Whose fault is it if a cyclist "T-bones" you at a T-junction

Whose fault is it if a cyclist "T-bones" you at a T-junction

Author
Discussion

Bennet

Original Poster:

2,122 posts

131 months

Thursday 21st September 2017
quotequote all
I turned in to a T-junction accross a lane of standing traffic this morning. Despite the fact that I was leaning forward in my seat looking down the lane of traffic of in order to try to avoid this exact situation, I still had a reasonably near miss with a cyclist. We both stopped in time. As you can see, there is no cycle lane and everyone on the scene was driving a Mitsubishi FTO.

If I hadn't been looking for him and we'd colided, would it have been my fault? Or is it his fault for filtering through a junction without due care? Does it make a difference if there is a cycle lane? If the car you're turning in front of is actually an HGV, and you can't see past it at all, should you refuse to turn?


99dndd

2,084 posts

89 months

Thursday 21st September 2017
quotequote all
I'd go with the person turning right, it's your responsibility to make sure it's clear.

mike13

716 posts

182 months

Thursday 21st September 2017
quotequote all
i"d be thinking 50/50.

MDMetal

2,775 posts

148 months

Thursday 21st September 2017
quotequote all
If he t-bones you surely his fault? Otherwise yours?

SantaBarbara

3,244 posts

108 months

Thursday 21st September 2017
quotequote all
99dndd said:
I'd go with the person turning right, it's your responsibility to make sure it's clear.
I agree completely

BuzzBravado

2,944 posts

171 months

Thursday 21st September 2017
quotequote all
I miss my FTO frown

lufbramatt

5,344 posts

134 months

Thursday 21st September 2017
quotequote all
You're crossing his path.. highway code says:

"Turning right

Rule 179

Well before you turn right you should
•use your mirrors to make sure you know the position and movement of traffic behind you
•give a right-turn signal
•take up a position just left of the middle of the road or in the space marked for traffic turning right
•leave room for other vehicles to pass on the left, if possible.

Rule 180

Wait until there is a safe gap between you and any oncoming vehicle. Watch out for cyclists, motorcyclists, pedestrians and other road users. "

However as a cyclist I never filter down the nearside for this reason, also people turning left never look to see if anything is coming up the inside, and the risk of getting doored. I'd filter down the offside.

dirty doug

483 posts

195 months

Thursday 21st September 2017
quotequote all
Pretty common situation I reckon. Faced it many times myself & have had a near miss or three...

I would think it's 100% car drivers fault.

Car driver doesn't have right of way.

AyBee

10,533 posts

202 months

Thursday 21st September 2017
quotequote all
SantaBarbara said:
99dndd said:
I'd go with the person turning right, it's your responsibility to make sure it's clear.
I agree completely
This. Just because the car has stopped does not mean that all traffic has stopped - it's your job to make sure that the road is clear before crossing.

RacerMDR

5,498 posts

210 months

Thursday 21st September 2017
quotequote all
so the driver should sit and wait forever because he can't see?

or cyclist responsible for his own safety.

If I had exactly this accident on my motorbike I would entirely judge myself as the idiot and wouldn't even claim against the drivers insurance should it be deemed a 50/50.

I have the same scenario every single day, inside and outside of the filtering traffic - and I never go faster than I can stop (so far)

Integroo

11,574 posts

85 months

Thursday 21st September 2017
quotequote all
Bennet said:
I turned in to a T-junction accross a lane of standing traffic this morning. Despite the fact that I was leaning forward in my seat looking down the lane of traffic of in order to try to avoid this exact situation, I still had a reasonably near miss with a cyclist. We both stopped in time. As you can see, there is no cycle lane and everyone on the scene was driving a Mitsubishi FTO.

If I hadn't been looking for him and we'd colided, would it have been my fault? Or is it his fault for filtering through a junction without due care? Does it make a difference if there is a cycle lane? If the car you're turning in front of is actually an HGV, and you can't see past it at all, should you refuse to turn?

