Why isn't there more turbo/supercharger conversions?

Why isn't there more turbo/supercharger conversions?

Author
Discussion

anonymous-user

54 months

Wednesday 13th June 2018
quotequote all
Boosting a mid-engine car is only likely to end in a pile of trouble. Adequate cooling is virtually impossible unless you get into substantial body modifications.

Look how much bigger the side scoops are on a 718 compared with 981, even though 718 has a physically smaller engine and isn't even being asked to deliver big power.

ajondyh

681 posts

124 months

Wednesday 13th June 2018
quotequote all
Slippydiff said:
Buy or try one, then come back and tell us if you think it is/you are missing 100-150hp, I'm doubtful you will. If however you do, you'd be better off buying a 718 and remapping that, rather than wasting your money (imo) bolting a turbo or a supercharger onto a 981.
IF you're that much of horsepower junkie, I'd fit a 3.8 engine into a 981 and tune it, but don't think for one moment a big engined or forced induction 981 will be easy to sell come resale time, or that you'll get back ANY of the money you've "invested" in the conversion.
I don't agree with all your posts but this one is spot on wink

VladD

7,855 posts

265 months

Thursday 14th June 2018
quotequote all
rockin said:
Boosting a mid-engine car is only likely to end in a pile of trouble. Adequate cooling is virtually impossible unless you get into substantial body modifications.

Look how much bigger the side scoops are on a 718 compared with 981, even though 718 has a physically smaller engine and isn't even being asked to deliver big power.
I've had my 987.1 Boxster turbo for over four years and I've never had any cooling problems. Mine is a daily driver though, so maybe I don't drive it hard enough for long enough periods for it to become an issue. I'll have to take it on a track day at some point to see how it gets on.

Porsche911R

21,146 posts

265 months

Thursday 14th June 2018
quotequote all
Slippydiff said:
Might as well have been 4300 Torques,
Describe the handling characteristics. Actually don’t, I’ll do it for you...

Driven gently : Mild understeer.

Driven spiritedly : Understeer.

Driven as it’s maker intended : Terminal understeer.

Haldex ? I’ll take a proper front wheel drive car over a Haldex equipped car ANy day of the week.

For someone who bangs on about hating understeer David, you’re giving a lot of praise to a car renowned (even in its latest, light block 400hp version) for being utterly dull (and understeery) to drive (from a handling dynamics perspective)

I’d take an M2 or a 718 S EVERY time.
OP wants off the line and straight line performance, as did I at the time, my car did not under steer in fact under power it over steered.

As I said I did vmax events , its pretty straight line ;-) some times one needs a bit of poke to try, the TTRS is the best / cheapest way to get it.

A unmappped car is night and day over a remapped one as is one with standard geo etc.

remember I had mine way back 8 or 9 years a go, nothing else like it, it would out drag a mk1 Nissan GTR.

I loved it at the time, but after 2 years I got over the speed thing.

Slippydiff

14,828 posts

223 months

Thursday 14th June 2018
quotequote all
Porsche911R said:
I loved it at the time, but after 2 years I got over the speed thing.
Am I to understand you're a Gen 2 991 GT3 owner now ? scratchchin

pp3355

8 posts

95 months

Sunday 17th June 2018
quotequote all
because you buy a cayman for the NA tune engine

VladD

7,855 posts

265 months

Sunday 17th June 2018
quotequote all
pp3355 said:
because you buy a cayman for the NA tune engine
Apart from those people that don't. My neighbours wife has a Cayman and I bet she doesn't even know if it's NA or turbo.

bcr5784

7,109 posts

145 months

Monday 18th June 2018
quotequote all
pp3355 said:
because you buy a cayman for the NA tune engine
Personally bought it mainly for the chassis. I (much) prefer the more linear power delivery of the (supercharged) Evora 410. Lag is never an issue with a supercharger - its just like an NA engine with higher air pressure - like an NA engine on a good day.
That said I think that heat would be difficult to manage with either a turbo or supercharger.
And it would make the car very hard to sell.

Bullet-Proof_Biscuit

1,058 posts

77 months

Sunday 7th June 2020
quotequote all
I might build one for my next project. Considered a 987 3.4 with a borked engine and diy rebuild, but then there's not must money in it if I were to buy a sound 2.7 (thicker barrels) croc, and fit a low pressure turbo install, the space is there for the turbo, scavenge pump, charge cooler, standard manifolds retained just need a Y pipe, that's £2k of hardware and some fabrication, say £2k for ecu & mapping and thats £4k build costs on a leggy 2.7 which might be £8k these days? General maintenance asside (I'd buy a 'dooer upper' regardless. Then I'm £12k in which is 3.4 money but less score issues. Granted it'll be more stressed but nothing more radiators and an air/oil cooler can't fix.

I'll go and hide now lol. (And start a build thread.. hehehe)

HH