RE: 4 Stroke Redesigned
Discussion
The general pattern aside from the constant, the power we get from a windmill is V ^ 3 x D ^ 2. So it depends on the velocity up to 3 power. Here it was measured according to the predicted theory for these dimensions, with the velocity in the gap increasing 6 times. Up to 216 times up to the third power, more than a traditional windmill with the same diameter, say 10 m / s ... The power of a traditional windmill, with a diameter of 1 meter, at this speed about 0.5 horse ... but when we equip it with such "Bombiche" of the same diameter and length, you can theoretically get 216 times more, or about 100 horsepower. Besides, you do not see any items hanging around / And it's bigger bomb than MOAB ....
Andrew
Andrew
So here was measured using Hand-held digital anemometer velocity in the slot. It was consistent with the theoretical assumption, and was 6 times higher than the nozzle entry. For example 10 m / sec give 60 m / sec. The internal veturi nozzle requires other curves to have a laminar flow. Here is a picture from Excel where you can plot these curves, up to 1 mm. Part of them turned out to be rounded .. what the traditional nozzle does not have ..
Now you need to develop a turbine, preferably as if it was Pratt & Witney, and propel hydraulics, with so much power. Only then, with hydraulics to the electric current ... and see how far we go
The fact that my drawings are simple does not mean that the matter is simple, in general, that it has not been known until now.
But using the available scientific studies, we can estimate some parameters
Here is a scientific dissertation on the turbofan engine fanning when no fuel is coming in. Despite the overflow of up to 6 different turbines, combustion chambers and turbulent flow, we get 140 km / h, a flow of 1 kg / sec. With such a flow of 1 kg / sec, the turbine car engine has a power of 100 HP. But with a laminar flow (secured by a venturi) and driving only one turbine, this power can be obtained at 40 km / h. And Feliks, unfortunately, is not a research center of the Penemude type, and a modest resident of Cracow, living in a country where intellectual values are not at the highest level and are underestimated...
http://new4stroke.com/2015_JTM_Garcia_Rosa_Windmil...
Andrew
Now you need to develop a turbine, preferably as if it was Pratt & Witney, and propel hydraulics, with so much power. Only then, with hydraulics to the electric current ... and see how far we go
The fact that my drawings are simple does not mean that the matter is simple, in general, that it has not been known until now.
But using the available scientific studies, we can estimate some parameters
Here is a scientific dissertation on the turbofan engine fanning when no fuel is coming in. Despite the overflow of up to 6 different turbines, combustion chambers and turbulent flow, we get 140 km / h, a flow of 1 kg / sec. With such a flow of 1 kg / sec, the turbine car engine has a power of 100 HP. But with a laminar flow (secured by a venturi) and driving only one turbine, this power can be obtained at 40 km / h. And Feliks, unfortunately, is not a research center of the Penemude type, and a modest resident of Cracow, living in a country where intellectual values are not at the highest level and are underestimated...
http://new4stroke.com/2015_JTM_Garcia_Rosa_Windmil...
Andrew
Feliks said:
Now you need to develop a turbine, preferably as if it was Pratt & Witney, and propel hydraulics, with so much power. Only then, with hydraulics to the electric current ... and see how far we go
I'm not sure what you're trying to achieve here, but if you think you can make a vehicle faster or more efficient by putting a high drag contraption on the roof, I think you're barking up the wrong tree.GreenV8S said:
I'm not sure what you're trying to achieve here, but if you think you can make a vehicle faster or more efficient by putting a high drag contraption on the roof, I think you're barking up the wrong tree.
But it is necessary to start discussions about the barking on various types of trees, There was Lord Kelvin, who until today many years after his death barked to the plane tree and said he would not fly and laugh with him. But he had no idea about aerodynamics .. But he forbade to eat good apples from apple tree because he did not know the trees.Write your point of view on the matter, behaving exactly like him.
http://zapatopi.net/kelvin/papers/interview_aerona...
You think it's about something like this movie, with optimistic music.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bkcn8ZkvKKc
And here the bum has agreed with you completely .. because these 10 fans on alternators with a diameter of 0.5 m each, together, at a speed of 36 km / h will give us ... only 0.5 horsepower of power, which is certainly a lot Not enough for this car to drive at such speed .. and de facto go on batteries ..
Practically these fans generate only the great resistance you think of ..
But my case is far different.
Let's start with why this smolot, however, years, against Lord Kelvin. Of course not enough to have wings only. Many conditions must be met for the aircraft to fly. The speed is appropriate, the slope of the wing to the level and the corresponding air wing profile. It is only the right combination of these parameters that causes a force to be generated that is capable of flying. One of the basic prarameters is the laminar flow of air on the wing. When it's gone and there is a turbolet flow, the plane drops like a stone down.
