Switchable Turbo?

Author
Discussion

RobM77

Original Poster:

35,349 posts

234 months

Friday 3rd March 2006
quotequote all
A friend of mine has just bought a Nissan 200SX S13 and asked me an interesting question earlier on today. He asked if it was possible to disable the turbo with a switch. He doesn't always need the boost and the subsequence decrease in fuel economy.

I haven't got a clue, thus this post

Could this be done with some sort of electrically actuated clutch between the impellor and compressor? I don't understand how turbos work very well, so I may need this explaining as well!

thanks.

Andrew Noakes

914 posts

240 months

Friday 3rd March 2006
quotequote all
Fitting some sort of clutch between turbine and compressor would be complicated and expensive, and would probably add to the inertia of the assembly giving you massive turbo lag.

The most cost-effective way of keeping the turbo off boost is to keep the revs down and use high gears.

Begs the question, why buy a turbocharged sports coupe in the first place?

RobM77

Original Poster:

35,349 posts

234 months

Friday 3rd March 2006
quotequote all
Andrew Noakes said:
Fitting some sort of clutch between turbine and compressor would be complicated and expensive, and would probably add to the inertia of the assembly giving you massive turbo lag.

The most cost-effective way of keeping the turbo off boost is to keep the revs down and use high gears.

Thanks.
Andrew Noakes said:

Begs the question, why buy a turbocharged sports coupe in the first place?

He loves the power, but just not all the time as it is a little hard on the wallet! Apparently the turbo comes in at 3,000rpm; which makes accelerating without using the turbo an arduous task as the engine's way off it's peak torque and efficiency.

dilbert

7,741 posts

231 months

Friday 3rd March 2006
quotequote all
Not that it's much help, but I'd have thought that this is more practical with a supercharger.

edc

9,234 posts

251 months

Friday 3rd March 2006
quotequote all
Not switchable per se but a manual boost controller might provide the flexibility needed.

CombeMarshal

2,030 posts

226 months

Friday 3rd March 2006
quotequote all
I was about to say the very same thing, and you can mount it inside.
He will need some turbo otherwise he won't even move, as I found out when I 'Bust' mine!

rev-erend

21,408 posts

284 months

Friday 3rd March 2006
quotequote all
Engines are designed as a whole package.

If a turbo is fitted - the compression ratio would be lowered in relation to the max amount of boost expected.

Having an engine capable of high boost and bhp / litre would be desirable but the trade off is fuel economy.

If for example the 2 litre 16 valve turbo pumps out 350 bhp then you have the power of a 5 litre V8 .. so you will get the same fuel economy as the larger engined cars when using all the power.

When not using all the power - you have the trade off : which is :

1) the compression ratio is lower than is ideal
2) the turbo uses some power - think of it like a restriction in the exhaust and the engine (pistons etc) have to push it .. a little bit.

So - in reality : the 2 litre probably has the fuel economy of a 2.5 litre car and the pull on boost power of a much larger car..

In short - you cannot turn off the turbo.

Hope that helps.

stevieturbo

17,258 posts

247 months

Friday 3rd March 2006
quotequote all
A sensible right foot helps economy no end. TBH most turbo cars, if driven sensibly arent really that much harder on fuel than a lot of n/a equivalents.

eliot

11,418 posts

254 months

Sunday 5th March 2006
quotequote all
My 5.7 running 7psi boost is effectivley like driving 8.5L engine, And I can confirm that it has the fuel economy of one!
Yes, Keeping of the throttle would help, but then again - its just tooo much fun not to!

To answer the original question, fit a boost controller. And perhaps a wastegate that opens at a low pressure.

>> Edited by eliot on Sunday 5th March 08:50

stevieturbo

17,258 posts

247 months

Sunday 5th March 2006
quotequote all
My supercharged 5.7 can manage about 25mpg on a run, less through towns etc.

It isnt really much worse on fuel than my old 4.6 twin turbo RV8.

