Big power Westfield build

Big power Westfield build

Author
Discussion

jontysafe

Original Poster:

2,351 posts

178 months

Monday 28th March 2016
quotequote all
Evening all,

I have a general engine build thread running in the technical section but wanted to run an idea ref radiator mounting past the combined knowledge of peeps here.

The engine is a turbo YB with a power target of 450-500bhp with the emphasis on response and reliability. With that in mind I have removed chargecooler and engine rad I was using last year and am going to air to air intercooler mounted at the front. It`s an 18x12x4.5" so quite thick and with end tanks will fill nosecone.

I want to remove the engine radiator to the rear of the car just behind the roll cage in the airflow. This way I can fit a full size 50mm thick cosworth radiator instead of the major compromise of a nosecone radiator. Somehow doubling the power of the engine (and more) and seriously reducing the frontal area of the rad no matter what you did re ducting etc, never rang true to me.
The rad in the roll over part of the cage at the rear will see clean airflow and not be subject to the low pressure you can get at the very rear of the car.

Has anyone done this before? Any advice? Questions are will I need a supplemental water pump? Any clues on plumbing?

Am I mad?

ugg10

681 posts

217 months

Monday 28th March 2016
quotequote all
Have a look at the off road pari Dakar type spaceframe cars, these guys often have the rad mounted where the rear window would be.

This is a drift car with an ls3, this what you mean?


jontysafe

Original Poster:

2,351 posts

178 months

Monday 28th March 2016
quotequote all
That is exactly what I mean but obviously in a Westy there is no bodywork there.



The rad will fit perfectly in the rear roll bar.

I`ve actually just bought a full roll cage but the idea is the same. I will probably sit the rad 4-5 inches away from supports behind rear of the seats and duct it in a way that if it did spring a leak it wouldn't leak on me!

eliot

11,418 posts

254 months

Monday 28th March 2016
quotequote all
Why not fit the rad in the boot and draw air from the top and release underneath?

jontysafe

Original Poster:

2,351 posts

178 months

Tuesday 29th March 2016
quotequote all
I have thought about that but there isn't a lot of room. I have a 1.5ltr swirl pot, Bosch 044 fuel pump and Holley Blue lift pump on top of the fuel tank plus I don`t want to unduly heat the fuel. Mind you would be alright if I was running toluene like the f1 cars in the 80s!

Paul Drawmer

4,875 posts

267 months

Tuesday 29th March 2016
quotequote all
Don't forget that the water pipes will take a fair bit of space, and that they will radiate a lot of heat, even in an open Westie, it will toast you on most days if the plumbing is internal. If you run them external, then they will be vulnerable unless they're tucked up rather near the propshaft.

Mr MXT

7,691 posts

283 months

Tuesday 29th March 2016
quotequote all
Been following this since you bought it, would be great to see it back on the road!

I'm with elliot, having the rad horizontal with ducting seems the best idea. I know space is limited under the boot cover, so why not put it higher than the current boot cover and box it in?

Vertically against the back of the roll bar seems like it would act as a huge windbreak - Would that be enough alter the handling balance at high speed?

The option to consider - have you got any room for a twin rad set up, one each side?

Might be worth asking on WSCC too, those guys usually come up with some good ideas.

chuntington101

5,733 posts

236 months

Tuesday 29th March 2016
quotequote all
Why not mount it on the rear lid with the front edge raised say 5-6 inch? The rad then becomes the duct. You would still need some decent fans on the hot side but it would be venting upwards, away from the fuel and, totally unrestricted. There should be enough air getting in there and you could even box it in a bit if you liked.

You could even play around with the angle to reduce / increase cooling. smile

chuntington101

5,733 posts

236 months

Tuesday 29th March 2016
quotequote all
Alternatively you could look at twin rads mounted behind the rear wheels. You could then have side scoops feeding the air over the rear archs to the rads. Should give you plenty of air and would be exiting into a nice low pressure area helping pull the air through.

Only issue would be reducing the cr@p the front wheels kick up into the scoops. Maybe some decent mesh would be enough?

Mr MXT

7,691 posts

283 months

Tuesday 29th March 2016
quotequote all
chuntington101 said:
Alternatively you could look at twin rads mounted behind the rear wheels. You could then have side scoops feeding the air over the rear archs to the rads. Should give you plenty of air and would be exiting into a nice low pressure area helping pull the air through.

Only issue would be reducing the cr@p the front wheels kick up into the scoops. Maybe some decent mesh would be enough?
Front mudguards make a huge difference.

