1973 Mercedes SLC

Author
Discussion

CharlesdeGaulle

Original Poster:

26,089 posts

179 months

Sunday 2nd July 2017
quotequote all
The CdeG car story continues along a familiar theme; that theme being impulsive purchases of cars that have the potential to ruin a man.

It all started a few months ago when a PH-er showed me a link to a car at his local auction house. I'd revealed elsewhere that I'd hankered after a Mercedes SLC, and he offered to go and view on my behalf. He did view, and advised me not to bid.

I had no need for it, hadn't driven it, hadn't in fact even seen it. I had nowhere to park it, and had sold a rather nice 560 SEC because I was intending to down-size. At the time of the auction, I was about to go overseas for a week and, for reasons varied, justifiable, and largely car-related, any purchase was guaranteed to be a red rag to the domestic bull. Crazy to consider a 44 year old car on a whim, obviously. Equally obviously, I bought it.

It went for below auction estimate; so that's good, yeah? Yeah? Even in those heady early days, it was clear that the car wasn't without issues, and it was undoubtedly sent to auction for a reason, but I'd long hankered after one of these and now I could tick the box. I just hope it isn't a financially ruinous box.

This is the virtual image that I saw and the basis upon which I bought.



CharlesdeGaulle

Original Poster:

26,089 posts

179 months

Sunday 2nd July 2017
quotequote all
What followed was a journey. A journey of discovery and restoration at distance. I was abroad and dealt with the auction house, a car transporter chap and a well-regarded MB specialist by e-mail. It all worked seamlessly though, and the very helpful people made things happen satisfactorily in my absence. The car was delivered to the specialist and work started.

The assessment of condition in general wasn't too bad, but amongst the dramas there were 2 very apparent faults. The first was cosmetic but obvious, with cracking right through the bonnet paint. The second was an inability to idle, with surging revs making the car almost undriveable. Other faults were very poor fuel lines which badly needed replacement, some under-body corrosion that needed welding, and work required to repair and restore the bulkhead. There were plenty of other things too, but the one that bothered me the most was the removal of the white-wall tyres, which I really didn't like.

LeoSayer

7,299 posts

243 months

Sunday 2nd July 2017
quotequote all
That's a beauty - I love the look of these of these early 107s.

What's different to an SL, apart fro m the obvious?

CharlesdeGaulle

Original Poster:

26,089 posts

179 months

Sunday 2nd July 2017
quotequote all
The list of work that was done over the following 2 months was extensive. All of the smaller parts were provided by MB, but there's quite a lot that is either NLA or else obscenely expensive. I bought a second-hand accelerator pedal from the Bay of Dreams myself, and sourced a suspension bush kit from Germany. All parts were delivered to the specialist and fitted. He restored the steering box and did all sorts of other smaller jobs, including some fabrication, and got the car MOTd. The total bill came fairly comfortably below the 5 grand maximum I'd set.

The time quickly came when I wanted the car. I usually drive a new car for a bit before deciding on any work, so spending money before even driving it felt as though I was breaking my own rules. I wanted to see it, to drive it, and to play with it before committing myself any further. I wasn't even sure I'd like it, so didn't want to have so much money sunk into it that I wouldn't recoup my costs if I decided to sell.

In anticipation of its' arrival, and in recognition that space really is limited and that I really do have to down-size because of imminent career changes and house move, I put my much-loved A124 320 CE up for sale.

Edited by CharlesdeGaulle on Sunday 2nd July 21:16

CharlesdeGaulle

Original Poster:

26,089 posts

179 months

Sunday 2nd July 2017
quotequote all
And that just about brings us up to date. Yesterday I experienced the bum-clenching thrill of the first drive of a new car. I'd owned it for a few months but, apart from a very short test drive with the mechanic after some initial work, had barely seen it, let alone driven it. Yesterday was collection day.

There were a couple of givens: fuel reserve light lit, check; unsure of route home, check; cash in a brown envelope, check; and the number of the recovery firm close to hand, natch. But, despite the trepidation, we made it and it now sits on my drive.

First impressions were positive, but there's no escaping the fact it's very evidently a 70s car. Ride is excellent and the big fat tyres really soak-up bumps. Visibility is terrific. It sits comfortably at 3-figure speeds and goes pretty well. I also noticed that there is a lot of wind noise and the fuel economy is laughable. I think I'm going to like it! The rest of the first day was spent with cleaning products.

CharlesdeGaulle

Original Poster:

26,089 posts

179 months

Sunday 2nd July 2017
quotequote all
This was it on return.



