Best 4-cylinder diesel engine?...

Best 4-cylinder diesel engine?...

Author
Discussion

towser44

3,490 posts

115 months

Tuesday 7th July 2020
quotequote all
Love the 2.2CDTI Honda engine in my Civic. No DPF, excellent MPG, pretty quick and no clutch issues yet ha ha!

sunbeam alpine

6,941 posts

188 months

Tuesday 7th July 2020
quotequote all
Toyota 3 litre diesel in the Hilux and Landcruiser is quite torquey. Sounds quite agricultural though.

longblackcoat

5,047 posts

183 months

Tuesday 7th July 2020
quotequote all
OM646 in a Mercedes W211 E-Class will do you 48mpg as an average on longer runs, plenty of waft, and feels good to drive. My 2006 model is now on 230k miles and it’s had nothing other than routine servicing in my ownership (the last 130k).

Cheap to service at an Indy (never even think about using a Mercedes dealer) and depreciation means that for £2k you’ll get a good one.

Not as fuel efficient as a VW but much tougher and you’ll probably never need to change the turbo etc. Cost per mile it’s the cheapest car I’ve ever owned.



Edited by longblackcoat on Tuesday 7th July 20:10

WonkeyDonkey

2,338 posts

103 months

Tuesday 7th July 2020
quotequote all
The JTDm engine in my old Alfa 147 was pretty decent. 150bhp and fairly economic. Very reliable for a supposedly unreliable brand as well.

HenryHippo

250 posts

96 months

Tuesday 7th July 2020
quotequote all
towser44 said:
Love the 2.2CDTI Honda engine in my Civic. No DPF, excellent MPG, pretty quick and no clutch issues yet ha ha!
x 2, great engine, ahead of its time

white_goodman

Original Poster:

4,042 posts

191 months

Tuesday 7th July 2020
quotequote all
longblackcoat said:
OM646 in a Mercedes W211 E-Class will do you 48mpg as an average on longer runs, plenty of waft, and feels good to drive. My 2006 model is now on 230k miles and it’s had nothing other than routine servicing in my ownership (the last 130k).

Cheap to service at an Indy (never even think about using a Mercedes dealer) and depreciation means that for £2k you’ll get a good one.

Not as fuel efficient as a VW but much tougher and you’ll probably never need to change the turbo etc. Cost per mile it’s the cheapest car I’ve ever owned.



Edited by longblackcoat on Tuesday 7th July 20:10
Thanks, W211 is a really nice car regardless of engine really. Will add it to the shortlist!

white_goodman

Original Poster:

4,042 posts

191 months

Tuesday 7th July 2020
quotequote all
I was always a little intrigued my Subaru's 4 cylinder "Boxer" diesel. Has anyone experienced one of those in anything?

anonymous-user

54 months

Tuesday 7th July 2020
quotequote all
I have a 1.6 JTDM-2 Giulietta. Current calculated average is 51.4 mpg, with a fair chunk of city driving. When I have (or rather, had) the luxury of going to work on the motorway I reckon it would be up near 60. Car cost me £3 thousand and something.

And no, it hasn’t blown up and left me stranded. They have a few minor niggles that are well documented. Engines are strong if a bit rough.

Although, I’d look at the 2 litre personally, the increased boost pressure in Dynamic more can be amusing but the 1.6 is still pretty gutless, I do regret not sacrificing a few mpg for 140 or 170 bhp to be honest.

Anyway, if you must have a hatchback with a 4 pot diesel then you may as well get one that genuinely does raise a smile (mine sure does!).

ZX10R NIN

27,573 posts

125 months

Tuesday 7th July 2020
quotequote all
2.1d Mercedes unit reliable with a decent amount of poke.

mickyh7

2,347 posts

86 months

Tuesday 7th July 2020
quotequote all
clockworks said:
I had a Vectra with the 1.9 as a company car. It went back after 3 and a bit years with over 120k on the clock. I had no problems at all with it once they sorted out the fault it left the factory with - leaky inlet manifold that caused random limp home errors. Great engine, averaged a shade over 50mpg
This.
I had the 1.9 150bhp with a Tuning Box fitted.
Probably the best day to day smallish engine
I've had. No major problems. Cheap to run 55-60mpg on a fastish run.
Loads of torque for overtaking.
Fiat engine I think?

anonymous-user

54 months

Tuesday 7th July 2020
quotequote all
When I saw the thread title, I did instantly think of the 1.9 PD TDI. There are more refined, powerful and characterful 4 banger diesels but I think as a unit it's pretty good. Reliability is a big factor.

It was in everything from an Ibiza to an A6 - ironically the Ibiza was the car given its largest ever (official) output of 160bhp in the Cupra TDI. Although, I recall the 150bhp in the Leon Cupra/FR and the Golf GTI TDI had issues with the clutch and all that power/torque. I think the best all rounder is the PD 130. I've seen multiple VAG cars in the trade with well over 200k - I once drove a 290k mile Passat 130 it still trundled along well.

Chris Hinds

482 posts

165 months

Tuesday 7th July 2020
quotequote all
Two stick with me from the past (depending how far back you go!)