NotNormal

2,359 posts

214 months

Tuesday 29th March 2016
quotequote all
I've just added rear rads in my Dax, but these are to support the one up front so different to your line of thought.

The Dax Rush however in these pics though is more in line with what you're trying to achieve I guess? No idea how efficient it is in operation but gather their is lots of ducting.



jontysafe

Original Poster:

2,351 posts

178 months

Tuesday 29th March 2016
quotequote all
I`ve had some contact with the owner of that DAX. He was experiencing some overheating "issues" on track.

I`m going to buy an el cheapo ebay cossie rad to do some experimenting.

I`ve been doing quite a lot of research and it seems the ram-air effect is very important in radiators and they also don`t like being sloped........unless you have the rad constructed that way, i.e water tubes at 45 degrees like this: http://www.ahfabrications.com/information.php?info...

I don`t want to compromise air flow and just have two massive fans constantly running.

With regard to aerodynamic drag, I may sit the bottom of the rad just below boot line and duct air out the rear to keep frontal surface area more optimal. Westie`s have such poor aerodynamic performance anyway that if I get great cooling on track and on the road and the trade off is drag...........the car is meant to be a 40-130ish monster.

twin Side pods overcomplicates things for me, Pete at Spec R suggested the same but had to concede this would work and was fairly simple.


jontysafe

Original Poster:

2,351 posts

178 months

Tuesday 29th March 2016
quotequote all
Paul Drawmer said:
Don't forget that the water pipes will take a fair bit of space, and that they will radiate a lot of heat, even in an open Westie, it will toast you on most days if the plumbing is internal. If you run them external, then they will be vulnerable unless they're tucked up rather near the propshaft.
Will be running them through the tunnel with heat shielding.

chuntington101

5,733 posts

236 months

Tuesday 29th March 2016
quotequote all
There are loads of rads out there that are angled. Even production cars like the GM C7 (although not a good example as they over heat). I don't even think F1 cars use that style of angled rad!

jontysafe

Original Poster:

2,351 posts

178 months

Tuesday 29th March 2016
quotequote all
Mr MXT said:
Been following this since you bought it, would be great to see it back on the road!

I'm with elliot, having the rad horizontal with ducting seems the best idea. I know space is limited under the boot cover, so why not put it higher than the current boot cover and box it in?

Vertically against the back of the roll bar seems like it would act as a huge windbreak - Would that be enough alter the handling balance at high speed?

The option to consider - have you got any room for a twin rad set up, one each side?

Might be worth asking on WSCC too, those guys usually come up with some good ideas.
It`s been off the road a while now! I have managed about 3000 miles since I bought it, not a lot! It was going very well until the last incident. The new engine is being built to a 650bhp plus spec and turned down for reliability.

I`ve been trying to re-sign up for WSCC membership but can`t seem to get hold of anyone.

Mr MXT

7,691 posts

283 months

Tuesday 29th March 2016
quotequote all
PM me your email and I'll get someone from WSCC to mail you.

jontysafe

Original Poster:

2,351 posts

178 months

Tuesday 29th March 2016
quotequote all
chuntington101 said:
There are loads of rads out there that are angled. Even production cars like the GM C7 (although not a good example as they over heat). I don't even think F1 cars use that style of angled rad!
I can assure you they do! in F1 they will tilt a radiator to the rear and to the side and then manufacture the water channels to suit.

chuntington101

5,733 posts

236 months

Tuesday 29th March 2016
quotequote all
jontysafe said:
chuntington101 said:
There are loads of rads out there that are angled. Even production cars like the GM C7 (although not a good example as they over heat). I don't even think F1 cars use that style of angled rad!
I can assure you they do! in F1 they will tilt a radiator to the rear and to the side and then manufacture the water channels to suit.
Having a quick google doesn't really show much but suffice to say I don't think you would have any issues running a standard core tilted at an angle! It might be a few % less efficient than these angled cores but it will still work!

jontysafe

Original Poster:

2,351 posts

178 months

Tuesday 29th March 2016
quotequote all
Will have a bit of a play around!

Is it wrong that I like the look of those slanted core radiators from an engineering point of view? I rang them today but no answer.

chuntington101

5,733 posts

236 months

Wednesday 30th March 2016
quotequote all
jontysafe said:
Will have a bit of a play around!

Is it wrong that I like the look of those slanted core radiators from an engineering point of view? I rang them today but no answer.
No they do look cool and I can see how they work. They do not require the air to change direction which is always helpful. However in many applications, esp front mounted radiators, you need the air to change direction in order to leave the car properly. So in the sitations a normal core is just as efficient as you need to turn the air anyway.