Bikes really are unsafe

Bikes really are unsafe

Author
Discussion

LoonR1

Original Poster:

26,988 posts

177 months

Saturday 28th April 2012
quotequote all
Having read the ongoing threads about the two top end sportsbikes (S1000RR and Panigale), one of which has a recall for a pretty major failure and the other having a high speed weave, like the Pan European a few years back. It's becoming clear that bikes are inherently unsafe.

No matter how I ride or how much care I take, there will always be an underlying manufacturung defect within them. There's been some bad press for all the major makes from fork failures, to frames snapping and so on.

Given that I'm the breadwinner, is it fair for me to jack it in and sell the bikes, as I'm worried I could end up as a statistic in someone else's law suit?

randlemarcus

13,518 posts

231 months

Saturday 28th April 2012
quotequote all
Might one suggest jacking up the life cover to the point where the statistical possibility of your demise becomes a "good thing" for the Loon Crew? wink

bamberwell

1,266 posts

162 months

Saturday 28th April 2012
quotequote all
considering I started riding when EVERY bike had an inherent fault smile, i'd say no..

The Moose

22,844 posts

209 months

Saturday 28th April 2012
quotequote all
As with anything you do in life, you have to weigh up the risks involved in doing it.

We aren't here indefinitely and will at some point die - its just a matter of how.

I would rather pop my clogs doing something I enjoy (or sooner because of) than living in a cotton wool box for my entire life never doing anything and worrying about walking to waitrose as there may be a car with brake failure at the zebra crossing.

Just IMHO of course! Just make sure suitable life insurance is in place.

RemaL

24,973 posts

234 months

Saturday 28th April 2012
quotequote all
You could just cross the road and become a statistic

I'm the breadwinner also, I think of it sometimes but have good life insurance to cover the family just in case

Yoda.

2,260 posts

248 months

Saturday 28th April 2012
quotequote all
Is there some sort of subliminal insurance advertising going on here...

deltashad

6,731 posts

197 months

Saturday 28th April 2012
quotequote all
Did the TL1000s not have some really bad problem when it was originally launched?
Something to do with the yokes leading on to high speed tank slappers? I did a search but didn't see anything. Don't know why that's stuck in my head...

SixtySpeedTwin

320 posts

152 months

Saturday 28th April 2012
quotequote all
My wifes looking forward to a free house and a long cruise if i get statistic-ed!

vonhosen

40,230 posts

217 months

Saturday 28th April 2012
quotequote all
The worst financial outcomes for most involve coming off badly, getting life changing injuries, but not being killed.

Jimbo.

3,947 posts

189 months

Saturday 28th April 2012
quotequote all
deltashad said:
Did the TL1000s not have some really bad problem when it was originally launched?
Something to do with the yokes leading on to high speed tank slappers? I did a search but didn't see anything. Don't know why that's stuck in my head...
Nothing to do with the yokes. A short wheelbase, phenomenally grunty engine, light weight and a steep head angle all conspired to bite people on the arse. The never-seen-since rotary rear shock was often hinted at (by the likes of Maxton, etc) as being a contributory factor, but at the end of the day it was just a bike that demanded respect.

Of course, the utter s at MCN jumped up and down on it, hyping it up beyond all belief. "Killer bike" this, "Widow maker" that...editing readers letters from "My ZZR1100 had a mild tank slapper..." to "My TL1000S tried to kill me...".

Suzuki shat themselves and issued a recall to fit a steering damper. The TL1000R was rushed out, the TL1000S killed off. A shame frown

bogie

16,381 posts

272 months

Saturday 28th April 2012
quotequote all
make sure you have a good critical illness and life insurance, then enjoy your life without worrying about others

tell the missus you have bumped the life policy to £1million if she lets you keep the bike ...that usually works for most people and only costs a couple of tanks of fuel per month for the premium wink

Fort Jefferson

8,237 posts

222 months

Saturday 28th April 2012
quotequote all
vonhosen said:
The worst financial outcomes for most involve coming off badly, getting life changing injuries, but not being killed.
You're cheerfull this morning.

LoonR1

Original Poster:

26,988 posts

177 months

Saturday 28th April 2012
quotequote all
It's got nothing to do with insurance levels (not least as some of you seem not to understand what Critical Illness covers anyway). It's more to do with the fact that it's clear that bikes are now becoming bady manufactured piles of crap and I don't want to die as a result of someone else's mistake.

sprinter1050

11,550 posts

227 months

Saturday 28th April 2012
quotequote all
My missus will be going on the game if I kick the bucket.

can't see what's wrong with that meself. Life insurance ? Bah
Ride like the wind & forget responsibilities Loon wink

tezzer

983 posts

186 months

Saturday 28th April 2012
quotequote all
deltashad said:
Did the TL1000s not have some really bad problem when it was originally launched?
Something to do with the yokes leading on to high speed tank slappers? I did a search but didn't see anything. Don't know why that's stuck in my head...
I had an early (97) TL-S which was a superb bike ridden to the max on many occaisions, and never once did I have a "moment". No idea why, maybe due to my small stature and light weight, but not once until it was brutally stolen from my locked garage did it give me cause for concern. odd.

Wedg1e

26,799 posts

265 months

Saturday 28th April 2012
quotequote all
LoonR1 said:
It's got nothing to do with insurance levels (not least as some of you seem not to understand what Critical Illness covers anyway). It's more to do with the fact that it's clear that bikes are now becoming bady manufactured piles of crap and I don't want to die as a result of someone else's mistake.
They've mostly always been badly-manufactured piles of crap. Ask any professional welder to take a look at a Japanese bike frame, he'll fall about laughing. Monkey-metal castings, chocolate fasteners, piss-poor coatings, ill-assembled electrics. Just as long as they go very fast for the street heroes, that's all that counts.

smack

9,728 posts

191 months

Saturday 28th April 2012
quotequote all
Troll whistle

Hooli

32,278 posts

200 months

Saturday 28th April 2012
quotequote all
LoonR1 said:
It's got nothing to do with insurance levels (not least as some of you seem not to understand what Critical Illness covers anyway). It's more to do with the fact that it's clear that bikes are now becoming bady manufactured piles of crap and I don't want to die as a result of someone else's mistake.
Get a classic & restore it, then you get to crash & die due to your own incompetence hehe

Tango13

8,423 posts

176 months

Saturday 28th April 2012
quotequote all
LoonR1 said:
Having read the ongoing threads about the two top end sportsbikes (S1000RR and Panigale), one of which has a recall for a pretty major failure and the other having a high speed weave, like the Pan European a few years back. It's becoming clear that bikes are inherently unsafe.

No matter how I ride or how much care I take, there will always be an underlying manufacturung defect within them. There's been some bad press for all the major makes from fork failures, to frames snapping and so on.

Given that I'm the breadwinner, is it fair for me to jack it in and sell the bikes, as I'm worried I could end up as a statistic in someone else's law suit?
Is this the windup you promised on Thursday in the S1000RR recall thread? wink






Wedg1e

26,799 posts

265 months

Saturday 28th April 2012
quotequote all
LoonR1 said:
having a high speed weave, like the Pan European a few years back.
The Pan Euro 1300 STILL has a high-speed weave, it didn't go away... wink