Looking back at the Lancer Evolution.

Looking back at the Lancer Evolution.

Author
Discussion

Grindle

Original Poster:

764 posts

83 months

Monday 18th June 2018
quotequote all
I owned 4 of these over the years, my personal favourite of the entire range being my black 2006 XlV 360 model. But for you were they, as many people have said, an ugly souped-up Japanese taxi? A laggy 2 litre 4 cylinder which sounds like a vacuum cleaner which needs it's box emptying? A saloon car but with supercar insurance, road tax, servicing costs and fuel consumption?
Or was it for you a point to point weapon, a car with awesome traction and heroic performance from it's tiny 2 litre lump? Lord knows i have too many cars already but i saw a very good condition Evo 8 400 recently for sale which i wondered about buying. It was up at £22,500. Then i saw an immaculate 2013 BMW M3, with it's sonorous and wonderful 4.0 litre V8 engine and a cabin to die for compared with the Mitsubishi. For £1,500 less. Where are you on this one?

anonymous-user

53 months

Monday 18th June 2018
quotequote all
Weren't the service intervals 5k and st mpg as well as probably getting nicked and used as a ram raider..

I always liked them but prefer scobbies.

LP670

819 posts

125 months

Monday 18th June 2018
quotequote all
id take the evo everytime. personally i prefer the earlier 5 and 6 to the later ones but a mate had an 8MR about 7/8 years back and it was a lovely thing.

Gary C

12,313 posts

178 months

Monday 18th June 2018
quotequote all
Thesprucegoose said:
Weren't the service intervals 5k and st mpg as well as probably getting nicked and used as a ram raider..

I always liked them but prefer scobbies.
Loved my V and it was in every way superior to my blob STi uk.

The AYC was brilliant, gave a predictable chassis without getting in the way of the driving, balance was oversteer transitioning to neutral and always predictable.

Engine on the V was excellent, very little lag (I mean lag, not low off boost performance), and had loads of character.

Ride for such a quick point to point car was fine, lots of compliance.

Downsides,

Ate discs, 4.5k services rarely came much under £1k and my AYC wore out and needed replacing.

In the wet, very little could touch it, certainly my STi would not see which way it went.

Butter Face

30,191 posts

159 months

Monday 18th June 2018
quotequote all
I luckily got to drive a few brand new in my youth and they were indeed superb cars.

The IX 360 was epic, just a great car.

Gary C

12,313 posts

178 months

Monday 18th June 2018
quotequote all
The ones after the VI were aimed as road cars and didn't have some of the more agricultural bits like the whining 5 speed box and the front diff that could wrench the wheel out of your hand if you weren't ready for it coming out of a junction.

Lifting off to half throttle from full boost caused a dump and surge that was great when you knew about it.

V was the best looking imho.

Remember I needed a new starter motor. This machined aluminium Jewel like unit weighing next to bugger all turned up at my local dealer and I almost passed out when they told me how much it was.

GravelBen

15,654 posts

229 months

Tuesday 19th June 2018
quotequote all
I always thought they sounded more like a blender than a vacuum cleaner. Even full Group-A spec rally Evos with shotgun antilag still manage to just sound loud rather than nice or characterful.

Fast, immensely capable, but never really inspired me the way their Subaru competition did - I think a lot of that was just down to subjective things like the sound and looks.

Edited by GravelBen on Tuesday 19th June 09:21

Turkish91

1,084 posts

201 months

Tuesday 19th June 2018
quotequote all
I’ve got a VI and I think it’s a fabulous car, albeit not as easy to drive quickly as a modern hot hatch or the more modern Evo/Impreza variants.

designforlife

3,734 posts

162 months

Tuesday 19th June 2018
quotequote all
Probably the only car i would swap my dc5 for in terms for an upgrade in overall driving experience...however the crap MPG, short service intervals and tenancy for things to go wrong in expensive fashion does put me right off.

I only do 20 miles a week at the moment and even that isn't enough to tempt me.

cracking cars though.


Heaveho

5,279 posts

173 months

Thursday 21st June 2018
quotequote all
I've had my '03 plate 8 for 15 years. The first non-consumable part it needed was a heater matrix at 10 years old. The second was an aircon rad last month.

That's all.

The car was modified 8 years ago with a Mivec head, Evo 9 turbo, inlet and ECU and mapped to 400 brake or thereabouts. The parts were all second hand, and I don't know what mileage they had done when fitted. The turbo finally shat itself last year in Scotland on a fast road trip, having been run at 1.8 bar for all of the years it had been on the car. Given it wasn't original and running at more or less all it had to give, it's hardly the fault of the car.

It had a clutch at 44k miles, after several 7k rpm launches at Santa Pod and Thorney Island. Again, fair enough. In a Subaru the clutch would have been fine. The box would have needed replacing. Ask me how I know!

The general running costs are high, but they are offset by frankly remarkable levels of reliability. I can't think of many cars that can give so much performance for relatively little trouble.