It's just a laminar flow that causes a Boeing 747 with a weight of 500 tonnes to fly with a thrust of only 80 tonnes. And this wonderful laminar flow of many people today does not really understand it.
In my project is a pipe, relatively long, because such dimensions only allow this laminar flow, ie 10 times the resistance of the city, than in the flat board of the same diameter. But for that we get 6 times the speed of the flow, that is, 6 ^ 3 = 216 times more than this car with believers .. The power of driving is about 0.5 x 216 = ~ 100HP..addition. ..
I think you should think about eating apples from this Apple tree and eating them, the Beatles, Steve Jobs, and now it seems to me
Andrew
In the same way, the car will go under the wind faster and faster....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embed...
Remember that if Frank's ideas were to be made in a timely manner, then perhaps World War II would not have happened.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Whittle
Andrew
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embed...
Remember that if Frank's ideas were to be made in a timely manner, then perhaps World War II would not have happened.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Whittle
Andrew
Edited by Feliks on Friday 28th April 01:52
So, while I was interested in the development of my Segway Car Feliks, I found some helpful solutions on the web. It turned out that with the help in developing motorization, come ... Disabled and their machines .. It's such a Segway with a chair because after all the disabled can not stand ....
And there are companies that Segwaya adapt to them ...
Now it's enough for such a vehicle, make a canopy with doors and windshield wipers, teeth do not reach us, a phone holder in which there is a speedometer and other important things, and the front energy-absorbing plastic bump so that not immediately at what, With your feet flickering .. after you get the blinkers, the vehicle becomes a capable Segway Car Feliks ..
I also see the way to develop such a car, not even a multiplayer, with the increase of wheels and the use of such solutions .. but not for acrobatics and normal driving ..
Also, I think of a small diesel engine that drives an alternator, and this whole 15kg system would give that car an unrestricted reach, of course when adding gasoline. But not much, because my four stroke engine would be as good as 30 ccm.
Here are some examples from the internet ..
Https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OXlAXwD_KA0
Https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p46F0IbYEUA
Https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uf6Gh-hPDeo
Https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z8QZ0HEoZHQ
Andrew
And there are companies that Segwaya adapt to them ...
Now it's enough for such a vehicle, make a canopy with doors and windshield wipers, teeth do not reach us, a phone holder in which there is a speedometer and other important things, and the front energy-absorbing plastic bump so that not immediately at what, With your feet flickering .. after you get the blinkers, the vehicle becomes a capable Segway Car Feliks ..
I also see the way to develop such a car, not even a multiplayer, with the increase of wheels and the use of such solutions .. but not for acrobatics and normal driving ..
Also, I think of a small diesel engine that drives an alternator, and this whole 15kg system would give that car an unrestricted reach, of course when adding gasoline. But not much, because my four stroke engine would be as good as 30 ccm.
Here are some examples from the internet ..
Https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OXlAXwD_KA0
Https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p46F0IbYEUA
Https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uf6Gh-hPDeo
Https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z8QZ0HEoZHQ
Andrew
Edited by Feliks on Tuesday 2nd May 01:42
uote]Originally posted by EpsomJames
[quote]Originally posted by Anth
cool
actually! where is the mad old bugger?
[/quote]
Sold his design to Nissan, now is basking in his holiday retreat in the Caribbean.*
So I have to thank that good people brought me to the ground with my Segway Car Felix ... I of course have invented it completely unmistakably, never seen such a solution .. But I was provided with my much earlier (2011) professional Segway rules here a few photos. As for Nisan's solution, it is quite complicated.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gHrl2P6QGYQ
My engine also provides a variable degree of compresion ratio, which unfortunately is not noticeable on the animation of my engine. It is necessary to start working on it with great precision, using a program for calculating the geometry of my engine. The first version of this program was also created on perforated cards and punched strips. on a Cyber computer.
I then learned that after adjusting the cage between the crankshafts, not only will the camshaft phase change, but also the compression ratio will change. Well, you remind me that this is so ...
in 2004 I programmed excell to calculate my engine, and colored fields can be changed to fit the needs. On other cards is a little bit described what and how. You can see, for example, that the minimum chamber is 370 degrees, not the traditional 360 degree rotation of the crankshaft. You can see, for example, that the minimum chamber is at the right hand side of the sheet. , the increase in power is like overtaking the ignition by 10 degrees of ignition at 0 degrees .. (obviously there is also a larger crank arm)
There are so many interesting things that just come out while working on this engine .. But surely at Nisana also do not like to learn completely new information about the four engine .. Because it would have to last 6 months .. and practically only I only know those few advantages and disadvantages ..
I think that for the rest of my life I did not suffer, especially that Myasthenia and related double vision, only now can give unconventional solutions
VOLUME EXCELL http://www.new4stroke.com/volume.zip
Regards Andrew
[quote]Originally posted by Anth
cool
actually! where is the mad old bugger?