And after a decent clean (I'm very much a sponge and soapy water kind of chap, I don't do detailing).


Bomma220

14,452 posts

124 months

Sunday 2nd July 2017
quotequote all
Genuine LOL at the opening post!

Very nice CdG, very nice indeed. Looking forward to this one.

CharlesdeGaulle

Original Poster:

26,089 posts

179 months

Sunday 2nd July 2017
quotequote all
Coincidentally, a retro car show locally gave me the chance to take it out and park amongst all sorts of other random vehicles and admire it in the sunshine.








55palfers

5,892 posts

163 months

Sunday 2nd July 2017
quotequote all
Splendid Mon General!

Remind me, what is the monthly rental on a modern Benz?


CharlesdeGaulle

Original Poster:

26,089 posts

179 months

Sunday 2nd July 2017
quotequote all
I was slightly under-tattooed for the show really, and it was heavy with stance-fans, ricers, Americana and Dub-scene cars rather than classics, but it nonetheless looked good. I had to leave early, and the car performed the essential task of starting and moving in good order, without making me look too much like a tragic loser.

CharlesdeGaulle

Original Poster:

26,089 posts

179 months

Sunday 2nd July 2017
quotequote all
There are jobs that remain to be done. Most notably, it runs very rich on idle and tends to surge until D is engaged. Even then, it's not quite right, so the running is probably the most important job to sort. The specialist had warned me of this, but the trial and error nature of diagnosis and rectification means that I'll probably wait for a bit before getting it looked at. That wait will probably last as long as it takes me to forget the sum I've paid already, or until the rather show-offy noise it can make embarrasses me too much, whichever comes first.

Notwithstanding, it's a cracking car. It's a tourer rather than a sports car, but performance is pretty good. It will comfortably seat 4, although there aren't any seat belts in the back – those crazy 70s!

All in all, I'm pleased with it. Madame deG likes it too, and that's something of a first. I'm planning to take it to the Silverstone Classic and am confident that all the camping detritus will fit in the generous boot and back seat, so I can even boast about its practicality. What's not to like?

TR4man

5,207 posts

173 months

Sunday 2nd July 2017
quotequote all
That does look really, really nice.

Interested to see the leather upholstery as I think I'm right in saying that most SLCs seem to have had velour?

CharlesdeGaulle

Original Poster:

26,089 posts

179 months

Sunday 2nd July 2017
quotequote all
LeoSayer said:
That's a beauty - I love the look of these of these early 107s.

What's different to an SL, apart fro m the obvious?
The obvious is the fixed head versus the soft-top, but there are a number of other differences, although I suspect they are very similar in most respects. The wheelbase of the SLC is longer, and I understand that the perceived wisdom is that the C is a better drive. This perhaps is a view held mainly by SLC owners! MB had some rally success with the larger-engined versions.

Krikkit

26,500 posts

180 months

Sunday 2nd July 2017
quotequote all
Doesn't get much better than that, fabulous. biggrin

CharlesdeGaulle

Original Poster:

26,089 posts

179 months

Sunday 2nd July 2017
quotequote all
TR4man said:
That does look really, really nice.

Interested to see the leather upholstery as I think I'm right in saying that most SLCs seem to have had velour?
I saw an SL today with that rather yummy checked cloth. I'm not sure what was most usual on the SLCs but I have seen quite a few with velour. The interior on mine looks pretty good and is in very good condition for a car more than 40 years old. I gave it a deep clean yesterday and there are no tears or scuffs.

n_const

1,707 posts

200 months

Sunday 2nd July 2017
quotequote all
Love the car CdG !! I really am hankering after an older Mercedes again and you , 0a , strela and r129sl are really not helping the situation.

dbdb

4,311 posts

172 months

Sunday 2nd July 2017
quotequote all
That is beautiful - I have long had a thing for the SLC. Indeed, it was something of a fantasy car for me when I was a child and it still has a certain power over me.

idiotgap

2,112 posts

132 months

Sunday 2nd July 2017
quotequote all
That looks absolutely fabulous CdG, I hope I can see it soon and compare 107 notes.

r129sl

9,518 posts

202 months

Sunday 2nd July 2017
quotequote all
The car looks great CdeG. I was surprised by how well these go. Although undoubtedly a cruiser, the car can handle and accelerate with verve. Undoubtedly owning one of these is probably as rewarding as working for a living right now.

I regret selling mine, but then I regret most things in life.

wolfracesonic

6,940 posts

126 months

Monday 3rd July 2017
quotequote all
Always wondered, are those privacy curtains in the rear windows or just a fixed louvre type affair?