RE: Aston backer is flooded with offers

RE: Aston backer is flooded with offers

Tuesday 8th May 2007

Aston backer is flooded with offers

Kuwait-based company receives offers for its stake in Aston Martin


Another change of owner?
Another change of owner?
Investment Dar, the Kuwait-based holding company that operates under Islamic law, has disclosed that it has been flooded with offers for its current stake in Aston Martin.

The group put up £240M for a 50% stake to help buy Aston Martin from Ford as part of a £479M bid fronted by Prodrive boss David Richards. Now, less than two months since the bidding process, it has been reportedly been offered £360M even before the completion of purchase.

"We are receiving bids daily," Investment Dar Executive Vice President Amr Abou El Seoud said. "We're getting bids at a 50 percent profit. The company will probably hold onto its stake for at least a year before selling a portion", Seoud added. "We have a plan and strategy that we would love to see implemented before thinking seriously about selling," although he declined to give any details about the plan. "We are not expected to exit but rather to diversify to seek value-added investors to share with us," he said.

Another report has a source quoted as saying the group will not sell until it has made a 100% profit. Meanwhile, Richards has insisted there are no plans for an early exit.

Author
Discussion

bob1179

Original Poster:

14,107 posts

209 months

Tuesday 8th May 2007
quotequote all
Hmmmmmm.

What worries me about these guys is that they have no idea about the motor industry. They are just there to make a profit. What happens if Aston Martin doesn't make as much money next year? They won't get their money back and will want to dump their share asap without any care to happens to the company or its employees.

hendry

1,945 posts

282 months

Tuesday 8th May 2007
quotequote all
As opposed to selling in a few months time without any care for what happens to the company or its employees?

I am afraid few companies are run by life-long enthusiasts these days. Our greatest hope is that whomever does buy their share has even deeper pockets and an eye for the long term.

jon-

16,505 posts

216 months

Tuesday 8th May 2007
quotequote all
"We're getting bids at a 50 percent profit."

That'll teach my bank manager for dismissing my business plan. All I wanted was £250mill...

markh450

85 posts

211 months

Tuesday 8th May 2007
quotequote all
I wonder how genuine these offers are? I don't know many sane businesses that would turn down over a hundred million in profit for little or no effort, sorry but I know what I'd be doing.

also where were these offers when Aston first went on the market?

its looks like a bit of window dressing to further boost the image and value of the Aston brand.

Dr JonboyG

2,561 posts

239 months

Tuesday 8th May 2007
quotequote all
bob1179 said:
Hmmmmmm.

What worries me about these guys is that they have no idea about the motor industry.


They're a venture capital group - what did you expect?

bob1179

Original Poster:

14,107 posts

209 months

Tuesday 8th May 2007
quotequote all
It is just wishful thinking on my part. I would love to see Aston martin taken on by people that were interested in the marque and the history and value associated with them, also looking forward to keeping the company going through investment and development.

Not a bunch of venture capitalists out to make a quick buck.

I realise the MG-Rover and TVR cases were different, but look at what happened to them, I'd hate to see AM going the same way in a few years time due to shoddy management and poor investment, especially as they are at the top of their game at the moment.

993rsdesperado

191 posts

205 months

Tuesday 8th May 2007
quotequote all
Islamic venture capital firms are fraught with ethical and moral dilemmas. They are bound by strict beliefs, some which pre-date Islam.

It is impossible for these firms to act in the same way a UK VC would operate. Account needs to be taken for the fact that they cannot simply buy-in on a venture without long-term goals for the benefit of the business. It governs the running of any company to the proportions of investment inlaid.

It's all very complicated, but itmeans a more moral approach (having said that it seems to be that the getting around of these obstacles is the current obsession).

Eitherway AM shouldn't suffer too much, not in the short-term at least....

edb49

1,652 posts

205 months

Tuesday 8th May 2007
quotequote all
markh450 said:
also where were these offers when Aston first went on the market?


Exactly... is Aston now worth 50% more because the Prodrive name is involved?

bencollins

3,497 posts

205 months

Tuesday 8th May 2007
quotequote all
This is wierd, as far as i know, Aston Martin has never, ever made a profit. Still, maybe it will soon, its a nicce badge. I cant believe Ford have got back what they put in.

