew2000 said:
Why is there a Panoz GTLM?
LNT raced a few makes of car prior to purchasing Ginetta.

At one point I think he owned maybe 4(certainly 2) of the T400 racing TVRs and bought the first prototype road T440 from the factory as well.

2mad

180 posts

179 months

Monday 21st March 2011
quotequote all
therealpigdog said:
I love them - but really want them to develop the G50 into a road car. I think there's definitely a market for these, and wish them all the best - Ginetta seem to be doing things right though and concentrating on their core business, which is producing racing cars rather than having pie in the sky aspirations to take over the world. It might be a labour of love, but I can't see LNT failing with Ginetta - it is in safe hands.

Some shots from when I was lucky enough to visit the factory a while back (fantastic experience and thanks to everyone at Ginetta).





like the purple ginetta.

DonkeyApple

55,239 posts

169 months

Monday 21st March 2011
quotequote all
2mad said:
like the purple ginetta.
I guess it could have been a Ginetta if he'd been successful in his attempt to buy TVR. wink

Harry Monk

5,187 posts

237 months

Monday 21st March 2011
quotequote all
otolith said:
Nature abhors a vacuum.

Twincam16

27,646 posts

258 months

Monday 21st March 2011
quotequote all
EDLT said:
julian64 said:
mitch78 said:
julian64 said:
The 95K needs to come down to 50K and then Ginetta will be the new TVR IMHO.
You're right. If they dropped it to ~£50k they would be the new TVR, unable to provide reliable cars for the money and bankrupt in no time.
Nope, TVR were cars that should only have been sold to certain members of the public. They should only have been sold to people who never discussed taking out warrantees, and were never RAC or AA affiliated, and always carried enough tools in the boot to sort 99% of anything that went wrong.

The sort of people who didn't care much about sat navs, the fit of the internal decor, or all the other crap that people to seem to care about today in their vectras and mondeos, but did care about having a decent lightweight package with a decent engine, in other words a car with a bit of character in a sea of crap eurobox monotony.

Small market perhaps in this day and age but probably enough to keep a niche manufacturer alive.
Like Bristol then?
No. I know what he means - TVRs were almost like turnkey kit-cars featuring highly advanced, professional designs. I actually reckon TVR could viably return as a supplier of alternatives to Cobra-style kit cars.

But Bristol - they're massively misunderstood on this site. They're built and trimmed to Rolls-Royce standards, but with high-quality understatement in place of overblown opulence. Nothing like TVR at all.

Back on topic, I like Ginetta a lot. They deserve to do well (if sales are realistic and directed at the right people), possibly stepping into the Elise's shoes if Lotus are determined to go Ferrari-chasing.

DonkeyApple

55,239 posts

169 months

Monday 21st March 2011
quotequote all
Harry Monk said:
otolith said:
Nature abhors a vacuum.
I've been awake for 12 hours and this was the first laugh of the day.

vintageracer01

873 posts

175 months

Monday 21st March 2011
quotequote all
2mad said:
therealpigdog said:
I love them - but really want them to develop the G50 into a road car. I think there's definitely a market for these, and wish them all the best - Ginetta seem to be doing things right though and concentrating on their core business, which is producing racing cars rather than having pie in the sky aspirations to take over the world. It might be a labour of love, but I can't see LNT failing with Ginetta - it is in safe hands.

Some shots from when I was lucky enough to visit the factory a while back (fantastic experience and thanks to everyone at Ginetta).





like the purple ginetta.

lnt

72 posts

246 months

Monday 21st March 2011
quotequote all
Thanks to all PHs for their comments, I follow the comments but don't always comment. I think one of the main difference with Ginetta is that we never want to produce more than 300 cars a year TOTAL including our race cars. The G40 is a brilliant car to drive road and race - I've had a go in both......
The idea of the G40 road car is going back to the days when you could drive your race car to a circuit. The G40 road car has the same safety cage as the 24 hour class winning car..... Not many competitors can do that for £30k ish. It is a track focused car for enthusiast, but you can get all your kit in the boot. I love it.
Thanks for all your support
Lawrence



vintageracer01

873 posts

175 months

Monday 21st March 2011
quotequote all








Ginettas seem to be great cars technically but do they have to appear like a kit car?
The only way small companies can differentiate themselves from competition is with some extraordinary design. Or at least some sophiticated or pretty one.

The only pretty Ginetta I know of is the G3. I do not know who came up with it but it is well proportioned and has a beautiful form.

I have to say the current Ginetta designs look too amateurish and much too conservative.
Cool shapes do not cost much more. One just need more time to think them up and resolve them.
Get customers excited to want one. Great engineering others also can do but the emotions are transported via appearence. Sportcars have to be alluring, outrages or attractive in order to be remembered and stick to mind. It enhances value for money tremendously if I get an exciting shape included in the engineering package.

Just as some examples, this where exciting designs:







Well, I know, it is down to taste of cause, but the current Ginettas do not have anything special and exciting.

Edited by vintageracer01 on Monday 21st March 20:40

Podie

46,630 posts

275 months

Monday 21st March 2011
quotequote all
Disagree - the simple shapes become timeless. I love the classic lines of the G40 and G50.

Let's hope Ginetta succeed where TVR and Marcos failed. Exciting times.