Forghieri speaks on the Glickenhaus car

Forghieri speaks on the Glickenhaus car

Author
Discussion

astroarcadia

1,710 posts

200 months

Sunday 15th May 2016
quotequote all
I'm sure this debate is now a matter of principal for those involved but can somebody break this down to level 1 for me...

If the Glickenhaus car is the Daytona winner what is the uplift in value with this added provenance?


miurasv

Original Poster:

458 posts

209 months

Sunday 15th May 2016
quotequote all
astroarcadia said:
I'm sure this debate is now a matter of principal for those involved but can somebody break this down to level 1 for me...

If the Glickenhaus car is the Daytona winner what is the uplift in value with this added provenance?
Have you read my post of earlier today?

4rephill

5,040 posts

178 months

Sunday 15th May 2016
quotequote all
ferrisbueller said:
miurasv said:
Blah
Would you mind clarifying what your interest is here please?
He seems to get some sort of obsessive pleasure in hounding Napolis at every opportunity, determined to prove to World somehow that Napolis is some sort of evil, lying conman when it comes to his car collection and make his life a misery! (He did exactly the same thing on Ferrarichat.com [where there was a suggestion of a hidden agenda being involved] ) - It's quite sad really!

Why Napolis has continued to have any interaction with him whatsoever is beyond Me in all honesty - I'd have ignored him years ago and just got on and enjoyed My car collection if I were Napolis, because life's just too short for this scensoredt!


astroarcadia

1,710 posts

200 months

Sunday 15th May 2016
quotequote all
miurasv said:
Have you read my post of earlier today?
Yes.

miurasv

Original Poster:

458 posts

209 months

Monday 16th May 2016
quotequote all
4rephill said:
He seems to get some sort of obsessive pleasure in hounding Napolis at every opportunity, determined to prove to World somehow that Napolis is some sort of evil, lying conman when it comes to his car collection and make his life a misery! (He did exactly the same thing on Ferrarichat.com [where there was a suggestion of a hidden agenda being involved] ) - It's quite sad really!

Why Napolis has continued to have any interaction with him whatsoever is beyond Me in all honesty - I'd have ignored him years ago and just got on and enjoyed My car collection if I were Napolis, because life's just too short for this scensoredt!
You are absolutely wrong. My only interest is in Ferrari History not being distorted. However there is an example of Mr Glickenhaus's lying on the 11th of May about the engine mountings on his chassis in the pic/text attached below.




Silent1

19,761 posts

235 months

Monday 16th May 2016
quotequote all
4rephill said:
ferrisbueller said:
miurasv said:
Blah
Would you mind clarifying what your interest is here please?
He seems to get some sort of obsessive pleasure in hounding Napolis at every opportunity, determined to prove to World somehow that Napolis is some sort of evil, lying conman when it comes to his car collection and make his life a misery! (He did exactly the same thing on Ferrarichat.com [where there was a suggestion of a hidden agenda being involved] ) - It's quite sad really!

Why Napolis has continued to have any interaction with him whatsoever is beyond Me in all honesty - I'd have ignored him years ago and just got on and enjoyed My car collection if I were Napolis, because life's just too short for this scensoredt!
He also appears to enjoy harassing an old man in Italy and constantly harassing/bullying him into changing his mind at every turn, whatever his issue is I do find it to be disgusting the amount of contact he has whenever forghieri says something not in line with his narrative.

Silent1

19,761 posts

235 months

Monday 16th May 2016
quotequote all
miurasv said:
4rephill said:
He seems to get some sort of obsessive pleasure in hounding Napolis at every opportunity, determined to prove to World somehow that Napolis is some sort of evil, lying conman when it comes to his car collection and make his life a misery! (He did exactly the same thing on Ferrarichat.com [where there was a suggestion of a hidden agenda being involved] ) - It's quite sad really!

