340i MPPK torque vs M140i

340i MPPK torque vs M140i

Author
Discussion

Billy_Whizzzz

Original Poster:

2,007 posts

143 months

Wednesday 26th April 2017
quotequote all
Interested that the 340i with the MPPK has less torque than the auto (i.e. When it's remapped it is given less torque) - presume this is to protect the gearbox. But the manual M140i has the same torque as the auto - both of which have more than the 340i. So, I'm wondering if a) I'm wrong and the torque in manual M140s is less than autos or b) whether the manual 340 has a different gearbox...

Monty Python

4,812 posts

197 months

Wednesday 26th April 2017
quotequote all
Figures I've seen for the 340i MPPK increases torque from 332 to 369 lb ft - that's not a reduction in my book. It looks to me like the MPPK simply remaps the engine in the 340i to the same state as in the M140i (albeit with a bit more power). After all, it's the same engine.

Edited by Monty Python on Wednesday 26th April 08:26

Billy_Whizzzz

Original Poster:

2,007 posts

143 months

Wednesday 26th April 2017
quotequote all
Sorry my point was that the auto 340
Is remapped to 369 ft/lb whereas the manual remapped to 350 ft/lb when surely the gearbox can handle the same torque (369) as the 140?

Monty Python

4,812 posts

197 months

Thursday 27th April 2017
quotequote all
Billy_Whizzzz said:
Sorry my point was that the auto 340
Is remapped to 369 ft/lb whereas the manual remapped to 350 ft/lb when surely the gearbox can handle the same torque (369) as the 140?
Not necessarily - manual gearboxes tend to have lower torque ratings, which is part of the reason why just about every high performance car now has some form of DSG/automatic gearbox. It allows a degree of control over how much torque is fed through the gearbox, something that can't really be done with a manual.

Billy_Whizzzz

Original Poster:

2,007 posts

143 months

Friday 28th April 2017
quotequote all
I know that. But my question is: given that the 140 must have the same gearbox as the 340 (or am I wrong in thinking this) why can't the torque in the manual MPPK 340 be the same as the manual 140?

Monty Python

4,812 posts

197 months

Friday 28th April 2017
quotequote all
Billy_Whizzzz said:
I know that. But my question is: given that the 140 must have the same gearbox as the 340 (or am I wrong in thinking this) why can't the torque in the manual MPPK 340 be the same as the manual 140?
No idea - if you're that bothered, ask BMW.

CarsOrBikes

1,135 posts

184 months

Friday 28th April 2017
quotequote all
The 3 is a heavier car, so the gearbox will be the weakest link I would think, that's all, you'd quite possibly find it more tractable even with a few lbs less.

Nogbadthebad

5 posts

225 months

Friday 28th July 2017
quotequote all
That then would probably explain why I`m on my 3rd manual gearbox on my 2010 335i (110K) all under warranty luckily.

the-sheep

6 posts

92 months

Monday 31st July 2017
quotequote all
Billy_Whizzzz said:
I know that. But my question is: given that the 140 must have the same gearbox as the 340 (or am I wrong in thinking this) why can't the torque in the manual MPPK 340 be the same as the manual 140?
It is sometimes worth asking these questions, you may find it comes down to someone making a typo that never gets checked!

helix402

7,859 posts

182 months

Monday 31st July 2017
quotequote all
140 and 340 have different gearboxes.

gizlaroc

17,251 posts

224 months

Monday 31st July 2017
quotequote all
Monty Python said:
No idea - if you're that bothered, ask BMW.
Haha, surely this is point of forums.

Billy_Whizzzz

Original Poster:

2,007 posts

143 months

Monday 31st July 2017
quotequote all
gizlaroc said:
Monty Python said:
No idea - if you're that bothered, ask BMW.
Haha, surely this is point of forums.
Exactly. And BMW haven't a clue.

CarsOrBikes

1,135 posts

184 months

Monday 31st July 2017
quotequote all
Maybe it's torque difference between cars plus additional weight of 3 series = increased load on transmission?

Crackie

6,386 posts

242 months

Tuesday 1st August 2017
quotequote all
Monty Python said:
Figures I've seen for the 340i MPPK increases torque from 332 to 369 lb ft - that's not a reduction in my book. It looks to me like the MPPK simply remaps the engine in the 340i to the same state as in the M140i (albeit with a bit more power). After all, it's the same engine.
They are both B58 engines but there's a good chance the version in the M140i/240i is making a fair bit more than rated power. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BMW_B58

The HP version of the N55 used in the M135i/M235i made 40bhp more than the standard N55 used in the 335i. I read somewhere that the M135i/235i version has different cams, different exhaust and mapping to suit these.

http://www.superchips.co.uk/curves/N55%20with%20Re...

http://www.superchips.co.uk/curves/F21M235iEPC.pdf



Edited by Crackie on Tuesday 1st August 08:29

Mike335i

5,004 posts

102 months

Tuesday 1st August 2017
quotequote all
helix402 said:
140 and 340 have different gearboxes.
Realoem has them both a gs6 45bz.

Wills2

22,819 posts

175 months

Tuesday 1st August 2017
quotequote all
Crackie said:
They are both B58 engines but there's a good chance the version in the M140i/240i is making a fair bit more than rated power. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BMW_B58

The HP version of the N55 used in the M135i/M235i made 40bhp more than the standard N55 used in the 335i. I read somewhere that the M135i/235i version has different cams, different exhaust and mapping to suit these.

http://www.superchips.co.uk/curves/N55%20with%20Re...

http://www.superchips.co.uk/curves/F21M235iEPC.pdf



Edited by Crackie on Tuesday 1st August 08:29
Ah yes that well known charity BMW AG, free additional power for everyone!