Proper mapping makes a huge difference to economy. Standard cars are good for emissions and various other things, but there is much room for improvement as far as economy goes.

ylee coyote

420 posts

236 months

Sunday 5th March 2006
quotequote all
It is very possible
He could fit a dual pressure gated boost control as made by turbo smart

the low boost setting could be set at virtually no boost at all and the high boost for when he wants to play

I had one fitted to my saab but it had two settings
Imprezza and porsche....

eliot

11,418 posts

254 months

Monday 6th March 2006
quotequote all
stevieturbo said:
My supercharged 5.7 can manage about 25mpg on a run, less through towns etc.

It isnt really much worse on fuel than my old 4.6 twin turbo RV8.

Proper mapping makes a huge difference to economy. Standard cars are good for emissions and various other things, but there is much room for improvement as far as economy goes.

35" mud tyres, 4wd, auto box , nearly 2 tonnes weight, brick-like aerodynamics tend to affect fuel consumption on mine. mid-range I'm just lean of stoic, but quickly ramp to about 12:1 under load. Could be improved if I could get it on a rolling road I guess, but haven't really bothered about it. 70mph cruise with a locked torque convertor turns about 1800rpm, 14.7 afr - so should be quite efficient, but I rarely drive it like that.

stevieturbo

17,258 posts

247 months

Monday 6th March 2006
quotequote all
I dont think you will find a less fuel efficient vehicle to put an engine in Eliot lol..

Getting any mpg in that combo is doing well.

Mine has aerodynamics like a brick, but otherwise, its a pretty straightforward car. I'm more than pleased with its economy.

r988

7,495 posts

229 months

Tuesday 7th March 2006
quotequote all
Toyota Superchargers as fitted to the 4AGZE an 1GGZE were clutch activated electronically, they only engaged at high throttle settings on the road car to try and solve the fuel consumption problems that occur with an 'always on' supercharger as Mercedes found.

You could sell the turbo and fit a supercharger, modify it to be activated by a switch and with some tuning it should work. Otherwise the easy way is to just bleed off all the unneeded boost as mentioned above. I guess you could run it on crap fuel with that setting as well as the compression ratio will be low with no boost to cause the engine to ping (just remember to fill up with premium when your planning on running boost!).

stevieturbo

17,258 posts

247 months

Tuesday 7th March 2006
quotequote all
Some crazy ideas popping up here..

How much money do some people intend to spend to TRY and save a few pennys worth of fuel ??

Turbo cars are generally very efficient, and more so that n/a car for what they give power wise. The most sensible option would be a proper mappable ecu. At least that way you can have more power, and better efficiency. But even that will cost hundreds of pounds, if not over a thousand.

Unlesss you do high miles, you will be a while saving that back.

If its turbocharged, just enjoy it. Isnt that why you bought it ?

RobM77

Original Poster:

35,349 posts

234 months

Wednesday 8th March 2006
quotequote all
stevieturbo said:
Some crazy ideas popping up here..

How much money do some people intend to spend to TRY and save a few pennys worth of fuel ??

Turbo cars are generally very efficient, and more so that n/a car for what they give power wise. The most sensible option would be a proper mappable ecu. At least that way you can have more power, and better efficiency. But even that will cost hundreds of pounds, if not over a thousand.

Unlesss you do high miles, you will be a while saving that back.

If its turbocharged, just enjoy it. Isnt that why you bought it ?



To be honest, that is a fair comment. Doing 10,000 miles a year, even going from 20 to 30mpg only saves £500 a year. I expect that we're talking more about going from 20 to 25mpg to be honest, so £250 a year saving. It was an interesting theoretical question though I think some driver adjustment of the turbo sounds like an interesting idea - worth pursueing bearing the costs and savings in mind.

I've given my friend a link to this thread, and he says "thanks for all the comments"!

Pigeon

18,535 posts

246 months

Wednesday 8th March 2006
quotequote all
It's not just about the money though. Going from 20 to 25 mpg means you get 25% more range out of the same size tank, which has got to be a good thing.

chris1roll

1,696 posts

244 months

Wednesday 8th March 2006
quotequote all
You could just unhook the wastgate actuator, so the wastegate just hangs open...no boost then.