hp versus Bhp

Author
Discussion

willdew

2,138 posts

264 months

Tuesday 5th November 2002
quotequote all
www.howstuffworks.com/question381.htm

This is the best site in the world for this stuff.

JonGwynne

270 posts

265 months

Tuesday 5th November 2002
quotequote all

willdew said: www.howstuffworks.com/question381.htm

This is the best site in the world for this stuff.


It is a good site. However, one writer there seems to think that 12 cylinders is the practical limit for car engines. Apparently he's not familiar with what companies like Cizeta, Bugatti and Volkswagen (among others) have done with 16 and even 18 cylinders.

arandle

Original Poster:

89 posts

265 months

Friday 8th November 2002
quotequote all
Phew! I'm glad I started this one.

I do feel somewhat wiser having read through the thread and checked out the websites, thanks all for your input, very interesting stuff (for us saddo's).

Can't recall who mentioned it but yes, the aircraft engine is low revving - normal operating range is 1800-2500 RPM peaking at about 2800RPM at take-off, if my memory serves me right. So this particular engine does fall into the high torque but low power rating category (in HP terms - this is the 150Hp engine that started the debate)....and of course you don't have to change gear when you're flying so all the arguments make sense.

Thanks again all, great stuff.

ErnestM

11,615 posts

267 months

Saturday 9th November 2002
quotequote all
Just remember (famous Carrol Shelby quote):

horsepower sells cars, torque wins races

ErnestM