Porsche Macan

[mollytherocker]

anonymous said:

[redacted]

I think it looks exactly as i thought it would. Its a smaller SUV with some porsche styling cues.

It's far too safe in my view. Boring in fact. At least the Evoque is distinctive.

How people get excited by these i dont know.

[mollytherocker]

anonymous said:

[redacted]

I cant really argue with any of that except maybe that it has some aggression.

Its just far too damn safe! But, i fully accept that they have probably hit the market dead on.

It will sell like hot cakes.

[Zyp]

anonymous said:

[redacted]

Okay, who's hacked moose's log in?

[Zyp]

The front wing looks odd - those panel gaps....

[homerdog]

anonymous said:

[redacted]

What makes you say that, have you driven/owned one?

[homerdog]

anonymous said:

[redacted]

Special compared to what?

[David W.]

red_slr said:

To much angle on the rear window for me, will stay Cayenne although it could perhaps replace our Freelander's. profile similar to an Audi A1 (edit) 3 door.

Edited by David W. on Sunday 3rd November 07:53

[nsm3]

Agree on the rear window angle. One of my criticisms of our Q5 is that the boot could be bigger with the seats up. That window rake will reduce it even more - my dog would get a crick in his neck!

[jackal]

angle on teh rear is one of the very things that stopped it looking mundane and crap !

(IMHO)

[Fezzaman]

I find it funny how in this thread not much more has really been released in terms of spec/engines than what was posted several pages back yet the Porsche PR/marketing machine is certainly doing its job well in drumming up attention.

Anyway, here's a larger camo-free pic of the interior I don't think I've seen posted here, courtesy of 6speedonline, not sure where the original source is from there so don't know how legit it is.

http://www.6speedonline.com/forums/attachment.php?...

[clarki]

anonymous said:

[redacted]

That's just nonesense??!!

[Luke.]

anonymous said:

[redacted]

I think you're taking this a little seriously.

[clarki]

anonymous said:

[redacted]

Your thinking?? lol

[Luke.]

clarki said:

Your thinking?? lol

My thinking. Yes.

[clarki]

Luke. said:

clarki said:

Your thinking?? lol

My thinking. Yes.

Your taking this all a bit too seriously. Yes. lol

[anonymous-user]

Parrot anyone?

[homerdog]

clarki said:

That's just nonsense??!!

And why I didn't bother asking any further questions!

[J-P]

garyhun said:

Parrot anyone?

Makes no sense to me - I'm guessing the wrong "your" has been used early on which is confusing matters.

"your" instead of "you're" followed by a recognition of this and a joke of it from Clarki.

That's my guess but I could be wrong

[anonymous-user]

J-P said:

garyhun said:

Parrot anyone?

Makes no sense to me - I'm guessing the wrong "your" has been used early on which is confusing matters.

"your" instead of "you're" followed by a recognition of this and a joke of it from Clarki.

That's my guess but I could be wrong

you are not wrong.

[ttdan]

Fezzaman said:

I find it funny how in this thread not much more has really been released in terms of spec/engines than what was posted several pages back yet the Porsche PR/marketing machine is certainly doing its job well in drumming up attention.

Anyway, here's a larger camo-free pic of the interior I don't think I've seen posted here, courtesy of 6speedonline, not sure where the original source is from there so don't know how legit it is.

http://www.6speedonline.com/forums/attachment.php?...

Sports chrono, thank god for that..