Tesla S - or - Why can't everybody else...?

Tesla S - or - Why can't everybody else...?

Author
Discussion

TooMany2cvs

Original Poster:

29,008 posts

126 months

Tuesday 17th December 2013
quotequote all
Kawasicki said:
The competence of engineers doesn't change much from company to company. Whether or not the management listens to them really, really does.
So every other senior management within the entire motor industry is so massively incompetent as to close-on triple the cost of a development project?

swisstoni

16,977 posts

279 months

Tuesday 17th December 2013
quotequote all
Apart from the stunning tech, what amazes me is that the styling of the thing is so good.
Most newcomers can't get this right and even the Famous Names get it very wrong a lot of the time.

Kawasicki

13,079 posts

235 months

Tuesday 17th December 2013
quotequote all
TooMany2cvs said:
Kawasicki said:
The competence of engineers doesn't change much from company to company. Whether or not the management listens to them really, really does.
So every other senior management within the entire motor industry is so massively incompetent as to close-on triple the cost of a development project?
It's not individual incompentence as such...it's systematic/political/structural. I would say that costs are easily doubled. Easily.

Engineer says "A will NEVER work, B will"
Management say "Well A is all we can afford, so make it work"
A doesn't work. Then the A redesign starts, it still doesn't work. It goes on and on and on, like some crazy comedy. Get the experts in, they say "do B". So that's it decided then. B. How much money/time wasted?


TooMany2cvs

Original Poster:

29,008 posts

126 months

Tuesday 17th December 2013
quotequote all
swisstoni said:
Apart from the stunning tech, what amazes me is that the styling of the thing is so good.
Most newcomers can't get this right and even the Famous Names get it very wrong a lot of the time.
It's a bit cut'n'paste. Jag XF arse, Maserati nose, all finished with a Vauxhall grille with an Audi bar through it?

Kawasicki

13,079 posts

235 months

Tuesday 17th December 2013
quotequote all
Beefmeister said:
That's possibly the best thing I've read on PH this year. Have a big, manly internet high five.
Why, thanks!...awkward high five back at you....woo hoo!

Beefmeister

16,482 posts

230 months

Tuesday 17th December 2013
quotequote all
Kawasicki said:
Beefmeister said:
That's possibly the best thing I've read on PH this year. Have a big, manly internet high five.
Why, thanks!...awkward high five back at you....woo hoo!
No problem. I've worked for 12 different OEMs in my career as a design engineer and that statement rings very, very true.

Except Italy. The engineers in the Fiat Group building in Turin are 85% lazy talentlesss f**kwits trading off a family name or similar, then there are 15% absolute goddam geniuses. Maestros with a mouse and a CAD package. hehe

Kawasicki

13,079 posts

235 months

Tuesday 17th December 2013
quotequote all
Beefmeister said:
No problem. I've worked for 12 different OEMs in my career as a design engineer and that statement rings very, very true.

Except Italy. The engineers in the Fiat Group building in Turin are 85% lazy talentlesss f**kwits trading off a family name or similar, then there are 15% absolute goddam geniuses. Maestros with a mouse and a CAD package. hehe
One of mu colleagues is ex Fiat Group, he left, he was(is) one of the 15%. Yes, he is a genius. Makes life fun.

TransverseTight

753 posts

145 months

Tuesday 17th December 2013
quotequote all
TooMany2cvs said:
Clivey said:
I wouldn't compare it to a petrol
By which, of course, you mean "petrol or diesel". Well, them's the only choices. So by not comparing it to one, you're not comparing it to anything.

Clivey said:
they depreciate because of UK fuel costs, tax etc. etc
No, they depreciate because people won't pay the same for an old car as a new one. The UK isn't really comparable to other countries because we sit on the wrong side of the car to make used cars internationally portable, which is what props used values up in other European countries.

Clivey said:
and the people looking at this in the UK will typically be comparing it to rivals like the top-of-the-range diesel Germans. - The residuals of those are much higher than the petrol equivalents.
Small detail - a high-spec 10yo diesel 5-series is still only worth a small proportion of that pre-payment towards the new battery.

Anyway, they aren't.
Of 236 petrol 10yo+ 5-series on Autotrader, only one is over £5k (excluding the armoured one...). Only six are between £4k and £5k.
Of 97 diesel 10yo+ 5-series on Autotrader, only one is over £5k. Only seven are between £4k and £5k.

But, whilst this is all interesting, it gets away from the original question...

How come Tesla can develop a complete, seemingly ground-breaking and excellent car for a fraction of what the mainstream spend to develop a ho-hum same-old-same-old platform alone?

Edited by TooMany2cvs on Sunday 15th December 18:26
The other point is you have to compare it to a petrol if you want like for like power and performance. The 740d had only 300 bhp and 0-60 of 6.2 whilst the base Tesla has over 340 and 0-60 of 5.2.

pthelazyjourno

1,848 posts

169 months

Wednesday 18th December 2013
quotequote all
Interesting (if lightweight) overview of some of Tesla's income. $400m government loan, selling off tax credits for making 'green' cars to other OEMs, lots of different revenue streams outside of the cars they make.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/joannmuller/2013/05/11...

swisstoni

16,977 posts

279 months

Wednesday 18th December 2013
quotequote all
TooMany2cvs said:
swisstoni said:
Apart from the stunning tech, what amazes me is that the styling of the thing is so good.
Most newcomers can't get this right and even the Famous Names get it very wrong a lot of the time.
It's a bit cut'n'paste. Jag XF arse, Maserati nose, all finished with a Vauxhall grille with an Audi bar through it?
Sounds easy doesn't it.