*CQ*

670 posts

208 months

Tuesday 8th May 2007
quotequote all
bencollins said:
This is wierd, as far as i know, Aston Martin has never, ever made a profit. Still, maybe it will soon, its a nicce badge. I cant believe Ford have got back what they put in.


That's the absolute opposite to what I was told during a factory tour last April. In fact Aston Martin was the only part of the Ford empire that was making a profit.

TheOriginalGT40

334 posts

204 months

Tuesday 8th May 2007
quotequote all
Oh dear...

Kind of has a TVR ring to it this story.

God forbid if this Marque goes the same way. Just wish Prodrive could have afforded to buy the company without these investors, who appear to simply want to use the Marque to make a quick buck

rimmer

6,681 posts

206 months

Tuesday 8th May 2007
quotequote all
120 million in 2 months now that would be a hell of a profit.

NDT

1,753 posts

263 months

Tuesday 8th May 2007
quotequote all
edb49 said:
markh450 said:
also where were these offers when Aston first went on the market?


Exactly... is Aston now worth 50% more because the Prodrive name is involved?


no, of course it's not.
The way the exchange rate has moved, AML is worth less now, not more.

NDT

1,753 posts

263 months

Tuesday 8th May 2007
quotequote all
TheOriginalGT40 said:
Oh dear...

Kind of has a TVR ring to it this story.

God forbid if this Marque goes the same way. Just wish Prodrive could have afforded to buy the company without these investors, who appear to simply want to use the Marque to make a quick buck


David Richards bought the company, not Prodrive.

bogie

16,381 posts

272 months

Tuesday 8th May 2007
quotequote all
yup ...nothing to do with Prodrive at all ...just Richards and a consortium of private equity investors

Murph7355

37,684 posts

256 months

Tuesday 8th May 2007
quotequote all
Sounds like talking up the game to me.

As for concerns about ownership, Ford only bought in the first place to turn a profit. And only sold it because it was the only thing they could sell that might net them anything worthwhile. Welcome to the shiny world of business (and don't go thinking David Richards has any romantic notions either - if it doesn't work out as intended with whatever sub 5-yr plan they have, watch them bail).

Not convinced about the moral approach of said VC's either. ALL these places do what they do to make cash. End of.

I just hope that in the mean time they produce some cracking cars. It's the only way they'll survive. And at present, I'm not convinced that the likes of the DBS and Rapide will be enough. And I certainly don't believe an updated branding strategy (CAR Magazine this month) should be top of the list of priorities (that whole interview in CAR was a bit of a worry to me).

TheOriginalGT40

334 posts

204 months

Wednesday 9th May 2007
quotequote all
NDT said:
TheOriginalGT40 said:
Oh dear...

Kind of has a TVR ring to it this story.

God forbid if this Marque goes the same way. Just wish Prodrive could have afforded to buy the company without these investors, who appear to simply want to use the Marque to make a quick buck


David Richards bought the company, not Prodrive.


Sorry, my mistake, should have said DR Mind you, I'm sure he could have got some big money behind the Prodrive name to take full control, rather than what appears to be a group of far east investors only interested in making a quick buck!!!!

rubystone

11,252 posts

259 months

Wednesday 9th May 2007
quotequote all
NDT said:


David Richards bought the company, not Prodrive.


I'm pretty much 99.999% sure that he has no skin in the game at all.

Islamics - easy - take the money, stick it on deposit, tell them you invested it in property and hand back some profit. Everyone wins....


thirsty

726 posts

264 months

Wednesday 9th May 2007
quotequote all
Even during the Ford years, Aston managed to keep it's British roots. I would really hate to see this happen to another great British car maker. I really don't believe it would happen though .. I don't think the new owners are just interested in a quick profit. It's like buying a football team. You do it for the prestige of owning it.

AMPilot

37 posts

205 months

Wednesday 9th May 2007
quotequote all
I also think that the prestige element is very important and that Dar Investments is not using AML as an quick turnaround move. If there is any meat on this bone, it is probably the fact that there is a major link-up with another manufacturer, possibly pre-agreed, with Dar controlling the slack in the process.

As for the real decision makers, my view is that one has to look closer to Newport Pagnell and Kuwait City.