Expensive Squeak

Author
Discussion

DarkMatter

1,473 posts

231 months

Sunday 25th February 2018
quotequote all
Glad to hear there was a happy ending even though it dented your wallet a bit for what turned out to be an unnecessary second opinion.

Bluedot

Original Poster:

3,587 posts

107 months

Sunday 25th February 2018
quotequote all
DarkMatter said:
Glad to hear there was a happy ending even though it dented your wallet a bit for what turned out to be an unnecessary second opinion.
Thanks.
Yeah it's all a bit strange, I can't get my head round it really, especially why the first guy didn't want paying (I transferred him some anyway just out of goodwill).

Nice to get it back and have had a great couple of days out in the sun with it thumbup

jh001ace

615 posts

177 months

Sunday 25th February 2018
quotequote all
Bluedot said:
Picked it up Friday from the first garage and it's all fixed scratchchin
Guy said it was the rollers and didn't want any money, really can't fault him for service like that.
By rights I should go running back to the second garage asking what the hell they were playing at but I just want to put it behind me now and fingers crossed it's all fixed and ok from now on.
If indeed it was the rollers (I guess you mean tensioning rollers by that) how was the noise still there with the belts off?

Bluedot

Original Poster:

3,587 posts

107 months

Sunday 25th February 2018
quotequote all
jh001ace said:
If indeed it was the rollers (I guess you mean tensioning rollers by that) how was the noise still there with the belts off?
No idea, someone is either telling porkies or woefully bad at their job.
Happy to just get it back now and hopefully fixed for good.

jh001ace

615 posts

177 months

Sunday 25th February 2018
quotequote all
Great news that all is now fixed....and relax....

DJMC

3,438 posts

103 months

Sunday 25th February 2018
quotequote all
jh001ace said:
If indeed it was the rollers (I guess you mean tensioning rollers by that) how was the noise still there with the belts off?
I wouldn't have sent him money when I certainly wouldn't be using a liar again! Rollers indeed...

sundayjumper

529 posts

282 months

Monday 26th February 2018
quotequote all
DJMC said:
I wouldn't have sent him money when I certainly wouldn't be using a liar again! Rollers indeed...
I've re-read this thread twice and I think the first guy actually came good ? Sorted it FOC in the end. Which I guess means it must have been something fairly simple.

It's the second bunch that I'd be avoiding. £348 to not find the squeak, and apparently lie about it still being present when the belt was removed, and ask for a further £1400+VAT as a starting point for further work ! That's pretty shocking.


CaineIsCarter

78 posts

74 months

Monday 26th February 2018
quotequote all
sundayjumper said:
I've re-read this thread twice and I think the first guy actually came good ? Sorted it FOC in the end. Which I guess means it must have been something fairly simple.

It's the second bunch that I'd be avoiding. £348 to not find the squeak, and apparently lie about it still being present when the belt was removed, and ask for a further £1400+VAT as a starting point for further work ! That's pretty shocking.
That’s what I was thinking...

To the OP - glad it’s all sorted.

Bluedot

Original Poster:

3,587 posts

107 months

Monday 26th February 2018
quotequote all
CaineIsCarter said:
sundayjumper said:
I've re-read this thread twice and I think the first guy actually came good ? Sorted it FOC in the end. Which I guess means it must have been something fairly simple.

It's the second bunch that I'd be avoiding. £348 to not find the squeak, and apparently lie about it still being present when the belt was removed, and ask for a further £1400+VAT as a starting point for further work ! That's pretty shocking.
That’s what I was thinking...

To the OP - glad it’s all sorted.
Yep, thats the way it was, the first guy came good.

Thanks to all for the messages and advice. thumbup