SrMoreno

546 posts

146 months

Wednesday 18th December 2013
quotequote all
pthelazyjourno said:
Interesting (if lightweight) overview of some of Tesla's income. $400m government loan, selling off tax credits for making 'green' cars to other OEMs, lots of different revenue streams outside of the cars they make.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/joannmuller/2013/05/11...
The tax credits aspect is interesting and just shows how short-sighted the major car manufacturers have been.

Clivey

5,110 posts

204 months

Wednesday 18th December 2013
quotequote all
TransverseTight said:
The other point is you have to compare it to a petrol if you want like for like power and performance. The 740d had only 300 bhp and 0-60 of 6.2 whilst the base Tesla has over 340 and 0-60 of 5.2.
The new 5/6 Series 40d, A6 3.0 Bi-TDi and XF 3.0D S all do 0-60 in the 5 point something range. smile

anonymous-user

54 months

Wednesday 18th December 2013
quotequote all
Clivey said:
TransverseTight said:
The other point is you have to compare it to a petrol if you want like for like power and performance. The 740d had only 300 bhp and 0-60 of 6.2 whilst the base Tesla has over 340 and 0-60 of 5.2.
The new 5/6 Series 40d, A6 3.0 Bi-TDi and XF 3.0D S all do 0-60 in the 5 point something range. smile
Isn't the 550xd in the 4s??

TransverseTight

753 posts

145 months

Wednesday 18th December 2013
quotequote all
Max_Torque said:
I think the main thing for me with the Tesla S pricing is that we don't know if it is actually sustainable or not. i.e How are they writing down their development and manufacturing facility costs on this one car? I suspect, they aren't, and that they will need a higher volume product to actually make money in the long run. As a pure EV, the car will have been a lot less expensive to develop compare to a conventional ICEV, but it is still a might costly buisness making a genuine BMW/Merc competitor product!

My general feeling is that the S would be something like 20% more expensive if a fully sustainable business case was being used?
I checked upon this before thinking the same. But realised as they started shipping in volume they can't be giving them away at less than cost. According to this article their margin is 22%.

http://mobile.bloomberg.com/news/2013-08-07/tesla-...

I'd love a model S but am hanging on for the 3 series rival. In the mean time I'm quite fancying an XF S d as they're nearly less than chips. Although according to some anti Ev phers I might be able to pick up a used tesla next year for about £20k if their depreciation curves are correct wink

AnotherClarkey

3,596 posts

189 months

Wednesday 18th December 2013
quotequote all
TransverseTight said:
I checked upon this before thinking the same. But realised as they started shipping in volume they can't be giving them away at less than cost. According to this article their margin is 22%.

http://mobile.bloomberg.com/news/2013-08-07/tesla-...

I'd love a model S but am hanging on for the 3 series rival. In the mean time I'm quite fancying an XF S d as they're nearly less than chips. Although according to some anti Ev phers I might be able to pick up a used tesla next year for about £20k if their depreciation curves are correct wink
Same for me. I like the S but it is bigger than I need and I would like to see what they come up with in the next generation. The other thing that will be interesting is how quickly they get their supercharger network up here. Apparently the first one goes in soon and they want a basic countrywide network by the end of 2014. If they do the appeal of 'free fuel, forever' may be very appealing to people (supposing the company survives, of course).

Clivey

5,110 posts

204 months

Thursday 19th December 2013
quotequote all
Max_Torque said:
Isn't the 550xd in the 4s??
I think so...but we don't get it in the UK - something to do with the RHD conversion IIRC. Basically though, big, fast diesels are available (and selling). I see them as the biggest & closest competitors for the Model S but once it's released over here, I'm sure it will make a massive impact. I mean…you're getting equal or better performance in a car that costs under a fiver to fill up? Who's going to argue with that?






I fear the answer is: Polititians looking to raise taxes.

TooMany2cvs

Original Poster:

29,008 posts

126 months

Thursday 19th December 2013
quotequote all
Clivey said:
...a car that costs under a fiver to fill up? Who's going to argue with that?
Who do you buy your electricity off?

90kWh battery, at ~15p/kwh = £13.50. Sure, it's a lot less than diesel or petrol, but it ain't "less than a fiver".

It's also worth remembering that from a domestic 13A 230v socket, it's going to take 30hrs to fully charge.

Clivey

5,110 posts

204 months

Thursday 19th December 2013
quotequote all
TooMany2cvs said:
Who do you buy your electricity off?

90kWh battery, at ~15p/kwh = £13.50. Sure, it's a lot less than diesel or petrol, but it ain't "less than a fiver".

It's also worth remembering that from a domestic 13A 230v socket, it's going to take 30hrs to fully charge.
Lol; I've been speaking to an American that owns one*…but still, even with UK 'leccy prices, that's cheap.

* As an aside, he says it's excellent in winter weather; the TCS is much better than anything that can be fitted with an IC engine as it works in conjunction with the electric motors powering the wheels and therefore the response time is much faster.

thatdude

2,655 posts

127 months

Thursday 19th December 2013
quotequote all
What is the distance one could realistically travel on a full chage (given use of radio, lights, air-con / heater, heated seats etc etc etc etc)?

I would love one of these as a daily commuter (although I cant afford one yet, but in the future? who knows...money to be saved in servicing, filling up and road tax)

AnotherClarkey

3,596 posts

189 months

Thursday 19th December 2013
quotequote all
This is a pretty good video showing what range you might expect in cold conditions:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XZ5PqPeOPT0

Also very good at demonstrating just how much room there is in the thing...