1964 Alvis Stalwart

Author
Discussion

Jeepv6

73 posts

109 months

Sunday 20th August 2017
quotequote all
That's a good site fancy a Kraz as well I've a mate who had one a few years ago it was fantastic

pherlopolus

2,088 posts

158 months

Sunday 20th August 2017
quotequote all
Now I spend a lot of time here reading and can resist having silly ideas about most cars. But to have stolly and zil in same thread is tipping me over the edge....

Eddieslofart

1,328 posts

83 months

Sunday 20th August 2017
quotequote all
Just read all 9 pages. Lots of mad people on here, very good, carry on ! biggrin

LewG

Original Poster:

1,358 posts

146 months

Monday 21st August 2017
quotequote all
Jeepv6 said:
I'm about to retire I'm after another zil but want a reo whistler I drive an Amy merc e63 but due to speed limits it point less so a cheap run around and a nice old truck would be better
Perfect! I'd much rather a Reo or a Zil over a posh Merc biggrin there were loads of Whistlers at War and Peace a few weeks back, dear God do they sound good

LewG

Original Poster:

1,358 posts

146 months

Monday 21st August 2017
quotequote all
We aim to please! nuts

veccy208

1,320 posts

101 months

Monday 21st August 2017
quotequote all
Bit ot but we always hear that Russian military equip was reliable and easily repaired. Is that a wives tale? Are they more reliable than say NATO counterparts?

Jeepv6

73 posts

109 months

Tuesday 22nd August 2017
quotequote all
Bits for mine were cheap of eBay mostly from Russia easy to work on and 18 months never let me down or failed to start 1st time....


LewG

Original Poster:

1,358 posts

146 months

Tuesday 22nd August 2017
quotequote all
I'd say they were definitely simpler and less 'delicate' than the stuff we built. Having had a look round say a BMP or a T55 they're much more clunky and quite crude in places. However it does seem to work quite well!
A lot of our vehicles were proper 'engineers' projects, massive amounts of thought and money went into each individual little component rather than just making it tough and easy to repair/replace in my opinion.

LewG

Original Poster:

1,358 posts

146 months

Wednesday 23rd August 2017
quotequote all
This evening we stripped the rearmost floor panels out and unseized some pins so that we could remove the frame and cross beam above the engine.


The parts pile continues to grow


This is the rear left hand 'tower' that contains the coolant header tank, now mostly removed


This is with the floor frame removed, bugger was it heavy removing it by hand!


We then took the radiator pipes off, it is held in two rubbers at the bottom end and has studs with a big spring behind the nut at the top end. With two people holding the brackets at the top we gave it a good heave upwards and out it came.


Lovely evening for it too

LewG

Original Poster:

1,358 posts

146 months

Saturday 26th August 2017
quotequote all
Fan pack removed this evening giving us much better access with regards to removing the engine. Got a whole day to play with tomorrow so will get a bit more done

ivanhoew

976 posts

241 months

Saturday 26th August 2017
quotequote all
I have completely lost the plot Lew , why were you taking out the engine again ?

Regards robert .

LewG

Original Poster:

1,358 posts

146 months

Saturday 26th August 2017
quotequote all
Basically we've established that the transfer box/left hand centre bevel box has shat itself and spat out its bearing and cage, the front left prop shaft wobbles about half an inch either way! There's an awkward crossbeam in the way above the driveline for a start so it's easier to lift it all 'back and up' as one assembly, that being the engine, gearbox and transfer box.
There's a lot of other reasons for doing it too, at the moment the hull is absolutely full of accumulated crap and dirt from years of neglect and abuse. With the majority of it out the hull is basically just an empty skip so that can all be thoroughly cleaned out, rotted pipes and hoses repaired etc and most importantly, a nice coat of silver paint. The bilge pump strainers are in the bottom too and they're completely blocked with dirt. Can't say I'd fancy swimming it without those working biggrin
The Rolls Royce 'B' series of engines are overhead inlet, side exhaust valve so with the engine in the vehicle it makes it pretty much impossible to do the valve clearances and that sort of thing, so a good clean up and a good refresh of the engine won't go amiss. The clutch is a big twin plate so it'll give us a chance to have a look at the state of that as well.
There's a huge amount to do but we can only crack on and start bringing her back to life properly.
We move into our new unit 1st September so we may even be able to get her in a nice new shed, which will be super

ivanhoew

976 posts

241 months

Saturday 26th August 2017
quotequote all
great explanation ,thank you ,that makes perfect sense .

RR

LewG

Original Poster:

1,358 posts

146 months

Saturday 26th August 2017
quotequote all
Made some new front brake pipes for my crappy little kit car today and fitted those, then devoted some time to the Stolly. I removed the air filters and brackets to give me better access and then started removing pipes etc down one side of the engine. On the right hand side access to the front engine mount bolts is restricted by the compressor and hydraulic pump so I set about removing those too. Not finished yet but it's all baby steps in the right direction.



Evoluzione

10,345 posts

243 months

Sunday 27th August 2017
quotequote all
I know nothing about these things, so am enjoying your thread, I even recognised one at Croft circuit a few weeks ago:


LewG

Original Poster:

1,358 posts

146 months

Monday 28th August 2017
quotequote all
Good spot! Looks a nice example

Matt took a few more bits out today, the main gearbox and power take off actually look quite clean inside so that's a bonus, he also removed the prop shafts to both bevel boxes feeding the Dowty water jets, with the shaft removed they both turn freely thankfully.



Centre bevel boxes both sides however biggrin not so healthy...

Nunga

332 posts

108 months

Monday 28th August 2017
quotequote all
^^Is that corrosion partly due to water ingress, or mostly because they just copped abuse every single time it'd be driven? If I'm honest I'm pleased much of it still functions after all these years, along with the relative neglect. British engineering and all that.

toastyhamster

1,664 posts

96 months

Tuesday 29th August 2017
quotequote all
Bloody hell. :-o

Halmyre

11,183 posts

139 months

Tuesday 29th August 2017
quotequote all
LewG said:
Centre bevel boxes both sides however biggrin not so healthy...
Soon sort that out...


LewG

Original Poster:

1,358 posts

146 months

Tuesday 29th August 2017
quotequote all
laugh

When we bought it the top cover plate was removed off the top of the transfer box. I think what's happened is rather than seeing the relatively obvious damage with a closer look to the bevel box output as we have, they've removed it for a look inside expecting to see damage and left it off. That's 20 years plus outside in a field uncovered, no wonder it's not pretty in there! I remember even as a kid looking down through the grilles in the roof and seeing a lot of rainwater down in her belly. Sometimes when I stand back and think about that fact I really must be a glutton for punishment eh? wink
With a bit of luck and a fair wind she will move again though, in fact I remain pretty damn confident of it. The fact it seems to have lasted so well considering the abuse and neglect it's had is massive testament to the engineering excellence that went into it all those years ago