Gary C

12,313 posts

178 months

Thursday 21st June 2018
quotequote all
designforlife said:
Probably the only car i would swap my dc5 for in terms for an upgrade in overall driving experience...however the crap MPG, short service intervals and tenancy for things to go wrong in expensive fashion does put me right off.

I only do 20 miles a week at the moment and even that isn't enough to tempt me.

cracking cars though.
My STi was worse on fuel than my Evo. Did Lancaster to Milan and returned an easy 25-28 mpg in normal driving. The real problem was its tiny fuel tank. To put the rear drive in a fwd lancer chassis, they shrunk the tank size (as the rally cars wouldn't use it) which meant you had a road car that, when driven hard, could empty the tank in 150 miles smile

GravelBen

15,654 posts

229 months

Friday 22nd June 2018
quotequote all
Heaveho said:
The general running costs are high, but they are offset by frankly remarkable levels of reliability. I can't think of many cars that can give so much performance for relatively little trouble.
Maybe if you get a good one - I remember a mate reciting the list of things he had to replace on his Evo 5. Gearbox, clutch, diffs, turbos, the list went on... and several of them more than once. To be fair though he had it for quite a few years and it had done 120k miles by the time he sold it.

Grindle

Original Poster:

764 posts

83 months

Friday 22nd June 2018
quotequote all
I've bought the Evo 400 and convinced myself that it's an investment as the previous and only owner really loved the car, only ever used 99 octane, changed the oil every 2,000 miles and serviced it before the recommended miles had happened. I've driven it 300 miles so far and i have to say the lag is pretty awful compared to say an A45 AMG or RS3, cars people own at work. But i'm finding a love for it as a rebel, a hooligan which refuses to behave and as for lag, it basically says ''ave it''! I'm keeping it stock even though i was told you can modify these for more power AND less lag, quite how i don't yet know. Standard hopefully will mean better retained value. Here's to a fun summer but in so many ways a BMW M2 is just so much better if i'm honest. I drove my dad's yesterday and it's a great car.

Xaero

4,060 posts

214 months

Friday 22nd June 2018
quotequote all
Grindle said:
I saw a very good condition Evo 8 400 recently for sale which i wondered about buying. It was up at £22,500. Then i saw an immaculate 2013 BMW M3, with it's sonorous and wonderful 4.0 litre V8 engine and a cabin to die for compared with the Mitsubishi. For £1,500 less. Where are you on this one?
You need some man maths to justify buying an old car over newer technically superior car. I think performance cars do need a bit of heart involved rather than head though. I want to go back to an old car too (AE86s are my flavour) and at 8k for a dodgy one, 10k for decent, I could buy a lot newer better car for the money but it would depreciate more and wouldn't take my heart in the same way.

Just read at the bottom you went for the Evo anyway, congrats! Enjoy it smile If you come to sell it in the next 10 years, I'm sure it would have gone up in value and the M3 down so you could easily trade and be quids in.

fredd1e

781 posts

219 months

Friday 22nd June 2018
quotequote all
Evo IX (GT) the 2nd car I've bought twice! I missed the 1st one after getting rid in a moment of attempted sensibleness 10years ago. I'm now back with an IX GT Wagon, covering the sensibleness aspect there properly this time. The IX GT has just about the right amount of go (though a bit more never hurts) with a fast spooling turbo that lets the engine pick up its skirts very nicely even on part throttle boost far better than my previous Audi S1 Sportback did. The latter always felt it needed full throttle & higher revs to demonstrate it was able to accelerate at a reasonable rate of knots. The IX (on factory fit Billies) just smoothers the local rippled pothole roads better than anything I've peddaled (even company rented hire cars don't come close!) . Re the EVO 400 lag, never driven one but suspect a decent map may help though sticking it in top gear at sub 2.5/3K rpm is probably not going to give any sort of decent rate of speed change even in a cooking Evo (8/IX)

Heaveho

5,279 posts

173 months

Friday 22nd June 2018
quotequote all
GravelBen said:
Maybe if you get a good one - I remember a mate reciting the list of things he had to replace on his Evo 5. Gearbox, clutch, diffs, turbos, the list went on... and several of them more than once. To be fair though he had it for quite a few years and it had done 120k miles by the time he sold it.
In my opinion, the later the car, the better they were fettled from the factory. A lot of the problems on earlier models, such as the 5, were resolved model by model as they were replaced. The AYC pump on the later cars are a known issue, I'm sure I'll have that to deal with at some point.

VR6VR6

253 posts

242 months

Monday 25th June 2018
quotequote all
I know of an immaculate Blue EVO 6.5 TME (no stickers) with less than 15k miles on the clock.

The car has been part of a private collection in Japan and then the UK.

Does anyone know what this would be worth?

designforlife

3,734 posts

162 months

Monday 25th June 2018
quotequote all
a sh*tload going by current prices..easily north of £20k...maybe £25-30k depending on condition etc.

VR6VR6

253 posts

242 months

Monday 25th June 2018
quotequote all
designforlife

The car is like new.

!

designforlife

3,734 posts

162 months

Monday 25th June 2018
quotequote all
probably up towards 30k then, i'm not that up on prices but sufficed to say it's an asset that will probably keep climbing.