Lawsuit: Ferrari has device to reset odometers?

Lawsuit: Ferrari has device to reset odometers?

Author
Discussion

WDISMYL

Original Poster:

235 posts

87 months

Tuesday 28th February 2017
quotequote all

Yipper

5,964 posts

90 months

Tuesday 28th February 2017
quotequote all
About 1 in 10 of all cars (all brands) are clocked in the UK. It is fairly widespread. Leased cars are seeing a lot of it at the moment. Leasers rent a car for, say, 10k miles over two years, run it up to 20k miles, and then a man in a van with a laptop pops round the week before handback and OBDs it back down to 9950 miles.

Camlet

1,132 posts

149 months

Tuesday 28th February 2017
quotequote all
Not foolproof, but I keep my service books properly stamped with the recorded mileage. I wouldn't buy any Ferrari without a detailed and credible service book.

Plus on cars like the F50, I understand a mechanic can see the miles/kms delivered by each gear. I'm sure if someone wants to check on other cars there's ways of doing so.

The laugh is, some new owners are happy to turn a blind eye. Yes, they'd rather pay more in the comfort their new Ferrari has only "delivery miles".




MitchT

15,850 posts

209 months

Tuesday 28th February 2017
quotequote all
"Lawsuit: Ferrari has device to reset odometers?"

No biggie. Every man and his dog could lay their hands on such a device if they were so inclined. "Mileage correction" devices are credible enough tools when used correctly, i.e., setting the correct mileage on a car if the device displaying the mileage has been replaced, but is obviously open to abuse.

"If these accusations are indeed true, it means the mileage of any late-model Ferrari is in question"

Clocking Ferraris is as old as the hills. It isn't just late models. Buy on condition.

Camlet said:
I wouldn't buy any Ferrari without a detailed and credible service book.
This and a thorough independent inspection. Then ignore the mileage - assume it's inaccurate - and buy on condition.

WDISMYL

Original Poster:

235 posts

87 months

Tuesday 28th February 2017
quotequote all
I agree but that shouldn't give owner's the idea that clocking is acceptable - "just make sure the car is in great condition". It is fraud and if it is true that 10% or higher are clocking their cars then the crime isn't being taken seriously enough.


MitchT

15,850 posts

209 months

Tuesday 28th February 2017
quotequote all
I agree, but it's humorously suggested among Ferrari communities that pretty much every used Ferrari out there has been clocked as values are so mileage sensitive. Not condoning it, just saying it's a part of the landscape and that seasoned Ferrari buyers generally factor it into their due diligence.

PixelpeepS3

8,600 posts

142 months

Tuesday 28th February 2017
quotequote all
please.... ferris bueller was doing this in the 80's

Durzel

12,256 posts

168 months

Tuesday 28th February 2017
quotequote all
Will wait to see what comes of the lawsuit really, if anything.

As has been said above Ferraris are very mileage sensitive. On a LaFerrari, per the allegation, the difference in value between sub-1000 miles and 10k+ would, I'm sure, run into several hundred thousand pounds. In that context, and even with lesser margins you can see why it's such big business.

As the guy said above it's taken as read by anyone looking at these cars that this is the landscape you're dealing with.

ferrisbueller

29,314 posts

227 months

Tuesday 28th February 2017
quotequote all
PixelpeepS3 said:
please.... ferris bueller was doing this in the 80's
He fking was not.

v8ksn

4,711 posts

184 months

Tuesday 28th February 2017
quotequote all
Its a little more complex than a bloke with a laptop hitting zero....

http://jalopnik.com/ferrari-accused-of-allowing-il...

Article states..... The nature of the Ferrari DEIS Tester itself suggests that any actions undertaken using the DEIS Tester tool was not simply the choice of the local dealership, Ferrari of Palm Beach, because each use of the tool requires online authorization from Ferrari. In other words, this was systemic, not isolated.


PixelpeepS3

8,600 posts

142 months

Tuesday 28th February 2017
quotequote all
ferrisbueller said:
PixelpeepS3 said:
please.... ferris bueller was doing this in the 80's
He fking was not.
laugh

jtremlett

1,375 posts

222 months

Tuesday 28th February 2017
quotequote all
v8ksn said:
Its a little more complex than a bloke with a laptop hitting zero....

http://jalopnik.com/ferrari-accused-of-allowing-il...