Why Napolis has continued to have any interaction with him whatsoever is beyond Me in all honesty - I'd have ignored him years ago and just got on and enjoyed My car collection if I were Napolis, because life's just too short for this scensoredt!
You are absolutely wrong. My only interest is in Ferrari History not being distorted. However there is an example of Mr Glickenhaus's lying on the 11th of May about the engine mountings on his chassis in the pic/text attached below.



This is obsessive, as in mentally unwell to be stalking someone.

topjay

775 posts

218 months

Monday 16th May 2016
quotequote all
(Pantomime voice on) Oh no he didn't! (much laughter)


camshafted

938 posts

165 months

Monday 16th May 2016
quotequote all
This is continuing on the Ferrari Chat forum as well, where there are almost 8,000 posts!

ferrisbueller

29,317 posts

227 months

Monday 16th May 2016
quotequote all
And he still won't tell us what his interest is.

Weird doesn't begin to cover it.

Petrus1983

8,687 posts

162 months

Monday 16th May 2016
quotequote all
This really is the thread that keeps giving laugh

I heard on the grapevine that the car in question has never even been to Italy and was infact made from the first Model T Ford painted in red - I have loads of documentation to prove it, but I'm not prepared to share it.

Burwood

18,709 posts

246 months

Monday 16th May 2016
quotequote all
ferrisbueller said:
And he still won't tell us what his interest is.

Weird doesn't begin to cover it.
It's pretty obvious to me even though I think he's a dick

miurasv

Original Poster:

458 posts

209 months

Tuesday 19th July 2016
quotequote all
Just bringing this thread up to date for those interested. Proof has now been found in the form of photographs by the noted photo journalist Karl Ludvigsen of the real Ferrari P3/P4 0846 at Daytona in 1967 that it had the engine mountings properly converted to have perfect engine mounts to fit the P4 engine. The real 0846 did not retain its P3 engine mounts, or "vestigial P3 engine mountings" as Mr Glickenhaus likes to call them, when it was converted to P4 as he maintains. Mr Glickenhaus's car does not even have P3 engine mounts.

miurasv

Original Poster:

458 posts

209 months

Tuesday 19th July 2016
quotequote all

miurasv

Original Poster:

458 posts

209 months

Tuesday 19th July 2016
quotequote all
The picture of the 0846 stamp is a blow up of the picture above. You can see that these pictures are of the same car. Details including the scratches and marks on the tube with the stamp on prove it.



Edited by miurasv on Tuesday 19th July 13:55

miurasv

Original Poster:

458 posts

209 months

Tuesday 19th July 2016
quotequote all


Compare the right forward side engine mounting on the Glickenhaus car above with the real 0846 pictured at Daytona 1967. They are clearly not the same. The captions on the above picture are Mr Glickenhaus's disproved explanations of how the engine mountings identify his car as 0846.

miurasv

Original Poster:

458 posts

209 months

Tuesday 19th July 2016
quotequote all


You can see that the mount on the real 0846 pictured at Daytona 1967 is the same as the one on P4 0858 with the large bolt hole.

anonymous-user

54 months

Tuesday 19th July 2016
quotequote all
OP, you really do need to sit in a dark, cool room and chill.

This is not healthy!

miurasv

Original Poster:

458 posts

209 months

Tuesday 19th July 2016
quotequote all


In this picture, which is Mr Glickenhaus's own picture from his 0846 on line pdf, you can see his car chassis DP0003 from the back. Please ignore the red circles and arrows in this picture.

Edited by miurasv on Tuesday 19th July 18:55

miurasv

Original Poster:

458 posts

209 months

Tuesday 19th July 2016
quotequote all


This picture with the yellow circle and yellow arrows is a blow up of the one in the last post of the left hand side rear engine mount. Within the yellow circle, the arrow pointing down is at the angled bracket to compensate for the engine mounting not lining up with the chassis engine mount. The arrow pointing up is where the angled bracket actually bolts to the engine.