[/quote]
Sold his design to Nissan, now is basking in his holiday retreat in the Caribbean.*
- maybe
So I have to thank that good people brought me to the ground with my Segway Car Felix ... I of course have invented it completely unmistakably, never seen such a solution .. But I was provided with my much earlier (2011) professional Segway rules here a few photos. As for Nisan's solution, it is quite complicated.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gHrl2P6QGYQ
My engine also provides a variable degree of compresion ratio, which unfortunately is not noticeable on the animation of my engine. It is necessary to start working on it with great precision, using a program for calculating the geometry of my engine. The first version of this program was also created on perforated cards and punched strips. on a Cyber computer.
I then learned that after adjusting the cage between the crankshafts, not only will the camshaft phase change, but also the compression ratio will change. Well, you remind me that this is so ...
in 2004 I programmed excell to calculate my engine, and colored fields can be changed to fit the needs. On other cards is a little bit described what and how. You can see, for example, that the minimum chamber is 370 degrees, not the traditional 360 degree rotation of the crankshaft. You can see, for example, that the minimum chamber is at the right hand side of the sheet. , the increase in power is like overtaking the ignition by 10 degrees of ignition at 0 degrees .. (obviously there is also a larger crank arm)
There are so many interesting things that just come out while working on this engine .. But surely at Nisana also do not like to learn completely new information about the four engine .. Because it would have to last 6 months .. and practically only I only know those few advantages and disadvantages ..
I think that for the rest of my life I did not suffer, especially that Myasthenia and related double vision, only now can give unconventional solutions
VOLUME EXCELL http://www.new4stroke.com/volume.zip
Regards Andrew
Well, this is my new idea ... I decided to get rid of force, guide the piston ...
This gives an average of about 10% higher efficiency of the engine, because we do not waste energy on friction .. In marine, eolnobrotowych, so far used to be used crosshed.
Instead, I used such a machanism, based on oil like a pump, with a rope as a working element .. Because the rope can not be "pushed", I put the other such arm in motion to the other side .. And from this simple connecting rod driving the crankshaft. Thanks to this, there is no side force anywhere in the whole mechanism .. It is in a traditional design, very large force, reaching up to 1/6 of the total force in the connecting rod driving the crankshaft .. Here its size is calculated .. I think that the average 10% of the engine's reliability will be obtained. The engine has very small orots, 100 rows per minute, and I think that this will work ... In the steam locomotive, we will get rid of the slider, and its efficiency will increase significantly ..
Certainly the demand for oil, which suppressed this large friction, will be much smaller ..
Maybe someday it will go to F1
http://www.marinediesels.info/Theory/Thrust_on_Cro...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QoCEcjJxPZs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOtN7yFXP8Y
Regards Andrew
This gives an average of about 10% higher efficiency of the engine, because we do not waste energy on friction .. In marine, eolnobrotowych, so far used to be used crosshed.
Instead, I used such a machanism, based on oil like a pump, with a rope as a working element .. Because the rope can not be "pushed", I put the other such arm in motion to the other side .. And from this simple connecting rod driving the crankshaft. Thanks to this, there is no side force anywhere in the whole mechanism .. It is in a traditional design, very large force, reaching up to 1/6 of the total force in the connecting rod driving the crankshaft .. Here its size is calculated .. I think that the average 10% of the engine's reliability will be obtained. The engine has very small orots, 100 rows per minute, and I think that this will work ... In the steam locomotive, we will get rid of the slider, and its efficiency will increase significantly ..
Certainly the demand for oil, which suppressed this large friction, will be much smaller ..
Maybe someday it will go to F1
http://www.marinediesels.info/Theory/Thrust_on_Cro...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QoCEcjJxPZs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOtN7yFXP8Y
Regards Andrew
https://web.facebook.com/andrzej.feliks/videos/102...
The film shows that with 3 movements of the arm, the vehicle travels about 10 meters .. with a piston stroke of 50 cm, having 300 cubic centimeters of air, a liter will travel 30 meters .. from 100 liters 3 km, and from a pressure of 200 atmospheres 60 km. .. 10 such tanks, and we have a range of 600 km .. 100-liter tank is a pipe with a diameter of 24 cm and a length of 2 meters in a square meter will fit 16 such tanks .. ie in the tank 1 m x 1 m x 2 m, 200 atm, it we have a range of 1000km ... I am wrong somewhere, because through my miastenia , I have a double vision .. Such an idea for a Polish family-owned electromobile car .. And it is with us (Poland) REAL, most importantly ..
No Tesla ..
Andrew
with a simple and light, cheap engine, pneumatic cylinder .. Just 3 cm in diameter, if the pressure is 10 atmospheres ..