Article states..... The nature of the Ferrari DEIS Tester itself suggests that any actions undertaken using the DEIS Tester tool was not simply the choice of the local dealership, Ferrari of Palm Beach, because each use of the tool requires online authorization from Ferrari. In other words, this was systemic, not isolated.
It is very important to note that this is an accusation that hasn't yet gone to court or in any way been proven and it is very hard to see what Ferrari could possibly gain if it were true. So I strongly suggest reserving judgement until further details emerge.

Jonathan

Terminator X

15,031 posts

204 months

Tuesday 28th February 2017
quotequote all


TX.

v8ksn

4,711 posts

184 months

Tuesday 28th February 2017
quotequote all
jtremlett said:
t is very important to note that this is an accusation that hasn't yet gone to court or in any way been proven and it is very hard to see what Ferrari could possibly gain if it were true. So I strongly suggest reserving judgement until further details emerge.

Jonathan
I agree its only an accusation at the moment with nothing proved but as for it being 'very hard to see what Ferrari could possibly gain' I disagree. Surely having low mileage cars in their dealership network to help keep the prices of used models high (or even very close to retail price) can only be beneficial to Ferrari.

Durzel

12,256 posts

168 months

Tuesday 28th February 2017
quotequote all
jtremlett said:
t is very important to note that this is an accusation that hasn't yet gone to court or in any way been proven and it is very hard to see what Ferrari could possibly gain if it were true. So I strongly suggest reserving judgement until further details emerge.
Especially as, in the States at least, "odometer fraud" is illegal so if Ferrari were advising dealers formally to do this then they'd be potentially landing themselves in some hot water.

Over here clocking isn't illegal, but misrepresenting the mileage of a vehicle is, though one wonders what the point of clocking is if not to misrepresent. confused

sone

4,587 posts

238 months

Thursday 2nd March 2017
quotequote all
Ferrari world is rife with this sort of thing, I mean you'd think they start going backward at 25k miles automatically. I know of a 360 that's up for sale with a reputable dealer and 3 years or so ago it had little if any service record, it had stood still for the last 7 years serviced twice. Roll forward to very recently glowing report on dealers website with full documented history, stamped service history the lot!
How's that happen then?

SpeckledJim

31,608 posts

253 months

Friday 3rd March 2017
quotequote all
jtremlett said:
v8ksn said:
Its a little more complex than a bloke with a laptop hitting zero....

http://jalopnik.com/ferrari-accused-of-allowing-il...

Article states..... The nature of the Ferrari DEIS Tester itself suggests that any actions undertaken using the DEIS Tester tool was not simply the choice of the local dealership, Ferrari of Palm Beach, because each use of the tool requires online authorization from Ferrari. In other words, this was systemic, not isolated.
It is very important to note that this is an accusation that hasn't yet gone to court or in any way been proven and it is very hard to see what Ferrari could possibly gain if it were true. So I strongly suggest reserving judgement until further details emerge.

Jonathan
Nobody wants to buy a 70k 10 year old Ferrari. But that's what they all actually are.

Everybody wants to buy a 30k 10 year old Ferrari. So that's what everyone conspires to create. Owners, dealers, next owners. It's in nobody's interest to rock the boat, and everybody's interest that it continue.

100 IAN

1,091 posts

162 months

Friday 3rd March 2017
quotequote all
Back in the early noughties F40's were circa £150k and all had circa 20k on the clock, there were some with 25-30k on the clock.

Today they're what....£800k and pretty much all have 5-10k on the clock. I can't remember the last time I saw one advertised with 20k miles(!)

Perhaps low mileage ones are crap so people want to get rid of them, but high mileage ones are better and so owners want to keep them....?

....or maybe not!

lol!

Bo_apex

2,534 posts

218 months

Saturday 4th March 2017
quotequote all
SpeckledJim said:
Nobody wants to buy a 70k 10 year old Ferrari. But that's what they all actually are.
Engines and running gear are not made of chocolate. Plenty of happy owners with mileage way past 100K. Regular maintenance is the significant factor.


ferrisbueller

29,314 posts

227 months

Saturday 4th March 2017
quotequote all
SpeckledJim said:
Nobody wants to buy a 70k 10 year old Ferrari. But that's what they all actually are.

Everybody wants to buy a 30k 10 year old Ferrari. So that's what everyone conspires to create. Owners, dealers, next owners. It's in nobody's interest to rock the boat, and everybody's interest that it continue.
My, that's a broad brush you're wielding there.