147mph on motorway

Author
Discussion

HantsRat

Original Poster:

2,369 posts

108 months

Monday 22nd January 2018
quotequote all
https://www.hampshire.police.uk/news/general/video...

Only disqualified for 9 months with £325 fine.

vonhosen

40,233 posts

217 months

Monday 22nd January 2018
quotequote all
article said:
PC Foster, from the Joint Roads Policing Unit, said: “We see a lot of things in this job but even I was shocked to see someone driving at such high speeds.
PC Foster needs to get out a bit more.
What were they doing on his driving courses?

anonymous-user

54 months

Monday 22nd January 2018
quotequote all
He gets up to 155 mph at one point. Crikey! It reminds me of driving on an autobahn in the early 90s, with Trabants in the middle lane.

HantsRat

Original Poster:

2,369 posts

108 months

Monday 22nd January 2018
quotequote all
vonhosen said:
PC Foster needs to get out a bit more.
What were they doing on his driving courses?
To be fair in my 7 years as a PC, I have not seen anyone drive that fast on public roads in Hants.

cuprabob

14,614 posts

214 months

Monday 22nd January 2018
quotequote all
vonhosen said:
article said:
PC Foster, from the Joint Roads Policing Unit, said: “We see a lot of things in this job but even I was shocked to see someone driving at such high speeds.
PC Foster needs to get out a bit more.
What were they doing on his driving courses?
Watch out for upcoming BBC Drama spin off from Dr Foster about PC Foster smile

anonymous-user

54 months

Monday 22nd January 2018
quotequote all
"“It is sheer luck that Hornby’s driving that day did not cause a collision"

Really?

Boobonman

5,654 posts

192 months

Monday 22nd January 2018
quotequote all
That’s my patch, got to admit that the footage didn’t look particularly unsafe to me at all.

anonymous-user

54 months

Monday 22nd January 2018
quotequote all
Luck that no collision? I'd say so - The road was quiet but not empty, and all it needed was one car to pull out doing a normal motorway speed and there could have been trouble. Not everyone checks mirrors and not everyone correctly judges the speed of a vehicle approaching from behind, especially as most drivers aren't expecting traffic to be closing at over twice the speed limit.

ashleyman

6,985 posts

99 months

Monday 22nd January 2018
quotequote all
Bloke was driving an S4, Wonder if he was sat on the limiter?

numtumfutunch

4,723 posts

138 months

Monday 22nd January 2018
quotequote all
Breadvan72 said:
Luck that no collision? I'd say so - The road was quiet but not empty, and all it needed was one car to pull out doing a normal motorway speed and there could have been trouble. Not everyone checks mirrors and not everyone correctly judges the speed of a vehicle approaching from behind, especially as most drivers aren't expecting traffic to be closing at over twice the speed limit.
As the lane 2 was occupied by MLM's in that clip its probably safe to hypothesise nobody was going to change lane anytime soon smile

Although he's a bloody idiot for:
a) doing that speed in daylight
b) not being suspicious enough that a car following you over 100mph would be anything other than the police

Cheers

mcg_

1,445 posts

92 months

Monday 22nd January 2018
quotequote all
bit busy to be doing that sort of speed

Funk

26,274 posts

209 months

Monday 22nd January 2018
quotequote all
Just me or did that not look like 100mph speed differential to the truck sat in the inside lane when he passed it?

cmaguire

3,589 posts

109 months

Monday 22nd January 2018
quotequote all
And still cars in the middle lane that should not be.
Why do they feel the need for all the melodrama? 150 there is a piece of cake going by that video yet we're always told it is only by luck that armageddon was avoided

anonymous-user

54 months

Monday 22nd January 2018
quotequote all
You cannot tell how fast the cars in the middle lane are going. At one point the Audi passes two cars that are quite close together in the middle lane. One of those might have decided to overtake the other.

Assume that all the cars in the middle are driven by MLMs. Such drivers might have have poor observational skills and might change lane without warning.

anonymous-user

54 months

Monday 22nd January 2018
quotequote all
One assumes that PC Foster would be of the opinion that it was due to something other than "sheer luck" that his own 150+mph driving didn't cause a fatal accident.

Richard-390a0

2,256 posts

91 months

Monday 22nd January 2018
quotequote all
I'd be happy to reach the dizzying heights of 47mph on the M3 most days... so 147mph would feel like the Millenium Falcon entering warp speed in comparison!!

R8Steve

4,150 posts

175 months

Monday 22nd January 2018
quotequote all
“You can see from the footage just how dangerous it was.

He was not only risking his own life but the lives of other innocent road users and that is unacceptable.

It is sheer luck that Hornby’s driving that day did not cause a collision, because if it had the consequences at that speed would have undoubtedly been fatal.

There is absolutely no excuse for such reckless and totally irresponsible driving and we will take action against those who put lives at risk.”

What, more dangerous and lucky than the guy travelling even faster behind him?

Granted, it is completely irresponsible but i can never understand how the police can come out with such statements when they are doing exactly the same themselves.

vonhosen

40,233 posts

217 months

Monday 22nd January 2018
quotequote all
cmaguire said:
And still cars in the middle lane that should not be.
Why do they feel the need for all the melodrama? 150 there is a piece of cake going by that video yet we're always told it is only by luck that armageddon was avoided
There isn't much drama really.

He was reported with speeding & convicted of speeding.
His choice of speed meant his driving was not appropriate in the view of the state. There was an increase in risk over what there would otherwise have been from a considerably lower choice of speed.
If the prosecution thought it amounted to dangerous driving he'd have been charged with dangerous driving.

cmaguire

3,589 posts

109 months

Monday 22nd January 2018
quotequote all
PC Foster appears to have a somewhat different take. Perhaps he should 'No comment'

R8Steve

4,150 posts

175 months

Monday 22nd January 2018
quotequote all
cmaguire said:
Perhaps he should 'No comment'
That would be the sensible thing to do.

Why anyone thought it was a good idea to let individual police officers have twitter accounts and be allowed to comment on such cases in such a manner i have no idea.