The 1896cc VW 1.9TDI - preferably in 110 or 130HP form, the 90 was sluggish while the 150Hp had LAAG
The 1905cc PSA 1.9TD XUD block - because old school turbo D and actually that was rather refined for the times!

Mr Tidy

22,250 posts

127 months

Tuesday 7th July 2020
quotequote all
Well when I got my pre-registered 123d in 2008 I would have said the BMW N47 twin-turbo in that!

201 bhp from a 4 cylinder diesel meant you got pretty much hot-hatch performance at the time, and overall mine averaged almost 49mpg over the 6+ years and 81K miles I had it. Only faults were a battery that didn't last 5 years and a starter motor that died after 6 years, but I think not turning off the stop-start function was responsible for their demise. rolleyes

But by 2014 I wasn't doing enough miles to justify diesel and I fancied a change and had started reading about some owners suffering cam-chain issues. So my ongoing addiction to N/A straight 6 petrols began. laugh

Saying that I'm sure plenty of N47s have racked up high mileages without chain problems as they were fitted to quite a few other BMW models, but not with twin-turbos.

The M47 engine in the 320td Compact it replaced was also pretty good with 150 bhp and nearly as good economy during my 3 years with it, plus they seem to have less serious problems and don't have a dpf.

Nicks90

545 posts

54 months

Tuesday 7th July 2020
quotequote all
The Mercedes 200 and 220 CDI are very impressive engines and have been around donkeys years, reliably smacking 250-300k miles with ease.
The b class 200cdi I had on loan for a month managed 65mpg driving from Leeds to Chertsey and back 4 times at -ahem- slightly above legal motorway speeds down the m1/m40. 2000 miles at 65mpg just can't be sniffed at.
Quiet once settled in to a cruise, but abit gruff when giving it some
Or the Volvo d4, properly good motor when strapped in a V50 or v60

bristolracer

5,535 posts

149 months

Tuesday 7th July 2020
quotequote all
My VW caddy 1.9 PD engine let go at 126k. Big end failure

Just sayin'

bobclayton

126 posts

106 months

Tuesday 7th July 2020
quotequote all
white_goodman said:
TCX said:
Vauxhall 1.7cdti 55/06
Don't think I've driven that one. The Mokka that I drove was a 1.6 CDTi I think. What did the 1.7 come in? The 1.9 CDTi of that era was problematic?
It was an Isuzu unit Vauxhall used for far too long, replaced by the 1.6CDTi "whisper" diesel.
In fairness it was rather tough!

Nicks90

545 posts

54 months

Tuesday 7th July 2020
quotequote all
Indeed it was, fiat also used it in the Punto. Cracking motor but a complete cock to work on when shoehorned into a MK1 Punto!

A1VDY

3,575 posts

127 months

Tuesday 7th July 2020
quotequote all
white_goodman said:
A1VDY said:
There's only one, VW 1.9 PD.
Various power outputs, 100, 115, 130&150hp. They're all good. Be aware though that the 6 speed gearbox can be trouble some in some variants..
Remind me which ones got the 6-speed? The 130/150 mk4 Golfs IIRC but maybe not the B5 Passats (apart from the Sport)? My spec of choice for the Passat was the Highline. More comfortable seats than the Sport and didn't ground out as easily, albeit a bit floatier...
The 130 and 150hp versions had the 6 speed box but some Passats were 5 speed.
IIRC it's the 6th gear synchro which can cause issues.
The 130hp versions were the best all rounders, plenty of torque and without the slight lag of the 150 with the bigger turbo.

gazza285

9,806 posts

208 months

Tuesday 7th July 2020
quotequote all
Pug XUD. I have had two vans with this engine, a 305 and a Berlingo, both did over 250,000 miles before I sold them on via eBay. Other than a duff alternator on the Berlingo at 180,000 miles I had no problems with either of them. Seventy horses that would last forever.

wiliferus

4,060 posts

198 months

Wednesday 8th July 2020
quotequote all
Agree with what some have said... the VAG 1.9tdi engine was very very good... in it’s time! Really reliable (except for one type that got a reputation for putting con rods through the block). I had an AHN 110bhp version in an A4. 50mpg all day long, torquey, and very reliable. However refined they were not, they were very agricultural by today’s standards.

The Vauxhall 1.9 I seem to remember was good in 120bhp flavour, but the 150 had a reputation for EGR issues.

I had a VAG 2.0tdi with 140bhp for a few years. Drove nicely with a really linear power delivery. I don’t recall having anything but routine maintenance on it, and took it from about 40k to 120k.

Don’t overlook the Volvo D5... yes it’s five cylinders. But if you get a late 2005/2006 car with the 163 bhp engine and a manual box you’ll be laughing. Loads of torque, and I couldn’t get mine below 50mpg, 60mpg was achievable on a run. For mpg avoid the later 185bhp as ironically the Euro compliance gubbins really knocked the mpg down to low to mid 40s. FWIW I’m on my 3rd D5, I love the blend of power and economy. Shame they’ve stopped making the 5 cylinder unit now. When mine dies I shall struggle to think of what to replace it with.