New front engined porker ??

New front engined porker ??

Author
Discussion

iguana

Original Poster:

7,035 posts

260 months

Wednesday 1st October 2003
quotequote all
Today in our regular 'Iguana investigates' slot- the Lizard may have haplessly stumbled across a top secret Porsche idea.......


Spotted in Evo this month that 'Authoritative reports from the US' suggest a front engined- RWD Porsche is on the cards & that it would be an entry level car in the sub £35-35k bracket. Possibly a coupe or Saloon could this finally be a 944/68 replacement??


Bear with me on this next tangent coz just across the page to this snipet article is a statement from GM boss ref the GM Lightning concept car (Vx220 replacement) that now won't happen.

He says new crash regs make it very difficut to produce a front engined sports car as you now have to have 10cm of space over the engine & that the only solution he can see is a flat engine- like a subaru....


Soooooo putting 2 and 2 together & ref the front engined porker idea, anyone else thinking what I am (no- not the thing about Kylie covered in baby oil) simply that a certain manufacturer of products pork flavored is rather well known for engines a la horizontally opposed......


So not only is there a possible posible option that Porsche may at last admit its huuuuuuuuge error in never bringing out a replacemnt for the excellent 944/68, but also there is the slim posibilty that porsche could at last place a a tuneful flat six at the correct end of the car



Hmmmmm I can just see it now, bung in a GT3 engine, have a cabin as devoid of creature comforts as your average Stalag, brakes from messers big & red at Brembo, kidney hugging seats from the nice chaps at Recaro, & suspension from Herr Bilstein esq, a skip at Stuttgart filled with un-necessary lardy crap & poncy drivers aids- and you could have ladies & gentlemen a 968CS for the new milenium......



(This idea is copyright Lizard productions 2003 Ltd PlC ABC GCSE, all rights reserved)

>>> Edited by iguana on Wednesday 1st October 21:14

diver944

1,843 posts

276 months

Wednesday 1st October 2003
quotequote all
Also, why not make it an air cooled flat-6

Then it can become the new traditional pork.

Front engined, air cooled flat-6, I love it where do I place my deposit?

AJLintern

4,200 posts

263 months

Wednesday 1st October 2003
quotequote all
Sounds like my sort of car

Thhom

1,716 posts

247 months

Thursday 2nd October 2003
quotequote all
iguana said:
porsche could at last place a tuneful flat six at the correct end of the car


No doubt changing the spark plugs would be HUGE fun.

hammerhead

2,700 posts

254 months

Thursday 2nd October 2003
quotequote all
What about 'slanted' inlines or wide angle 'V' engines? You'd still be able to keep a low bonnet height then, wouldn't you? (and change plugs easily).

But yes, a 968 successor is definitely needed. Some of us don't have hair to ruffle anymore so a Coupe is the way to go

iguana

Original Poster:

7,035 posts

260 months

Thursday 2nd October 2003
quotequote all
diver944 said:
Also, why not make it an air cooled flat-6



The problem is young Diver that the noise & emissions nazis have killed off air cooled engines, so alas it will never be a reality as a new car.

Nowt to stop you bunging one in a 944 tho.... oh and a 993 turbo lump gets my vote- an easily achivable and unstressed 500bhp- lovely jubbly

bluesatin

3,114 posts

272 months

Thursday 2nd October 2003
quotequote all
what is the weight of those 993 engines?

iguana

Original Poster:

7,035 posts

260 months

Thursday 2nd October 2003
quotequote all
bluesatin said:
what is the weight of those 993 engines?


Oh blimey Blue lets not go through all that 911 engines vs Ultima power plants again


I'm not sure of the 993 turbo engine weight, but a normal N/A 3.6 993 lump is 232kg & the 964 3.6 (single) turbo lump is 276kg.

AJLintern

4,200 posts

263 months

Thursday 2nd October 2003
quotequote all
How much does a 993C2 engine cost?

iguana

Original Poster:

7,035 posts

260 months

Thursday 2nd October 2003
quotequote all
AJLintern said:
How much does a 993C2 engine cost?


About £3k.

bluevelvet

2,318 posts

254 months

Thursday 2nd October 2003
quotequote all
iguana said:

AJLintern said:
How much does a 993C2 engine cost?



About £3k.


Is that all the bits ready for a rebuild?

iguana

Original Poster:

7,035 posts

260 months

Thursday 2nd October 2003
quotequote all
bluevelvet said:

iguana said:


AJLintern said:
How much does a 993C2 engine cost?




About £3k.



Is that all the bits ready for a rebuild?


???

AJLintern

4,200 posts

263 months

Thursday 2nd October 2003
quotequote all
Hmmm, that's cheaper than a supercharger...

bluevelvet

2,318 posts

254 months

Friday 3rd October 2003
quotequote all
iguana said:

bluevelvet said:


iguana said:



AJLintern said:
How much does a 993C2 engine cost?





About £3k.




Is that all the bits ready for a rebuild?



???



Just seems the price of a unit ready for a rebuild at £3k.
I have not seen anything you can put straight in and use for much less than £5k.

If you can buy a good 993 engine for £3k,it would make a lot of sense to stick one in a 3.2 carrera,rather than spend the £2-£3k they need on an inevitable top end re-build.

iguana

Original Poster:

7,035 posts

260 months

Friday 3rd October 2003
quotequote all
bluevelvet said:



Just seems the price of a unit ready for a rebuild at £3k.
I have not seen anything you can put straight in and use for much less than £5k.

If you can buy a good 993 engine for £3k,it would make a lot of sense to stick one in a 3.2 carrera,rather than spend the £2-£3k they need on an inevitable top end re-build.


Fair enough £3k is pretty bargain basement level I admit, but I know of engines bought for £3k & good units too, (however I've also paid £5k when one was needed in a hurry tho) so I know £3k is possible but you do have to search for 'em.

As an example a 993 engine & all ancilaries inc exhaust is in 911 & PW this month for £3.6K it states 15,000km which id take with a pinch of salt, but still as long as you check it out properly it could be a bargain.

People do put 993 lumps in 3.2s etc Im sure 911 & PW did a feature a while back- I can't find the mag at the mo but 9m did it if I recall correctly.

dogsharks

427 posts

246 months

Saturday 4th October 2003
quotequote all
Everyone knows the 944 and 928 series of engines were the best to come out of Zuffenhausen. The flat-six was raced with a lot of success, but had it been the better design, it wouldn't be water cooled today.

Here's probably the best engine ever built by Porsche for a street going car.



www.kellymoss.com/Images/928GTR1.jpg


Dogsharks


DontLift

9,396 posts

258 months

Saturday 4th October 2003
quotequote all


Come to papa

AJLintern

4,200 posts

263 months

Saturday 4th October 2003
quotequote all
I'll have two please!

diver944

1,843 posts

276 months

Saturday 4th October 2003
quotequote all
iguana said:

The problem is young Diver


Younf Diver - I like this bloke



Question for the people who have put different engines into cars (possbly a stoopid question ) . Are you then supposed to inform any officialdom like the DVLA or get the registration documents altered in any way to show a different engine, even if you are putting a sandard engine in from another identical car?

domster

8,431 posts

270 months

Monday 6th October 2003
quotequote all
I don't think there is an official requirement. You just write the new details onto the log book and send it off, like a change of address. They don't check. I once wrote the wrong VIN number for a car on it (had about twelve zeroes in a line and I put eleven!) and it never mattered. The onus is on the keeper to get it right - could only really cause trouble for them in terms of resale etc if they didn't.

I suppose the only time you wouldn't declare a new engine is if you forget, don't think it's relevant, or have stolen it