The film shows that with 3 movements of the arm, the vehicle travels about 10 meters .. with a piston stroke of 50 cm, having 300 cubic centimeters of air, a liter will travel 30 meters .. from 100 liters 3 km, and from a pressure of 200 atmospheres 60 km. .. 10 such tanks, and we have a range of 600 km .. 100-liter tank is a pipe with a diameter of 24 cm and a length of 2 meters in a square meter will fit 16 such tanks .. ie in the tank 1 m x 1 m x 2 m, 200 atm, it we have a range of 1000km ... I am wrong somewhere, because through my miastenia , I have a double vision .. Such an idea for a Polish family-owned electromobile car .. And it is with us (Poland) REAL, most importantly ..
No Tesla ..
Andrew
with a simple and light, cheap engine, pneumatic cylinder .. Just 3 cm in diameter, if the pressure is 10 atmospheres ..
Edited by Feliks on Friday 2nd February 19:39
Well, there is one big advantage of such a crosshead. We can freely change the stroke, piston in relation to the crankshaft stroke .. For example, the stroke of the piston is the same, and the crankshaft stroke even twice as long .. Everything will depend on the demand, and what is most important in a given engine application ..
Of course, the rope has to go exactly in the axis of the piston ..
So that his way of placing the crankshaft, as you can see in the figure, from the side, will make the engine will be much lower ..
Of course, only for marine engines 102 rpm
Andrew
Of course, the rope has to go exactly in the axis of the piston ..
So that his way of placing the crankshaft, as you can see in the figure, from the side, will make the engine will be much lower ..
Of course, only for marine engines 102 rpm
Andrew
What if you made Teflon so much ?
And maybe in diesel it would be enough to lubricate them with fuel ?
And the rolling bearings on the crank with the grease in the middle ?
This ... the engine could have been WITHOUT lubricating oil.
Just what would Castrol say ?
Or maybe a carbon fiber line ?
Okay, yes, do we continue to develop ideas ...
here one of the advantages: the possibility of completely separating the piston chamber, from the crankshaft chamber and main connecting rod .. This causes that the oil used for lubricating the shaft will not be contaminated with combustion products. He is in a clean state ... As someone will want to lubricate the piston with oil, it can use a different oil for this purpose.
However, I think that Teflon will fulfill its role ......
Anddrew
here one of the advantages: the possibility of completely separating the piston chamber, from the crankshaft chamber and main connecting rod .. This causes that the oil used for lubricating the shaft will not be contaminated with combustion products. He is in a clean state ... As someone will want to lubricate the piston with oil, it can use a different oil for this purpose.
However, I think that Teflon will fulfill its role ......
Anddrew
Here all the forces in the crank mechanism ... Reduction in the stroke of the shaft twice reducing, with the same stroke of the piston causes a large increase in efficiency, by reducing the forces of inertia. Also the force Nm sometimes reaches up to 30% of gas force , which can be seen in the charts.
http://www.new4stroke.com/sily%20w%20cylindrze.pdf
When it does not exist at all, the average efficiency of these 10 to 15% of the engine will be higher. only because of its lack ..
Adding a fall in the shaft stroke by 50% from the inertia forces, even the next 10% increase in efficiency will be able to achieve ... in total, some 25% efficiency will be better ...
Andrew
http://www.new4stroke.com/sily%20w%20cylindrze.pdf
When it does not exist at all, the average efficiency of these 10 to 15% of the engine will be higher. only because of its lack ..
Adding a fall in the shaft stroke by 50% from the inertia forces, even the next 10% increase in efficiency will be able to achieve ... in total, some 25% efficiency will be better ...
Andrew
It seems to me that you're trying to reinvent some of the ideas that were used in steam engines before internal combustion took over. You would probably find it interesting to research the mechanisms used on large steam engines such as Watt's linkages. You might also find it useful to think about why these well known mechanisms are not used on modern internal combustion engines.
Now he will describe how we can change the crankshaft pitch in relation to the piston stroke and what it can give us in Feliks Crosshead :smoking:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wheel_and_axle
Andrew
Here is a textbook of a young handyman..
http://www.cimac.com/cms/upload/history/Dragsted_H...
Or so very quiet?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZYI5ORbX8g8
Or some game ...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=heMCodsfl9w
Or maybe such a rope made of such a chain or a timing belts ?
Half milion ibs ...
https://www.usarollerchain.com/240-4-Quad-Strand-R...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=myXCwpYyywg
Andrew
http://www.cimac.com/cms/upload/history/Dragsted_H...
Or so very quiet?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZYI5ORbX8g8
Or some game ...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=heMCodsfl9w
Or maybe such a rope made of such a chain or a timing belts ?
Half milion ibs ...
https://www.usarollerchain.com/240-4-Quad-Strand-R...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=myXCwpYyywg
Andrew
Gassing Station | Engines & Drivetrain | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff