981S vs 718 base

Author
Discussion

johnbear

1,567 posts

235 months

Friday 28th December 2018
quotequote all
Just traded in a 981 3.4s against a 991 turbo s, but due to an issue I have had a 718s as a loan car for a week I believe if you have not owned a 981, then the 718 is a great car. Probably the best new sub £100k convertible.
As 981'er I missed the unbelievable 6 cylinder sound - we were spoilt. I always though the 981 needed more power as the handling was so impressive. However, I believe the lighter 718 with more power isn't as stable as 981. It's near impossible off track to get 981 to break loose, but it's alarmingly easy to get the back out in a corner with a 718S. I was always front of the pact with tours as I never had to consider if it would slide, just floored it.
The 981S with PDK and PASM s a perfect point in time car but times and emissions regs change.
If your buying a 718 get PASM as the normal suspension is too hard, oh, get PDK as well.

Bob-2146

286 posts

72 months

Saturday 29th December 2018
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Ever so slightly. But also a price worth paying as it’s better...

CastroSays

182 posts

76 months

Saturday 29th December 2018
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
LOLOLOL - Better if you want wallet-raped by your OPC - paying more money for 33% less engine......

Basaltbox

21 posts

67 months

Saturday 29th December 2018
quotequote all
Amazing how a balanced post prompts the usual 718 bashing

JayK12

2,324 posts

202 months

Saturday 29th December 2018
quotequote all
718 owners people like the 718
981 owners people like the 981.

No surprises there.

I got the 981 out after 2 months, and you forget how loud it is when firing up in the garage (daily drives are 330e Msport/Macan). Then you start with the whole manual thing, feels great after 2 months of autos.

I agree though the 981 isn't fast, it's not slow either but in today's performance it's not really that fast. I only took it for fuel the other night as planning to go Wales tomorrow morning but wasn't pushing it, I came back longing for a fast straight line car, as that's all I drove. But it wouldn't be a 718 because that doesn't feel any faster and I don't like the characteristics of the engine which is most important for me, but an R8 V10 does. However when I drove the car in the twisties where straight line speed isn't really noticed I'll love it. Is there any perfect car?

Maybe 718 Spyder Manual will hit the spot.

Either way enjoy your cars whatever you own!






Edited by JayK12 on Saturday 29th December 15:28

Basaltbox

21 posts

67 months

Saturday 29th December 2018
quotequote all
Lovely looking car !

testdrive_tv

2,908 posts

195 months

Monday 31st December 2018
quotequote all
I liked this topic so much that I made a video.

Ever wondered how the 718 2.0 compares against the 981s 3.4?

Clicking subscribe would mean a lot. Thanks guys.

https://youtu.be/afKLty1i62I




jonttt

681 posts

171 months

Tuesday 1st January 2019
quotequote all
Great video covering the main points with logical comments ;-)

Bob-2146

286 posts

72 months

Tuesday 1st January 2019
quotequote all
And here’s another view by a 981 owner upgrading to a 718... except this one’s not endorsed by Jontt... wink

https://www.planet-9.com/718-chat/235097-first-imp...

bcr5784

7,109 posts

145 months

Wednesday 2nd January 2019
quotequote all
jonttt said:
Great video covering the main points with logical comments ;-)
+1

jonttt

681 posts

171 months

Wednesday 2nd January 2019
quotequote all
Bob-2146 said:
And here’s another view by a 981 owner upgrading to a 718... except this one’s not endorsed by Jontt... wink

https://www.planet-9.com/718-chat/235097-first-imp...
That review lost me when it stated “I am not feeling any 'dreaded' lag.” ie I buy sports cars to drive on B roads not motorways and traffic light Grand Prix lol

Anyone who states they have not experienced lag in a 718 either does not know what lag is or does not drive a sports car as it is meant to be driven IMHO.

Nb that’s not to say that lag should stop you from liking the car if FI is your thing but to say you have not experienced it discredits any review IMHO. Because of that I did not really read the rest of the article but I also presume from the reviewers comments that he does not cover issues with the sound of the 4 pot either (I guess he does not experience that either lol)

Bob-2146

286 posts

72 months

Wednesday 2nd January 2019
quotequote all
jonttt said:
Bob-2146 said:
And here’s another view by a 981 owner upgrading to a 718... except this one’s not endorsed by Jontt... wink

https://www.planet-9.com/718-chat/235097-first-imp...
That review lost me when it stated “I am not feeling any 'dreaded' lag.” ie I buy sports cars to drive on B roads not motorways and traffic light Grand Prix lol

Anyone who states they have not experienced lag in a 718 either does not know what lag is or does not drive a sports car as it is meant to be driven IMHO.