Yours. You turned across his lane of traffic. Which you shouldn't have done if it wasn't clear.

There is zero doubt in my mind that this is correct.

kambites

67,554 posts

221 months

Thursday 21st September 2017
quotequote all
A cyclist would be a complete and utter idiot to get him/herself into a situation where that can happen, but I believe others are right in that it would be viewed as the driver's fault for turning across on-coming traffic.

Integroo

11,574 posts

85 months

Thursday 21st September 2017
quotequote all
RacerMDR said:
so the driver should sit and wait forever because he can't see?

or cyclist responsible for his own safety.

If I had exactly this accident on my motorbike I would entirely judge myself as the idiot and wouldn't even claim against the drivers insurance should it be deemed a 50/50.

I have the same scenario every single day, inside and outside of the filtering traffic - and I never go faster than I can stop (so far)
He should go slowly until he can see.

Bennet

Original Poster:

2,122 posts

131 months

Thursday 21st September 2017
quotequote all
Fairly clear consensus there then. The rules seem out of sync with reality to me in this case because in practice, you're likely to need to stick your bonnet accross the cyclists' path in order to be able to see him, unless you happened to have a mirror on a stick.

syko89

366 posts

158 months

Thursday 21st September 2017
quotequote all
100% drivers fault.

Happens fairly often when I'm cycling to work so I do try to look out for this. They might be in the wrong but I know who will come off worse if we collide.


RacerMDR

5,498 posts

210 months

Thursday 21st September 2017
quotequote all
Integroo said:
RacerMDR said:
so the driver should sit and wait forever because he can't see?

or cyclist responsible for his own safety.

If I had exactly this accident on my motorbike I would entirely judge myself as the idiot and wouldn't even claim against the drivers insurance should it be deemed a 50/50.

I have the same scenario every single day, inside and outside of the filtering traffic - and I never go faster than I can stop (so far)
He should go slowly until he can see.
agree entirely - but car to move at some point or the city stops functioning............and the cyclists (in London) are like mosquitos......so unless we want to stop ever pulling out or into any junction we need to assume the cyclist has responsibility for not wiping himself out by brainlessly assuming every turning is clear..........exactly the same as a motorcycle, jogger or pedestrian........

hence - it's 50/50 responsibility ............but the responsibility is on the vulnerable party to not get dead.

If a cyclist hit my car in this scenario I would be going after money for the damage


kambites

67,554 posts

221 months

Thursday 21st September 2017
quotequote all
Of course such is the ineptitude of road planners that many cycle lane type setups make this a very common risk. You can argue that a cyclist shouldn't be cycling down the inside of a row of stationary traffic but you can hardly argue that they shouldn't be cycling down a cycle lane.

KillerHERTZ

942 posts

198 months

Thursday 21st September 2017
quotequote all
100% Drivers fault, your crossing his path.

Its basic driving that you need to ensure that the road is clear before you cross.




hondansx

4,569 posts

225 months

Thursday 21st September 2017
quotequote all
It regularly happens to me with motorcylists - I will be flashed or waved across by a car driver only for me to notice a motorcycle at the last second. it's exacerbated as their closing speed is far higher than a bicycle - they either weren't paying attention or going at an inappropriate speed. I realise the blame would probably still be at my door though.

Angrybiker

557 posts

90 months

Thursday 21st September 2017
quotequote all
lufbramatt said:
You're crossing his path.. highway code says:

"Turning right

Rule 179

Well before you turn right you should
•use your mirrors to make sure you know the position and movement of traffic behind you
•give a right-turn signal
•take up a position just left of the middle of the road or in the space marked for traffic turning right
•leave room for other vehicles to pass on the left, if possible.

Rule 180

Wait until there is a safe gap between you and any oncoming vehicle. Watch out for cyclists, motorcyclists, pedestrians and other road users. "

However as a cyclist I never filter down the nearside for this reason, also people turning left never look to see if anything is coming up the inside, and the risk of getting doored. I'd filter down the offside.
Fixed that for you smile