Nb that’s not to say that lag should stop you from liking the car if FI is your thing but to say you have not experienced it discredits any review IMHO. Because of that I did not really read the rest of the article but I also presume from the reviewers comments that he does not cover issues with the sound of the 4 pot either (I guess he does not experience that either lol)
Hi Jon, I think what he actually said is "Net net, I am not feeling any 'dreaded' lag" vs the 981 which "always had a bit of a flat spot off idle to about 1900-2,000".





Twinfan

10,125 posts

104 months

Wednesday 2nd January 2019
quotequote all
My thoughts exactly. No lag and no comment on the sound? Really?

Bob-2146

286 posts

72 months

Wednesday 2nd January 2019
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
I did not write the review, but different concepts can exhibit similar characteristics. Saying they exhibit similar characteristics in the low revs "net net" is a little different to claiming that lag does not exist.


bcr5784

7,109 posts

145 months

Wednesday 2nd January 2019
quotequote all
Bob-2146 said:
Hi Jon, I think what he actually said is "Net net, I am not feeling any 'dreaded' lag" vs the 981 which "always had a bit of a flat spot off idle to about 1900-2,000".
I can only say that I don't feel the comments are coherent . The 718 clearly has quite a lot of lag until around 3000 rpm. My 981S didn't have a flat spot below 2000 revs which you could detect with PDK in auto (however it does go a bit flat if you exceed half throttle at those revs in "manual" - but PDK changes down at those throttle openings so you wouldn't notice it unless you drive "manual") So I think he is allowing pdk to drive round the lag of the 718 - which is pretty dire as others have pointed out below 2000 revs - but exaggerating a much more minor issue a the same revs with the 981 (or at least with my 981)

anonymous-user

54 months

Wednesday 2nd January 2019
quotequote all
bcr5784 said:
The 718 clearly has quite a lot of lag until around 3000 rpm.
Not the ones I've driven.

bcr5784 said:
My 981S didn't have a flat spot below 2000 revs
That's odd, because my 918S is flat as a pancake unless you rev its nuts off.

bcr5784 said:
I think he is allowing pdk to drive round the lag of the 718
Be fair, PDK is just as good at driving around 918's lack of torque as it is at driving around 718's characteristics. However, I don't favour auto in this type of car so mine's a manual.

Base 718 with PDK looks great performance/value for money IMO.

testdrive_tv

2,908 posts

195 months

Wednesday 2nd January 2019
quotequote all
bcr5784 said:
jonttt said:
Great video covering the main points with logical comments ;-)
+1
Thanks to both of you.

Re the lag debate, it's there I assure you, but it's going to impact the enjoyment of the enthusiastic drivers more than the types commuting down the motorway, for that reason I feel there will always be a debate around it.

bcr5784

7,109 posts

145 months

Thursday 3rd January 2019
quotequote all
rockin said:
bcr5784 said:
The 718 clearly has quite a lot of lag until around 3000 rpm.
Not the ones I've driven.

bcr5784 said:
My 981S didn't have a flat spot below 2000 revs
That's odd, because my 918S is flat as a pancake unless you rev its nuts off.

bcr5784 said:
I think he is allowing pdk to drive round the lag of the 718
Be fair, PDK is just as good at driving around 918's lack of torque as it is at driving around 718's characteristics. However, I don't favour auto in this type of car so mine's a manual.

Base 718 with PDK looks great performance/value for money IMO.
While I'd certainly agree that allowing PDK to disguise the dip in the torque curve in the 918 between 2500 and 4000 (my personal beef with the 981) is not notionally different from allowing it to disguise lag in the (say) 2500- 3000 region in the 718, it's very different in the 1900-2000 region mentioned. In that region (manual or auto) the 918 is perfectly pleasant at "toodling". The 718 on the other hand has a lot of lag that PDK can't disguise and a thoroughly agricultural transition from off boost to on.

Regarding performance, I'd certainly agree that the base 718 has enough performance to make the case for the S much weaker than in the 918 era. To call it a performance bargain is stretching a point. It now has similar performance to other contenders at a similar price point - M2, Alpine, if a bit behind the TT. Previously the base 981 was well behind the competition in outright performance.


Edited by bcr5784 on Thursday 3rd January 08:44

Bob-2146

286 posts

72 months

Thursday 3rd January 2019
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
The bottom line is that neither car is within the power band in the low revs. That the 718's kicks in much earlier is generally seen as a benefit except amongst the NA F6 die hards.

anonymous-user

54 months

Thursday 3rd January 2019
quotequote all
Bob-2146 said:
That the 718's kicks in much earlier is generally seen as a benefit except amongst the NA F6 die hards.
^^^ This